tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30618809.post3736957726012897698..comments2008-11-02T20:59:02.641-08:00Catherine McCormack-Skibahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03707398699208090454noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30618809.post-28840174221402295502008-11-02T20:57:00.000-08:002008-11-02T20:57:00.000-08:00

Thanks for clarifying, this makes much more sense to me now when you relate it to abrupt changes in pricing. As you say there is always room for existing models to be challenged... great posting Brian.

Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30618809.post-79584337382408170722008-11-02T20:54:00.000-08:002008-11-02T20:54:00.000-08:00

This a very useful knowledge! Thanks Brian.

Gringohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10628811617256542161noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30618809.post-78870039003235001662008-10-31T20:19:00.000-07:002008-10-31T20:19:00.000-07:00

Anon, by &#39;naturally&#39; I mean that the work in this scenario has yet to stand by itself within the mainstream market. A natural development of pricing over time is almost always the best way to go. It makes the market for a specific artists work more stable in the long run. <BR/><BR/>Thus, if a young artist goes from selling works for a few thousand independently to selling art for $20,000

Balhatainhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08812426376810899256noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30618809.post-4231887533397143712008-10-31T18:16:00.000-07:002008-10-31T18:16:00.000-07:00

Dear Brian<BR/><BR/>Important article that would be of significance to many artists. <BR/><BR/>I would just like to ask you, what exactly did you mean in the opening section "to be established naturally within the context of the art market." ?<BR/><BR/>Specifically I would like to understand what and why assumptions have been made about how the art market 'should' operate, or how an artist's

Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com