Robert Priddy Exposed

Priddy's Former 684-Year Old Guru

2009-11-22T08:29:00.000-08:00

Priddy's Former 684-Year Old Guru

Robert Priddy (a caustic critic and defamer of Sathya Sai Baba who once hailed the Guru as God Incarnate and thereby the Father who sent Jesus, Allah who sent Muhammad and the Creator of the Universe), claimed he attended Sathya Sai Baba's 670th birthday celebration!

Robert Priddy is the same guy who boasts he is mentally sound with unimpaired memory. Gerald Joe Moreno has written extensively about Robert Priddy’s not-so-Priddy blunders, defamations and libels that seriously compromise his self-professed integrity.

For interested readers, Sathya Sai Baba is celebrating his 84th Birthday Celebration this year (2009), not his 684th Birthday Celebration (as would be alleged by Robert Priddy).

Robert Priddy's Amusing Attacks Against Astrology

2009-10-26T11:58:00.000-07:00

Robert Priddy's Amusing Attacks Against Astrology

In an amusing twist of events, Robert Priddy (a caustic critic and defamer of Sathya Sai Baba who once hailed the Guru as God Incarnate and who once fervently Worshipped And Kissed The Guru’s Feet) wrote an article trashing & bashing “astrological superstitions” and ”fallacious astrological claims” about “cloud-cuckoo” gulikakala and rahukala (alleged inauspicious astrological times based on alleged planetary influences).

What is so amusing about Robert Priddy’s criticism of astrology is that his own son (Kai Nicolai Priddy) is an astrologer, believes in astrology, created astrology software and is the registrant for the astrology domain abacusastrology.com!

By attacking astrologers and astrology, Robert Priddy is also attacking his “lunatic fringe” astrologer son, Kai Nicolai Priddy. Now there’s something to chuckle about.

Way to go, Priddles!

Information About Gulika Kaal And Rahu Kaal

The 'Gulika-kaal' (or simply 'Gulik') is a period of approximately 1 hour and 30 minutes duration every day of the week. This time duration is ruled by 'Shani' (Saturn). This period is considered to be inauspicious to start any important work. However, 'Gulik Kala' is considered a good period to undertake new projects.

This time is calculated by dividing 'Dinamaan' into eight equal parts (each of approximately 1 hour 30 minutes). The 'Dinamaan' is the total duration of time between local sunrise and sunset on any given day. The 'Gulik-kaal' and its order vary from day to day. (Reference)

It has been believed from the Vedic Age and has been observed even presently that there are certain times of the day called 'Rahu Kalam', which is believed to be an ill-omened time period of the day. During this time frame one should avoid any auspicious action such as investments, business transactions, asset purchases, journeys, relationships, meetings and medical treatments. It is believed that work done during this period does not bring successful results.It is a normal practice in South India.

'Rahu Kalam' (or, 'Rahu-kaal') is an inauspicious time period for a particular day. It is one-eighth part of the difference between the Sun set and Sun rise time (approx. 90 minutes) of a particular place for specific day of a week. The Rahu Kalam time period and its order vary from day to day. (Reference)

Genital Oilings Expert - Robert Priddy

2009-10-21T08:22:00.000-07:00

Dear Friends And Fellow Readers,

This article is part of a series written by Gerald Joe Moreno defending himself from absurd and libelous claims made by Ex-Devotees that he was “molested sexually” by Sathya Sai Baba. Since Ex-Devotees (particularly Barry Pittard and Robert Priddy) unremittingly and ceaselessly disperse this blatant disinformation on their Wordpress blogs, a response is therefore necessary.

Robert C. Priddy’s Homoerotic Genital Oilings Fascination

Gerald Joe Moreno has already written a rather lengthy article exposing the Homoerotic Fantasizer Robert C. Priddy. Further strengthening the argument that Robert C. Priddy appears to be projecting his latent homosexuality onto others is the irrefutable fact that Robert C. Priddy ceaselessly drools and monomaniacally blathers about “genital oilings” and describes them with great relish and in great detail although he never received or witnessed a single “genital oiling” himself! Why does Robert C. Priddy express so much fascination and intrigue with alleged “genital oilings” when he knows absolutely nothing about them except from what he’s heard through others?

Since Robert C. Priddy never received a so-called “genital oiling” from Sathya Sai Baba, why does he present himself as a proxy authority on “genital oilings”? The few alleged victims who claimed they received “oilings” are nowhere to be found, are completely silent on the issue and have since long disappeared from the internet scene. Why is Robert C. Priddy foaming at the mouth, raising a huge wail, gnashing his teeth and acting as a proxy spokesperson for alleged victims when he has no direct experience of what he alleges to be “irrefutably true”? Robert C. Priddy’s homoerotic assumptions, homoerotic speculations and homoerotic conspiracies about “genital oilings” arise solely from his groin and not from any first-hand experience. Robert C. Priddy is not credible and cannot be trusted to accurately or honestly relay details about alleged “genital oilings” because he openly fabricated a “genital oiling” account against Gerald Joe Moreno (and adamantly refuses to print a retraction).

Robert C. Priddy is a laughable pervert who had the audacity to fabricate sexual molestation claims against Gerald Joe Moreno.

Robert C. Priddy is a laughable con-artist who published fraudulent screencaps against Gerald Joe Moreno and adamantly refuses to vindicate his claims by publishing full screencaps to Moreno’s vishvarupa.com domain.

Robert C. Priddy is a laughable stooge who attributed his own computer’s IP to Gerald Joe Moreno.

Robert C. Priddy is in perpetual denial and publicly defends his laughable SheilaWaring Lie even though other critics have distanced themselves from that controversy.

Robert Priddy is a laughable LSD Advocate who even cited a Pro-Drug Forum intended for Drug Users to defend his LSD-induced hallucinations.

The list goes on and on.

The more Robert C. Priddy drools, squirms and obsesses over alleged “genital oilings”, the more one wonders why Robert C. Priddy is so thoroughly fascinated by that topic. More importantly, one is left to wonder why the parents to all of these alleged “victims” have never (ever) filed a single public grievance, basic police complaint or court case in India against the Guru.

Robert C. Priddy not only acts as a proxy spokesperson for alleged victims, he also acts as a “proxy guardian” because alleged victim’s mothers and fathers have all (without exception) failed in their moral, ethical and legal duties by ignoring the alleged molestations of their children. The reason why Robert C. Priddy does not shut up is because if he did, the silence would be deafening because no one else besides critics are making all the fuss.

Ex-Devotees (including Robert C. Priddy) ceaselessly reference the alleged credibility of Ullrich Zimmermann (a German ex-devotee of Sathya Sai Baba and current devotee of the alleged 35,000 year-old Lemurian Warrior and Ascended Master “Ramtha”). Although Ullrich Zimmermann made several unbelievable and graphic claims about Sathya Sai Baba (which he originally recalled while drunk at a Ramtha “wine ceremony”), Ullrich Zimmermann related an alleged oiling experience that was completely and wholly non-sexual.

According to Ullrich Zimmermann, Sathya Sai Baba rubbed materialized oil down the “kundalini line” on his chest and was instantaneously and miraculously cured of a chronic breathing ailment due to too much smoking. Although Ullrich Zimmermann apparently had nothing to hide and divulged alleged “tantric” experiences with the Guru, his only alleged “oiling” experience never involved his pubic region or genitals and he never had his pants pulled down.

Since Robert C. Priddy believes Ullrich Zimmermann (despite bashing and trashing channelers, mediums and New Age believers as belonging to the “lunatic fringe” seen in cults, ashrams and New Religious Movements), one is left to wonder why Robert Priddy ceaselessly fantasizes about “genital oilings” when Ullrich Zimmermann (who apparently had nothing to hide) described his “oiling” to be wholly and completely non-sexual. As a matter of fact, Ullrich Zimmermann’s mother is still a Sai Devotee and apparently felt that her son’s alleged encounters with Sathya Sai Baba were just as miraculous and wonderful as he described them to be. Ullrich Zimmermann even claimed that his alleged “white tantric” experiences with Sathya Sai Baba were “honors” conferred upon him (which made the person filming Zimmermann’s account gasp out loud)!

In conclusion, Robert C. Priddy needs to shut up and let the alleged victims and their mothers and fathers talk for themselves. The fact that alleged victims and their mothers and fathers are not talking strongly suggests that Sathya Sai Baba did nothing wrong. Robert C. Priddy should take his gripes to the parents of alleged victims and should be castigating them for ignoring their children’s alleged molestations.

Sathya Sai Baba has never (ever) been charged with any crime, sexual or otherwise and critics cannot provide a scintilla of credible or verifiable information to the contrary.

See:
- SaiSathyaSai: Exposing Critic’s Smear Campaigns Against Sathya Sai Baba

Priddy's Pornographic Submissions

2009-10-07T11:09:00.000-07:00

Robert Priddy: The Anti-Sai-Baba Extremist

Homoerotic Fantasizer Robert Priddy and Psychic Trance Medium Conny Larsson (both caustic critics and laughable defamers of Sathya Sai Baba and others) have been so determined and desperate in their smear campaigns against Gerald Joe Moreno (a Pro-Sai Activist) they have ridiculously accused Moreno of “submitting” Ex-Devotee’s names to pornography websites and then “publicizing” it!

The following screencap provides the so-called “proof” that Robert Priddy and Conny Larsson cited against Moreno:

Because Moreno’s blog titles and blog descriptions appeared on pornography websites, Robert Priddy and Conny Larsson alleged that Moreno must have “submitted” and “publicized” his own articles through pornography websites! This self-serving argument puts Robert Priddy in a tenuous position.

If Priddy & Larsson’s claims are true (they aren’t) then this must mean that Robert Priddy “submitted” and “publicized” his webpages through pornography websites because his webpage links, webpage descriptions and webpage titles similarly appeared on pornographic websites. See for yourself:

Needless to say, Robert Priddy and Conny Larsson (internet newbies who continually embarrass themselves with their idiotic cyber-sleuthing; such as The Bogus IPs and The Laughable SheilaWaring Lie) are apparently unaware of the reality of pornography spamdexing. Whenever any webpage discusses sexual content (which is invariably the case when discussing Ex-Devotees and their bizarre and deviant sexual obsessions), pornography websites attempt to obtain higher rankings by stealing titles and descriptions that will help them get higher internet traffic.

It is 100% true that Robert Priddy’s primary Anti-Sai webpage was indexed on porn sites because Priddy paid to get his Anti-Sai Site listed on SeekInsider.com (which is a no longer existent, pay-per-click Search Engine) under the Category: “World Wide Sex Com - World Wide Sex Directory - World Wide Sex” (View Google Cache)! Guess Robert Priddy did not have the foresight to see that by listing his website on a World Wide Sex Directory, porn sites would index his site for content! Of course, none of this is surprising considering that Robert Priddy is an LSD Advocate who is thoroughly obsessed with genital oilings and relishes projecting his homoerotic fantasies onto Moreno.

Robert Priddy’s criticisms against Moreno are a source of great amusement considering that Robert Priddy is very good buddies with openly bisexual Conny Larsson (who is admittedly sexually attracted to men and who is no stranger to homosexual sex)!

Of course, Robert Priddy and his psychic & bisexual buddy Conny Larsson cannot provide a scintilla of credible proof that Moreno “submitted” and “publicized” his articles through pornography websites. The so-called “proof” that Robert Priddy and Conny Larsson cited against Moreno only serves to implicate them as well. Too bad Conny Larsson’s psychic prowess couldn’t save Robert Priddy from even more public embarrassement. Tsk.

Relevant Pornography Spamdexing Links:
- OrganicSpam.com About Spamdexing
- Wikipedia Article About Spamdexing
- Moodle Addresses Spamdexing
- Spamdexing - The Bane Of Search Engine Optimization
- Musa Aykac Writes About Spamdexing

Robert Priddy - Blogged Articles To Date

2009-10-01T20:11:00.000-07:00

Is Robert Priddy A Latent Homosexual?

2009-09-30T11:56:00.000-07:00

Is Robert Priddy A Latent Homosexual?

Dear Friends And Fellow Readers,

This article is very important for several reasons. First, it documents the vicious behaviors of Ex-Devotees of Sathya Sai Baba (who often claim they are “credible”, “honest,” and “sincere” individuals). Secondly, this article is important because it documents the unbelievable extents that Ex-Devotees of Sathya Sai Baba will go in order to malign, defame and libel others. Lastly, this article is important because it reveals the dubious standards that Ex-Devotees use to determine what they consider “sexual abuse” and/or “sexual molestation”.

Since former followers of Sathya Sai Baba unremittingly and falsely accuse Gerald ‘Joe’ Moreno of being “molested sexually” by Sathya Sai Baba, Moreno’s story is unique and provides a revealing and telltale glimpse into the mindset, fanaticism and extremism that altogether exemplifies the Anti-Sathya-Sai-Baba Movement.

Robert Priddy (a caustic critic and defamer of Sathya Sai Baba who once hailed the Guru as God Incarnate and who once fervently Worshipped And Kissed The Guru’s Feet) wrote more blatant disinformation on his Anti-Baba blog about Gerald Joe Moreno (a Pro-Sai Activist).

The case is easily made that Robert Priddy is a bitter, vindictive and sexually-debauched defamer and propagator of disinformation against Gerald Joe Moreno (henceforth referred to as “Moreno”). Ex-Devotee’s willful, malicious and obsessive claims about Moreno being “molested sexually” by Sathya Sai Baba has undeniably cast a dark shadow of suspicion and doubt on their self-professed and alleged “credibility”, “honesty” and “sincerity”.

Moreno has refuted the “sexual molestation” libels against him going back to July 2006. See:

Moreno Refutes Allegations Of Sexual Abuse

Robert Priddy Falsifies Sexual Molestation Claim (View Blog Version)

Sai Petition And More Sexual Abuse Libels (View Blog Version)

Dirty Old Man Robert Priddy (View Blog Version)

Moreno’s Response To Sanjay Dadlani

Let us take a look at what Robert Priddy wrote on September 26th 2009 (underlined and bold emphasis added by Moreno):

robertpriddy.wordpress.com/2009/09/26/gerald-morenos-wildest-attack-so-far
Robert Priddy: “His biggest point in his overwrought blog is that I wrote that Sai Baba pulled down his pants - which statement I did not attribute to him as he also claims.”

Let us take a look at what Robert Priddy wrote on April 1st 2009, which is still located on his blog as of September 30th 2009 (underlined emphasis added by Moreno):

robertpriddy.wordpress.com/2009/04/01/sathyasaibaba-specious-claims-and-self-defeating-arguments/
Robert Priddy: “Moreno has himself described how his pants were lowered by Sathya Sai Baba lowered and he was ‘oiled’ on his ‘lower stomach’.”

Therefore, Robert Priddy did in fact claim that Moreno “himself described how his pants were lowered by Sathya Sai Baba” (a bold-faced and gutter untruth and libel). Now, however, Robert Priddy would have everyone believe that he never attributed the “Sai Baba pulled down his pants” comment to Moreno when in fact he did attribute that comment to Moreno. This is the type of typical sleaze and typical disinformation that Robert Priddy peddles to unsuspecting readers on his Anti-Baba blogs and Anti-Baba websites on almost a daily (sometimes twice-daily) basis.

Robert Priddy is so forgetful, he cannot even recall what he wrote and what he said about Moreno. It would appear that Robert Priddy is exhibiting signs and symptoms that strongly suggest his mental faculties are failing him. Robert Priddy’s numerous “Not So Priddy Blunders” are fully documented on Moreno’s webpage entitled: Robert Priddy - Oslo, Norway.

Robert Priddy’s Homoerotic Imaginations
Now, let us take a look at Robert Priddy’s sexually-twisted and sexually-focused homoerotic imaginations relating to Moreno’s interview with Sathya Sai Baba:

Robert Priddy: “Nonetheless, I hold that Sai Baba MUST, in one way or another got to lower Moreno’s pants. He is reported as pulling down pants by many of those who describe molestations. To those who have not been to a Sai Baba interview, know that no young man [since at least the 1970s] could ever get into an interview with Sathya Sai Baba unless dressed in the traditional Indian white so-called ‘pyjama suit’ (usually of cotton, as seen in countless videos) The trousers are kepy up by a string tied at the front, or a belt in some less usual cases. Therefore, for Sai Baba to be able to massage ‘the lower stomach‘ it was customary (according to numerous testimonies) for him to require that the knot be undone and the cotton ‘pyjama’ lowered. To put his hand down the trouser without loosening the string would be extremely unusual (and would itself constitute as bad a violation as pulling down the young man’s pants). Now, whether Sai Baba asked or motioned to Joe Moreno to drop his pants, or whether he pulled the bow fastener himself is a matter of no consequence. He got where he wanted to go. His authority with those who believe him to be a great soul – and usually God Incarnate – means he can and does in effect ‘pull down pants’, however it is done. Moreno claims Sai Baba did not pull them down. This is only an attempt at an adroit avoidance of the issue – he was oiled on the lower stomach (by his own admission).”

Robert Priddy argued that Sathya Sai Baba “MUST” have lowered Moreno’s pants because others alleged it happened to them. This “MUST” mean that anyone who has ever had a private interview with Sathya Sai Baba “MUST” have had their pants lowered as well, which brings us to Robert Priddy’s private interviews. Did Sathya Sai Baba similarly lower Robert Priddy’s pants and is he “too embarrassed” to talk about it? It does not matter what excuses, defenses, denials or refutations Robert Priddy gave or will give, his private interviews “MUST” be viewed in the exact manner as he views Moreno’s private interview.

Just as Robert Priddy denies Moreno’s first-hand account, one must similarly deny Robert Priddy’s first-hand account.

Just as Robert Priddy ignores Moreno’s claims of not being sexually molested by Sathya Sai Baba, one must similarly ignore Robert Priddy’s claims of not being sexually molested by Sathya Sai Baba.

Just as Robert Priddy concludes that Moreno is “too embarrassed” to talk about being “molested sexually” by Sathya Sai Baba, one must similarly conclude that Robert Priddy is “too embarrassed” to talk about being “molested sexually” by Sathya Sai Baba.

Needless to say, Moreno does not believe that Robert Priddy was molested by Sathya Sai Baba. Rather, Moreno is attempting to show how Robert Priddy’s self-serving and irrational arguments could be mirrored back at him and would implicate him in the very same situation he tries to place Moreno.

Robert Priddy has never been able to refute or shake off similar accusations made against him by Leo Rebello. See: Leo Rebello’s $1,000,000 Legal Threat For Defamation Against Robert Priddy.

Let it go on record that Moreno did not wear white pajama clothing on his first visit to see Sathya Sai Baba and most certainly did not wear white pajama clothing in his interview with the Guru. As a matter of fact, Moreno was wearing grey jeans with a belt and a grey button-down shirt! Since Moreno was new to Sathya Sai Baba’s ashram, he did not dress in white pajama clothing like other devotees because he did not originally plan to visit the Guru (Moreno visited Sathya Sai Baba only after a miraculous experience he had while in Calcutta). Although Moreno was advised (several times) to wear white pajama clothing at the Guru’s ashram, he could not find any clothing that fit him properly and decided to wear his own Western clothes instead.

Since Robert Priddy is a sexually imbalanced person who relies on homosexual fantasies and homosexual imaginations to make his arguments against Moreno, it is not really surprising that Robert Priddy considers the belly button to be part of one’s genitals!

Robert Priddy is absolutely clueless about the details of Moreno’s interview. Robert Priddy actually had the audacity to fabricate stories against Moreno by resorting to assumption, speculation and conspiracy. If Ex-Devotee’s have the audacity to fabricate sexual molestation claims against Moreno, what other sexual molestation claims are they fabricating as well?

Moreno has consistently and repeatedly denied Ex-Devotee’s absurd claims that Sathya Sai Baba pulled down his pants. Even though Moreno’s statements are well documented, Robert Priddy continues to argue (like a drooling and insatiable pervert in utter denial) that Moreno’s first-hand account is to be rejected while Priddy’s libidinous speculations are to be accepted! This is the Golden Standard that Ex-Devotees use to determine who has been “sexually abused” or “sexually molested” by Sathya Sai Baba.

Robert Priddy’s Disturbing Homosexual Fantasies
Robert Priddy is a big advocate of psychological projection and often uses “psychological projection” as an argument to defend himself and belittle his detractors. Using the argument of “psychological projection”, Robert Priddy appears to be 100% “projecting” latent homosexual desires onto Moreno that are manifesting as obscene, erotic and explicit homosexual fantasies that involve his former Guru.

All of Robert Priddy’s graphic and sexual descriptions about what he speculated and imagined happened to Moreno in his interview with Sathya Sai Baba arise solely from Priddy’s groin and not from any factual, verifiable or known writings from Moreno.

Robert Priddy is continually and obsessively immersing himself in graphic, homosexual fantasies that involve specific homosexual acts that he imagines and visualizes to be true although they are not based in reality or on any known writings by Moreno. It would appear that Robert Priddy is obtaining some sort of deviant sexual arousal by intensely imagining and visualizing homosexual acts involving Moreno and his former Guru.

Robert Priddy’s Miscellaneous Homoerotica
Strange enough, Robert Priddy’s own son (Kai Nicolai Priddy) belonged to an industrial band from Norway that used dildos and transvestites as theatrics in their music performances (Ref). Apparently, the apple didn’t fall far from the tree.

Although Robert Priddy originally interpreted his Sai-related dreams to be blessings from the Guru, he currently argues that Sai-related dreams are the result of one’s subconcious desires and projections. Robert Priddy dreamed that Sathya Sai Baba kissed him on the mouth and drew up impurities associated with his “muladhara chakra” (Source Of The Dream by Robert Priddy; “Enigmas of Suffering and Healing”, pp. 174-175). The muladhara chakrum is the subtle “sex center” often associated with sexual energy, sexual desire and the genitals.

Therefore, using Robert Priddy’s current interpretations of Sai-related dreams, it would appear that he entertained sexual desires for his former Guru, which were projected into the dream state where his subconscious desires manifested as his former Guru kissing him on the mouth and sucking up and swallowing a substance drawn from his astral sex-center! Since Robert Priddy formerly attributed significance to this dream, his current views about Sai-related dreams has solidly situated himself between a rock and a hard place!

Robert Priddy’s Homoeroticism - In Conclusion
It is a fact that heterosexual men are not known to enjoy projecting, imagining and visualizing homosexual acts between other men (as Robert Priddy has done and continues to do). It is also a fact that heterosexual men are not known to enjoy re-writing non-sexual stories and making them into homo-erotic stories full of graphic and homosexual descriptions based on flights of imagination (as Robert Priddy has done and continues to do). Therefore, a strong argument could be made that Robert Priddy appears to be a sexually frustrated, sexually obsessed and ambiguously sexually oriented individual in need of orthodox psychosexual help.

Robert Priddy (one of the main spokespersons for the Anti-Sai Movement) embodies the perversion, deviancy and pruriency that are widely prevalent among critics of Sathya Sai Baba. Blinded by his own hate, Robert Priddy presents himself as the single most persuasive argument why one should not believe the allegations against Sathya Sai Baba. For that, Robert Priddy is to be thanked.

Robert Priddy's 9-11 Blunder

2009-09-11T21:22:00.000-07:00

Robert Priddy (a caustic critic and defamer of Sathya Sai Baba) wrote a blogged article today on 9-11-09 entitled “Twin Tower Disaster & Sathya Sai Baba”, which began with the following sentence:

Robert Priddy: Today it is 11 years since the Twin Towers disaster...

For Robert Priddy’s information, the 9-11 attacks occurred in the year 2001, not 1998. Today is the eighth-year anniversary (not eleventh) commemorating the 9-11 attacks.

Robert Priddy is so desperate to dupe his readers into believing he is credible, he actually posted a side-menu section on his blog claiming he is “healthy” with “unimpaired memory”! Needless to say, numerous articles reveal what appears to be the onslaught of senile dementia in Robert Priddy: For example, see:

Robert Priddy & The SheilaWaring Lie

The Joe Apodaca Sexual Abuse Lie

Falsified Sexual Abuse Allegations Against Moreno

Robert Priddy - A Devotee For 18 To 26 Years

Robert Priddy’s Embarrassing Wikipedia Blunder

Robert Priddy’s Lie About Lisa DeWitt

Priddy’s Colossal Ignorance About IPs

Robert Priddy Cited A Pro-Drug Forum Intended For Drug Users!

etc., etc., etc. (the list goes on and on)

Let’s hope that Robert Priddy will get someone to proof-read his loose and typically inaccurate articles before he further embarrasses himself.

Robert Priddy vs Richard Dawkins

2009-06-12T08:09:00.000-07:00

ROBERT PRIDDY VS RICHARD DAWKINS

Robert Priddy & Psychic Trance Medium Conny Larsson
Robert Priddy (a caustic critic and defamer of Sathya Sai Baba who once hailed the Guru as God Incarnate and thereby the Father who sent Jesus, Allah who sent Muhammad and the Creator of the Universe) is now being advertised on self-professed prophet & psychic medium Conny Larsson’s New Age Cult website Heart & Soul Expo.

Conny Larsson was one of the primary founding members to the Anti-Sai Movement who quickly began peddling himself as an internationally renowned trance medium, self-proclaimed Prophet & psychic healer just after he defected from the Sai Movement. Besides Conny Larsson’s vedicmasterclass.org and saibabaexpose.com domains, Conny Larsson is one of two “International Coordinators” (the other being Judith Bourque) for the psychic and New Age domain Heart & Soul Expo. The Heart & Soul Expo website solicits the following areas of expertise:

Heart & Soul Expo: Inspirational speakers plus: Acupressure, Angel therapy, Aura photography, Breath Work, Clairvoyance, Crystal Healing, Crystal Bowl Therapy, Diana Cooper School of Angel Healing, Energy Biofeedback Therapy, Environmental issues, Esoteric teachings, Feldenkreis therapy, Indian Head Massage Practitioner, Life Counsellor, Meditation, Oriental Dance Teachers, Pranic Healing, Psychic Medium, Reflexology, Reiki Practitioners / Masters, Shamanism, Tai Chi, Vedic Meditation Master, Yoga Teachers. Company products such as organic herbs, natural products, crystals, gemstones and gemstone jewellery, angels, fairies, Buddha’s. meditation CDs, incense and essential oils, meditation scarves and books. (Ref)

Although Robert Priddy continually attempts to con the general public into thinking he is entirely given to scientific reasoning, he is actually a true believer and a fierce defender, promoter, endorser, solicitor and friend to various self-professed psychics, trance mediums, reiki healers, guru wannabees, superstitionists, eccentric spiritualists, astrologers (including his own son, Kai Nicolai Priddy, who is heavily into astrology and is the webmaster for abacusastrology.co.uk) and other “lunatic fringe” Baba bashers.

ROUND ONE: Priddy vs Dawkins
Richard Dawkins wins with a knock-out punch to Robert Priddy’s pseudo-intellectual head. Robert Priddy’s adamant refusal to say one word against psychic medium Conny Larsson (although he trashed and bashed other psychics, mediums and channelers as “absurd charlatans”) thoroughly compromises his pseudo-skeptical rants.

Robert Priddy Hypocritically Cited Richard Dawkins
Robert Priddy (who can often be seen siding with and citing skeptics, atheists and rationalists against Sathya Sai Baba) wrote a hypocritical and deceitful article entitled “Sathya Sai Baba vs Richard Dawkins” and said (in part):

Robert Priddy: Richard Dawkins has some pertinent comments on how ‘personal religious experiences’ come about which the ‘blind believer’ should learn:-

“The human brain runs first-class simulation software. Our eyes don’t present to our brains a faithful photograph of what is out there, or an accurate movie of what is going on through time. Our brains construct a continuously updated model” and...

“Constructing models is something the human brain is very good at. When we are asleep it is called dreaming; when we are awake we call it imagination or, when it is exceptionally vivid, hallucination. As Chapter 10 will show, children who have ‘imaginary friends’ sometimes see them clearly, exactly as if they were real. If we are gullible, we don’t recognize hallucination or lucid dreaming for what it is and we claim to have seen or heard a ghost; or an angel; or God; or – especially if we happen to be young, female and Catholic – the Virgin Mary. Such visions and manifestations are certainly not good grounds for believing that ghosts or angels, gods or virgins, are actually there.On the face of it mass visions, such as the report that seventy thousand pilgrims at Fatima in Portugal in 1917 saw the sun tear itself from the heavens and come crashing down upon the multitude, are harder to write off. It is not easy to explain how seventy thousand people could share the same hallucination. But it is even harder to accept that it really happened without the rest of the world, outside Fatima, seeing it too – and not just seeing it, but feeling it as the catastrophic destruction of the solar system, including acceleration forces sufficient to hurl everybody into space.” From ‘The God Delusion’ by Richard Dawkins, p. 115.

Richard Dawkins FRS, FRSL (born 26 March 1941) is a British ethologist, evolutionary biologist and popular science author. He was formerly Professor for Public Understanding of Science at Oxford and was a fellow of New College, Oxford. Dawkins is an atheist, secular humanist, sceptic, scientific rationalist, and supporter of the Brights movement. He has widely been referred to in the media as “Darwin’s Rottweiler”, by analogy with English biologist T. H. Huxley, who was known as “Darwin’s Bulldog” for his advocacy of Charles Darwin’s evolutionary ideas. In his 2006 book The God Delusion, Dawkins contends that a supernatural creator almost certainly does not exist and that faith qualifies as a delusion − as a fixed false belief. According to Dawkins, faith − belief that is not based on evidence − is one of the world’s great evils (Ref). Richard Dawkins is also a fierce critic of New Age alternative therapies, psychics, mediums, channelers, faith healers, angel therapists, aura photographers, astrologers, tarot card readers, homeopathists and water diviners.

The following excerpts were taken from an article published on the Times Online website entitled “Richard Dawkins And The New Age Fakers”:

This time, in The Enemies of Reason, he takes on the wider penumbra of the paranormal, New Age mystical mumbo-jumbo, and the often expensive spiritual services that bring succour to the sucker. His targets include astrologers, psychics, dowsers, homoeopaths and a woman called Elisis Livingstone who claims that in our Atlantean past we all had 12 strands of DNA rather than two...Much of the material may seem familiar to interested sceptics: the practice of cold-reading, whereby “psychics” pick up cues from their audience’s reactions to a scattering of vague words and phrases and use them to make people imagine they have been told something that relates specifically to them. Or the fact that homoeopathic remedies are claimed to work despite containing not a single molecule of the supposed active ingredient. The programmes feature a series of confrontations with assorted paranormal professionals who are asked to explain the basis behind their belief and whether it has ever been scientifically tested...So how many of these practitioners are crooks? “The psychics, I think, mostly are,” he says. “But with one spiritualist I couldn’t make out if he was a charlatan or not. It’s possible that they sort of know that they’re cold-reading, but they still think it’s the spirits channelling through them.” (Reference)

The following excerpts were taken from an article entitled “New Age Therapies Cause ‘Retreat From Reason’” and were originally published in the Sunday Telegraph UK on August 8th 2007:

Known as “Darwin’s rottweiler“, Prof Richard Dawkins caused a furore with a stinging attack on religion. Now the evolutionary biologist has turned his wrath on “new age” alternative therapies, describing them as based on “irrational superstition”. Prof Dawkins says that alternative remedies constitute little more than a “money-spinning, multi-million pound industry that impoverishes our culture and throws up new age gurus who exhort us to run away from reality.” The 66-year-old scientist has investigated a range of gurus and therapists, including faith healers, psychic mediums, angel therapists, “aura photographers”, astrologers, Tarot card readers and water diviners, and concluded that Britain is gripped by “an epidemic of superstitious thinking”....He laments the fact that half the population claims to believe in paranormal phenomena and more than eight million have consulted psychic mediums, while the number of students sitting physics A-level has fallen 50 per cent and chemistry by more than a third in the past 25 years....The professor reserves some of his most scathing criticism for homeopathy, used by 500 million people worldwide, and which, in the UK, benefits from taxpayers’ money even though it requires no qualifications.

Richard Dawkins has authored the following books:

“The Greatest Show On Earth : The Evidence For Evolution” by Richard Dawkins (To be released in September 2009)

“The Oxford Book of Modern Science Writing ” by Richard Dawkins; Published by Oxford University Press 2008

“The God Delusion” by Richard Dawkins; Published by Houghton Mifflin 2006

“The Selfish Gene” by Richard Dawkins; Published by Oxford University Press 2006

“The Ancestor's Tale : A Pilgrimage to the Dawn of Life” by Richard Dawkins; Published by Mariner Books 2005

“A Devil’s Chaplain : Reflections on Hope, Lies, Science, and Love” by Richard Dawkins; Published by Mariner Books 2004

“Unweaving the Rainbow : Science, Delusion and the Appetite for Wonder” by Richard Dawkins; Published by Mariner Books 2000

“The Extended Phenotype : The long reach of the gene” by Richard Dawkins; Published by Oxford University Press 1999

“Climbing Mount Improbable ” by Richard Dawkins; Published by W.W. Norton & Company 1997

“The Blind Watchmaker : Why the Evidence of Evolution Reveals a Universe Without Design” by Richard Dawkins; Published by W.W. Norton 1996

“River Out of Eden : A Darwinian View of Life” by Richard Dawkins; Published by HarperCollins Publishers 1996

Despite his hypocritical citations to Richard Dawkins, Robert Priddy openly promotes, endorses and/or professes friendship with:

Trance Channeler & Self-Proclaimed Prophet Conny Larsson

Guru Promoter, UFO Conspiracist & True Believer PhD Timothy Conway

New Age Advocate & Reincarnator Alan Kazlev

Self-Proclaimed Spiritual Master ‘Ramana Baba’

Ramtha Devotee Ullrich Zimmermann

Fetishist & Hare Krsna Congregational Member Sanjay Dadlani

Reiki Master And Spiritual Healer Yaman Konuralp

As a matter of fact, when Robert Priddy attempts to defend himself against Joe Moreno (a Pro-Sai Activist) he directs his readers to either:

Psychic Trance Medium Conny Larsson’s website (located at saibabaexpose.com)

Reincarnator, New Age Advocate and Grungy Integral Philosopher Alan Kazlev’s website (located at kheper.net)

How’s that for “scientific” or “rational”? Robert Priddy is obviously a very gullible and naive “true believer” who is willing to give credence to non-scientific beliefs by claiming that trance mediums, self-proclaimed prophets, aura readers, séance conductors, New Age advocates, guru adherents, self-proclaimed reincarnators, New Age believers and the like are intelligent, honest, credible and reliable individuals worthy of being referenced by him (a so-called “scholar” and “academic” not given to lunatic fringe or superstitious beliefs)! To Date: Robert Priddy adamantly refuses to say one word about his promotion and endorsement of these “lunatic fringe” (Priddy's favorite slur) individuals.

Apparently, Robert Priddy didn’t read Richard Dawkins “pertinent comments on how personal religious experiences come about which the blind believer should learn”. By citing Richard Dawkins against “blind believers”, Robert Priddy effectively invalidates the credibility, integrity and honesty of Conny Larsson (an alleged meditation guru, mantra acharya, trance medium, yoga instructor, pet psychic, Vedic Master, psychic healer & self-proclaimed prophet), Alan Kazlev (a grungy integral philosopher, reincarnator, New Age advocate and an alleged alien exiled to Earth to save the planet), Phd Timothy Conway (a true believer in New Age beliefs & practices, a solicitor of psychics and oracles, a UFO advocate and an author promoting numerous Gurus and Eastern philosophies), Sanjay Dadlani (a Hare Krishna congregational member who advocates for the literal and historical accuracy of the miracles described in Hindu scriptures), Tony O’Clery (a self-professed psychic, demon trance channeler and promoter of shape-shifters), Paul Eno (a self-professed psychic, intuitive, past life reader, Angel advocate and afterlife preparer), Kai Nicolai Priddy (Robert Priddy’s son who is heavily involved with astrology and is the webmaster for abacusastrology.co.uk), Ullrich Zimmermann (a Ramtha adherent who believes in a 36,000 year old entity as channeled through the alleged psychic medium JZ Knight), David J. Lyons (a member of IONS and a believer in Edgar Cayce), Julian O’Donnell (a self-professed psychic with alleged vast powers to combat the forces of evil), Kyra Kitts (a self-professed psychic and channeler), Dhyani Jo Sinclair (a New Age advocate and promoter of pyramid power), Alexandra Nagel (a believer in psychic medium Jane Roberts and psychic Wolf Messing), Barbara Dent (a fanatic Christian, a self-professed visionary, an alleged channeler of Mother Mary, a past life reviewer and astral traveler with the alleged power to make men impotent), Dilip Rajeev (a homeopathist, Bach flower therapy practitioner, fanatic promoter of the Falung Dafa cult and a creationist highly critical of science and the fossil record), Rin Meddo (a clearly schizophrenic and mentally unstable defamer of Sathya Sai Baba who claims possession), among numerous other “lunatic fringe” individuals belonging to the Anti-Baba movement (Ref).

ROUND TWO: Priddy vs Dawkins
Richard Dawkins wins with an incapacitating jab to Robert Priddy’s yellow-belly. Robert Priddy’s intimate association with various self-professed psychics and New Age adherents undermines his so-called scientific temper.

Robert Priddy And True Believer Helen Fields
On Trance Medium Conny Larsson’s psychic website (Heart & Soul Expo), Helen Fields (a reflexologist, reiki practitioner and Angel advocate) published various articles from Robert Priddy’s book “Beyond Science”, which is critical of the scientific method. As a matter of fact, Psychic Conny Larsson (under whose direct supervision the Heart & Expo website operates) apparently obtained Robert Priddy’s permission to publish his articles (as Priddy constantly whines about his “copyrights”) and apparently directed Helen Fields to publish Robert Priddy’s articles on his psychic domain because he is attempting to use Priddy’s articles as a prop, defense and alternative philosophical explanation for the purported claims made by psychics, mediums, trance channelers, angel/spirit guides, etc.!

Some priceless gems from pseudo-scientist and pseudo-rationalist Robert Priddy (one wonders what Richard Dawkins would think):

Robert Priddy: Having said all this, nonetheless, one must admit that there is no method by which the possibility of genuine divine revelation can be disproved, even though some sources can be largely discredited on sound research grounds. By carefully considering some of the content of many scriptures, one can well understand how the sublimity of conception and the resonance of ideas convince millions of their truth and their value as precepts, these convictions usually increasing with personal maturity. (“Revealed Truth”; Ref: Beyond Science (Without A Disclaimer As Of June 2009), by Robert Priddy)

Robert Priddy: We cannot perhaps be convinced that we are essentially nothing but truth, consciousness and bliss until, on some occasion at least, we experience it directly as such. The problem of truth is only fully resolved in Being. Meanwhile, faith of the kind rooted in experience inspires the understanding to move the spirit beyond the constraints of worldly attachments towards realisation. Through Vedanta we learn that only self-revealed truth, or of some aspect thereof, is universal. What is often called perennial or higher philosophy teaches that truth is to be found in the unsullied divinity shining through from deep within every being and each event. (“Transcendental Inexpressible Truth”; Ref: Beyond Science (Without A Disclaimer As Of June 2009), by Robert Priddy)

Robert Priddy: One also speaks of ‘intuitions’ that come ‘as a sixth sense’ and purport to reveal states of affairs that are hidden to normal perception. These cannot safely be ignored by truth-seekers, for some such intuitions have proven extremely accurate, as can be demonstrated beyond reasonable doubt from many of the countless recorded instances from all around the world throughout history. One cannot even discount all prophetic inspiration, nor any kind of ‘message’ from such supposed sources of information as trance and mediumism may contact, like disembodied minds or higher astral beings. (“Truth And Intuition”; Ref: Beyond Science (Without A Disclaimer As Of June 2009), by Robert Priddy)

On the Heart & Soul Expo domain, Helen Fields page states:

“Helen Fields is a Member of the Association of Reflexologists (MAR). She qualified as a Reflexologist in 1990 and have developed her skills alongside a career in nursing and health care education. Helen uses Reflexology as the starting point and then draws on her work with personal development coaching, NLP (Neuro-Linguistic Programming), Reiki, Angels and EFT (Emotional Freedom Therapy).” (Ref)

On the Vedic Master Class domain, Helen Fields is listed under “courses” and “teachers” (Refs: 01 - 02) and her profile states:

Helen Fields, England/Cyprus - Registered nurse and healthcare educator. Reflexologist since 1990. Works holistically as a therapist, using Reflexology as a starting point and then drawing from training in NLP, EFT, Reiki, Spiritual Response Therapy and angels. Helen enables clients to become the best of who they are, allowing their bodies to remember wellness. At the Masters Class she presented reflexology along with some techniques for self treatment.

Of course, the big questions are:

Why is Helen Fields publishing Robert Priddy’s articles when he cited Richard Dawkins as a credible voice against superstition, New Age beliefs, reiki practitioners, gurus, true believers, blind believers, angel promoters and the “lunatic fringe” seen in cults, ashrams and new religious movements?

Why hasn’t Robert Priddy said one word against psychic medium Conny Larsson although he cited Richard Dawkins as a credible voice against psychics, mediums and channelers?

Why is Robert Priddy allowing Conny Larsson and Helen Fields to publish his anti-science rants on a psychic website when he is a fierce advocate for Richard Dawkins, Basava Premanand and other skeptics, atheists and rationalists who constantly belittle, ridicule and challenge people who claim paranormal abilities?

Why is Robert Priddy allowing Conny Larsson to use his articles to justify and bolster the notion that psychics and New Age believers may be bona fide and have genuine spiritual experiences, intuitions and gifts?

Why is Robert Priddy constantly citing psychic medium Conny Larsson as a credible voice against Sathya Sai Baba but purposely withholding any and all information about Conny Larsson’s psychic claims?

If Robert Priddy truly believes that psychics, mediums and channelers are “absurd charlatans”, why did he give a public lecture alongside psychic medium Conny Larsson?

Psychic Medium Larsson With Pseudo-Scientist Priddy

ROUND THREE: Priddy vs Dawkins
Richard Dawkins wins as a discombobulated Robert Priddy knocks himself out. Robert Priddy’s anti-science rants and the publication of his articles on a psychic website to bolster the integrity of New Age advocates undermines his loud-mouthed references to skeptics, rationalists and atheists.

Robert Priddy Formerly Believed In Elementals, Elves And Fairies
In an article entitled “Belief and Manifestations” (which was first published in 1987 and left untouched until 2006) Robert Priddy professed belief in elementals, elves, fairies, mediums, leprechauns, UFOs and demons. After Joe Moreno found the article, Robert Priddy added a disclaimer giving a tongue-in-cheek denial about his former beliefs. Robert Priddy added the disclaimer because his former beliefs (like his use of LSD) clearly undermine his attempt to portray himself as a rationalist and intellectual.

BELIEF AND MANIFESTATIONS
The role of ‘elementals’ in visions and appearances by Robert Priddy

The existence of elementals that seek opportunities to take on any form that a living person’s mind or subconscious can provide for them could explain many otherwise incomprehensible ‘manifestations’, from ghosts and poltergeists to UFOs & extra-terrestrials and even the appearance of divine figures, the manifestation of deities (ishtadarshan) and religious personages. Some of these may be beneficial, some quite the opposite. Advaitic spirituality teaches that, ultimately, everything is a product of mind, which fits very well with this.

Among traditional forms of apparitions and visions in which many believed (and many still do) can sometimes be seen, conversed with and even touched by people are elves, fairies, leprechauns, gnomes, trolls, water spirits, animal and plant spirits or ‘devas’ , angels, invisible helpers', shaman ‘spirits’, ‘allies’ , UFOs, extra-terrestrials, possessive demons, Satan, Pan-figures and other demi-gods. Elementals may sometimes also assume the characteristics (voice, personality traits etc.), or even the physical form, of a departed person, as can allegedly be experienced in spiritualistic sessions.

I am well aware that most people who work in some scientific pursuit, or are involved with psychology and not least in psychiatry, will reject the views I air here, according to the supposed ‘scientific correctness’ of the times. Such professionals are very often too ensconced in their own beliefs to take notice that something is known of matters outside their ken, for they seldom set a foot beyond their mentally-furnished worlds into the uncomfortable realm of real uncertainties or self-risk.

I happen to have had a considerable number of experiences of otherwise inexplicable phenomena that fit with the thesis of elementals. Once, for example, when I was much attracted to nature mysticism, some wonderful synchronicities with creatures took place. (Ref)

ROUND FOUR: Priddy vs Dawkins
Richard Dawkins gives Robert Priddy whopping fat lips on both sides of the mouth he speaks out of. Robert Priddy’s flip-flopping from Anti-Science to Pro-Science, Pro-Superstition to Anti-Superstition, Pro-Psychics to Anti-Psychics back to Pro-Psychics, Pro-LSD to...well, Pro-LSD, etc., reveals his self-serving hypocrisy.

Robert Priddy Still Believes In Paranormal Powers
And to top it all off, Robert Priddy still believes (even to this day, after his defection) that Sathya Sai Baba possesses genuine paranormal powers.

Robert Priddy: “Nonetheless, it will surely surprise some that I am still almost certain - on the basis of extended personal observation - that Sathya Sai Baba can and does carry out apports, which therefore can appear as materialisations from nothing.”

Apports are said to be physical objects in existence that are dematerialized from one location and rematerialized to another.

Robert Priddy: “Some of what I experienced of SSB’s extraordinary and positive powers through many years is undeniable, even after the most rigorous skeptical investigations, and I do not regard him as any ordinary human being. I have simply had to realize that his actions in the worldly and human sphere are not infallible and are not always setting a perfect example for others.”

Robert Priddy believes that Sathya Sai Baba possesses genuine paranormal powers because the Guru cured him of a debilitating and chronic neck and spinal problem that no one else could cure and whose symptoms no doctor could alleviate. Robert Priddy claimed that Sathya Sai Baba cured him through a series of “dream-operations” that resulted in a literal and physical transformation of his spine, which was supported by x-rays and the testimony of Mr. Kylie (“an osteopath and master of various other disciplines”).

Robert Priddy also claimed that Sathya Sai Baba freed his mother from chronic pain and that a small speck of Sathya Sai Baba’s vibuthi instantaneously cured his paralyzed cat when it suffered from what appeared to be a stroke.

Trying to pass himself off as an intellectual who currently holds rationalistic and scientific beliefs, Robert Priddy miserably fails to explain away the enigma of Sathya Sai Baba. Instead, Robert Priddy appears very confused, conflicted and non-intelligent and ends up sticking his foot further into his mouth with his never-ending and very amusing equivocations. At least Richard Dawkins is consistent.

Robert Priddy vs Richard Dawkins: I think it is abundantly clear who the winner (i.e., Dawkins) is and who is the loser (i.e., Priddy).

These are the types of stooges and clowns who are attempting to “expose” Sathya Sai Baba. Next time you open your big mouth Mr. Priddles, make sure you don’t stick your big foot in it for the scientific world to see.

Swami Ambikananda Lambasted Robert Priddy

2009-06-10T22:11:00.000-07:00

Swami Ambikananda Lambasted Robert Priddy

Before Robert Priddy became an overzealous enthusiast of the Indian Guru Bhagavan Sri Sathya Sai Baba, he was a devotee of Swami Ambikananda. About Ambikananda, Robert Priddy said:

Robert Priddy: “When I was connected in the 1970s with a pure Indian swami who lived in England (Swami Ambikananda), and to whom I had an intense relationship for some period, the same kind of synchronous phenomena occurred... and grew into a whole range of simultaneous thoughts-cum-events. It became very troublesome, for the more I concentrated on my connection to him, the more every other thought remotely I had about it seemed to produce a creak in the woodwork of the house or various ‘signs’ relating to him. During one period, the flame of a candle before his picture would ‘answer’ my definitive mental desire for an affirmation by directly sinking almost down to extinction for some time before burning up again.”

Robert Priddy also discussed Swami Ambikananda in his Pro-Baba book “Source Of The Dream - My Way To Sathya Sai Baba” (without mentioning him by name) and claimed that the Swami visited him in dreams, possessed supernatural and psychic powers, passed his predetermined mental tests, was responsible for his marriage to Reidun and that his eyes shone “like burning embers”. Robert Priddy also claimed that a clap of thunder echoed from a clear sky when he entertained the thought that Swami Ambikananda might be a womanizer!

It is significant to note that Swami Ambikananda told Robert Priddy that he should always remember Sai Baba or he “could go mad”. Although Robert Priddy wrote and spoke favorably about Swami Ambikananda, it is surprising that the Swami actually lambasted Robert Priddy as a “skeptic septic tank” (when he had no reason to do so) years before Robert Priddy became a foaming-at-the-mouth skeptic and years before Robert Priddy defected from the Sai Movement! As a matter of fact, Swami Ambikananda died in 1997, three years before Robert Priddy became a rabid ex-devotee.

By reading Robert Priddy’s current writing against Sathya Sai Baba and others, it certainly appears he has gone mad and most certainly is a “skeptic septic tank”. Apparently, there is more to Swami Ambikananda than meets the eye and his prophecy regarding Robert Priddy is wholly remarkable.

Images Curtesy Of:
- Quintessence Ashram
- Quintessence

Copyright Blathering Backfires

2009-05-23T09:10:00.000-07:00

Copyright Blathering Backfires

Robert Priddy (a caustic critic of Sathya Sai Baba and others) maliciously, publicly and widely published three different versions of Gerald Joe Moreno’s picture on WordPress and adamantly refused to remove them despite official requests from Wordpress to do so. As a matter of fact, Robert Priddy said:

Robert Priddy: I fully expected Moreno to complain against me in tit-for-tat fashion as usual, and he did! Mark of wordpress.com mailed (18 March 2009) to warn me that the person in the image I used several times had complained and asked for its removal! So far I have not complied.

As a result of Robert Priddy’s non-compliance, his Anti-Baba blog was delisted from WordPress results. Consequently, Robert Priddy was forced to remove Moreno’s copyright protected images, which he reluctantly did. Moreno’s three images were deleted by WordPress (Refs: 01 - 02 - 03) after Moreno was able to verify and fully substantiate that he is the copyright holder to the image in question (and thus to any derivative images made from it).

Although Robert Priddy and Kai Nicolai Priddy gnashed their teeth, foamed-at-their-mouths and raised huge wails about the following screencapped picture of them, they have been wholly unable to substantiate their claims to possessing the copyright to that screencapped picture (both Robert and Kai each claim copyrights to the picture in the screencap):

To Date: Let it go on record that:

Moreno has never at any time been contacted by WordPress, Google, the DMCA (or anyone else for that matter) about the screencapped image of Robert Priddy & Kai Priddy.

Moreno has never at any time been asked by WordPress, Google, the DMCA (or anyone else for that matter) to remove the screencapped image of Robert Priddy & Kai Priddy.

Therefore, it would appear that both Robert & Kai have been wholly unable to provide any verifiable or credible type of documentation that they are the copyright holders to the image in question.

Let this be a warning to other ex-devotees and critics who think they are free to publish Gerald Joe Moreno’s copyright protected picture in their publications. Since Gerald Joe Moreno is fully able and fully prepared to document that he is the copyright holder to the picture possessed by ex-devotees and critics, anyone caught publishing Moreno’s copyright protected picture in their publications without Moreno’s authorization are subject to legal prosecution for copyright infringement with hefty fines.

Priddy's Htaccess Spin

2009-05-03T08:52:00.000-07:00

Priddy's Htaccess Spin

Robert Priddy (a caustic critic and defamer of Sathya Sai Baba who once hailed the Guru as God Incarnate and thereby the Father who sent Jesus, Allah who sent Muhammad and the Creator of the Universe) wrote another fairy tale about Moreno on his Anti-Baba conspiracy blog.

This time around, Robert Priddy took issue with Moreno’s posts on his TimeLine Page (specifically the posts dated December 8th 2004 and December 10th 2004):

(Gerald Joe Moreno:) December 8th 2004: ExBaba.com, SaiGuru.net, SaiPetition.net and Robert Priddy banned my site from linking to their sites. They redirected the links, from their pages, to a hack-page that opened multiple windows and forced innocent users to shut down their computers!

(Gerald Joe Moreno:) December 10th 2004: ExBaba.com, in a frenzied attempt to maintain soviet-style control over their site, redirected all external links, from their site, to an index2 page that attacks me. This means that one cannot cut and paste the links into the address bar and view the page. The links must be accessed through their main frame. Consequently, you must look for the relevant link via category. ExBaba.com is running scared and trying to prevent the general public from validating my claims easily. This action forces the user to randomly browse their fluff site.

About these posts, Robert Priddy said:

Robert Priddy: COMMENT: No one was ever banned from linking to any of the named websites.There was no frenzy at ExBaba! Reinier van der Sandt decided to make use of frames. Moreno did not understand how to cut and paste links after the change. One simply had to right click on any page and go to “Properties” to copy the full URL. No other sites changed any parameters. There is no more control by the webmaster over the ExBaba site than Moreno’s exercises over his many websites and blogs. “Soviet-style” and “Running scared’ are laughably unreasonable claims.

Robert Priddy: COMMENT: Totally untrue all of it. None of us had any idea how to reject a particular person’s links to our websites or any way to force people to shut down their computers. An absurd false accusation. Moreno had troubles with his own computer, most likely, and - as with so many other things - chose to blame it on the exposé. This served Moreno’s intention NEVER to link to any exposé web pages, which he has never done since then. He was worried that people would then see the falsity of his highly selective materials, out-of-context references and how hugely he ’spins’ everything. Naturally, most exposé sites do not link to him, for why would any wish to link to pages full of libel, distortion, misinformation, slurs and mud-slinging?

Far be it for an internet newbie like Robert Priddy (who even attributed an IP belonging to HIS own computer to Moreno and who published several embarrassing internet blunders such as the Laughable SheilaWaring Lie) to be making erroneous assumptions about Web-Designer Moreno’s proficiency in finding URLs on framed websites! This issue was/is not about finding URLs whatsoever.

Malicious Redirection Ploys Confirmed:
It is a fact that Ex-Devotees blocked Moreno’s website through htaccess and redirected all links from Moreno’s domain to a hack page that forced innocent users to shut down their computers. Moreno viewed this malicious htaccess hack for himself first-hand and received several complaints from others as well. The htaccess hack did not occur solely only on Moreno’s computer as falsely assumed by Robert Priddy.

Even when Reinier van der Sandt created his 77 attack pages against Moreno, Reinier never once denied the htaccess ploy. Only after a couple of years of absolute silence did Ex-Devotees finally come forward claiming that Moreno lied about the htaccess event.

However, there is circumstantial evidence that strongly supports Moreno’s claim about the htaccess ploy. Just two days after Moreno deactivated all direct links to Anti-Baba domains (meaning that the htaccess ploy would no longer work), Reinier van der Sandt (the webmaster for the Ex-Baba Domain) resorted to another htaccess redirection ploy that was screencaptured by Moreno and documented on his TimeLine Page (dated December 10th 2004).

The ExBaba domain was a framed website and if one accessed the ExBaba Domain through their main index page, all of their webpages loaded into frames. However, if one accessed the ExBaba Domain through internet searches, the webpages loaded as single webpages (not in frames).

On December 10th 2004 (after Moreno deactivated direct linking to Anti-Baba websites) Reinier van der Sandt redirected all non-framed webpages to an “index2.html” file by using another htaccess redirection ploy. Therefore, it is a fact that at the time Moreno accused Ex-Devotees of using a malicious htaccess redirection ploy, they were experimenting with other htaccess redirection ploys to prevent direct linking to the ExBaba domain.

The common code used for this type of htaccess redirection ploy is:

Redirect /index.html http://www.site.com/index2.html

Needless to say, the “index2.html” htaccess redirection ploy prevented internet users from accessing the Anti-Baba information they sought because it forced them (via redirection) into the framed “index2.html” webpage. Once Reinier van der Sandt realized the ramifications of his not-so-clever redirection ploy, he removed it in February 2005, but not before Moreno screencaptured it (Ref). See for yourself:

After Reinier van der Sandt removed the “index2.html” htaccess redirection ploy, he then added a frame forwarding script to the webpages that reloaded them into the framed version. Many months later, this script was removed as well. To prevent easier verification of Moreno’s claims, Reinier van der Sandt blocked access to archive.org. See For Yourself.

It goes without mention that although Moreno deactivated direct linking to Anti-Baba websites, he still provided the full URLs to relevant webpages, which readers were free to cut and paste if they so chose.

Therefore, Moreno’s claims that Ex-Devotees were using htaccess redirection ploys are based on facts, not speculations, assumptions or conspiracies.

For a couple of years Ex-Devotees never once denied Moreno’s “htaccess ploy” accusation against them.

Reinier van der Sandt was experimenting with htaccess redirection ploys a couple of days after Moreno accused him of using a malicious htaccess redirection ploy that forced users to turn off their computers.

Reinier van der Sandt blocked archive.org so that his subterfuge and deceit could not be easily verified by the general public.

Robert Priddy and Ex-Devotee’s internet behavior reeks of deceit and dishonesty and their non-referenced, unsubstantiated and unsupported speculations bear no resemblance to Moreno’s open, direct and fully referenced replies.

Second Coming Ignorance

2009-04-30T13:13:00.000-07:00

Second Coming Ignorance

Robert Priddy (a caustic critic and defamer of Sathya Sai Baba who once hailed the Guru as God Incarnate and thereby the Father who sent Jesus, Allah who sent Muhammad and the Creator of the Universe) wrote an amusing response to Moreno’s article about him entitled Is Robert Priddy A Fundamentalist Christian?

Robert Priddy responded (in part):

Robert Priddy: Firstly, Joe Moreno (as vishvarupa108) made wide accusations of clinging to a Christian fundamentalist belief against the group he calls “anti-Sais” which is shown in the following posting which turned up in an archived e-mail attachment I received. There he claimed we all cling to a “second coming” mentality because we have nothing else to cling to. Wholly preposterous, of course, and indicative of Christian fundamentalism - for belief in the Second Coming is hardly no longer a belief promoted by mainstream Christianity (as opposed to fundamentalists). Moreno’s co-worker Lisa de Witt (who he never criticises or corrects despite her outrageous statements) has definitively included and named me as Christian and fundamentalist (which she may try to deny). Therefore Moreno is obviously aligned with her by his recent stated support for her claims.

First and foremost, Moreno has never supported the alleged claim that Lisa De Witt said that Robert Priddy is a Christian. Lisa de Witt denies making such a claim and although Robert Priddy expected Lisa de Witt to deny the claim, he provided no references to support his comments about her. Therefore, this particular argument by Robert Priddy is totally deflated. Secondly, let us look at Moreno’s actual comments (with references) in proper context regarding his usage of the term “second coming”:

Joe Moreno: Yes, Dave, you can still cling to your “second coming” mentality regarding the “truth” that will come out regarding the murders. (Reference)

Joe Moreno: Anti-SSB Activists are clinging to their “second coming” mentality and are relying on unsubstantiated propaganda until the evidence they hope exists, surfaces. (Reference)

Joe Moreno: Robert Priddy clings to his second coming mentality, hoping that his conspiracy theory will one day be vindicated. Eleven years and counting and Bhagavan Sri Sathya Sai Baba has never been implicated (in any way, shape or form) with the police shootings that occurred on June 6th 1993. (Reference)

As one can clearly see, the context Moreno used for the term “second coming mentality” was non-religious in nature and was not indicative (directly, indirectly or otherwise) that Robert Priddy and Ex-Devotees were Christians awaiting the Second Coming of Jesus Christ.

As rational and intelligent readers are aware, the term “Second Coming” (besides referring to Christ’s return) is also a semantical term commonly used by prestigious media (including Forbes, Discover magazine, international newspapers, books, movies, TV stations, etc.) that does not refer to the Christian concept of parousia (also known as the “Second Advent”). Rather, the term “second coming” can be used to denote the occurrence, hope or expectation of an actualization, reappearance or re-invention of a person, thing or event.

Common Non-Christian Usage For The Term “Second Coming” In International Media (A Small Selection):

The Second Coming of Biofuels

Brian O’Leary The Second Coming Of Science

The iPhone’s Second Coming

Tim Geithner, CNBC, and the Second Coming of Known Unknowns

Clough’s Second Coming

Why Keegan’s Second Coming at Newcastle may be doomed to failure

Al-Qaeda: The Second Coming

Second Empire to expand in ‘second coming’

The Second Coming Of Richard Li

The Second Coming Of Christos Cotsakos

No Quick Second Coming for Dead Zimdollar

The Second Coming of Newt Gingrich

Tony Blair’s second coming

HOMEOPATHY: THE SECOND COMING

Medvedev as the Second Coming of Gorbachev

The Second Coming Of Identity Politics

Imperfect Charisma: The Second Coming of Benazir Bhutto

Therefore, Moreno’s usage of the term “second coming mentality” proves he did not imply or insinuate (in the least) that Robert Priddy and Ex-Devotees were Christians awaiting the Second Advent of Jesus Christ.

Robert Priddy Denies Christian Anti-Baba Movements:
Robert Priddy (under the pseudonym “Participant Observer”) said:

Robert Priddy (Pseudonym “Participant Observer”): No, bazza1, I am not a Christian or a follower of any other organised religion. This is typical of Sai people... to think that vested church interests are behind the allegations etc. because Sai Org. chief Indulal Shah made this specious claim in directives against his better knowledge. I know of no Church involvments, and I know the exposé scene better than most. (Reference)

That’s right, Robert Priddy claimed that he knew of no Church involvements against Sathya Sai Baba despite the fact that his co-conspirator and co-writer Barry Pittard openly boasted about polarizing Christians against Sathya Sai Baba. Reinier van der Sandt (the webmaster to the largest Anti-Baba websites on the internet and a known associate of Robert Priddy) posted Christian banners on his Ex-Baba domain (Ref) and wrote a couple of letters to Cardinal Simonis attempting to polarize Christians against Sathya Sai Baba. Read The Full Article About Christian Anti-Hindu and Anti-Baba Movements Here.

So when Robert Priddy attempted to argue that Moreno “hypoctitically tries through vehement denial to appear to distance himself from the business of smearing ‘Anti-Sais’ as Christians and/or fundamentalists among whom he definitively includes me”, he is out of touch with reality.

The extreme way in which Robert Priddy pigeonholes Moreno’s words gives one the distinct impression that Robert Priddy is unmovable by truth or reason and his moral cowardice is masked in bold rhetoric.

Screencap Fraud Against Gerald Joe Moreno

2009-04-28T10:31:00.000-07:00

Screencap Fraud Against Gerald Joe Moreno

Anti-Sai Activists Caught In A Deliberate Act Of Screencap Fraud
Although Moreno has been saying for years that Anti-Sai Activists are frauds, cheats and liars, there is now conclusive proof that Ex-Devotees are openly resorting to fraudulence by publishing faked “screencaps” of webpages they alleged were taken from Moreno’s vishvarupa.com domain.

On Psychic Trance Medium Conny Larsson’s Anti-Sai website, he published an obviously faked ‘screencap’ of Moreno’s About Me webpage (Moreno’s picture has been covered and the thumbnail pic can be enlarged by clicking on it):

Obvious Discrepancies On The Bogus Screencap:

Notice the complete difference in width.

The picture is offset.

The text is offset.

The spacing between the text “~About Me~” and the picture is incorrect.

The spacing between the picture and the text is incorrect.

The bogus screen-cap states “New Mexico ~” when it should read “New Mexico, USA~” (the word “USA” is completely missing).

The line that reads “I’m captivated by India” should be on one line. On the bogus screen-cap, it isn’t.

The text on the original page is tightly snuggled between two side-bars. Notice the vertical, pink line on the bogus screencap (showing a gap where the other sidebar was obviously added). This vertical line is nowhere to be found on Moreno’s geocities website.

Notice that the spacing between the sidebars is significantly wider than it is on Moreno’s geocities website. For instance, the sentence “For the past 14 years I have traveled many times to India” fills the entire space between the sidebars. On the bogus screencap, there is additional spacing on both sides of that sentence although the extra word “I’m” was added (note that the font size has been set in the html).

The line that reads “I’m rational, logical and down to earth. Yes, seriously. I’m Caucasian/Italian/Mexican Blend and 34 years young” is the very last and concluding statement on the page. It is not (and never has been) located in the introductory comments, conclusively proving the screencap was faked.

About the bogus screencap, Psychic Trance Medium Conny Larsson said:

Conny Larsson: (screen captures are from a secondary source on the web which reproduced parts of his vishvarupa.com pages)

Needless to say, Moreno’s geocities webpages were never “reproduced” on his vishvarupa.com domain. Therefore, the claim of a “secondary source” is a bold-faced and gutter lie. Why would critics need to rely on “secondary sources” when Moreno’s geocities webpages are still on the internet? The “secondary sources” admission from critics proves they did not obtain the screencap legitimately or directly from Moreno’s geocities website.

Of course, this is not the first time that Ex-Devotees have published fraudulent information against Moreno. See:

QuickTopic Posts And The ‘saibabaexpose’ Lie

Cloaked Or Anonymous IP Lies

“Fighting The Smears” Articles: 01 - 02 - 03 - 04 - 05 - 06 - 07 - 08 - 09 - 10

Robert Priddy’s Publication Of A Fraudulent Screencap
Robert Priddy (a caustic critic and defamer of Sathya Sai Baba and others) published a screencap on his defamatory Anti-Baba blog that he alleged was taken from Moreno’s vishvarupa.com domain. In truth, the screencap most certainly did not come from Moreno’s vishvarupa.com domain! Even the title on Priddy’s bogus screencap is messed up (whereas the title on Moreno’s webpage has never been messed up).

Moreno still has all his backups from his vishvarupa.com domain going back to 2004 and none of those backups contain the fake URL listed on Priddy’s bogus screencap. As a matter of fact, all of Moreno’s articles (beside pictures) were published under the folder “Fair-Is-Fair” and the links page with relevant redirects can be found here (which has been online since mid-2005 when Moreno moved his Sai Controversy webpages to his newer saisathyasai.com domain).

Robert Priddy’s Bogus Screencap:

The geocities webpages in question were made using geocities webpage-maker. Therefore, all of the pictures and text in Moreno’s articles are set to exact specifications that cannot be easily duplicated on other websites. It certainly appears that someone copied Moreno’s image files and attempted to mess with the html with obvious and messy results!

Important points to ponder:

Why would Moreno lie about not duplicating his geocities webpages on his vishvarupa.com domain?

What would Moreno have to lose considering that the webpages in question are still available on the internet on geocities?

Critics have not (so far) alleged that there are any discrepancies between their copies of Moreno’s webpages and the ones currently online. So what exactly are critics whining about?

How Robert Priddy’s Screencap Was Most Likely Falsified:
A simple way to falsify the screencap is to simply replace the web address with a different one. A simple tactic that anyone can do in a matter of seconds. For example, look at the following screencap. By observing it, one would think that the Albert Einstein template was published on Moreno’s vishvarupa.com domain. It wasn’t. The web address was simply changed and the screencap taken.

These are the types of shameless liars, deceivers and counterfeiters who are attempting to portray themselves as credible and moral voices against Bhagavan Sri Sathya Sai Baba!

Critics should come forward with full screencaps to all of Moreno’s alleged webpages and make them publicly available for public scrutiny. After all, what do they have to fear? One is left to wonder why critics are publishing bits and pieces of Moreno’s webpages (many years after the fact) that reveal altered and manipulated text, font and urls.

Even though Moreno’s vishvarupa.com and geocities websites are archived on archive.org, Robert Priddy (being the conspiracist that he is) attempted to argue that Moreno was somehow able to manipulate and deceive archive.org about which content they archived!

Of course, Robert Priddy is an LSD Advocate (who publicly solicited a Pro-Drug Forum intended for drug users). Robert Priddy is also a fierce defender, promoter and associate of Conny Larsson, an ex-devotee turned self-professed Prophet and Psychic Trance Medium! And to top it all off, Robert Priddy fabricated sexual molestation claims against Moreno.

If Robert Priddy has the temerity to falsify sexual molestation claims against Moreno, what other stories of sexual molestation is he falsifying as well?

If Robert Priddy shamelessly falsified sexual molestation claims against Moreno, what is to stop him from falsifying other information against Moreno as well?

Sai Devotee Anywhere Between 17-26 Years

2009-04-27T22:23:00.000-07:00

Sai Devotee Anywhere Between 17-26 Years

Robert Priddy ceaselessly contradicts himself about how long he was a devotee of Sathya Sai Baba and when he defected from the Sai Movement. One thing is certain: Robert Priddy and Reidun Priddy became Sai Devotees in 1983. Robert & Reidun claimed they left Sathya Sai Baba in April of 2000. Therefore, Robert Priddy was a Sai Devotee for 17 years. Needless to say, Robert Priddy has blatantly exaggerated (i.e., “lied”) and purposely embellished the number of years he was an alleged Sai Devotee. Look at the following screencap that proves this point (click on picture to enlarge):

Although both Robert and Reidun Priddy were devotees of Sathya Sai Baba for 17 years, Robert Priddy progressively changed the number of years from “about 18 years” to “18 years” to “20 years” to “26 years”! Robert Priddy was also writing Anti-Sai Articles as early as March 2001.

As Moreno has said many times before, Robert Priddy is a known exaggerator, liar and deceiver with proof. All of the screencaps above were obtained solely through Anti-Sai Websites. But most of them came directly from Robert Priddy’s Anti-Sai Websites. Needless to say, Robert Priddy will continue to whine, snivel and lie that all the claims Moreno makes against him are not supported with facts, etc. (as he has spammed on his Anti-Baba blog and elsewhere on the internet).

Legal Threat Sent Robert Priddy Packing

2009-04-24T22:42:00.000-07:00

Legal Threat Sent Robert Priddy Packing

Dr. Leo Rebello, N.D., Ph.D., D.Sc., F.F.Hom, MBA, is the Director of Natural Health Centre, Bombay. He has delivered over 10,000 lectures in 63 countries (including WHO, UNAIDS, UNESCO, UNDP, UNEP, UN-HABITAT conferences), has written 30 books and has been interviewed by the world media.

Due to Leo Rebello’s critical (albeit private) emails about Mary Garden’s book “The Serpent Rising”, Ex-Devotees herded together (as they typically do) and spammed Leo Rebello with numerous hate emails.

Leo Rebello responded likewise and wrote what definitely appeared to be highly confrontive and defamatory responses. However, Leo Rebello wrote his replies privately, without attempting to give them publicity on the internet. Needless to say, Robert Priddy (a caustic critic and defamer of Sathya Sai Baba and others) decided to publicly smear Leo Rebello and published selective and private emails allegedly sent to him by Leo Rebello. Robert Priddy purposely misspelled various email addresses (so they could not be identified) and purposely misspelled his own name as “Rob*rt Pr*ddy” so as to “avoid undue web publicity from search engines for myself”. Noticeably absent were many of the emails that prompted Leo Rebello’s responses in the first place.

Going for the jugular, Robert Priddy publicly published Leo Rebello’s alleged emails with Mary Garden and others on the following three websites:

home.chello.no/~reirob/Rebello.htm

angeltowns.com/members/tanik/

metasci.tripod.com/hom.htm

Leo Rebello responded by threatening Robert Priddy with a million dollar legal suit for defamation and:

Publicly accused Robert Priddy of being a homosexual.

Publicly accused Robert Priddy of being sexually abused by Sathya Sai Baba.

Publicly accused Robert Priddy of having a gay lover named “Ronald Pallas”.

Publicly alleged that Robert Priddy was suffering from AIDS.

Publicly alleged that Robert Priddy used bogus email IDs.

Publicly alleged that he filed a legal suit against AngelTowns and sent copies to the Mumbai Police, Interpol, Euro police and Swedish police.

In emails no longer online, Rebello alleged:

Robert Priddy was suffering from “schizophrenia”.

Robert Priddy was a “nitwit”.

Everyone at ExBaba.com were “homosexuals”, “drug addicts“ or “vagabonds“.

Robert Priddy wrote a lot of “shit”.

Robert Priddy wrote a lot of “spam”.

Robert Priddy was a “buffoon” and compared the ExBaba admin to “deranged gang members”.

Robert Priddy was a “nut case”, “sick man” and a “mentally deranged person”.

By reading Rebello’s opinions about Robert Priddy and Ex-Devotees, one could definitely say that Rebello’s opinions were defamatory and libelous. HOWEVER, what was Robert Priddy’s response to Leo Rebello’s million dollar legal threat?

First, Robert Priddy egotistically challenged Leo Rebello and said:

Robert Priddy: So it is with confidence that I would face Rebello in the Norwegian courts, where whatever reputation he may have will really be destroyed in a sound public fashion (note: I am not under any Indian jurisdiction, of course). In any case, my counter-damages would be considerable, of course, and he will have to face all the costs too. The only problem is, in the most unlikely even of him appearing in this country which I know so well, it would be utterly boring and distasteful to have to do with such an unbalanced person as one can see he is from his ravings and (judging by his fixation on gutter sex language) such an apparently sexually-disturbed individual.

Then what did Robert Priddy do? Robert Priddy immediately and promptly deleted all of his public webpages against Leo Rebello although it appeared that Leo Rebello was the one guilty of defamation. WHY did Robert Priddy (who often makes legal threats against others) cave in so quickly to Leo Rebello’s legal threat? Could it be there was some truth to Leo Rebello’s claims about Robert Priddy?

I suspect there was.

I also suspect that Robert Priddy and Ex-Devotees sent Leo Rebello highly defamatory emails as well (which would explain their absence on Robert Priddy’s former Anti-Rebello websites).

As a matter of fact, the following email (sent at 2:42 A.M.) from Robert Priddy (which he publicly released and self-disclosed on AngelTowns for years as public domain) provides revealing insights as to what provoked Leo Rebello to write what he did:

Robert Priddy: Dr. Leo Rebello, Having found out some of what you wrote to Mary Garden as according to the new posting on the web (www.exbaba.com), I recognise that you are clearly a King among that broad class of people who are “ignorant and arrogant”. Probably you have imbibed too much of your own urine and other products. I know the whole story of the contorted ayurveda which is now largely ancient superstition from a time when people died not even knowing the actual causes... and you have the temerity to proffer yourself as a candidate for the Swedish Nobel Prize in medicine! Some hopes you do have! One has to chuckle at your supreme witlessness.

You are just a self-promoting parasite on well-known people (Weve seen the promo photos and your sheepish pride such as with the famous like Deepak Chopra, another expensive cheapjack). Who do you think you are to talk about abortion as murder, when you have murdered your own intelligence with your overweening ego and grasping nature... and indirectly share the heavy responsiblity with your absurd brain-washed AIDS propaganda for the awful sufferings and unnecessary deaths of countless AIDS victims. You in your ridiculous rainbow-coloured coat... not a Jacob but a patronising skunk whose words show your lack of normal human decency, absence of compassion and moral stupidity. Besides, the Brahma principle, as you would probably call it, does not enter the human foetus until around 14 weeks, and you don't even know that!

Never fear, the advance of medicine will sweep away all the detritus of your perverted kind of ‘spirituality’ in the course of time as the race evolves. You most probably believe in hell... so may you be happy in it! With righteous scorn for an all-round indecent priggish and wholly unconvincing ‘man’. And you are being monitored carefully by people you are not aware of. Take good care, instead of mouthing off...

Robert Priddy also published the following disgusting picture of Rebello on his angeltowns account:

This is the way pseudo-moralist Robert Priddy typically attacks his detractors.

According to Leo Rebello, he was sent harassing emails from:

korola@start.no (Ronald Pallas, who happened to have the exact same IP as Robert Priddy, raising the suspicion that the name “Ronald Pallas” may be a pseudonym.)

r.v.d.sandt@hetnet.nl (Rienier Van Der Sandt)

ex-baba@hetnet.nl (Reinier Van Der Sandt)

dark_knight_9@yahoo.com (Sanjay Dadlani)

ompukalani@hotmail.com (Brian Steel)

RaviChandra@everyday.com (Ravi Chandra - Unknown and raising the suspicion that the name “Ravi Chandra” may be a pseudonym.)

marygarden@bigpond.com (Mary Garden)

glenmeloy@earthlink.net (Glen Meloy)

yesontruth@earthlink.net (Glen Meloy)

conny@email.com (Conny Larsson)
norbert@chello.no (Norbert K Hinna - Unknown)
bpittard@beachaccess.com.au (Barry Pittard)
rover@jcputty.com (Unknown and a suspected pseudonymous account)

allenbro@chello.no (Unknown and a suspected pseudonymous account)

robrei@start.no (Robert & Reidun Priddy)

rpriddy@online.no (Robert Priddy)

rero@chello.no (Robert Priddy)

satyavijaya@myrealbox.com (Robert Priddy)

anir@start.no (Robert Priddy and/or Randi Godager - “anir” was the name of the root folder to one of Robert Priddy’s Anti-Baba websites and it is unknown why “Randi Godager” would use an email address that resolved specifically to Robert Priddy’s Anti-Baba domain, raising the suspicion that the name “Randi Godager” may be a pseudonym.)

One can’t help to wonder why Ex-Devotees spammed Leo Rebello numerous times under various email addresses. It certainly appears that Ex-Devotees attempted to portray themselves as different people (under various email accounts) and were caught in the act by Rebello.

Leo Rebello’s Original Comments About His Legal Threat Against Robert Priddy On Indymedia (Since Deleted By Indymedia Because Of Priddy’s Defamatory Comments And Due To A Legal Threat Against Them As Well):

india.indymedia.org/en/2004/01/208787.shtml
REJOINDER TO ROBERT PRIDDY's MALICIOUS COMMENTS
Dr. Leo Rebello 29/10/2004 08:39
leorebello@vsnl.com
http://www.aidsalternativa.org

ROBERT PRIDDY (rpriddy@online.no; robrei@start.no)
AND ANGEL TOWN (http://www.angeltowns.com)
SUED FOR MISCHIEF ON THE NET
For more details contact Dr. Leo Rebello
Email : leorebello@vsnl.com
Website : www.aidsalternativa.org

The topic above is World Parliament and look at what this moron called Robert Priddy is writing. The so-called defamatory emails that he is referring to were all in response to his spamming and mudslinging. I do NOT know this bum personally. Robert Priddy claims that he is a British scholar, who earlier retired from Swedish university and now residing in Oslo, Norway. This 70+ nitwit sometimes writes that he retired as Lecturer and sometimes as Professor of Sociology and Philosophy. Earlier he taught Botany!!! He also worked for Satya Sai Baba and was obviously used by Baba. Hence, he and his insane colleagues have started a website called www.exbaba.com in which they say that Baba screwed many of them at Putthaparthy. If their charge that Baba is a Homosexual is true, then Baba obviously knows who are Homosexuals!!! Robert Priddy is one of them.

This Robert Priddy and his other colleagues on www.exbaba.com all of a sudden started spamming me in mid-December 2003 and continued till January 2004, till I served a legal notice on them and complained to various authorities.

Briefly the case is: One Mary Garden, the writer of The Serpent Rising, resident of Australia sent me her said book duly autographed, for REVIEW in Indian media. I do not know her personally. Infact, it is her publisher who first got in touch with me by scanning Indian authors and publishers directory.

On reading the said book I found it very disgusting and I wrote to her and the publisher that I would not be reviewing it. Thereafter, the whore unleashed madmen like Robert Priddy on me and they would spam me daily hitting below the belt and I too in turn give them good. During one month, I carpet bombed them with about 40 replies, including a notice to Mary Garden. She kept quiet, but this crook called Robert Priddy continued because no one had challenged him before about his dirty habits.

Homosexuals, as you would know always attack from behind. Since they could not fight with me, this Robert Priddy and "her" husband Ronald Pallas put some webpages on http://www.angeltowns.com/members/tanik/ since it offers free hosting. Robert Priddy is suffering from AIDS, "because AIDS is predominantly a disease limited to Homosexuals" Dr. Gordon Stewart, Emeritus Professor of Public Health, Universityof Glasgow, UK (for more details read my book AIDS and Alternative Medicine soon going into 4th edition due to popular demand).

I came to know of this piddling Priddy's mischief about three days ago and served a legal notice on AngelTowns.com, with copies to Mumbai Police, Interpol, Euro police, Swedish police, etc. Immediately the said defamatory matter was removed and the AngelTowns.com confirmed that offending ininformation was listed for the user called Ronald Pallas IP: 80.111.17.23 email: korola@start.no

I did further search to find out whether the mischief of these Homosexual idiots had spread and found that even on responsible Indymedia this man had planted the above libelous comment. This therefore is my candid reply.

Now let us come to Mary Garden's book The Serpent Rising, with which this nuisance started. Mary Garden of Australia has documented some of her forays into sex, drugs, and vagrancy in that book. Here are some nuggets: Sai Baba, she says, is a hermaphrodite & homosexual - page 44 and talks of surrendering to him - page 16. Then she runs away from him because he played footsie with her but did not call her to his bedroom. She is therefore disappointed and runs away to Rishikesh in the Himalayas. There she gets pregnant from Balyogi - page 203. She then aborts a 4-month fetus (a boy according to the nurse who puts the fetus in the dustbin) in a Delhi Nursing Home and feels it was a murder - page 211. Next she has encounters with Rajneesh in his dark chambers in Pune, etc. etc. The cover page shows Rajneesh working on her. Prior to meeting all these "unholy men" like Satya Sai Baba, Balyogi Premvarni and Rajneesh (her words), Mary enjoyed drugs & sex with older men in Auckland, by the time she was 16 - page 5. Infact her sexual experiments started at a very young age when the neighbour took her and her sister in a hen house and made them do felatio. And such a pornographic book she has dedicated to her two children. The details about her husband are missing.

I received the said book on 2nd December, 2003. After reading it I wrote to her that I was disappointed with her book and I will NOT be reviewing the same since it was semi-pornographic. So, she got wild and pressed into service Robert Priddy ( rpriddy@online.no; robrei@start.no;); Ravi Chandra ( RaviChandra@everyday.com); and these other persons with emails like satyavijaya@myrealbox.com; r.v.d.sandt@hetnet.nl; dark_knight_9@yahoo.com; anir@start.no; ompukalani@hotmail.com; rover@jcputty.com; ex_baba@hetnet.nl; rero@chello.no (I do NOT know any one of them), and they started spamming me till I sent them the following warning :-

----- Original Message ----- From: DR. LEO REBELLO To: rpriddy@online.no ; robrei@start.no
Cc: abuse@vsnl.com ; customerservice@vsnl.co.in
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 12:09 PM
Subject: Robert Priddy -- your spam returned

ROBERT PRIDDY Thrice you have said that you have my telephone number. So, what can you do? You also have my complete postal address. So, what can you do? I do not operate from behind post box addresses or bogus email IDs like you. You have also seen my photographs with the Prime Ministers, Presidents and other dignitaries on my website: www.aidsalternativa.org So, what can you do? This is your final warning, Robert Priddy. Piss off. Or you will spend the rest of your life in the Indian jails.
Best wishes for your sanity
Dr. Leo Rebello

So, this explains the full story.

Now, what I wish to know from Indymedia is whether they periodically check the violations on the Net or not. This Robert Priddy's libelous comment on me has been displayed on Indymedia since February 2004. In these months, it must have done immense harm to my reputation. Now, I want it to continue along with this my candid reply till the matter is solved.

Eventhough Angel Town has immediately removed the offending page http://www.angeltowns.com/members/tanik/ that Priddy refers to; I have served a one million-dollar damages claim on them. If Indymedia were to remove this comment and not apologise to me, and/or post other such mischievous comments from some bogus, I will make Indymedia also a party in the defamation case. Other mischief-makers should also take note.

MISCHIEF ON THE NET

Mischief on and by Indymedia
Dr. Leo Rebello 15/11/2004 06:23
leorebello@hotmail.com

One Robert Priddy has put a mischievous comment as under:

Dr. Leo Rebello
Not applicable 15/02/2004 12:36
rpriddy@online.no

http://www.angeltowns.com/members/tanik/

Against this, I posted a counter comment on 29th October, 2004, at about 2.00 PM. You were also notified on Saturday, October 30, 2004 1:16 PM vide an email. Till today, my counter has not appeared nor have you replied to this deliberate mischief. So, there seems to be a clear violation of netiquettes and I may be constrained to send you a defamation notice and/or institute criminal proceedings against Indymedia if this mischief continues. So, please post my reply to Robert Priddy, immediately. Thanks.

Robert Priddy loves to reference his libels to other people on the internet. Even referencing his sexual abuse libels against Moreno to Basava Premanand (who libeled Moreno the same way).

Consequently, if one were to use the exact same standards against Robert Priddy (that he used/uses against Moreno), he would be implicated in a rats nest of allegations that include homosexuality (let us not forget his son’s use of dildos and transvestites as theatrics in his music band and Priddy’s homoerotic dreams), AIDS, drugs, fake names, etc., all supported by a legal threat that sent Robert Priddy packing with his tail between his legs!

Tsk.

Robert Priddy - Blogged Articles To Date

2009-04-20T04:39:00.000-07:00

The Laughable Sheila Waring Lie

2009-04-20T04:31:00.000-07:00

Robert Priddy’s Laughable Sheila Waring Lie

About the pseudonym “sheila waring”, Kevin Shepherd said of Moreno:

kevinrdshepherd.net/html/23___sathya_sai_baba__problems.html
“His many blogs are often registered anonymously. He has resorted to many web pseudonyms such as Equalizer, vishvarupa108, and sheilawaring.”

About the pseudonym “sheilawaring”, Psychic Medium Conny Larsson said of Moreno:

saibabaexpose.com/sheilawaring.html
“Someone using the name ‘sheila waring’ reposted Moreno’s deleted postings on Netscape on July 9 2007- very soon after they had been banned and removed by Netscape. The identity of sheilawaring was concealed, but it is not hard to understad that this was either Moreno himself, or one of his proxies - it makes no real difference. That he must have had a hand in it is beyond doubt. The links are all to his defamatory website at saisathyasai.com Here are screenshots of the pages posted by sheilawaring on Netscape, also subsequently deleted by the netscape administration.”

About the pseudonym “sheila waring”, Robert Priddy said of Moreno:

robertpriddy.wordpress.com/2009/04/04/sathyasaibaba-in-the-shadows/
“He has often avoided using his most known username (joe108) in favour of unidentifiable ones like Equalizer, sheilawaring, or - for most people less identifiable ones like visvarupa 108, SSS108 (on Wikipedia) GM, JM, GJM with or without the 108 suffix and so on All were gradually identified as being his. He has also used diverse IPs in his e-mails and comments, as has been documented on various occasions, though he tries to deny it, the proofs are there for any eventual further use. He denied he was equaliser until exposed definitively as such, and he denies that he posted on Netscape under the username sheilawaring - but he is exposed as having done that just after he had been banned under a previous pseudonym like JM108).”

Let it go on record that Moreno has never (ever), at any time, used the name “sheila waring” on digg.com, netscape.com (now propeller.com) or anywhere else for that matter. Contrary to Robert Priddy’s senile claims (which he has been spewing all over his blog in recent weeks), Moreno never “denied” using the name “Equalizer” on his blogs. Once again, Robert Priddy makes unsupported, unsubstantiated and un-referenced claims against Moreno.

In an attempt to bolster their absurd claims that Moreno used the “sheila waring” pseudonym, several screencaps were published on Conny Larsson’s website. And thank goodness they did! After seeing the screencaps, Moreno nearly fell out of his chair laughing because Ex-Devotee’s apparently confused “sheila waring” as a Pro-Moreno Activist when in fact “sheila waring” was an Anti-Sai Activist hiding under a fake name! “Sheila Waring” went through all of Moreno’s posts on Netscape and “sunk” all of them (meaning that “sheilawaring” casted votes against all of Moreno’s articles). This is why Moreno’s articles showed up under “sheilawaring’s” Netscape history. One can clearly see the text saying “Sunk On July 09, 2007 07:49pm” below Moreno’s posts. One can also see the text that says “This story has mostly negative ratings” on top of Moreno’s posts with the number of “sinks” made against his articles. Critics used numerous fake names on Netscape to “sink” Moreno’s articles and all of their fake names were banned, including Robert Priddy, Barry Pittard and Brian Steel’s accounts.

The screencaps provided on Psychic Medium Conny Larsson’s website (which was referenced by True Believer Robert Priddy and others) are provided below:

That’s right, Kevin Shepherd, Conny Larsson and Robert Priddy (all claiming a “scholar” or “professional” status) are too idiotic to read posts correctly (akin to their idiotic inability to read IP headers correctly, even attributing IPs generated by their own computers to Moreno).

What a bunch of pathetic and laughable stooges and loons!

Although Ex-Devotees whine and snivel about Moreno's alleged “pseudonyms”, one will not find a single complaint from any of them about the numerous incognito web identities used by Robert Priddy, Sanjay Dadlani, Tony O’Clery, UsedByBaba, Barbara Dent and R.F.J. Sandt. Ex-Devotees even attempted to pass themselves off as various individuals (including Pro-Sai Activists and Moreno himself). This type of very disturbing online behavior has been fully documented by Moreno (Refs: 01 - 02).

Expect more spin, deflection and cover-ups from Ex-Devotees, who can’t even identify their own acts of subterfuge in action. Yes, this is exactly the type of shabby “research” and laughable “exposés” that Ex-Devotees typically peddle as the “irrefutable truth” to unsuspecting readers. They do the exact same thing in relation to Sathya Sai Baba as well.

Does Robert Priddy Have AIDS?

2009-04-18T09:34:00.001-07:00

Does Robert Priddy Have AIDS?

Robert Priddy (a caustic critic and defamer of Sathya Sai Baba and others) made the following comments on his Anti-Sai conspiracy blog about Lisa de Witt (a Pro-Sai Activist):

Robert Priddy: “However, Moreno (joe108) has widely supported his co-worker - the insufferable Lisa de Witt, who wrote that I am a fascist, a pervert, an alcoholic, a liar and a ‘bozo’ etc., and who also promoted the idea already years ago that I was dying of AIDS.”

Although it is true that Lisa de Witt is a Pro-Sai Activist, she rarely contributes to Moreno’s articles and emails him (on average) perhaps once a week.

Lisa de Witt immediately contacted Joe Moreno about Robert Priddy’s claim that she said “years ago” he was “dying of AIDS”. Lisa de Witt adamantly denied ever making such a comment. Since Robert Priddy never sources his claims against others and repeatedly attributes comments to people who never made them, Moreno believes Lisa de Witt.

Of course, this is not the first time that Robert Priddy falsely attributed comments to others. Joe Moreno has had to write several “Fighting The Smears” Articles (01 - 02 - 03 - 04 - 05 - 06 - 07 - 08 - 09) defending himself from Robert Priddy’s falsely attributed claims and bold-faced libels.

In actuality, Leo Rebello was the person who said “years ago” that Robert Priddy was dying of AIDS. Robert Priddy (whose failing memory appears to be the onslaught of senile dementia) cannot even remember who said what about him and falsely and erroneously attributed Leo Rebello’s comments to Lisa de Witt:

Leo Rebello: “Homosexuals, as you would know always attack from behind. Since they could not fight with me, this Robert Priddy and "her" husband Ronald Pallas put some webpages on http://www.angeltowns.com/members/tanik/ since it offers free hosting. Robert Priddy is suffering from AIDS, "because AIDS is predominantly a disease limited to Homosexuals" Dr. Gordon Stewart, Emeritus Professor of Public Health, Universityof Glasgow, UK (for more details read my book AIDS and Alternative Medicine soon going into 4th edition due to popular demand).” (Reference)

Leo Rebello: “Since I am NOT a homosexual, I won't touch a filthy, diseased bastard like you. But if you need my help, I shall certainly help you as a doctor, to treat you of AIDS.” (Reference)

Leo Rebello: “Mike, in all your dealings please always stay on the right track and do not entertain sick men like Robert Priddy. He is dying of AIDS and I forgive his antics. He cannot defame me, because I walk the right path. I do not bend before some senile Guru with my pants down, like him, and then cry hoarse that the Guru did me from behind......” (Reference)

Needless to say, Moreno was fully prepared to dispute and deny the AIDS accusation made against Robert Priddy had Lisa de Witt admitted she made it. In the past, Moreno came forward and defended the Anti-Sai Extremist Basava Premanand from highly questionable claims made against him. An anonymous internet source said Premanand had a concubine, cheated on his wife and that Dr Kovoor died of syphilis. Despite Moreno’s public defense of Basava Premanand from those highly questionable claims, Basava Premanand (several years later) had the audacity to attribute those highly questionable claims to Moreno: See For Yourself.

Robert Priddy was threatened with a million dollar legal suit for defamation by Leo Rebello. What was Robert Priddy’s response to Leo Rebello’s legal threat? Robert Priddy immediately and promptly deleted all of his public webpages against Leo Rebello although it appeared that Leo Rebello was the one guilty of defamation. WHY did Robert Priddy (who often makes legal threats against others) cave in so quickly in face of Leo Rebello’s legal threat? Could it be there was some truth to Leo Rebello’s claims about Robert Priddy?

Robert Priddy is always free to come forward with “documentary evidence” (which he often demands from others) and vindicate himself of the highly questionable AIDS claim made against him.

What say you, Robert Priddy?

Dirty Old Man Robert Priddy

2009-04-18T08:41:00.000-07:00

Dirty Old Man Robert Priddy

Robert Priddy (a caustic critic and defamer of Sathya Sai Baba and others) made the following comments on his Anti-Sai conspiracy blog about Joe Moreno (a Pro-Sai Activist):

Robert Priddy: Exactly what happened to Moreno in the private interview? The reason for my interest is not prurience but entirely as an investigator and exposer of many described crimes by Sathya Sai Baba. Joe Moreno makes a big deal about not having stated that oil was “massaged” onto his lower stomach (as I claim), saying only that it was “applied”. How then? With a spatula or a sponge? No. It was from Sai Baba’s hand, he has made that clear enough. So was it not rubbed on? (ie. = massaged in?). That way is widely reported by those describing these oil molestations. Joe is VERY cagey indeed about HOW it was applied and exactly how low down, wanting at any cost to escape any idea that he was being ‘groomed’ to see if he would rise to the approach. He says this occurs between the navel and the pubic area… but plenty of others have explained that it includes the genitals. I am not saying that Joe experienced that, but I think Sai baba did take his pants down (he does, according to reports) or told him to do in words or gestures (as other who received his attentions have described). Or did Sai Baba put his hand inside his pants to reach the lower stomach? Or what? Let Moreno explain himself. Too embarrassing to admit, perhaps, what actually was the case?

This article is an addition to two former articles:

Robert Priddy’s Sexual Molestation Libels

Sai Petition & More Sexual Abuse Libels

Robert Priddy’s fascination with Moreno’s interview experience with Sathya Sai Baba is not only one of “prurience”, it is one of sexual deviancy as well.

No matter how many clarifications, details or explanations Moreno may give, Robert Priddy will never be satisfied, will never let go of his lecherous fantasies and will never let go of his “too embarrassed to talk about it” argument.

Robert Priddy is a dirty old man that can’t stop obsessing, squirming and drooling over the possibility that Sathya Sai Baba did something sexual to Moreno (he didn’t). This type of sexual perversity is best left to psychiatrists, psychosexual therapists and the DSM-IV-TR. It would appear that Robert Priddy is the type of sadist who derives some sort of perverse sexual gratification in humiliating others by projecting his libidinous fantasies onto them.

Despite Moreno’s repeated and tireless clarifications about his interview experiences with Sathya Sai Baba, Robert Priddy continues to deny, distort and falsify Moreno’s account.

Moreno first addressed the sexual abuse libels made against him on July 3rd 2006 and a second time on September 19th 2006. Moreno published a detailed article in August 2007 refuting the sexual abuse libels made against him by Sanjay Dadlani, Tony O’Clery, Basava Premanand, Conny Larsson, Reineir Van Der Sandt, Barbara Dent, UsedByBaba and Alan Kazlev.

Moreno clearly stated that Sathya Sai Baba applied materialized, fragrant and green oil in one motion of his hand just beneath his belly button (i.e., “lower stomach”, not to be confused with one’s “lower abdomen” or “pubic” region). The oil was such that it promptly disappeared in contact with the skin and left no oily residue. Hence, no “massaging” required. Moreno divulged this information several years back and Robert Priddy continues to deny that Moreno ever made such clarifications!

As a matter of fact, Moreno said:

For those who have the integrity, honesty and decency to research the facts for him/her self, let me be absolutely clear about my oiling experience with Sathya Sai Baba:

I was not sexually abused by Sathya Sai Baba.

Sathya Sai Baba did not rub oil on my genitals.

At no time were my pants pulled down or my genitals exposed.

Sathya Sai Baba smeared the oil, in one movement of his hand, just below my belly button. I was not fondled, kissed, massaged or touched in any other way indicative of questionable or inappropriate sexual behavior.

Sathya Sai Baba did not “command” me to observe celibacy. He confirmed I should follow a path I had chosen but had doubts about.

The oil promptly disappeared on contact with my skin. There was no oily residue left afterwards.

The oiling was not “pleasurable”, nor did I experience euphoria or any other kind of altered state for several weeks after its application.

Although Sathya Sai Baba did not tell me what the oil was for, he materialized the oil just after telling me about a severe gastrointestinal illness I endured (from which I lost a significant amount of weight in a short period of time) and after confirming to me that I should observe celibacy. Baba knew about my question concerning celibacy and my illness although I said nothing to him or anyone else at the ashram.

These are the facts of the matter. I think my statements (which have not changed in all these years) supersede the libelous, sexually-twisted, defamatory and deceitful claims made by Ex-Devotees against me, (who go around claiming I was sexually abused and fondled when I was not). Since my oiling experience does not fit into critic’s preconceived ideas about oilings (none of the currently vocal critics ever claimed having received one), they attempt to misrepresent and twist my words with sexual inferences. This speaks volumes about ex-devotees, their lack of character, their lack of dedication to the truth and their very disturbing sexual focus/perversity on everything relating to Sathya Sai Baba.

Ex-Devotees invalidate everything I say (all the while calling me a “liar”) yet apparently believe me when I said I had an oiling. They cherry-pick their criticisms to advance their own nefarious agendas and attempt to deceive the general public by harping on sincerity, honesty, morality and ethics! If ex-devotees lie like this about me, what does this say about their claims against Sathya Sai Baba?

Reference (or View The August 27th 2007 Archive)

The facts show that Moreno did make the clarifications that Robert Priddy demanded from him (although Priddy is in no position to make any demands from Moreno). As stated before, Robert Priddy will never be satisfied with Moreno’s clarifications and will continually resort to the “he is too embarrassed to talk about it” argument.

If Robert Priddy fabricates sexual molestation claims against Moreno, what other sexual molestation claims is he fabricating as well?

When Robert Priddy believes that even those who deny being sexually molested were sexually molested, then one can better understand why Moreno refers to Robert Priddy as an “extremist”, a “fanatic”, a “pathological liar” and a “mentally unstable defamer”.

However, Moreno will make a few additional clarifications for interested readers:

Isn’t it strange that for someone who is alleged to have been “embarrassed” about being “molested sexually”, Moreno revealed the full details of his interview experience with Sathya Sai Baba on a public website (Ref)? Surely, if Moreno was so “embarrassed” about being “molested sexually” by Sathya Sai Baba, he would not have publicly mentioned it in the first place!

Sathya Sai Baba did not “gesture” or say “in words” for Moreno to lower his pants as graphically fantasized by Robert Priddy. As stated numerous times before, Moreno’s pants were never (ever) pulled down, loosened or touched.

Sathya Sai Baba did not (at any time) “put his hand inside” Moreno’s pants as graphically fantasized by Robert Priddy.

Moreno did not “want at any cost to escape any idea that he was being ‘groomed’ to see if he would rise to the approach” as graphically fantasized by Robert Priddy. Since Moreno’s genitals were never exposed or touched and since Sathya Sai Baba just finished confirming to Moreno that he should observe celibacy...how was that supposed to happen?

Robert Priddy’s arguments against Moreno are indicative of the type of conspiracy mentality and extremist mindset that makes him so utterly unbelievable. Robert Priddy would have the world believe that even those who deny being sexually molested, were. Robert Priddy would also have the world believe that his shabby conspiracies, fabricated statements and screwball speculations somehow trump Moreno’s first-hand comments and explanations!

Of course, Robert Priddy is the same guy who would have the world believe that his LSD-induced experiences were not hallucinatory in nature (although LSD is a hallucinogen)! Apparently, his telepathic connection with Eric Steadman, his “out of body experience” and his vision of broken bones sticking out of flesh from a broken wrist were not hallucinatory at all!...Which brings us back to Robert Priddy’s hallucinations about Joe Moreno & Sathya Sai Baba...The stuff drugs do to people’s brains!

Fundamentalist Christian Label

2009-04-17T14:30:00.000-07:00

Fundamentalist Christian Label

Robert Priddy (a caustic critic and defamer of Sathya Sai Baba and others) made the following comments on his Anti-Sai conspiracy blog about Joe Moreno (a Pro-Sai Activist):

Robert Priddy: “Invidiously, Joe Moreno calls me ‘a blatant liar’ many times obviously without any tangible proof because I can assure that I never lie. He is fond of childish name-calling and smearing through labeling: egs. he accused me of being a “fundamentalist Christian” (I am 100% agnostic!)”

Robert Priddy’s penultimate lie is that he “never lies”! Moreno already refuted Robert Priddy’s claim that he “never lies” here. Moreno has written several “Fighting The Smears” articles (Refs: 01 - 02 - 03 - 04 - 05 - 06 - 07) refuting Robert Priddy’s bold-faced lies, including multiple sexual abuse libels against Moreno.

Robert Priddy formerly attempted to argue that a “lie” is a false statement deliberately presented as the truth. Robert Priddy contended that since he is not relating his untruths deliberately, he is not “lying”. However, when Robert Priddy’s “untruths” are brought to his attention, he deliberately refuses to correct or retract them; meaning he is not only deliberately perpetuating lies, he is a bold-faced and shameless liar.

Right after Robert Priddy boasted that he “never lies”, what did he do? He lied! Robert Priddy falsely claimed that Moreno accused him of being a “fundamentalist Christian”. Moreno never (ever) accused Robert Priddy (even indirectly) of being a “fundamentalist Christian”.

The only thing that Moreno ever wrote about “fundamentalist Christians” in relation to Robert Priddy was a radical Christian website that duplicated Priddy’s webpages in full (the webpages have since been removed from the internet, but archive.org still has the archived link with no text) to push their Anti-Baba and Anti-Hindu agendas. Moreno did not (at any time) accuse or imply that Robert Priddy was a “fundamentalist Christian”. The argument Moreno made was that there are Christian groups pushing Anti-Baba and Anti-Hindu agendas (which Priddy denied several times): See For Yourself.

Therefore, WHERE exactly is Robert Priddy getting his disinformation from? He most certainly did not get it from Moreno’s websites. Why is it that Robert Priddy tries so hard to present himself as an honest and moral individual, yet repeatedly makes unsubstantiated and unsupported comments that are never referenced to verifiable sources?

It is exactly erroneous “untruths” (i.e., “lies”) like these that give impetus to the perception that Robert Priddy may be suffering from senile dementia (which he may have inherited from his mother, who suffered from severe memory loss for many years).

Robert Priddy Is Not A Fundamentalist Christian But A True Believer In Psychics, Spiritual Healers And A Self-Proclaimed Prophet:
Let it go on record that Moreno has never (ever) claimed (nor does he believe) that Robert Priddy is a “fundamentalist Christian”.

Robert Priddy is, however, a pseudo-moralist who continually attempts to con the general public into thinking he is entirely given to scientific reasoning, when in actuality he is a true believer and a fierce defender, promoter, endorser, solicitor and friend of various self-professed psychics, trance mediums, reiki healers, guru wannabees, superstitionists, eccentric spiritualists, astrologers (including his own son, Kai Nicolai Priddy, who is heavily into astrology and is the webmaster for AbacusAstrology.co.uk) and other "lunatic fringe" Baba bashers.

Robert Priddy and Barry Pittard (the main spokespersons for the Anti-Sai Movement) promote, endorse and/or profess friendship with:

Trance Channeler & Self-Proclaimed Prophet Conny Larsson

Guru Promoter, UFO Conspiracist & True Believer PhD Timothy Conway

New Age Advocate & Reincarnator Alan Kazlev

Self-Proclaimed Spiritual Master ‘Ramana Baba’

Ramtha Devotee Ullrich Zimmermann

Fetishist & Hare Krsna Congregational Member Sanjay Dadlani

Reiki Master And Spiritual Healer Yaman Konuralp

As a matter of fact, both Robert Priddy and Barry Pittard attempt to defend themselves against Joe Moreno (a Pro-Sai Activist) by directing their readers to either:

Self-Proclaimed Prophet Conny Larsson's website (located at saibabaexpose.com)

Reincarnator, New Age Advocate and Grungy Integral Philosopher Alan Kazlev's website (located at kheper.net)

How's that for "scientific" or "rational"? Robert Priddy and Barry Pittard are obviously very gullible and naive "true believers" who are willing to give credence to non-scientific beliefs by claiming that trance mediums, self-proclaimed prophets, aura readers, seance conductors, New Age advocates, guru adherents, self-proclaimed reincarnators and the like are intelligent, honest, credible and reliable individuals worthy of being referenced by them (so-called “scholars” and “academics” not given to lunatic fringe or superstitious beliefs)! To Date: Robert Priddy and Barry Pittard adamantly refuse to say one word about their promotion and endorsement of these "lunatic fringe" (Priddy's favorite slur) individuals.

Robert Priddy Is Not A Fundamentalist Christian But A Promoter Of LSD And A Pro-Drug Forum Intended For Drug Users:
Robert Priddy was also an LSD advocate and eulogized his own LSD-induced hallucinations for well over 46+ years! See:

Robert Priddy - An Advocate For Drug Users And LSD

Robert Priddy’s Removal Of Biographical Data From Personal Website

Robert Priddy’s Biographical Suppression

Robert Priddy’s “The Psychedelic Experience” (or Archive 01)

Robert Priddy’s “Truth, Being And Bliss” (or Archive 01)

Robert Priddy’s “A Vision Of Cosmic Energy” (or Archive 01)

Robert Priddy’s 30+ Year Glorification Of LSD

Robert Priddy Is Not A Fundamentalist Christian But Believes That Sathya Sai Baba Possesses Genuine Paranormal Powers:
And to top it all off, Robert Priddy believes (even to this day, after his defection) that Sathya Sai Baba possesses genuine paranormal powers:

Robert Priddy: “Nonetheless, it will surely surprise some that I am still almost certain - on the basis of extended personal observation - that Sathya Sai Baba can and does carry out apports, which therefore can appear as materialisations from nothing.”

Apports are said to be physical objects in existence that are dematerialized from one location and rematerialized to another.

Robert Priddy: “Some of what I experienced of SSB’s extraordinary and positive powers through many years is undeniable, even after the most rigorous skeptical investigations, and I do not regard him as any ordinary human being. I have simply had to realize that his actions in the worldly and human sphere are not infallible and are not always setting a perfect example for others.”

Is both a fraud and genuine.

Both can materialize objects and fakes materializations.

Both can cure diseases but really can’t cure diseases.

Needless to say, Barry Pittard also believes that Sathya Sai Baba has genuine paranormal powers. These are the equivocators and deeply conflicted individuals who are attempting to portray themselves as sober, rational and scientific!

Robert Priddy is not a fundamentalist Christian, but he is a liar and a fanatic equivocator with proof!

Robert Priddy's Lies Spiral Out Of Control

2009-04-17T10:44:00.000-07:00

Robert Priddy's Lies Spiral Out Of Control

Joe Moreno has had to write several “fighting the smears” articles (Refs: 01 - 02 - 03 - 04 - 05 - 06) to refute Robert Priddy’s internet propaganda, libels and complete disinformation.

In yet another illustrative example of Robert Priddy’s fairy-tale mentality (which appears to be the onslaught of senile dementia) is a complete and utter fabrication of facts against Moreno on his Anti-Baba conspiracy blog. Robert Priddy said:

Robert Priddy: “His case rested mainly on his having been able to make some false submissions to the petition before it was protected properly from such spamming (in its new location) - including a bogus entry he boasts about having made under the bogus name Joe Apodaco or the like. [Note that Joe Moreno gave no documentary proof he made that entry. However, it was removed just in case.]

At the same time Moreno states that he wrote (under the pseudonym) he had been “sexually abused” in the comment accompanying the sabotage signature! Interestingly - and perhaps unconsciously revealing a Freudian slip - for Joe Moreno was actually abused by Sathya Sai Baba, though he denies that the lowering of his pants and massaging with oil on his “lower stomach” was what the law (even in India) defines it as - sexual molestation when not performed with consent by a doctor of medicine. (See Basava Premanand’s discussion with Moreno on this)”

Sai Petition And The ‘Joe Apodaca’ Submission:
Click Here To Read More About The Bogus ‘Sai Petition’ that Robert Priddy made reference to. Of course, Robert Priddy miserably failed to inform his readers (as he typically does) that Moreno was able to submit multiple submissions to the Newer Sai Petition and those submissions were approved by the Sai Petition administrators!

The Older Sai Petition allowed for anyone to submit as many comments he/she so desired without any sort of verification process in place (with an admission from Robert Priddy himself). Therefore, the first 824 “signatures” on the Older Sai Petition have rightly been called into question by Robert Priddy himself. Thank you Mr. Priddles!

Why should Moreno provide “documentary proof” that he submitted the name of “Joe Apodaca” to the Sai Petition? If the Sai Petition is truly a legitimate and legal petition (as critic’s allege) they should be able to contact “Joe Apodaca” and verify the submission for themselves. The fact that critic’s were/are unable to verify Joe Apodaca’s submission is “documentary proof” enough that Moreno made it!

Robert Priddy Falsifies Yet Another Sexual Abuse Claim:

Robert Priddy: “At the same time Moreno states that he wrote (under the pseudonym) he had been “sexually abused” in the comment accompanying the sabotage signature!”

Robert Priddy falsely claimed that Moreno stated he had been “sexually abused” by Sathya Sai Baba under the pseudonym of “Joe Apodaca”! Robert Priddy completely fabricated this claim and (once again) cannot source it to any verifiable references whatsoever.

However, Moreno can reference his rebuttal that he never (ever) submitted a signature to the bogus Sai Petition with any comment claiming (even indirectly) that he was “sexually abused” by Sathya Sai Baba. See for yourself (names submitted were “Joe Apodaca”, “Joe M”, “J M”, “Isaac Nivek” and “Kevin Iassa”):

Under the name “Joe Apodaca”, Moreno said: “I had a friend who died at Sathya Sai Baba’s ashram”. Nowhere did Moreno claim (even indirectly) that he was “sexually abused” by Sathya Sai Baba as falsely and maliciously stated by senile Robert Priddy. See a screencap of the Google search results for yourself:

Moreno also sent Robert Priddy an email about the name “Joe Apodaca” on July 24th 2005:

From: Joe (July 24th 2005)
Subject: Remove Fake Name:
To: Robert Priddy

Dear Mr. Priddles,

I wanted to bring to your attention that you have published a fake name on your “Ex-Office Bearers” site, located at:

http://home.no.net/anir/Sai/saiorg/EX-OFFICE%20BEARERS.htm

If you had only cared to read my site a little more thoroughly, you would have noticed that I clearly stated that “Joe Apodaca” was one of several fake names I used to expose the inherent dishonesty in the submission policy at SaiPetition.net. I even provided a screen capture to these fake names (which has been on my site since November 2004)!

Check for yourself:
http://www.saisathyasai.com/baba/sathya-sai-baba-and-petition-saipetitionnet.html

Although I used various derivatives of my name ‘Joe’ (2 of which were deleted from SaiPetition.net), I did not lie about knowing someone who died at Sathya Sai Baba’s Ashram. Michael Oliver was a very good friend of mine (his parents live 50 miles away from me). I was amazed that you met him (I read about it in your book). He never mentioned your name to me. Not even once.

At any rate, it makes one wonder why you would publish someone’s name, and a comment they made, without caring to verify their identity or their claim. This nicely makes my case that the signatures on SaiPetition.net are not verified (I happened to use a fake email as well). It also makes my case that Anti-Sai Activists (like yourself) disperse information ‘willy-nilly’, caring less for factual integrity and caring more for negative content.

Consequently, to save yourself further embarrassment, I suggest you make the necessary correction immediately. Although I must tell you that I have already screen captured the page and saved the cache. Maybe I can write an article, like the one you did with the Sai Organisation and the Westminster Cathedral? After all, you have such a fervent dedication to the truth, I am sure you wouldn’t mind if I applied the same standard to you that you apply to others.

Have a nice day.

Sincerely,

Joe Moreno

Further solidifying Moreno’s rebuttal are archived links going back to 2005 that prove Moreno never (ever) claimed he was sexually abused by Sathya Sai Baba under his “Joe Apodaca” pseudonym:

View Original Article About The Apodaca Signature
- Or View The November 19th 2005 Archive

View The Fake Name Google Cache
- Or View The July 7th 2006 Archive

View Email Correspondence With Robert Priddy
- Or View The July 19th 2006 Archive

Robert Priddy is a dirty old man who loves to tell dirty stories about others. Barry Pittard (a pseudo-moralist and heart-string-plucker extraordinaire) loves to revel in Robert Priddy’s dirty stories and actually endorses them! Of course, Barry Pittard has his own fair share of criticism regarding his highly questionable past. How can anyone believe anything Robert Priddy and Barry Pittard have to say about Sathya Sai Baba when they shamelessly libel others?

Pervert Priddy Continues Sexual Abuse Libels:
Robert Priddy formerly libeled Moreno as being “molested sexually” by Sathya Sai Baba and claimed that Moreno said his pants were lowered by the Guru! Of course, Moreno never (ever) made the fabricated claims that Robert Priddy attributed to him. Now, however, Robert Priddy is claiming that Moreno said his “lower stomach” was “massaged” with oil by Sathya Sai Baba. Moreno never (ever) claimed he was “massaged” with oil. Alan Kazlev (Robert Priddy’s psychic & reincarnating friend) is to be attributed with that disinformation.

The big question is:

WHY is Robert Priddy so sexually focused on Moreno’s non-sexual interview?

Robert Priddy is like a sexual deviant who can’t stop fantasizing about the possibility that Moreno was sexually molested by Sathya Sai Baba and keeps on twisting Moreno’s words with sexual innuendo and sexual inferences not rooted in fact.

If Robert Priddy openly falsifies sexual molestation claims against Moreno, what other sexual molestation claims is he fabricating as well?

If Barry Pittard openly endorses falsified sexual molestation claims against Moreno, what other falsified sexual molestation claims is he endorsing as well?

One must remember that Robert Priddy is actually trying to make the argument that even though Moreno explicitly stated he was not sexually abused by Sathya Sai Baba, one must ignore Moreno’s first-hand words and clarifications and instead rely on Robert Priddy’s sexual inferences based on descriptions he fabricated against Moreno! This from a man who claims he has not told a single lie!

Robert Priddy should stop embarrassing himself and the Anti-Sai Movement he defends. As one can see, Robert Priddy’s failing memory (strongly indicative of senile dementia) is getting him into a lot of trouble. Robert Priddy’s proven pathological lies have thoroughly compromised his so-called credibility and integrity. Those who support Robert Priddy’s gutter untruths (such as Barry Pittard, Timothy Conway, Kevin Shepherd, Alan Kazlev, Brian Steel, Serguei Badaev, Reinier Van Der Sandt, Andries Krugers Dagneaux, Basava Premanand, et al) are similarly compromised.

What next will come out of Robert Priddy’s mouth (besides spit, invective, libel and disinformation)? One can be certain that many things will come out of Robert Priddy’s mouth, but the truth won’t be one of them.

Sai Organization

2009-04-16T08:54:00.000-07:00

Sai Organization

Robert Priddy (a caustic critic and defamer of Sathya Sai Baba and others) said the following about Dr G Venkataraman and Joe Moreno’s defense of the Sai Organization:

Robert Priddy: “Despite Moreno’s oyymoronic claim that the Sathya Sai Organization needs no defending, it has been defended by Dr. G. Venkarataman of Radio Sai and also massively by Moreno himself. This defense was done because of documented evidence and testimony on a large scale of its unaccountability, planned disinformation and deceptions of the public, covering up and ignoring crimes, including murder and sexual molestations of which all its leaders are aware. They have failed to exercise duty of care and ignored mandatory reporting.”

It is entirely true that the Sai Organization does not need to be defended from any bona-fide or legal complaints because none have ever been filed with the police or courts of law in India.

The only defenses offered by Dr G Venkataraman and Joe Moreno for the Sai Organization are those that expose the massive fraudulence of critic’s smear, disinformation, hate and defamation campaigns against Sathya Sai Baba on the internet.

Robert Priddy said that the Sai Organization “failed to exercise duty of care and ignored mandated reporting” regarding allegations of sexual abuse. Actually, the only people who have “failed to exercise duty of care and ignored mandated reporting” regarding sexual abuse are alleged victims and their mothers and fathers who have all (without exception) failed and refused to file a single police complaint, court case or public grievance in India against Sathya Sai Baba. These irrefutable facts strongly argue that Sathya Sai Baba never abused anyone and alleged victim’s accounts are highly unbelievable and come from non-credible sources.

The big question that Robert Priddy and other critics continually ignore is:

WHY should the Sai Organization resort to the legalistic process of “mandated reporting” regarding internet rumors when all of the alleged victims (without exception) and all of their mothers, fathers and relatives (without exception) have all failed and refused to resort to the legalistic process of “mandated reporting” themselves against the Sai Organization?

Robert Priddy’s argument is reverse logic. Instead of harping on the legal and moral duties of the Sai Organization, he should be focusing on the legal and moral duties of alleged victims and their mothers and fathers (all of whom have never filed any sort of legalistic complaints in India against Sathya Sai Baba).

Priddy’s argument is akin to accusing a person of theft, demanding that the thief publicly repent and turn himself into the police although there are no police complaints or court cases alleging theft!

Robert Priddy can interpret Moreno’s exposure of his embarrassing lies as a “defense” of the Sai Organization if he so chooses. In fact, if anyone is defending the Sai Organization, it is Robert Priddy! Why? Because Robert Priddy’s claims are so exaggerated, his pathos so caricatured, his libels so brazen, his arguments so flawed, his bitterness so palpable, his hissy fits so shrieking, no one in his/her right mind can believe anything Robert Priddy has to say against the Sai Organization.

Robert Priddy is an LSD Advocate and publicly defends Alaya Rahm (the prime interviewee on the Secret Swami Documentary) although Alaya self-disclosed (in official court records) that he was a college drop-out and a decade-long daily-user of illegal street drugs and alcohol seeking a large money settlement from the Sathya Sai Baba Society Of America! The end result of Alaya’s court case: Self-Dismissed With Prejudice! Robert Priddy is also a fierce defender, promoter and associate of Conny Larsson, an ex-devotee turned self-professed Prophet and Psychic Trance Medium! And to top it all off, Robert Priddy fabricated sexual molestation claims against Moreno. If Robert Priddy has the temerity to falsify sexual molestation claims against Moreno, what other stories of sexual molestation is he falsifying as well?

Thank goodness that very few revel in Robert Priddy’s bigoted campaigns to substitute rumor and gossip for bona fide evidence. The only defense the Sai Organisation requires is against the voluminous lies, conspiracies, propaganda and rhetoric dispersed against it by people who have shown themselves (time and again) to be pathological prevaricators.

Public Pictures And Swami Premananda

2009-04-09T21:48:00.001-07:00

PUBLIC PICTURES AND SWAMI PREMANANDA

Ex-Devotees (in particular Robert Priddy and Psychic Trance Medium Conny Larsson) have whined considerably about the fact that Joe Moreno (a Pro-Sai Activist) removed his picture from his personal website. The argument made by Ex-Devotees is that the absence of Moreno’s public picture is indicative of deceit and dishonesty. Let us take a closer look at what Conny Larsson published about Moreno on his Anti-Baba domain (similar arguments against Moreno have been made on Robert Priddy’s Anti-Baba blog as well):

“Joe Moreno originally had the photo of himself as above on his website, but he he removed it very soon after he began his attacks on ExBaba and associates. Why did he feel the need to do this? Is he worried that he could be recognised by people in the Sai movement when he goes to India etc.? It is true that thieves like anonymity and the dark, and it seems this also applies to thieves of copyright materials and defamers who fear consequences. By engaging in debate as a public figure on the www, he has - according to US law - to put up with his face (or rather his own ‘bust’) and chosen setting being exhibited by participant and observer parties.”

When Moreno provided a screencap to a public domain picture of Robert Priddy and Kai Nicolai Priddy, the image was immediately removed. Why did Robert Priddy feel the need to do that? Is he a “thief” who likes “anonymity and the dark”?

When Moreno provided screencaps to public domain pictures of Conny Larsson giving “psychic trance healings” on various women, those pictures were immediately removed. Why did Conny Larsson feel the need to do that? Is he a “thief” who likes “anonymity and the dark”?

To Date: One will not find a single picture of the vocal ex-devotees: Barry Pittard, Brian Steel, Dave Lyons, Reidun Priddy, Dennis Hanisch, Arthur Klein, Randi Godager, Julian O’Donnell, Terry Gallagher, Stephen Carthew, Jens Sethi, Gurprit Sethi, UsedByBaba, Barbara Dent, Hari Sampath, NitWit Nastik, Hariram Jayaram, William Lo, Glen Meloy (now deceased), Richard Nelson, Roy Pendragon, Shirley Pike, Sharon Purcell (now deceased), Rick Raines, Diana Scott (Payne), among numerous other critics and ex-devotees. As a matter of fact, even Robert Priddy did not make his image publicly available on his Anti-Baba websites for many years (only recently did he add very small thumbnail-sized pictures to them).

Why do critics demand that Moreno provide his picture publicly when many of those in the Anti-Sai Movement haven’t done so themselves? The answer: Self-serving hypocrisy, pure and simple! Robert Priddy and Conny Larsson made the argument that Moreno is a “thief of copyright material” because he copied their pictures to his websites. However, Robert Priddy, Conny Larsson, Alan Kazlev and Reinier Van Der Sandt have all published Moreno’s picture on their Anti-Baba websites and blogs. Therefore, what does that make them? You guessed it: thieves of copyright material”!

NOTE TO EX-DEVOTEES: Please come forward with your pictures and post them publicly for all to see or all of you will be seen as hypocrites, faceless cowards and “thieves” who “like anonymity and the dark”. Have the courage to put into practice the standards that Robert Priddy and Conny Larsson demand from Moreno. Otherwise, your silence and failure to act will invalidate Robert Priddy and Conny Larsson’s self-serving arguments and justify Moreno’s choice not to publish his picture.

Regarding Swami Premananda:
Furthermore, Robert Priddy said:

Robert Priddy: “Having removed his personal account and any details about himself from his vishvarupa.com website, Moreno still defends the convicted murderer and rapist Swami Premananda (double life sentence confirmed by Supreme Court Appeal) at vishvarupa.com, though he has removed former materials about that too!”

First and foremost, Moreno’s “personal account and details” were never (ever) published on his vishvarupa.com domain (hence Priddy’s inability to find that information). Conny Larsson & Co. were the first ones to disperse this total disinformation about Moreno. As one can see, Robert Priddy is a gullible and naive sciolist who relies on other’s black propaganda to make his arguments against Moreno.

It is also amusing that Robert Priddy claimed that Moreno removed material about Swami Premananda from his vishvarupa.com domain. In truth, Moreno’s material about Swami Premananda was never removed from his website: See for yourself. One is left to wonder where exactly Robert Priddy is getting his disinformation from and why he miserably failed to double check his facts before attempting to peddle his shoddy lies as the pristine truth.

Click Here too read how the UK’s leading DNA expert, Dr. Wilson J. Wall, testified that the DNA samples used to convict Swami Premananda were fraudulent. As a matter of fact Dr. Wilson J. Wall said the following about the court cases against Swami Premananda:

Dr. Wilson J. Wall: “Someone is trying to set-up Swami Premananda. The DNA case is a fabrication from start to finish. This deception throws a terrible shadow over validity of DNA fingerprinting if now there are scientists who are prepared to misuse it to find the innocent guilty.”

The book “The DNA Detectives” by Dr. W.J. Wall (which was published in August 2005) explains the fraudulent use of DNA evidence in the Swami Premananda case. Also, all of the alleged rape victims said they were tortured into giving false testimonies by the police and have since recanted their statements against Swami Premananda and have returned to his ashram.

Robert Priddy libeled Moreno as being sexually abused by Sathya Sai Baba and similarly claimed that Moreno removed his interview experience from his website (a bold faced lie). Moreno’s interview is still available on the internet and has never been removed: See For Yourself.

Robert Priddy’s atrocious researching abilities result in utter fiascoes of disinformation that are wildy and recklessly propagated as “irrefutable truth”! It is beyond dispute that the quaesitum of Robert Priddy’s rodomontades is the implementation of conniving techniques to woo over fatuitous egotists (which come a dime-a-dozen in the Anti-Sai movement) by using gutter tactics such as scapegoating, conspiracy theory, black propaganda and demagoguery.

Robert Priddy has effectively negated himself as a credible factor in the Anti-Sai-Baba movement and his proxy allegations, unsubstainated accusations and bold-faced libels can best be compared to sand castles that have been demolished and now blow across Ozymandias’s dead empire.

I met a traveller from an antique land
Who said: Two vast and trunkless legs of stone
Stand in the desert. Near them on the sand,
Half sunk, a shatter’d visage lies, whose frown
And wrinkled lip and sneer of cold command
Tell that its sculptor well those passions read
Which yet survive, stamp’d on these lifeless things,
The hand that mock’d them and the heart that fed.
And on the pedestal these words appear:
“My name is Ozymandias, king of kings:
Look on my works, ye Mighty, and despair!”
Nothing beside remains: round the decay
Of that colossal wreck, boundless and bare,
The lone and level sands stretch far away.

By substituting the name of Ozymandias with “Robert Priddy”, Percy Bysshe Shelley’s poem seems remarkably apropos...

Sai Petition And SaiSathyaSai Server

2009-04-08T07:56:00.000-07:00

SAI PETITION & SAISATHYASAI SERVER

Robert Priddy (a caustic defamer and critic of Sathya Sai Baba and others) said:

Robert Priddy: Ever since shortly after he first appeared as a pro-Sai obfuscator (and saboteur of the International Sai petition with bogus and untruthful submissions and comments) in 2004, Gerald Joe Moreno has tried to hide his face and cover his tracks on the Internet. He posted his website via an Indian third party web service to make locating his server undiscoverable to non-technical Internet users. This was nonetheless traced to U.S. server lunarpages.com, where libelous websites by him are still hosted.

About The Bogus ‘Sai Petition’:
Click Here To Read About The Bogus ‘Sai Petition’ mentioned by Robert Priddy.

Robert Priddy just fully acknowledged that “bogus and untruthful submissions and comments” were submitted to the Sai Petition by Moreno. Of course, the big questions are:

How was Moreno able to submit “bogus and untruthful submissions and comments” to the Sai Petition if it was truly a legitimate and legal Petition that verified its signatures and submissions?

If Moreno was able to submit “bogus and untruthful submissions and comments” to the Sai Petition, then who is to say that others did not submit “bogus and untruthful submissions and comments” to the ‘Sai Petition’ as well?

Why did Robert Priddy take one of Moreno’s openly faked names from the Sai Petition (which Moreno publicly disclosed on his website) and use it as a genuine and first-hand signature against Sathya Sai Baba (Ref)?

Thank you Robert Priddy for finally admitting that “bogus and untruthful submissions and comments” were submitted and accepted into the ‘Sai Petition’! That's exactly what Moreno has been saying all along.

About The SaiSathyaSai.com Server:
Robert Priddy’s comments about Moreno’s saisathysai.com domain reveal his profound ignorance about the internet. Of course, this is not the first time that Robert Priddy publicly embarrassed himself with his remedial research (which he attempts to peddle as the “truth” to other unsuspecting “non-technical internet users” such as himself). Robert Priddy formerly claimed (and still does) that Moreno used/uses anonymous and cloaked IPs, since proven ridiculous lies. Robert Priddy and other Ex-Devotees do not know how to read IP headers and even attributed IPs generated by their own computers to Moreno.

Moreno’s saisathyasai.com domain has never (ever) been posted “via an Indian third party web service”. Robert Priddy does not provide any verifiable references to support this ridiculous claim against Moreno. Moreno purchased his domain names through GoDaddy.com, which provides privacy services that protect domain registrants from spammers, scammers, spoofers, etc., by hiding one’s name, address, phone number and email address from public WhoIs results. Server information, however, is not hidden and is readily available on GoDaddy.com WhoIs inquiries.

Robert Priddy’s SaiBaba.org.uk Domain:
Robert Priddy anonymously registered his saibaba.org.uk domain (which attempted to fraudulently impersonate an Official UK Sai Organisation domain). The WhoIs results for Robert Priddy’s saibaba.org.uk domain provided the following details:

Domain name: saibaba.org.uk

Registrant: None

Registrant type: Unknown

Registrant’s address: Agathe Grondahlsgate 2b, Oslo 0478 NO

Relevant dates:
Registered on: 20-Aug-2007
Renewal date: 20-Aug-2009

Therefore Robert Priddy implicates himself in the very same reprehensible behavior he attributed to Moreno. Hypocrisy, clear and simple! Why did Robert Priddy register his fraudulent saibaba.org.uk domain anonymously with a UK designation when he lives in Oslo, Norway? If anyone is attempting to deceive others about web hosting servers, it is Robert Priddy.

Robert Priddy should first come clean about his fraudulent domain name and how he was barred from posting Sai Baba material on that domain (the details of which are fanatically guarded secrets) before attempting to criticize Moreno who has done nothing wrong.

Moreno has to repeatedly deflate Robert Priddy’s fatuous arguments that are fueled by his total disinformation, lack of knowledge about the internet and self-generated hot air. But then again, what more to expect from Robert Priddy, an LSD advocate and pathological prevaricator who openly advocated for a Pro-Drug forum intended for drug users and who publicly libeled Moreno as being sexually abused by Sathya Sai Baba?

Robert Priddy Cites Forum For Drug Users

2009-04-04T08:05:00.000-07:00

ROBERT PRIDDY CITES FORUM FOR DRUG USERS

LSD Advocate - Robert Priddy - Comes Clean:
After several years of beating around the bush and indirectly claiming authorship to three articles eulogizing LSD-induced hallucinations, Robert Priddy has finally come clean and publicly acknowledged (for the first time) that he is the author of the three LSD articles in question.

Robert C. Priddy created his own Wikipedia page in which he publicly solicited himself as a notable person in relation to Philosophy and his former Indian Guru Sri Sathya Sai Baba. Robert C. Priddy released his biographical data on a personal website hosted by a free, online hosting company in Oslo, Norway (home.no.net/anir/Nos/). On this free web-hosting domain, Robert Priddy personally disclosed biographical data that included stories of his experimentation with LSD, cannabis and other strong bio-chemicals. Robert Priddy deleted all of his public domain LSD-related webpages after he defected from the Sai Movement, apparently perceiving those LSD articles as a liability to his self-professed credibility, integrity and objectivity (Ref). Robert C. Priddy is now attempting to remove his relevant, unsavory, public and self-disclosed biographical data from the internet, although the material in question was released by him into the public domain as self-disclosure.

The DMCA And Google Both Ignore Robert Priddy’s Copyright Claims:
Robert Priddy claimed that he filed several copyright complaints (about Moreno’s duplication of his LSD articles) with the DMCA (Digital Millennium Copyright Act) and with Google (a multi-billion dollar corporation fully versed and compliant with copyright laws). According to Robert Priddy, both the DMCA and Google disregarded his copyright complaints (proving that Moreno’s duplication of his LSD articles falls under “Fair Use” and would not be considered an issue of copyright infringement). The articles in question were: 1) Unaltered; 2) Attributed; 3) Not dispersed for financial gains or published on a business website; 4) Taken from a free, online webhosting domain (not from a book or magazine).

Robert Priddy’s Relevant LSD Articles (for which he now publicly claims authorship) are:

Robert Priddy’s “The Psychedelic Experience” (or Archive 01)

Robert Priddy’s “Truth, Being And Bliss” (or Archive 01)

Robert Priddy’s “A Vision Of Cosmic Energy” (or Archive 01)

Robert Priddy Claims His LSD-Induced Hallucinations Were Genuine Experiences:
On Robert Priddy’s Anti-Baba blog, he said the following about his LSD-induced hallucinations:

Robert Priddy: On LSD-25 and alleged “drug-induced hallucinations” Moreno makes false assumptions in dismissing LSD-25 experiences merely as induced hallucinations - it is very far from being so simple. Hallucinations can occur as a result of LSD, but they did not in my case. I was a student interested in psychiatry and psychology and my dose of LSD-25 was actually provided by the Norwegian Minister of Health explicitly for experimental purposes! Only one who has experienced it can have any idea at all of what inner clarity and scope of the mind may be released, if one is well-balanced and fortunate in the circumstances. In that I was in company with many well-known writers and hands-on researchers on the subject (egs. Aldous Huxley, Gerald Heard, Professor Susan Blackmore etc.) The dangers are considerable for borderline psychotics and others, so experiments are definitely not to be recommended to the public.

In Robert Priddy’ detailed LSD articles (and in a subsequent update added by him after a Pro-Sai Activist found the LSD-related webpages), he never stated that his LSD-25 was “provided by the Norwegian Minister of Health explicitly for experimental purposes”. Robert Priddy specifically stated he first experimented with cannabis then later experimented with LSD when he was 26 years old in 1963 with his friend Eric Steadman (with whom he shared a “perfect unspoken telepathic awareness”) and the entire episode was saved on a tape-recorder he turned on.

Although Robert Priddy wrote about his LSD experiences in depth, he never mentioned anything about any University officials, volunteer testing, Karl Evang or that the LSD-25 he took was “provided by the Norwegian Minister of Health explicitly for experimental purposes”. Furthermore, Robert Priddy admitted he experimented with cannabis before he experimented with LSD in 1963, experimented with “strong bio-chemicals” and LSD years after he experimented with LSD in 1963 and even wrote about another LSD-induced hallucination in 1965. Therefore, Robert Priddy fully acknowledged he experimented with drugs prior to and after his initial LSD trip in 1963. Was Robert Priddy also using cannabis and other “strong bio-chemicals” for “experimental purposes”? Although Robert Priddy whined that his druggy years are “outdated” and “ancient”, it is amusing to note the he eulogized his “outdated” and “ancient” druggy years:

In 1988 (25 years later) in his LSD article entitled “TRUTH, BEING AND BLISS - AN AMAZING PSYCHEDELIC EXPERIENCE - Described By Robert C. Priddy - British author & ret’d researcher and teacher in philosophy and sociology, University of Oslo, Norway” (Ref).

In 1994 (31 years later) in his book “Source Of The Dream”, pg: 16-7, Chapter 2: ‘When the Soil is Ready’ (Ref).

In 2009 (46 years later) on his Anti-Baba blog in an article entitled “Copyright Infringement By SathyaSaiBaba”.

In the referenced quote above, Robert Priddy claimed “I was a student interested in psychiatry and psychology”. Robert Priddy told a different story in his LSD article entitled “The Psychedelic Experience - On how I came to psychedelic experiences By Robert C. Priddy”. In that article, Robert Priddy said he was a student of philosophy and sociology (not “psychiatry and psychology”) and that he considered psychology “mostly irrelevant to understanding people, myself or anything remotely like the psyche”!

It is also significant to point out that the scientific community (contrary to Robert Priddy’s layman claims) unanimously agrees that LSD is a hallucinogenic drug and is commonly referred to as a “hallucinogen” (Refs: 01 - 02 - 03 - 04).

When Sai Devotees attribute extraordinary experiences, dreams or visions to Sathya Sai Baba (without the aid of drugs), Robert Priddy bashes those experiences as mere flights of fantasy, imagination, mental disorder and/or projection. However, when it comes to Robert Priddy’s LSD experiences (induced with the aid of drugs), he proudly proclaims them as genuine and bona-fide! This is the type of Anti-Guru / Pro-LSD weirdo who continually attempts to invalidate Sai devotees for their spiritual experiences! If a person claimed a spiritual experience, who would you be more inclined to believe:

A person who never used drugs?

A person tripping on LSD?

And let us not forget what exactly Robert Priddy claimed was revealed to him when he tripped on LSD. Robert Priddy claimed he saw (amidst lots of fluff and airy-fairy scenes) his wrist break with the bones sticking out of his flesh, compared the experience to what “schizophrenics may experience with intensity”, that his mind was ”deranged” and that his mind was “shattered into pieces again and again”. Gee, that doesn’t sound “hallucinatory” at all, does it? (sarcasm implied)

LSD Advocate Robert Priddy Refers Readers To A Pro-Drug Website:
Attempting to bolster the case for his experimentation with LSD, Robert Priddy posted the following link on his Anti-Baba blog (click image to enlarge):

Robert Priddy: For objective source materials and intelligent discussions of LSD-25, see this major Forum

Since “scholar” Robert Priddy (who always boasts how thorough his research is) provided a link to drugs-forum.com (and described it as being “objective” and providing “intelligent discussions of LSD-25”), he apparently researched the site thoroughly and approved of its contents.

Let us take a closer look at drugs-forum.com, a website Robert Priddy described as “objective” and providing “intelligent discussions of LSD-25”.

First and foremost, drugs-forum.com is an international Pro-Drug website where users can request and/or share information on how to take, grow, purchase, make and use all types of illegal drugs, including LSD-25 (Refs: 01 - 02 - 03 or View Entire LSD Threads). All of these LSD-related threads prove that the discussions therein are far removed from being “objective” and do not provide “intelligent discussions on LSD-25”.

Drugs-forum.com provides numerous threads advocating for legalizing all types of drugs (Ref) and even provides threads about which drugs maximize sexual experiences (Ref). Drugs-forum.com also provides picture galleries so that users can identify hallucinogenic mushrooms, peyote, opiods, hallucinogenic cacti and hallucinogenic plants (Ref). A majority of the posts on the drugs-forum.com domain are chock full of invectives and graphic language. This is the type of Pro-Drug forum that “scholar” Robert Priddy described as being “objective” and providing “intelligent discussions on LSD-25”! Perhaps Robert Priddy posts on that Pro-Drug forum since he claims to know it so well, he actually provided a link to it on his Anti-Baba blog.

Robert Priddy revealed his drug advocacy and revealed his standards for “objectivity” and “intelligent discussion” by citing a Pro-Drug forum full of invectives that is intended for drug users! Thank you, Mr. Priddles for coming clean once again!

Robert Priddy, Kevin Shepherd, Drugs-Forum.com & Stanislav Grof:
It is also amusing to note that the drugs-forum.com webpage that Robert Priddy linked to (which he described as being “objective” and providing “intelligent discussions of LSD-25”), linked directly to another drugs-forum.com LSD webpage that strongly advocated for Stanislav Grof’s book “History Of LSD Therapy” (Ref). The drugs-forum.com website provides over 120 pro-articles on Stanislav Grof, holotropic breathwork and Pro-LSD research (Ref). The reason why this is so amusing is because Robert Priddy professes friendship and alliance with Kevin Shepherd, a staunch Anti-Drug, Anti-LSD and Anti-Grof critic! Isn’t it ironic that Kevin R.D. Shepherd professes friendship and alliance with Robert Priddy although:

Robert Priddy eulogized and promoted LSD for those who are “well-balanced and fortunate in the circumstances”.

Robert Priddy eulogized his LSD-induced experiences as bona fide revelations and not as the result of hallucinations (an absurd and dubious claim at best).

Robert Priddy solicited the objectivity and intelligent discussions of a Pro-Drug forum intended for drug users.

Robert Priddy solicited the objectivity and intelligent discussions of a Pro-Drug forum intended for drug users that strongly advocates for Stanislav Grof, Holotropic Breathwork and the benefits of LSD.

What more can I say more about Robert Priddy and his laughable views, absurd arguments and clown-like antics about LSD? This is the guy who is attempting to “expose” Sathya Sai Baba. Well, the truth is now out about Robert Priddy (direct from his personal blog) and there is no stopping it! Expect Robert Priddy to do damage control, offer no apologies, deflect from the issue and bore everyone with his mindless prattle. Afterall, that is what he does best.

PREDICTABLE APRIL 8th 2009 UPDATE:
After publishing this article about Robert Priddy’s loud endorsement of drugs-forum.com, a Pro-Drug Forum intended for drug users (which he described as containing “objective source materials and intelligent discussions of LSD-25”), Robert Priddy rushed to do damage control (just as Moreno predicted he would) and removed the link to drugs-forum.com by saying:

Robert Priddy: “Please note: Having looked more closely at the web pages on LSD-25 I had first linked to here I found them partly very misleading and that there was an overall bias towards possibly dangerous viewpoints, though there was also nonetheless a good deal of accurate historical and other materials in them and/or linked to them. As a whole those pages do not represent my standpoint, therefore the link is deleted”

“Scholar” Robert Priddy (who constantly claims he conducts thorough research) argued that drugs-forum.com (a Pro-Drug Forum intended for drug users) contained “objective source materials and intelligent discussions of LSD-25”). Now, however, Robert Priddy is claiming that his initial assessement of drugs-forum.com was wrong and the website is not as “objective” or as ”intelligent” as he first assessed it to be.

Why doesn’t Robert Priddy specifically tell us which webpages on drugs-forum.com (a Pro-Drug Forum intended for drug users) contained a “good deal of accurate historical and other materials in them and/or linked to them”?

Perhaps Robert Priddy’s change of heart was prompted by an email I sent to Kevin Shepherd about Priddy’s Pro-Drug advocacy? Kevin Shepherd is a notorious critic of the Findhorn Foundation, Stanislav Grof and LSD. Kevin Shepherd has a lot of face to lose by allying himself with LSD-advocate Robert Priddy. Well, for interested Findhorn Foundation members, Stanislav Grof advocates and LSD critics, Robert Priddy still believes that there is absolutely nothing wrong with using LSD and that his LSD trips were not hallucinatory in nature (although LSD is a hallucinogen)!

Rather, Robert Priddy would have the world believe that LSD is simply a great “mind clearer” that produces out-of-body experiences that result in enlightenment and visions of broken bones sticking out of bloody flesh! What more can one do but laugh out loud at Kevin Shepherd and his LSD-advocating friend, Robert Priddy?