tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34300632.post-91557595705108436812008-04-04T03:00:00.000+06:002008-04-04T03:00:00.000+06:00Btw, here I'm trying to explain why we feel we can compete with existing ones, such as SQL Server (certainly only in some cases): most of them really inherit the architecture of databases developed in 80-90s. The environment (and thus - goals) that time were completely different, and design\implementation they have seems not so good now. <BR/><BR/>We noticed this when works on our in-memory indexing engine were started, that in turn lead us to the following conclusion: we can do better. Not just for in-memory indexing, but even for in-cluster indexing. And although we don't fight for clusters right now, we try to deliver an architecture that will allow us to do this in near future.Alex Yakuninhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13800929290476802273noreply@blogger.com