Dr. Jeff Sutherland's Electronic Medicine

What the Inventor of the Flu Shot Thinks About the Vaccine

2009-11-17T14:45:00.002-05:00

I was astonished last night when a friend asked if I was going to get the flu shot! Doesn't anyone look at the lack of data on efficacy of flu shots? Or the fact that our previous administration made vaccine manufacturers immune from prosecution no matter how many people they maim or kill with flu shots! The reason for this is that the damages might be greater than the profits so the vaccine manufacturers might be reluctant to do business. The last swine flu vaccine killed 300 times more people than the swine flu itself.

Doesn't anyone know there are no clinical trials done on these vaccines and they would never pass the FDA test for efficacy and could never be marketed as a new drug? Don't they know that the squalene in the flu shot may be responsible for the Gulf War Syndrome and that the mercury is hazardous and known to destroy nervous system tissue.

Does anyone read the news about Baxter, a leading manufacturer of these vaccines, when recently they "accidentally" released a huge amount of animal vaccine contaminated with a deadly form of avian flu virus that killed every test animal innoculated. Don't they know that this virus must be contained under the highest levels of security and violators usually go to jail (unless they are vaccine manufacturers)?

Doesn't that worry you? Well if that doesn't, listen to the experts on flu vaccinations.

“Dr. Anthony Morris, a distinguished virologist and former Chief Vaccine Office at the U.S. Federal Drug Administration (FDA), states that “There is no evidence that any influenza vaccine thus far developed is effective in preventing or mitigating any attack of influenza” and that “The producers of these vaccines know they are worthless, but they go on selling them anyway.”

And in November 2007, the UK newspaper The Scotsman, made public warnings by the inventor of the “flu jab,” Dr. Graeme Laver.

Dr. Laver was a major Australian scientist involved in the invention of a flu vaccine, in addition to playing a leading scientific role in the discovery of anti-flu drugs. He went on record as saying the vaccine he helped to create was ineffective and [that] natural infection with the flu was safer. “I have never been impressed with its efficacy,” said Dr. Laver.” Read more ...

Congressman Ron Paul on Swine Flu

2009-11-11T10:27:00.001-05:00

Eva Vertes on the Origins of Cancer

2009-10-22T05:13:00.000-04:00

Teenager Eva Vertes has some of the best ideas on the future of cancer research. She observed what we knew back in the 1970's that cancer is an evolutionary phenomenon that acts to repair damaged tissue and usually does not kill the host until an age where reproduction is finished. She extends that to an analysis of why the heart and skeleton muscle doesn't get cancer and observes that microtumors are seen in skeletal muscle but the tumors cannot develop blood supplies to grow. Apparently, the amount of repair in muscle would cause everyone to get cancer all the time, so the body has had to evolve the handling of the cancer repair mechanisms to make it work properly in muscle, whereas in other parts of the body the repair mechansm goes hairwire and kills the host.

She concludes that in the future, cancer cells make be used as therapy which can repair the body if and when they can be controlled properly.

Former Health Minister of Finland on Swine Flu

2009-10-18T04:49:00.001-04:00

Apparently the Finland government has passed legislation against WHO forced vaccinations and Norway may do the same.

Attorney Jim Turner discusses the problems with our health care system

2009-10-10T03:11:00.002-04:00

American health care costs twice as much as the next most expensive health care system in the world and produces the worst healthcare outcomes of any industrialized nation.

A leading Washington lawyer discusses how the food, drug, and even education market is designed to maximize profits while producing poor outcomes (which in turn generates more profit).

Electronic Medicine Workshop - Kauai 4-6 Jan 2010

2009-10-06T12:57:00.002-04:00

Dear Friends of Dale Fawcett and Dr. Jeff Sutherland and Health & Longevity Enthusiasts,

So many of you have requested a workshop with Jeff in the last few years that he has decided to present another one Monday, January 4th, to Wednesday, January 6th, 2010. Come join us on the lovely, tropical Hawaiian Island of Kauai.

To meet your educational needs for the latest in advanced future technology, today, Jeff will focus on his new lab, fantastic Star Trek-like equipment, and exciting new developments since you last saw him. However, we’d also like to hear from you! Send us your requests for whatever special aspects of Jeff's work you'd like to learn about.

Jeff's Private Sessions have always been a big hit. In these, you can discuss anything you wish as he'll have his entire lab set up. As Jeff’s time is limited, please indicate your interest ASAP if you wish to sign up for a private, custom-designed session.

The meeting will be held at the lovely and inexpensive Aloha Beach Resort: www.alohabeachresortkauai.com Rooms begin at $96. When you call the hotel ask for their FREE upgrade to an Ocean View room. The finest protected swimming and snorkeling area in Kauai is right in front of this hotel and all the rooms have just been redecorated. Stay a few days before or after the conference for a dream vacation on the most beautiful of the Hawaiian islands. Kauai is a lush tropical paradise with the most sandy beaches of all the islands, where many famous movies have been filmed--Jurassic Park, Raiders of the Lost Ark, South Pacific, and Blue Hawaii. To book your room now, go to www.alohabeachresortkauai.com

Come to this unique, futuristic workshop, and see for yourself why Dr. Nenah Sylver -- author of The Rife Handbook of Frequency Therapy, with a Holistic Health Primer (2009) -- says: “I have used Jeff Sutherland’s services for many years, sometimes for myself but mostly for my beloved dog. Jeff’s scientific knowledge and finely honed intuition helped me nurse her through cancer and Lyme-related infections, extending her life I would estimate by about six years.”

Don’t miss out on cutting-edge technology at this once-in-a-lifetime workshop in Hawaii! For more information, email Dale Fawcett at dale.fawcett@gmail.com or call 360 598-6585. If enough people are interested in this workshop, we will consider doing future workshops in our usual places, i.e. Las Vegas, Seattle, and perhaps the East Coast as well. In the meantime, plan on joining us in Hawaii and post or forward this announcement to your friends and favorite e-groups. See you soon!

Regards,
Dr. Jeff Sutherland and Dale Fawcett
(360) 598-6585

Swine Flu Media Distortion: Clear and Present Danger

2009-10-04T07:23:00.000-04:00

Rarely does it become so clear that the mainstream media is distorted by corporate interests, or is it government interests? It's hard to tell the difference these days. The Health Freedom Alliance has done an excellent job of going through the Swine Flu issues systematically. If you value your health and freedom, it is important to understand these issues.

Ten Swine Flu Lies Told by MSM

msm(NaturalNews) The mainstream media is engaged in what we Americans call “bald faced lies” about swine flu. It seems to be true with this issue more than any other, and it became apparent to me recently when a colleague of mine — a nationally-syndicated newspaper columnist — told me their column on natural defenses for swine flu was rejected by newspapers all across the country. Many newspapers refused to run the column and, instead, ran an ad for “free vaccine clinics” in the same space.

The media, it seems, is so deeply in bed with the culture of vaccinations that they will do almost anything to keep the public misinformed. And that includes lying about swine flu vaccines.

There are ten key lies that continue to be told by the mainstream media (MSM) about swine flu and swine flu vaccines. Click here for details...

Tribute to Dr. Hulda Clark

2009-10-03T06:51:00.003-04:00

Hulda Clark will be remembered as one of the great pioneers in electronic medicine. Her probing of the human body with low voltage frequencies has led to findings that are incredibly valuable to many of us.

Her book, The Cure for All Cancers, was ridiculed by the medical profession when it was first published. However, she has gone on to cure more cancers than any physician I know, and I know a lot of them after being funded by the National Cancer Institute for a decade of cancer research.

There is no better testimonial than from a physician who was told to go home and die by his doctors and instead went home and cured himself with the help of Hulda. People do not have to die of cancer and should do everything in their power when threatened by imminent death to seek out alternative approaches to cancer treatment. If it does not save them, it will at least help save others.
--------
To whom it may Concern:
My name is Scott R. Werner, M.D., I developed Invasive Malignant Melanoma in 1987 with metastasis (Stage 4). The Doctors at my hospital told me to just go home and enjoy the last part of my life and get my home in order. I wasn't ready to die, so I prayed, and the name Hulda Clark came to my mind. An Article written by Hulda was on my desk the next morning (everyone I asked didn't know where it had come from) I gave Hulda a call and she told me how to cure my Cancer. As you can see, that was 22 years ago. I became an advocate Herbalist using the parasite cleanse, Esiac Tea, Cat's Claw, getting people to eat a more wholesome diet, and have seen miracle after miracle because of my one phone call many years ago. When I read your e-mail of Hulda's passing, I couldn't hold back the tears of Gratitude for her. She will be missed!
I honor all of you in continuing Hulda's life work and mission.
Sincerely
Scott Werner, M.D.

Frequency Foundation Workshop: Send in your preferences for location and date

2009-09-27T12:51:00.001-04:00

We've been receiving many requests for a future workshop that would discuss many significant changes to my Lab and methods. If anyone has any interest in attending an upcoming Frequency Foundation Workshop, possibly the 1st part of January in a warm location or even at a later date contact me at drjeffsutherland@gmail.com. We would also welcome what you would be most interested in learning for this and any future workshops' as well as possible locations, your phone # would be helpful.

Mattel gets free pass on independent lead tests

2009-09-27T12:35:00.000-04:00

Those of you who remember that the Dept. of Agriculture will sue anyone that does independent mad cow testing will not be surprised that corruption will make sure that your children will enjoy more lead contaminated toys without anyone knowing about it.

Mattel gets free pass on independent lead tests

Dear Friend,

Get ready for a repeat of one of the ugliest chapters in modern consumer history.

Mattel, the chief offender in the Chinese lead-toy scandal, is actually being allowed to skip the new safety measures that were put into place because of that scandal.

You heard that right. New measures designed to stop Mattel from doing what they did to our children won't apply to Mattel or its scandal-plagued subsidiary, Fisher-Price.

Remember, Mattel and Fisher-Price were forced to recall millions of shoddy toys, some of which had up to 180 times the legal limit of lead. The company had to pay $2.3 million in fines, but somehow got off without having to admit to doing anything wrong.

It must be nice to have friends in high places.

Now, these corporate criminals are up to their old toxic tricks again.

Congress acted with record-breaking speed after the lead-toy scandal, passing new laws that require all toy companies to submit their products to independent labs for testing.

The key word here is "independent."

Because Congress never met a law it couldn't fill with loopholes, they put the empty- headed fools at the Consumer Product Safety Commission in charge of enforcing it.

How empty are those hollow heads? When Mattel asked to be put in charge of its own product testing, skipping those new requirements for independent labs, those morons at the CPSC said, "Sure, go ahead. We trust you."

That's like the Fed putting Bonnie and Clyde in charge of bank security.

Wiping the lipstick off the pig,

William Campbell Douglass II, M.D.

How Effective is the Flu Vaccine?

2009-09-26T08:57:00.000-04:00

Dr. Mercola has a good summary on information on the flu vaccine. It is interesting to note that flu deaths in children increased earlier in this decade when mass vaccinations for the flu began. The research does not show any benefits from flu vaccine and shows plenty of negative side effects.

The majority of health professionals, myself included, do not get flu shots. So either they are based on political dogma or someone is making enough money to exert control of the political process. As CDC officials have repeatedly pointed out to me in workshops, in some cases their decisions are forced by political pressure and not by public health concerns.

Dr. Mercola comments:

How Effective is the Flu Vaccine?

Remember that the potential effectiveness of a flu vaccine is dependent on the ASSUMPTION, made nearly a year in advance, that Asia’s viral strains will be the ones hitting the U.S. When they guess wrong, the vaccine is worthless from the very start.
But does that mean they withdraw the flu vaccine when they discover it contains the wrong strains? NO! They just keep giving it out anyway.
But even if they were to overcome that hurdle and actually select the correct strains, there’s still no evidence that it does anyone any good to get a flu vaccine.
Study after study comes back showing the same dismal results: the flu vaccines are not an effective method of prevention of the flu, and they do not save lives. As mentioned earlier, they may even be responsible for an increased death rate in some groups.
Sometimes determining efficacy is as easy as reading the information coming straight from the vaccine manufacturer.
How about this quote taken directly from the flu vaccine FLULAVAL’s package insert (which you likely never see when getting the flu shot) for the 2009-2010 formula:
" FLULAVAL is an influenza virus vaccine indicated for active immunization of adults 18 years of age and older against influenza disease caused by influenza virus subtypes A and type B contained in the vaccine. This indication is based on immune response elicited by FLULAVAL, and there have been no controlled trials demonstrating a decrease in influenza disease after vaccination with FLULAVAL.”
That’s right, NO controlled trials demonstrating ANY decrease in your risk of contracting the flu at all after vaccination! (It also states that each dose contains a total of 25 mcg of mercury.)
For those of you who are still unconvinced, know that there’s plenty of scientific evidence available to back up the recommendation to avoid flu vaccines. In addition to studies mentioned in the video, here are several other examples showing that flu vaccines do not work for any age group:
A study published in the October 2008 issue of the Archives of Pediatric & Adolescent Medicine found that vaccinating young children against the flu had no impact on flu-related hospitalizations or doctor visits during two recent flu seasons.
The researchers concluded that "significant influenza vaccine effectiveness could not be demonstrated for any season, age, or setting" examined.
A 2008 study published in the Lancet found that influenza vaccination was NOT associated with a reduced risk of pneumonia in older people.
This supports an earlier study, published in The New England Journal of Medicine.
Research published in the American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine also confirms that there has been no decrease in deaths from influenza and pneumonia in the elderly, despite the fact that vaccination coverage among the elderly has increased from 15 percent in 1980 to 65 percent now.
In 2007, researchers with the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious
Diseases, and the National Institutes of Health published this conclusion in the Lancet Infectious Diseases: “We conclude that frailty selection bias and use of non-specific endpoints such as all-cause mortality,have led cohort studies to greatly exaggerate vaccine benefits.”
A large-scale, systematic review of 51 studies, published in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews in 2006, found no evidence that the flu vaccine is any more effective than a placebo in children. The studies involved 260,000 children, age 6 to 23 months.
Last but not least, I think it says a lot that 70 percent of doctors and nurses, and 62 percent of other health care workers do NOT get the yearly flu shot.
The reasons why they opted to not get vaccinated were:
They didn't believe the vaccine would work
They believed their immune systems were strong enough to withstand exposure to the flu
They were concerned about side effects

Dr. Douglas Spouts Off on the Flu Shot

2009-09-11T11:55:00.000-04:00

You will need to take strong defensive action if you are forced to take a flu shot. This will not be a normal flu shot. Dr. Douglass' recommendations are a good place to start.

How many shots are enough?

I was suspicious the moment I heard the talk of mass vaccinations for swine flu.

But now that they're saying people may need as many as four flu shots this year, I'm no longer just suspicious -- the lights are flashing and all my warning bells are ringing at full volume.

I don't quite know just what they're up to yet -- but I'm pretty sure it has little to do with that weapon of mass distraction known as swine flu.

Apparently, health officials still know so little about the swine flu vaccine that they don't even know how many shots people will need in order for it to be effective.

Welcome to your new life as a lab rat.

On top of that pig needle, they want everyone to get the regular flu shot. And if you've never had a flu shot before, well then, you should get two. .

It's enough to make your head spin -- or at least sprout a curly tail and start squealing.

We've had other disease panics in recent years, some far worse than swine flu, yet there was never any talk about mass forced vaccinations before, much less three or four jabs in a row.

There hasn't been a forced vaccination scheme on this scale since the polio shots of the 1950s, but school officials are buying into the panic, hook, line and oinker. Why is it that some of the least educated people always end up in charge of education?

I've already told you what you can do to protect yourself if you're forced to get a swine flu shot. The same goes for your kids, too.

Wiping the lipstick off the pig,

William Campbell Douglass II, M.D.

Cancer Frequencies: Finally a Clinical Trial

2009-09-10T18:03:00.001-04:00

We've known for decades that frequencies are an excellent approach to treating cancer with dramatically less side effects than chemotherapy and radiation. It is nice to finally see a group do a successful clinical trial on this.

This team did not even use frequencies in the range known to kill cancer cells and were successful. Image what they could if they utilized the expertise in the worldwide community working with this technology!

An important finding (pointed out for many years on this site) is that frequencies are specific to specific cells and cell types. This makes it challenging for the average university research groups. As Rife has shown us, getting the exact frequencies requires painstaking work for many years with highly refined tools not generally available.

Also well known, and can be inferred by the data in this study, is that it is difficult to eliminate cancer completely for terminal cases, but possible to signficantly increase the life span and quality of life compared to conventional treatment.
------

Amplitude-modulated electromagnetic fields for the treatment of cancer: Discovery of tumor-specific frequencies and assessment of a novel therapeutic approach
Alexandre Barbault, Frederico P Costa , Brad Bottger , Reginald F Munden , Fin Bomholt , Niels Kuster and Boris Pasche
Cabinet Médical, Avenue de la Gare 6, Lausanne, Switzerland
Rue de Verdun 20, Colmar, FranceSirio-Libanes Hospital, Oncology Center, São Paulo, Brazil
Radiology Associates, Danbury Hospital, Danbury, CT, USA
5Department of Radiology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham and UAB Comprehensive Cancer Center, Birmingham, AL, USA
SPEAG AG, Zurich, Switzerland
IT'IS, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zurich, Switzerland
Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, The University of Alabama at Birmingham and UAB Comprehensive Cancer Center, Birmingham, AL, USA

Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research 2009, 28:51doi:10.1186/1756-9966-28-51

The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://www.jeccr.com/content/28/1/51

Received:    8 January 2009
Accepted:    14 April 2009
Published:    14 April 2009
© 2009 Barbault et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Purpose
Because in vitro studies suggest that low levels of electromagnetic fields may modify cancer cell growth, we hypothesized that systemic delivery of a combination of tumor-specific frequencies may have a therapeutic effect. We undertook this study to identify tumor-specific frequencies and test the feasibility of administering such frequencies to patients with advanced cancer.

Patients and methods
We examined patients with various types of cancer using a noninvasive biofeedback method to identify tumor-specific frequencies. We offered compassionate treatment to some patients with advanced cancer and limited therapeutic options.

Results
We examined a total of 163 patients with a diagnosis of cancer and identified a total of 1524 frequencies ranging from 0.1 Hz to 114 kHz. Most frequencies (57–92%) were specific for a single tumor type. Compassionate treatment with tumor-specific frequencies was offered to 28 patients. Three patients experienced grade 1 fatigue during or immediately after treatment. There were no NCI grade 2, 3 or 4 toxicities. Thirteen patients were evaluable for response. One patient with hormone-refractory breast cancer metastatic to the adrenal gland and bones had a complete response lasting 11 months. One patient with hormone-refractory breast cancer metastatic to liver and bones had a partial response lasting 13.5 months. Four patients had stable disease lasting for +34.1 months (thyroid cancer metastatic to lung), 5.1 months (non-small cell lung cancer), 4.1 months (pancreatic cancer metastatic to liver) and 4.0 months (leiomyosarcoma metastatic to liver).

Conclusion
Cancer-related frequencies appear to be tumor-specific and treatment with tumor-specific frequencies is feasible, well tolerated and may have biological efficacy in patients with advanced cancer.

Trial registration
clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT00805337

Parasites: New Findings

2009-09-02T08:50:00.000-04:00

Parasites are easily eliminated from the body within a few hours with the correct frequencies. Each parasite strain requires at least eight frequencies to knock out each stage of the life cycle plus a frequency to knock out a critical protein. For some parasites there will be several strains in the body.

The complexity of multiple frequencies and multiple strains makes it difficult for most researchers to systematically eliminate parasites. Frequency Foundation has spent more than a decade of research to be able to do this consistently and effectively with frequencies only.

Ongoing research on the ability of parasites to evade the immune system is of interest for pursuing frequency strategies that can shorten frequency application time.

Parasite immunomodulation and polymorphisms of the immune system

Rick M Maizels

Centre for Immunity, Infection and Evolution, and Institute of Immunology and Infection Research, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH9 3JT, UK

author email corresponding author email
Journal of Biology 2009, 8:62doi:10.1186/jbiol166
The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://jbiol.com/content/8/7/62

Published:

5 August 2009

Abstract

Parasites are accomplished evaders of host immunity. Their evasion strategies have shaped every facet of the immune system, driving diversity within gene families and immune gene polymorphisms within populations. New studies published recently in BMC Biology and Journal of Experimental Medicine document parasite-associated immunosuppression in natural populations and suggest that host genetic variants favoring resistance to parasites may be detrimental in the absence of infection.

Parasites

Parasites are eukaryotic pathogens, and broadly comprise protozoa, fungi, helminths and arthropods (Figure 1) that complete part or all of their life cycle within a host organism. Like other pathogens, parasites must survive in the face of a highly potent immune system. They succeed in this through a great diversity of strategies for avoiding immune detection, suppressing cellular immunity and deflecting immune attack mechanisms. It has been suggested that the need to overcome suppressive mechanisms of parasites may have led to compensatory adjustments in immune genes that, in an environment where parasitic infection is not endemic, may increase the likelihood of inappropriate responsiveness to self-antigens (autoimmunity) and environmental allergens (allergy). This notion has become known as the hygiene hypothesis [1]. Two recent papers, from Jackson et al. [2] and Fumagalli et al. [3] lend support to this hypothesis.

Malaria Machine

2009-08-28T16:04:00.001-04:00

Those who understand frequency medicine know that malaria is completely unnecessary and can be eliminated in a few hours. Here is a machine that can do it in 60 minutes for a light infection. Of course this a big hammer to crack the walnut. Much smaller devices can do the job. The good news is that someone is actually doing some testing.

A physician from one of the leading multi-million dollar malaria projects in the world told me at an MIT conference that if they even tested an electromagnetic device on a malaria patient their funding would be totally eliminated.

Dr. Clark Research Association - 28 Aug 2009
David Amrein, Naturopath

Malaria is a condition of which 500 million people are affected every year, with as many as 2.7 million dying, mostly children. Malaria is caused by a parasite transmitted by mosquitoes in warm and damp areas, especially in Africa. The parasites are becoming increasingly resistant against the available drugs.

Prof Henry Lai at the University of Washington in Seattle studied the mechanism by which artemisinin, a natural compound used against the malaria parasite, works to kill the parasite. It has to do with the interaction of artemisinin with iron that is stacked within the parasite. Looking at the iron stacks, Prof. Lai wondered whether treatment with an oscillating magnetic field could maybe kill the parasite.

Lab tests were successful and Prof. Lai published his work in 2000, hoping that others would take up the idea and develop units that could be used to treat malaria with magnetic fields. Unfortunately, this did not happen.

I saw Prof. Lai's study some three years ago and was amazed that 6 years after publication, no one had developed any application of it! So I set out to do just that. It took 12 months to develop three prototypes of the device. They are man-sized devices, the larges one almost 2 meters (7 feet) tall. While developing the units, we started to network with African Governments in endemic areas to see whether we could run a test wit the devices. Finally we had the blessing of the Ghana Health Ministry. My right hand Konrad and myself traveled to Ghana in February of 2008 to start the tests.

How to get three large units into an African country is a science in itself, but we finally sailed around all cliffs and were ready to go. Our first aim was to try the treatment with patients that had los levels of parasites, just to see whether there would be any adverse effects. We worked with 4 patients. There were no adverse effects, but also the before and after tests showed that malaria was cleared in a very short treatment time with our units!

We then went on to work with a hospital to treat a larger number of patients -- the goal was to treat some 30 patients. After a few days we realized that we could not use those tests because the lab at the hospital bungled al lour blood test slides. At the end of our time in Ghana, we had only our first 4 (but very good) results and the useless hospital experience. We did not have the time to continue at that time but instructed a local professional on how to use the machines.

Now our first study is finished and 26 patients were treated. Out of the 26 patients, all except one became negative with the magnetic treatment! One felt worse the day after treatment started and decided to go for medication instead, so he dropped out of the study. The other 25 patients all became negative. And the ones who did not have high levels of parasites, were negative right after the first 60 minutes of treatment! This is so fast that we do not really have an explanation of how it could work so quickly. But the results are nothing short of sensational.

Now our goal is to do a second study and to get others on board to turn this into a household unit for treatment of malaria.

Swine Flu: Those who do not remember history are condemned to repeat it

2009-07-18T13:40:00.000-04:00

Let us remember the great Swine Flu epidemic of 1918. Those treated by homoepaths had almost no deaths. Those treated conventionally had about a 20% death rate.

Let us remember the great Swine Flu epidemic of 1976. One person died and thousands were maimed or dead from the vaccine.

1976 CBS '60 Minutes' Transcript
Government Propaganda in Swine Flu Scare Causes Many Deaths

Below is the full transcript of the 1979 broadcast from the CBS investigative news program 60 Minutes on government propaganda around the 1976 swine flu scare. The program was aired on Sunday, November 4, 1979. Only one person was killed by the actual flu, while hundreds filed claims of death of their loved ones from the massive vaccine campaign which was mounted.

Swine Flu 1976

MIKE WALLACE: The flu season is upon us. Which type will we worry about this year, and what kind of shots will we be told to take? Remember the swine flu scare of 1976? That was the year the U.S. government told us all that swine flu could turn out to be a killer that could spread across the nation, and Washington decided that every man, woman and child in the nation should get a shot to prevent a nation-wide outbreak, a pandemic.

Well 46 million of us obediently took the shot, and now 4,000 Americans are claiming damages from Uncle Sam amounting to three and a half billion dollars because of what happened when they took that shot. By far the greatest number of the claims - two thirds of them are for neurological damage, or even death, allegedly triggered by the flu shot.

We pick up the story back in 1976, when the threat posed by the swine flu virus seemed very real indeed.

PRESIDENT GERALD FORD; This virus was the cause of a pandemic in 1918 and 1919 that resulted in over half a million deaths in the United States, as well as 20 million deaths around the world.

WALLACE: Thus the U.S. government's publicity machine was cranked into action to urge all America to protect itself against the swine flu menace. (Excerpt from TV commercial urging everyone to get a swine flu shot.) One of those who did roll up her sleeve was Judy Roberts. She was perfectly healthy, an active woman, when, in November of 1976, she took her shot. Two weeks later, she says, she began to feel a numbness starting up her legs.

JUDY ROBERTS: And I joked about it at that time. I said I'll be numb to the knees by Friday if this keeps up. By the following week, I was totally paralyzed.

WALLACE: So completely paralyzed, in fact, that they had to operate on her to enable her to breathe. And for six months, Judy Roberts was a quadriplegic. The diagnosis: A neurological disorder called "Guillain-Barre Syndrome" - GBS for short. These neurological diseases are little understood. They affect people in different ways.

As you can see in these home movies taken by a friend, Judy Roberts' paralysis confined her mostly to a wheelchair for over a year. But this disease can even kill. Indeed, there are 300 claims now pending from the families of GBS victims who died, allegedly as a result of the swine flu shot. In other GBS victims, the crippling effects diminish and all but disappear. But for Judy Roberts, progress back to good health has been painful and partial.

Now, I notice that your smile, Judy, is a little bit constricted.

ROBERTS: Yes, it is.

WALLACE: Is it different from what it used to be?

ROBERTS: Very different, I have a – a greatly decreased mobility in my lips. And I can't drink through a straw on the right-band side. I can't blow out birthday candles. I don't whistle any more, for which my husband is grateful.

WALLACE: It may be a little difficult for you to answer this question, but have you recovered as much as you are going to recover?

ROBERTS: Yes. This - this is it.

WALLACE: So you will now have a legacy of braces on your legs for the rest of your life?

ROBERTS: Yes. The weakness in my hands will stay and the leg braces will stay.

WALLACE: So Judy Roberts and her husband have filed a claim against the U.S. government. They're asking $12 million, though they don't expect to get nearly that much. Judy, why did you take the flu shot?

ROBERTS: I'd never taken any other flu shots, but I felt like this was going to be a major epidemic, and the only way to prevent a major epidemic of a - a really deadly variety of flu was for every body to be immunized.

WALLACE: Where did this so called "deadly variety of flu", where did it first hit back in 1976? It began right here at Fort Dix in New Jersey in January of that year, when a number of recruits began to complain of respiratory ailments, something like the common cold. An Army doctor here sent samples of their throat cultures to the New Jersey Public Health Lab to find our just what kind of bug was going around here. One of those samples was from a Private David Lewis, who had left his sick bed to go on a forced march. Private Lewis had collapsed on that march, and his sergeant had revived him by mouth-to-mouth resuscitation. But the sergeant showed no signs of illness. A few days later, Private Lewis died.

ROBERTS: If this disease is so potentially fatal that it's going to kill a young, healthy man, a middle-aged schoolteacher doesn't have a prayer.

WALLACE: The New Jersey lab identified most of those solders' throat cultures as the normal kind of flu virus going around that year, but they could not make out what kind of virus was in the culture from the dead soldier, and from four others who were sick. So they sent those cultures to the Federal Center for Disease Control in Atlanta, Georgia, for further study. A few days later they got the verdict: swine flu. But that much-publicized outbreak of swine flu at Fort Dix involved only Private Lewis, who died, and those four other soldiers, who recovered completely without the swine flu shot.

ROBERTS: If I had known at that time that the boy had been in a sick bed, got up, went out on a forced march and then collapsed and died, I would never have taken the shot.

DR DAVID SENCER: The rationale for our recommendation was not on the basis of the death of a - a single individual, but it was on the basis that when we do see a change in the characteristics of the influenza virus, it is a massive public-health problem in the country.

WALLACE: Dr David Sencer, then head of the CDS - the Center of Disease Control in Atlanta - is now in private industry. He devised the swine flu program and he pushed it.

WALLACE: You began to give flu shots to the American people in October of '76?

DR SENCER: October 1st.

WALLACE: By that time, how many cases of swine flu around the world had been reported?

DR SENCER: There had been several reported, but none confirmed. There had been cases in Australia that were reported by the press, by the news media. There were cases in -

WALLACE: None confirmed? Did you ever uncover any other outbreaks of swine flu anywhere in the world?

DR SENCER: No

WALLACE: Now, nearly everyone was to receive a shot in a public health facility where a doctor might not be present, therefore it was up to the CDC to come up with some kind of official consent form giving the public all the information it needed about the swine flu shot. This form stated that the swine flu vaccine had been tested. What it didn't say was that after those tests were completed, the scientists developed another vaccine and that it was the one given to most of the 46 million who took the shot. That vaccine was called "X-53a". Was X-53a ever field tested?

DR SENCER: I-I can't say. I would have to -

WALLACE: It wasn't

DR SENCER: I don't know

WALLACE: Well, I would think that you're in charge of the program

DR SENCER: 1 would have to check the records. I haven't looked at this in some time.

WALLACE: The information form the consent form was also supposed to warn people about any risk of serious complications following the shot. But did it?

ROBERTS: No, I had never heard of any reactions other than a sore arm, fever, this sort of thing.

WALLACE: Judy Roberts' husband, Gene, also took the shot.

GENE ROBERTS: Yes, I looked at that document, I signed it. Nothing on there said I was going to have a heart attack, or I can get Guillain Barre, which I'd never heard of.

WALLACE: What if people from the government, from the Center for Disease Control, what if they had indeed, known about it, what would be your feeling?

JUDY ROBERTS: They should have told us.

WALLACE: Did anyone ever come to you and say, "You know something, fellows, there's the possibility of neurological damage if you get into a mass immunization program?"

DR SENCER: No

WALLACE: No one ever did?

DR SENCER: No

WALLACE: Do you know Michael Hattwick?

DR SENCER: Yes, uh-hmm.

WALLACE: Dr Michael Hattwick directed the surveillance team for the swine flu program at the CDC. His job was to find out what possible complications could arise from taking the shot and to report his findings to those in charge. Did you know ahead of time, Dr Hattwick that there had been case reports of neurological disorders, neurological illness, apparently associated with the injection of influenza vaccine?

DR MICHAEL HATTWICK: Absolutely

WALLACE: You did?

DR HATIWICK: Yes

WALLACE: How did you know that?

DR Hattwick: By review of the literature.

WALLACE: So you told your superiors - the men in charge of the swine flu immunization program - about the possibility of neurological disorders?

DR RATTWICK: Absolutely

WALLACE: What would you say if I told you that your superiors say that you never told them about the possibility of neurological complications?

DR HAJTWICK: That's nonsense. I can't believe that they would say that they did not know that there were neurological illnesses associated with influenza vaccination. That simply is not true. We did know that.

DR SENCER: I have said that Dr Hattwick had never told me of his feelings on this subject.

WALLACE: Then he's lying?

DR SENCER: I guess you would have to make that assumption.

WALLACE: Then why does this report from your own agency, dated July 1976, list neurological complications as a possibility?

DR SENCER: I think the consensus of the scientific community was that the evidence relating neurologic disorders to influenza immunization was such that they did not feel that this association was a real one.

WALLACE: You didn't feel it was necessary to tell the American people that information

DR SENCER: I think that over the - the years we have tried to inform the American people as - as fully as possible.

WALLACE: As part of informing Americans about the swine flu threat, Dr Sencer's CDC also helped create the advertising to get the public to take the shot. Let me read to your from one of your own agency's memos planning the campaign to urge Americans to take the shot. "The swine flu vaccine has been taken by many important persons," he wrote. "Example: President Ford, Henry Kissinger, Elton John, Muhammad Ah, Mary Tyler Moore, Rudolf Nureyev, Walter Cronkite, Ralph Nader, Edward Kennedy" -etcetera, etcetera, True?

DR SENCER: I'm not familiar with that particular piece of paper, but I do know that, at least of that group, President Ford did take the vaccination.

WALLACE: Did you talk to these people beforehand to find out if they planned to take the shot?

DR SENCER: I did not, no.

WALLACE: Did anybody?

DR SENC ER: I do not know.

WALLACE: Did you get permission to use their names in your campaign?

DR SENCER: I do not know.

WALLACE: Mary, did you take a swine flu shot?

MARY TYLER MOORE: No, I did not.

WALLACE: Did you give them permission to use your name saying that you had or were going to?

MOORE: Absolutely not. Never did.

WALLACE: Did you ask your own doctor about taking the swine flu shot?

MOORE: Yes, and at the time he thought it might be a good idea. But I resisted it, because I was leery of having the symptoms that sometimes go with that kind of inoculation.

WALLACE: So you didn't?

MOORE: No, I didn't.

WALLACE: Have you spoken to your doctor since?

MOORE: Yes.

WALLACE: And?

MOORE: He's delighted that I didn't take that shot.

WALLACE: You're in charge. Somebody's in charge.

DR SENCER: There are -

WALLACE: This is your advertising strategy that I have a copy of here.

DR SENCER: Who's it signed by?

WALLACE: This one is unsigned. But you--you'll acknowledge that it was your baby so to speak?

DR SENCER: It could have been from the Department of Health, Education and Welfare. It could be from CDC. I don't know. I'll be happy to take responsibility for it.

WALLACE: It's been three years now since you fell ill by GBS right?

ROBERTS: Right.

WALLACE: Has the federal government, in your estimation, played fair with you about your claim?

ROBERTS: No, I don't think so. It seems to be dragging on and on and on, and really no end in sight that I can see at this point.

JOSEPH CALIFANO: With respect to the cases of Guillain Barre...

WALLACE: Former Secretary of HEW Joseph Caifano, too was disturbed that there was no end in sight. So a year and a half ago, he proposed that Uncle Sam would cut the bureaucratic red tape for victims suffering from GBS and would pay up quickly.

CALIFANO: We shouldn't hold them to an impossible or too difficult standard of proving that they were hurt. Even if we pay a few people a few thousand dollars that might not have deserved it, I think justice requires that we promptly pay those people who do deserve it.

WALLACE: Who's making the decision to be so hard-nosed about settling?

CALIFANO: Well, I assume the Justice Department is.

WALLACE: Griffin Bell, before he left?

CALIFANO: Well, the Justice Department agreed to the statement I made. It was cleared word for word with the lawyers in the Justice Department by my HEW lawyers.

CALIFANO: That-that statement said that we should pay Guillain Barre claims without regard to whether the federal government was negligent, if they - if they resulted from the swine flu shot.

GENE ROBERTS: I think the government knows its wrong.

JUDY ROBERTS: If it drags out long enough, that people will just give up, let it go.

GENE ROBERTS: I—I am a little more adamant in my thoughts than my wife is, because I asked - told Judy to take the shot. She wasn't going to take it, and she never had had shots. And I'm mad with my government because they knew the fact, but they didn't realize those facts because they - if they had released them, the people wouldn't have taken it. And they can come out tomorrow and tell me there's going to be an epidemic, and they can drop off like flies to - next to me, I will not take another shot that my government tells me to take.

WALLACE: Meantime, Judy Roberts and some 4,000 others like her are still waiting for their day in court.

Bird flu, influenza and 1918: The case for mutant Avian tuberculosis

2009-07-13T09:24:00.000-04:00

Lawrence Broxmeyer MD, Bird flu, influenza and 1918: The case for mutant Avian tuberculosis. Med Hypotheses. 2006;67(5):1006-15. For Epub 2006 click here.
Reprint: Lawrence Broxmeyer.Bird Flu, Influenza and 1918: The case for mutant Avian tuberculosis. Journal of Chinese Clinical Medicine,2007,2(2):83-93.

Influenza is Italian for ‘‘influence’’, Latin: influentia. It used to be thought that the disease was caused by a bad influence from the heavens. Influenza was called a virus long, long before it was proven to be one. In 2005, an article in the New England Journal of Medicine estimated that a recurrence of the 1918 influenza epidemic could kill between 180 million and 360 million people worldwide.

A large part of the current bird-flu hysteria is fostered by a distrust among the lay and scientific community regarding the actual state of our knowledge regarding the bird flu or H5N1 and the killer ‘‘Influenza’’ Pandemic of 1918 that it is compared to. And this distrust is not completely unfounded. Traditionally, ‘‘flu’’ does not kill. Experts, including Peter Palese of the Mount School of Medicine in Manhattan, remind us that even in 1992, millions in China already had antibodies to H5N1, meaning that they had contracted it and that their immune system had little trouble fending it off.

Dr. Andrew Noymer and Michel Garenne, UC Berkely demographers, reported in 2000 convincing statistics showing that undetected tuberculosis may have been the real killer in the 1918 flu epidemic. Aware of recent attempts to isolate the ‘‘Influenza virus’’ on human cadavers and their specimens, Noymer and Garenne summed that: ‘‘Frustratingly, these findings have not answered the question why the 1918 virus was so virulent, nor do they offer an explanation for the unusual age profile of deaths’’. Bird flu would certainly be diagnosed in the hospital today as Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS). Roger and others favor suspecting tuberculosis in all cases of acute respiratory failure of unknown origin.

By 1918, it could be said, in so far as tuberculosis was concerned, that the world was a supersaturated sponge ready to ignite and that among its most vulnerable parts was the very Midwest where the 1918 unknown pandemic began. It is theorized that the lethal pig epidemic that began in Kansas just prior to the first human outbreaks was a disease of avian and human tuberculosis genetically combined through mycobacteriophage interchange, with the pig, susceptible to both, as its involuntary living culture medium. What are the implications of mistaking a virus such as Influenza A for what mycobacterial disease is actually causing? They would be disastrous, with useless treatment and preventative stockpiles. The obvious need for further investigation is presently imminent and pressing.
2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
---------

Frequency Foundation research findings indicate deaths from Swine flu are likely due to a viral tuberculosis co-infection, consistent with the hypothesis in the paper above.

Swine Flu: Do we really have the right diagnosis?

2009-07-11T13:11:00.001-04:00

Most people don't realize that autopsy studies in the U.S. and the U.K. show consistently that about 30% of patients die in the hospital from a disease they were not being treated for showing that even on your deathbed, your physician's diagnosis is wrong about 30% of the time.

Horrifying fact, but then most people don't realize that medical error is the third leading cause of death in the U.S.. Only heart disease and cancer kill more people (and of course 30% of the time those are not the real cause of death). After spending 34 years working in medicine I'm always on the lookout for medical error, particular bad diagnoses.

Infected by the swine flu on at least half a dozen occasions during my world travels, I easily eliminated all of them with the swine flu frequency set previously sent out to Frequency Foundation subscribers. However, on a recent return from Poland I still had a hacking cough after two weeks of frequency work with endless dark green mucus expectorate from my lungs and sinuses. Kielbasa sausage and high powered horseradish were recommended as a Polish antibiotic.

Nothing would end it, despite eliminating numerous co-infections with frequencies. My wife, a world renowned physician's daughter, pointed out that antibiotics can sometimes be useful, especially when you have pneumonia. However, I swore off them in 1993 and have never looked back. And a research aassociate, a surgeon at the University of Georgia Medical School called about the same time. He had been examining patients white cells under a dark field microscope and noticed that antibiotics rendered them completely disfunctional. A bacteria could walk right up to a white cell and bump into it and the white cells would not even notice.

My white cells were working overtime and created vast quantities of mucus. I began to understand how people can die from this stuff. While frequencies and homepathy were preventing any serious side effects, without them the buildup in congestion of the lungs could be terminal in persons with a compromised immune system. I was testing positive for Gelsemium, the remedy used by homeopaths in the 1918 flu epidemic where they achieved a virtually zero death rate compared to the horrendous death rate of conventionally treated patients. I decided to stick with homeopathy until I could figure out the frequencies.

This morning when I got up with the routine hacking cough, the frequency 333233 showed up. Searching my gigabyte database of historical frequencies, viral TB was the only hit. Several years ago I had a client with a repeated diagnosis of chronic viral tuberculosis and we developed a frequency set as the remedy.

Current viral frequency sets are far more comprehensive that the ones I used with success years ago. Expanding the old set out into the modern viral framework, within 30 minutes the color of the expectorate changed. Searching the web for recent news on viral forms of TB I found the following.

Toxic Treadmill
Thursday, May 21, 2009

H1 N.......what?!!? America's Mexican "Influenza"? asks Researcher Lawrence Broxmeyer, MD

TT Note: Hold on to your flu-like symptoms, folks. This doctor looks at the flu epidemic of 1918 and some researchers' findings. When compared to today's trendy virus, there appears to be some room for debate on the current flu-like symptoms. Is it really the flu?

/24-7 / -- All that is H1N1 does not glitter, at least with respect to the tireless efforts of Virologists, Epidemiologists and Health Officials to stake claim that the current "flu-like illness" pandemic is tied to "Influenza".

"The "H" and "N" of influenza sub-typing" Lawrence Broxmeyer, MD mentions, "revolves around two glycoproteins called Hemagglutin and Neuraminidase, both of which can be, and are, associated with infectious diseases such as the minuscule, viral forms of tuberculosis, a disease which ought to be high on the differential diagnosis for 'flu-like illness' . Since August, 2008, a Medline study in the Journal of Clinical Biochemistry showed that sputum neuraminidase levels over 1.0 mU per mL were proven associated with having tuberculosis in 92% of cases, previous to which bacteria closely related to TB where shown, through crystallization, to produce the same protein neuraminidase used to subtype 'Influenza'."

Furthermore, reminded Lawrence Broxmeyer MD, "Khomenko's 1993 study, showed that the explosive contagiousness of just such influenza-like forms of tuberculosis are exactly the stuff that previous epidemics and pandemics could have been made of." Khomenko was cited by Nobel nominee Lida Mattman in her textbook prior to her untimely death last year.

"That is exactly why", reiterated Lawrence Broxmeyer, MD "that in response to the present world "flu" pandemic, Japan's Health Ministry's Tuberculosis Infection Diseases Control Division deputy director Takeshi Enami went hand in hand with Yoshio Nanba, director of The Office of Pandemic Influenza Preparedness and Response, to attend a news conference in Tokyo on May 1, 2009."

But back in the US, the CDC and NIH seem to feel differently, ignoring everything but "the virus". There was much the same "Influenza" talk when in 1990, a new multi-drug-resistant (MDR) tuberculosis outbreak took place in a large Miami municipal hospital. Soon thereafter, similar outbreaks in three New York City hospitals left many sufferers dying within weeks. By 1992, approximately two years later, drug-resistant tuberculosis had spread to seventeen US states, with mini-epidemics in Florida, Michigan, New York, California, Texas, Massachusetts, and Pennsylvania and was reported, not by the American, but the international media, as out of control. Viral forms of swine, avian and human TB can be transmitted from one species to another. By 1993 the World Health Organization (WHO), proclaimed tuberculosis a global health emergency.

"No one can deny the similarities between the onset of the 1918 epidemic and that of today," mentioned Lawrence Broxmeyer MD, "Yet a Press Release, issued on August 19, 2008, by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), contains a striking finding and conclusion: The 20 to 40 million deaths worldwide from the great 1918 Influenza ("Flu") Pandemic were NOT due to "flu" or a virus, but to pneumonia caused by massive bacterial infection."

Subsequently, a study published in JAMA by Talbot and Moore in 2000 showed that Mexican immigrants to the US have the highest case rates for tuberculosis among foreign born persons.

The research of Lawrence Broxmeyer MD first proclaimed that the 1918 pandemic was due to bacteria, particularly mutant forms of flu-like fowl, swine, bovine, and human tuberculosis (TB) bacteria. These forms of tuberculosis are often viral-like, mutate frequently and can "skip" from one species to another. Moreover the antibodies from such viral TB forms react in the compliment fixation and later "viral" assays. They also grow on cultures which are supposed to grow only viruses. Click here for more ...
----------

Those familiar with the work of Royal Rife will remember that he asserted that cancer was caused by a bacteria so small it was pass through a filter, leaving the impression that it was a virus, the same as viral TB. Does the suppression of Rife's work created a blind spot in the medical community that has far reaching consequences?

The viral TB frequency set will be added to the Swine flu series and emailed to Frequency Foundation subscribers shortly. See link on left side of page to subscribe.

Swine Flu Editorial: Journal of Biology

2009-06-13T04:33:00.000-04:00

Influenza: one or two more questions

Miranda Robertson

Journal of Biology 2009, 8:45doi:10.1186/jbiol158
The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://jbiol.com/content/8/5/45

Published:

12 June 2009

Editorial

When we asked Peter Doherty to write a question-and-answer piece on influenza [1], Australia, where he is based, had one reported case of influenza A (H1N1). At the time of writing this editorial, Australia has more than 1,200 cases (though to date no deaths) and has triggered the announcement by WHO of a global pandemic.

Received wisdom has it that pathogens are not generally lethal to the hosts they normally infect, because they could not survive if they were. Pathogenicity thus becomes adapted to a level at which the host survives to become reinfected (or to produce young that become infected). The most notable example of such adaptation is in the herpesviruses, which have evolved a quite extraordinary repertoire of devices for avoiding human immunity and with which most human adults in the Western world are chronically infected. Herpesviruses persist through latency. Influenza virus belongs to a different strategic class, which proliferates rapidly and escapes in coughs and sneezes, leaving the host immune. Most humans survive infection with human influenza viruses; but the adaptive truce may break down when the human viruses recombine with viruses of avian or swine origin: hence the high human mortality associated with the H5N1 avian influenza virus that emerged into public consciousness in 2005. The so-called swine H1N1 influenza virus that is the cause of the current pandemic is apparently a triple-reassortant, with genes of swine, human and avian origin. Unlike H5N1 it is readily transmissible between humans, but it seems - so far at least - otherwise less uncouth, and in most people causes only mild disease; so perhaps in respect both of transmissibility and of pathogenicity it reflects its human rather than its swine or avian origins. What makes this virus particularly dangerous, as Peter Doherty and Stephen Turner explain in their Q&A in this issue of Journal of Biology [1], is simply that most of us are not immune to it, and it was not, until now, on the agenda for inclusion in the seasonal influenza vaccine programme.

It is probably the level - or rather the distribution - of population immunity that also partly accounts for the atypical pattern of mortality of pandemic as against the usual seasonal influenza. Whereas seasonal influenza is more likely to kill the old, pandemic influenza (including the present H1N1 influenza) tends preferentially to kill the young. This is thought to be because older individuals are likely to have some level of immunity due to crossprotective antibodies - that is, antibodies against similar features of other, in this case past, influenza viruses. (I ought however to restate that disease due to influenza A (H1N1) seems generally mild; and indeed mortality is almost certainly even lower than it seems, because it is highly likely that many infected individuals never bother to consult a doctor and the number of people actually infected therefore probably substantially exceeds the number reported.)

FDA Calls Cheerios an “Unapproved Drug

2009-05-19T23:40:00.002-04:00

The continued harassment and suppression of information by the FDA would be ludicrous if it wasn't killing hundreds of thousands of people every year. As some former FDA officials have pointed out, the organization is more a servant of drug companies than a protector of the health of American people.

In medieval times, people were not allowed to read the Bible as they might get strange ideas. Today, you are not allowed to talk about research in medical journals as you might start to question some of the drugs you are on.

------------------
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a warning letter to cereal manufacturer General Mills for claiming on its cereal box that Cheerios can help lower cholesterol, and saying on their website that “diets rich in whole grain foods can reduce the risk of heart disease.” The letter, dated May 5, called the above claims “serious violations” of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and applicable regulations. FDA stated that based on the claims made, Cheerios is now an unapproved drug, and must go through FDA new drug approval process.

FDA has issued warning letters in the past to various food producers to keep them from telling consumers about the healthful nature of their products. For example, cherry growers were targeted and enjoined from referencing peer-reviewed scientific articles proving cherries’ health benefits for gout and arthritis. For years, FDA barred health claims about the benefits of fish oil for heart, cancer, depression, body pain, and various other conditions until a drug company paid a great deal of money to take its fish oil through the approval process. That particular fish oil, now FDA-approved, sells at many more times the cost of regular fish oil. This type of enforcement effectively censors scientific information, greatly restricts consumer access to scientific studies that provide valuable information, and drives up healthcare costs.

American Association for Health Freedom

Homeopathic Treatment for Infectious Disease

2009-05-02T05:27:00.000-04:00

There is an interesting discussion of treatment of flu with homeopathy on Homeonet. David Kent Warkenten quotes Andre Saine who cites one of the many published papers in homeopathy showing the difference between conventional treatment of the flu and homeopathic treatment during the worst epidemics.

Today we have the same and better homeopathic remedies readily available and they are great support for any frequency work.

------
How does homeopathy address patients with infectious diseases? Homeopathic treatment is ideal to optimize the body's natural defenses against microbes. With the appropriate homeopathic treatment, people recover from infectious diseases, even the most serious ones, gently and rapidly. During past great epidemics such as diphtheria, scarlet fever, typhoid, cholera, yellow fever, malaria, etc., homeopathy decreased mortality by 10 to 30 times versus conventional medicine. During the infamous Spanish flu epidemic of 1918-19, it has been estimated that 25 to 50 million people died worldwide. In the United States alone, 550,000 died, approximately 10% of the people afflicted with the flu. Homeopathic physicians documented then more than 62,000 patients treated with homeopathy resulting in a mortality of 0.7%. For people who were sick enough to be hospitalized, conventional medicine had a mortality of 30% while with 27,000 documented hospitalized cases, homeopathy was reporting a mortality of 1.05% (Journal of the American Institute of Homeopathy 1921; 13:1028-43).

Homeopathy: The First Line of Defense in Dealing with the Flu

2009-04-30T15:58:00.000-04:00

It is well known to students of the homeopathic research literature that deaths from flu treated by homeopathy are almost nonexistent. The worse flu epidemics of the past had almost no deaths compared to conventional treatment. Melanie Grimes has a good summary of the literature in a recent article in NaturalNews.

Today, for most flus including the current swine flu, we have a very effective remedy in Oscillicocinum. It can be purchased in any Whole Foods Market. I have even seen it in some CVS and other chain drugstores. Use it at the first sign of the flu as it impacts a wider spectrum of flu organisms than any vaccine.

Important for Swine Flu Epidemic: Homeopathy Successfully Treated Flu Epidemic of 1918
Tuesday, April 28, 2009 by: Melanie Grimes, citizen journalist

(NaturalNews) Homeopathy was successful in treating the flu epidemic of 1918 and can provide answers to questions about the 2009 Swine Flu. Homeopathy can provide quick and inexpensive relief for symptoms of the flu. A system of medicine based on the principles of "like cures like," homeopathy uses plant, mineral and animal sources for the natural flu remedies. Homeopathy is based on ideas from ideas dating back to Egyptian medicine. The term "homeopathy" was coined by the medical doctor and medical reformer, Samuel Hahnemann in the 1800s. Homeopathic remedies have been used to treat flu symptoms for two centuries.

Was homeopathy successful in treating the flu epidemic of 1918?
Yes.
While the mortality rate of people treated with traditional medicine and drugs was 30 percent, those treated by homeopathic physicians had mortality rate of 1.05 percent.
Of the fifteen hundred cases reported at the Homeopathic Medical Society of the District of Columbia there were only fifteen deaths. Recoveries in the National Homeopathic Hospital were 100%. In Ohio, of 1,000 cases of influenza, Dr. T. A. McCann, MD, Dayton, Ohio reported NO DEATHS.

What homeopathic remedies were used to successfully treat the Spanish flu in 1918?
Gelsemium and Bryonia
According the Dr. Frank Wieland, MD, in Chicago, "(With) 8,000 workers we had only one death. Gelsemium was practically the only remedy used. We used no aspirin and no vaccines."

Homeopathy was 98% successful in treating the Spanish flu epidemic in 1918?
Yes.
Ohio reported that 24,000 cases of flu treated allopathically had a mortality rate of 28.2% while 26,000 cases of flu treated homeopathically had a mortality rate of 1.05% . In Connecticut, 6,602 cases were reported, with 55 deaths, less than 1%. Dr. Roberts, a physician on a troop ship during WWI, had 81 cases of flu on the way over to Europe. He reported, "All recovered and were landed. Every man received homeopathic treatment."

How do they know that a virus caused the flu epidemic of 1918, when the first virus was not isolated until 1933?
They don`t. In fact, many believe that the epidemic was actually a vaccine reaction.

Swine Flu Update 30 Apr 2009

2009-04-29T10:00:00.005-04:00

Frequency Foundation ongoing research indicates that there are three virus strains circulating. Two variants of swine flu and one of bird flu. This may account for mixed genetic material seen in viruses cultured by other researchers. The frequencies appear to be the same as one of the many hundreds of viruses that those infected with Lyme disease have been fighting for years with minor changes. So they are likely variants of the many viruses studied and released into the atmosphere at the Plum Island laboratory through decades of violation of EPA safety regulations. At least one United Nations expert thinks these viruses were produced in a lab. See Dr. Mercola's excellent article on swine flu.

Frequency Foundation subscribers will receive updated frequencies today as part of their normal subscription (see link on lower left side of page to subscribe). The current swine flu virus variant has produced mild symptoms in infected people so far in the United States and these frequencies might be helpful for prevention purposes.

Oscillicocinum is strongly indicated for this infection and recommended for anyone who thinks they have been exposed. You can buy it at any Whole Foods Market.

Human Swine Influenza Investigation
Swine Flu website last updated April 29, 2009, 9:45 PM ET

U.S. Human Cases of Swine Flu Infection(As of April 29, 2009, 11:00 AM ET)
States	# of laboratory confirmed cases	Deaths
Arizona	1
California	14
Indiana	1
Kansas	2
Massachusetts	2
Michigan	2
Nevada	1
New York	51
Ohio	1
Texas	16	1
TOTAL COUNTS	91 cases	1 death
International Human Cases of Swine Flu Infection See: World Health Organization

The outbreak of disease in people caused by a new influenza virus of swine origin continues to grow in the United States and internationally. Today, CDC reports additional confirmed human infections, hospitalizations and the nation’s first fatality from this outbreak. The more recent illnesses and the reported death suggest that a pattern of more severe illness associated with this virus may be emerging in the U.S. Most people will not have immunity to this new virus and, as it continues to spread, more cases, more hospitalizations and more deaths are expected in the coming days and weeks.
CDC has implemented its emergency response. The agency’s goals are to reduce transmission and illness severity, and provide information to help health care providers, public health officials and the public address the challenges posed by the new virus. Yesterday, CDC issued new interim guidance for clinicians on how to care for children and pregnant women who may be infected with this virus. Young children and pregnant women are two groups of people who are at high risk of serious complications from seasonal influenza. In addition, CDC’s Division of the Strategic National Stockpile (SNS) continues to send antiviral drugs, personal protective equipment, and respiratory protection devices to all 50 states and U.S. territories to help them respond to the outbreak. The swine influenza A (H1N1) virus is susceptible to the prescription antiviral drugs oseltamivir and zanamivir. This is a rapidly evolving situation and CDC will provide updated guidance and new information as it becomes available.

GAO Sting Operation Surfaces Fraud in Medical Trials

2009-04-28T21:04:00.000-04:00

Membership in the American Association for Health Freedom is strongly encouraged as it is one of the few organizations protecting your freedom of choice in medicine. You probably will not find this report in your local newspaper.

Ensnared by an Undercover Investigation, Drug Study Reviewer Halts Many of Its Review Operations

A previous Pulse of Health Freedom issue mentioned the uncover operations of the Government Accountability Office (GAO) which ensnared Coast IRB, LLC, of Colorado Springs. The GAO created a fake medical study of a fake product to see whether for-profit review boards adequately supervised medical trials. Two firms turned it down but Coast IRB took it.

Coast IRB has now voluntarily halted many of its review operations at the FDA’s request. Up to 300 trials could be affected. The company has issued a statement that it caught the “sting” internally and had launched an internal investigation.

In the wake of an adolescent’s death in a gene therapy drug trial, the safety of human volunteers in clinical trials has come under increasing scrutiny, and many are worried about the objectivity of the results presented to the FDA.

The influence of vested interests, particularly in medical research, is also of great concern. Educators like John Abramson, MD, author of Overdosed America, have clearly documented that vested interests skew medical school education, medical research, medical journal publication, and clinical practice guidelines. When guidelines become mandatory or coercive, which is the current direction the government and insurers are taking, it gives vested interests a chance directly to control medical care. All Americans deserve an objective assessment of their potential treatment options in order to make an informed decision about their health.

CDC Coverup: Politics often overwhelms reality

2009-04-13T13:11:00.000-04:00

Health agency covered up lead harm

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention withheld evidence that contaminated tap water caused lead poisoning in kids.

By Rebecca Renner, Salon.com

April 10, 2009 | From 2001 to 2004, Washington, D.C., experienced what may have been the worst lead contamination of city water on record. Tens of thousands of homes had sky-high levels of lead at the tap, and in the worst cases, tap water contained enough lead to be classified as hazardous waste. Not that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the government oversight agency for public health, was worried.

A 2004 CDC report found that water contamination "might have contributed a small increase in blood lead levels." The study has been influential. School officials in New York and Seattle have used the CDC report as justification for not aggressively responding to high levels of lead in their water, and other cities have cited the report to dispel concerns about lead in tap water.

But the results of thousands of blood tests that measured lead contamination in children were missing from the report, potentially skewing the findings and undermining public health. Further, the CDC discovered in 2007 that many young children living in D.C. homes with lead pipes were poisoned by drinking water and suffered ill effects. Parents wondered whether the water could have caused speech and balance problems, difficulty with learning, and hyperactivity. Yet the health agency did not publicize the new findings or alert public health authorities in D.C. or other federal agencies that regulate lead, such as the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency or Housing and Urban Development...

The House Science and Technology Committee Investigations and Oversight Subcommittee is beginning an investigation into CDC's handling of the D.C. lead crisis. Subcommittee chair Brad Miller, D-N.C., wrote the CDC on March 13, requesting all "records that indicate possible, probable or actual forgery, fabrication or other intentional misrepresentation of data," concerning lead in the water.