tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30786249.post116592401387861939..comments2007-02-19T12:50:47.961ZComments on Fluffytek Art Blog: Lulu.com – not for me.Richnoreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30786249.post-1165942028762875672006-12-12T16:47:00.000Z2006-12-12T16:47:00.000ZI sent them CYMK (or at least that was the opton I...I sent them CYMK (or at least that was the opton I selected in Acrobat).<BR/><BR/>I dont think the colour issues are the worst as I'm sure they could be overcome, but the actual quality of the prints were just too awful. Even if the greyscale reproduction had been right, the quality (speckles and lines) were just unacceptable.Richardhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04449619427741048486noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30786249.post-1165939147978104382006-12-12T15:59:00.000Z2006-12-12T15:59:00.000ZOk.. having been here before with a company other ...Ok.. having been here before with a company other than Lulu. I have to ask.. the images, before you embedded them in PDF, did you set the color seperation to CMYK, or RGB?<BR/><BR/>the problems I had.. were first, with the color images. even in CMYK seperations, they stunk..<BR/><BR/>the publication, also included Black and whites, which were converted to greyscale.. WRONG! because the pub. had color, it was all color. .I desaturated, and changed all the BW's to CMYK, and much better.<BR/><BR/>So.. what seperations did you send them?iksodashttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10853351447597055268noreply@blogger.com