Comments on vt.Buzz ~ a political blog: Douglas lifts Sand ban

Readers might want to read today's Caledonian Reco...

2007-12-21T08:36:00.000-05:00

Readers might want to read today's Caledonian Record editorial regarding the difference in law enforcement between the Northeast Kingdom and leftist meccas such as Windham and Chittenden counties. Nice to know there still is a place where the politically connected face the same justice as the rest of us peons!

Anonymous said... "You want to be Speaker of the V...

2007-12-18T07:59:00.000-05:00

Anonymous said...

"You want to be Speaker of the Vt. House. You want to be social and economic policy czar of Vt. You want to be "enforcer of orthodoxy" of Vt. Dems."

I do, eh? As always, feel free to cough up some evidence to substantiate that contention, little fella.

That's what I thought.

"You'll never be any of the above. Get used to it."

As opposed to the lunatic fringe fraud likes of you, little fella?

Again, feel free to demonstrate where I've expressed a desire to be Speaker, shmendrik.

The floor is yours.

That's what I thought.

Nice try. No sale.

Always a pleasure.

It's always nice to hear the "take back Vermont tr...

2007-12-18T07:51:00.000-05:00

It's always nice to hear the "take back Vermont trash" perspective - ignorant and ill-informed as it is - from bubbles and his invisible anonymous legion-of-lunatics supporters.

First of all, if you don't like Sanders, get yourself a qualified candidate and vote him out of office.

That's what those of us who've seen enough of Douglas's song and dance are going to have to do.

Why should it be any different for Bernie's coalition of the clueless critics?

That's what I thought.

I've got news for you nitwits. Both of ya.

Your nitwit-nonsense act didn't fly when Ruthie Dwyer and her Tunbridge Taliban supporters got smoked twice within the past decade.

Moreover, there's no evidence whatsoever that your take back Vermont trash shtick has gained any supporters lately.

Therefore, unless you can supply something even remotely resembling supporting evidence for your bogus assertions, stuff a sock in it.

Get yourselves some new nitwit-nonsense gop-slop to sling.

Dismissed.

You want to be Speaker of the Vt. House. You want...

2007-12-18T07:49:00.000-05:00

You want to be Speaker of the Vt. House. You want to be social and economic policy czar of Vt. You want to be "enforcer of orthodoxy" of Vt. Dems.

You'll never be any of the above. Get used to it.

Anonymous said... "Hey, ass: enforcing the law and...

2007-12-18T07:05:00.000-05:00

Anonymous said...

"Hey, ass: enforcing the law and giving equal treatment under the law is not a Dem v. Repub issue. In fact, letting rich white upperclass people off is a Republican trait."

You're, damned skippy it is, sport.

As always, feel free to point out where I said it was with respect to the former or it wasn't with respect to the latter.

That's what I thought.

You're firm grasp of the obvious never ceases to amaze, little fella.

"In addition, you implicitly claim that all Dems would agree that Martha Davis should have been let off. Guess what? You're wong. Again."

I do, eh? I am, eh?

See previous answer.

That's what I thought.

You're sense of "white and wong" is as psychotically skewed as ever, sport.

"Wannabe."

Really? Precisely just what is it that I want to be in your estimation, little fella, and what evidence do you have to support your assertion?

That's what I thought.

Always a pleasure, putz.

Hey, ass: enforcing the law and giving equal trea...

2007-12-17T22:04:00.000-05:00

Hey, ass: enforcing the law and giving equal treatment under the law is not a Dem v. Repub issue. In fact, letting rich white upperclass people off is a Republican trait.

In addition, you implicitly claim that all Dems would agree that Martha Davis should have been let off. Guess what? You're wong. Again.

Your opinions do not equal Dem. party positions.

Wannabe.

Anonymous said... "You're entitled to your opinion...

2007-12-17T18:50:00.000-05:00

Anonymous said...

"You're entitled to your opinion, and to be wrong."

Thanks anyway, but that's more your cup a tea. Feel free to swill my cup with your gop-slop kool-aid.

"Possessing marijuana is illegal. Growing marijuana is illegal. A white upperclass professional, and a professional colleague of the prosecutor, got preferential treatment. You and I would probably be doing jail time for the same offense."

So is criminal negligence, war crimes and destroying evidence, but look who's still President and who still supports him, pinhead.

It's also expensive. You want your taxes going up to pay for investigation, arrest and prosecution and incarceration of petty, non-violent crime? Fine. I don't. If you're feeling so generous, you can pay my share, too.

Anybody else want sport and bubbles pickin' up the check for the costs for non-violent criminals? Evidently, they're feelin' flush and charitable with cash to burn. I for one wouldn't dream of depriving them of such pleasure in this Season of Giving.

Besides, the War on Drugs is having the same deterrent effect that prohibition had on Al Capone.

The Corrections Budget is already up 10 percent from last year. That's a lot more than Education's up, little fella.

"Douglas got it right. "Decriminalization" was never the issue here. The appearance of preferential treatment was the issue."

Yeah, I'm sure the Orange Country revelation had nothin' to do with it.

Nice try. No sale.

Once again, you prove your loyalty to the Democratic Party is beyond reproach.

Always a pleasure.

You're entitled to your opinion, and to be wrong.P...

2007-12-17T16:51:00.000-05:00

You're entitled to your opinion, and to be wrong.

Possessing marijuana is illegal. Growing marijuana is illegal. A white upperclass professional, and a professional colleague of the prosecutor, got preferential treatment. You and I would probably be doing jail time for the same offense.

Douglas got it right. "Decriminalization" was never the issue here. The appearance of preferential treatment was the issue.

Balls had nothin' to do with it. He did it because...

2007-12-17T14:15:00.000-05:00

Balls had nothin' to do with it.

He did it because he'd been exposed as the fraud he is and has no case.

At least the Governor had the balls to change his ...

2007-12-16T22:16:00.001-05:00

At least the Governor had the balls to change his mind.

Pollina 08'

2007-12-16T22:16:00.000-05:00

Pollina 08'

Ask and ye shall receive, little fella.I'd give ya...

2007-12-16T21:09:00.000-05:00

Ask and ye shall receive, little fella.

I'd give ya more but I'm just too damned lazy to change threads.

So, is this where ya blame it on the other anonymous posters and go off about my role in the War on Christmas or are ya gonna finally grow a pair, grow up and fess up?

That's what I thought.

Always a pleasure.

Knock yourself out, little fella.

---------------------------------------------

bubba said...
Why doesn't Vermont just legalize ALL drugs and pedophilia and start concentrating on serious stuff like trying to start a business without all of the ACT 250 permits or the newly-arrived Volvonistas approval? Sure would make it easier for Vermont judges. Don't worry about the kids, they're just going to move out of state anyways!

4:55 PM, December 11, 2007

Anonymous said...
"He acted stupidly because he's a gop"

"Sticking with people and policies that are fundamentally-dishonest, two-faced"

Please provide facts that support and prove these assertions. Otherwise please take your position in line with the 'coalition of clueless' you so frequently berate.

If there are fundmental dishonesty and two-faced actions they whould be proven with fact not half baked assertions.

I look forward to your ranting brillance little fella.

4:58 PM, December 11, 2007

Anonymous said...
Well said Bubba. All these rules just get in the way. After all, we are Vermonters and nobody should be telling us what to do unless of course it is the Progs helping us better redistribute our incomes from those fat cats to masses.

5:08 PM, December 11, 2007

Anonymous said...
It's all about perception isn't it. We all saw the same set of facts. You perceive he blew it. I perceive he did the right thing.

Deciding right and wrong after the fact is easy. He had to make a call based on available facts at the time and remain open-minded enough to adjust his position if newer facts come to light. He did and good for him. That's why VT respects and elects him.

I suspect if JD made the statement 'the sky is blue' there would be an outpouring against the statement just because he is a GOP. And as JW has already told us, GOP=Stupid(even though he has offered no proof just his slanted opinion).

Let's not pretend. There has been nothing but opinion on any of these blogs from the right, left or whatever point of view JWCOOP represents.

8:40 AM, December 12, 2007

Anonymous said...
jw you haven't laid out a fact yet. In fact when asked to on earlier threads you said you didn't need to prove or disprove your points...something about it being the American way

You are a joke. In fact I read your posts before I read the funny papers.

1:55 PM, December 12, 2007

bubba said...
Hey Poop, you pathetic fruitcake, Hoffer DOESN'T WANT TO BE YOUR FRIEND anymore, didn't that sink into your pointy little head when he STOPPED blogging after you started kissing up to him?

2:04 PM, December 12, 2007

Anonymous said...
As for the who's stupid question take a look at the latest Gallup poll results.

A new Gallup Poll, conducted Dec. 6-9, finds 37% of Americans approving of the job George W. Bush is doing as president, an IMPROVEMENT from his recent scores in the low 30s. Meanwhile, 22% of Americans approve of Congress, essentially unchanged from last month.

At the time of last year's midterm elections, when voters transferred partisan control of Congress from the Republicans to the Democrats, 26% of Americans approved of Congress. After a brief "honeymoon period" at the beginning of the year, and nearly a year after the Democrats took control, Americans' views of Congress are no more positive (and are actually a bit more NEGATIVE) than at the tail end of Republican rule.

So JW...the survey is fact. Bush actually seems to be improving in the view of the US. The Pelosi/Reid coalition seems to be in a continued free fall offering the Country nothing positive. 22% seem to think their leadership is doing a good job... 1 in 5. GW's rating is 68% higher.

So now what is the definition of stupid?

Always a pleasure little fella.

2:08 PM, December 12, 2007

bubba said...
Bush has paid the price of standing upon principles, not the latest poll, ala Slick Willy. He is hated by the left-wing elitists because in their own self-importance, cannot believe that he whipped their precious little Gore-Kerry twin pack. And has kept America from attack since 9/11. You will never read about the low unemployment (lower than any time during Slick Willie's years), continually growing economy, or any good news in Iraq in their papers, or of course, their beloved NPR!

3:58 PM, December 12, 2007

Anonymous said...
As for the who's stupid question take a look at the latest Gallup poll results.

A new Gallup Poll, conducted Dec. 6-9, finds 37% of Americans approving of the job George W. Bush is doing as president, an IMPROVEMENT from his recent scores in the low 30s. Meanwhile, 22% of Americans approve of Congress, essentially unchanged from last month.

At the time of last year's midterm elections, when voters transferred partisan control of Congress from the Republicans to the Democrats, 26% of Americans approved of Congress. After a brief "honeymoon period" at the beginning of the year, and nearly a year after the Democrats took control, Americans' views of Congress are no more positive (and are actually a bit more NEGATIVE) than at the tail end of Republican rule.

So JW...the survey is fact. Bush actually seems to be improving in the view of the US. The Pelosi/Reid coalition seems to be in a continued free fall offering the Country nothing positive. 22% seem to think their leadership is doing a good job... 1 in 5. GW's rating is 68% higher.

So now what is the definition of stupid?

Always a pleasure little fella.

2:08 PM, December 12, 2007

bubba said...
Bush has paid the price of standing upon principles, not the latest poll, ala Slick Willy. He is hated by the left-wing elitists because in their own self-importance, cannot believe that he whipped their precious little Gore-Kerry twin pack. And has kept America from attack since 9/11. You will never read about the low unemployment (lower than any time during Slick Willie's years), continually growing economy, or any good news in Iraq in their papers, or of course, their beloved NPR!

3:58 PM, December 12, 2007
Anonymous said...
Bubba, I agree. I believe what the poll reflects is that the average rational American has realized the Dems are all talk. They made big assertions and promises then delivered nothing.

Much like the traffic on this board, it is easy to point out all the issues. It is much tougher when you are in the driver's seat and have to make and be accountable for decisions. I suspect few if any of the most opinionated in this crowd have actually been in a position of real responsibility.

It would actually be interesting to understand the demographics of the posters.

6:08 PM, December 12, 2007

Anonymous said...
"One look at the composition of the State Legislature should tell ya just how persuasive Vermonters find your ignorant, ill-informed, knuckle-draggin' nitwit take on things to be."

I have looked. It is a fine collection of unqualified dairy farmers, shop owners and retired school teachers. A fine crowd to deal with the real issues facing the state.

In a state where we require beauticians and tatto artists to be licensed and qualified we accept a complete lack of qualification to be a member of the legislature.

I think if you look at the accomplishments of the group last year in Montpelier it says it all. Nothing was put forward and nothing was accomplished. What a waste of taxpayer money. The real Vermonters you reference apparently prefer the under qualified. Perhaps its less threatening to you.

6:17 PM, December 12, 2007

bubba said...
"Has any other President in US History been as low in the polls for as long as Bush, little fella?"

Liberal hero Harry Truman, last poll in 1951, favorable rating: 23%

YA FAILED TO ADDRESS THE THAT LONG COMPONENT OF THE QUESTION, BUBBLES

ALWAYS A PLEASURE.

12:21 PM, December 13, 2007

Anonymous said...
Just a couple of the headlines from today's press....for your reading entertainment:

Democrats Blaming Each Other For Failures

By Jonathan Weisman and Paul Kane
Washington Post Staff Writers

Thursday, December 13, 2007; A01
When Democrats took control of Congress in January, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and Senate Majority Leader Harry M. Reid (D-Nev.) pledged to jointly push an ambitious agenda to counter 12 years of Republican control.
Now, as Congress struggles to adjourn for Christmas, relations between House Democrats and their colleagues in the Senate have devolved into finger-pointing.

From the Wall Street Journal….

Intraparty Feuds Dog Democrats, Stall Congress
BY DAVID ROGERS

WASHINGTON -- Democrats took control of Congress last January promising a "new direction." A year later, the image that haunts them most is one symbolizing no direction at all: gridlock.

From USAToday…

Our view on war in Iraq: Surge's success holds chance to seize the moment in Iraq.

Instead, Democrats are lost in time

From THE HILL.com…

Dems Cave on Spending
By Alexander Bolton

December 13, 2007
Senate and House Democrats backed down Wednesday from a spending showdown with President Bush.
The Democrats’ capitulation Wednesday on the total domestic spending level is the latest instance of Bush prevailing on a major policy showdown.

Facts, facts and more facts ....hmmm.

Who is pleased with who's performance? It seems the libs are turning out to be more talk than action. I guess its tough when you have to be accountable for your actions.

1:07 PM, December 13, 2007

Anonymous said...
"I guess its tough when you have to be accountable for your actions"

Yeah, who was it that started this war? Oh yeah, Bush and the GOP controlled Congress. And who has brought us the largest government ever and the highest deficit ever. Oh yeah, Bush and the GOP controlled Congress. It really is tough when you have to be accountable for your own actions.

1:32 PM, December 13, 2007

Anonymous said...
"It really is tough when you have to be accountable for your own actions."

You are exactly right and in that statement is the fundamental difference in the Parties. GW, Cheney, and all the other Repubs you don't like have made decisions, have had the courage of their convictions and have answered for the consequences of their actions. You may not like these guys but you have to admit they have been consistent in their actions. The Dems on the other hand found it fun to take pot shots at the Administration, talked a big game to get into a leadership role and now that they have to do something, can not. They have turned on themselves and have brought the Congress to its knees. It's not Pelosi's fault it's Reid....no no no it's not Reid, it's Pelosi...no no no it's someone else. C'mon.

That is why in an environment when they could shine and lock in control for years they have blown it because they are acting like the amateurs they are. You see it in the approval ratings posted earlier.

Accountability is tough.

2:03 PM, December 13, 2007

HOW THE HELL WOULD YOU KNOW, SCHMUCK.

Anonymous said...
"That's because Bush vetoes (or threatens to) every meaningful piece of legislation the Dems put forward."

Threats stop the powerful Dems? Wow... if it's that meaningful, overturn the veto.

Apparently it can't (did I use that word correctly?)be too meaningful if they can't find the few extra votes they need for an override. I thought everyone disagreed with GW. Should be easy but apparently not, huh.

Your pal,

Einstein

4:18 PM, December 13, 2007

Anonymous said...
"I just shred your sorry butts."

Simply calling names is not "shredding" anyone.

8:36 PM, December 13, 2007

YEAH, I NOTICE THEY'VE BEEN COMING PRE-SHREDDED LATELY. THANKS LITTLE FELLA. YOU'RE ONE THOUGHTFUL MORON.

Anonymous said...
Formula for a JW post, on any blog, on any subject:

1. Type the following:

"Nice try. No sale. Nitwit. Likes 'o you. Clueless. I-don't-have-to-state-any-facts-because-you're-wrong. Schmendrik. Always a pleasure. Dismissed."

2. Repeat the above 5 times but scramble the order.

3. Hit "send."

4. Ask mommy for more milk before bed.

8:40 PM, December 13, 2007

Green Mountain 05401 said...
We now know that there have been at least three incidents of Colchester police giving fellow officers free passes when they got caught driving drunk. Instead of a drunk driving charge, the drunk officers were given a free ride home.

Funny, Governor Douglas seems quiet on this one.

I thought he was concerned about equitable application of our laws. And avoiding the appearance that those in positions of authority and trust are above the law.

Shouldn't he be calling for all drunk driving cop cases in Colchester to be referred directly to the Public Safety Commissioner?

I'm disappointed with Gov. Douglas. His "politics first" style is becoming too obvious to ignore or forgive. Especially --such as in the area of drug issues --when it hurts real people.

Bobby Sands, on the other hand, has been acting like a responsible grown up. The same goes for TJ Donovan. Donovan seems to be handling the Colchester police situation directly, but with dignity and restraint. He'd make a good governor.

I feel for the police officers. Their job is stressful on many levels. It would be hard to arrest a friend or fellow officer. Especially knowing that such an arrest would perhaps subject a police officer (and the department) to extra (and sometimes mean-spirited) ridicule.

Driving drunk can be deadly. It's far more serious than possessing or smoking marijuana. But I'd still favor court diversion and job probation for first offenders.

Court diversion isn't a free pass. It's an opportunity to take responsibility for what you've done, and earn a second chance.

Douglas seems to want to end the marijuana discussion because it isn't going his way politically. But he doesn't want to take responsibility for his transgressions or earn a second chance. He wants the free ride. I can't respect that.

11:02 PM, December 13, 2007

Anonymous said...
You posted the exact same rant on the Freyne blog verbatim. Is your opinion that important?

12:42 AM, December 14, 2007

JWCoop10 said...

It is to you, evidently.

I certainly come across my share of wing-nut-nitwits in my travels, little fella, but I've never encountered anyone so obsessed with googling the opinions of other people while bitchin' about them expressin' those opinions until I stumbled over the likes o'you, sport.

What's up with that?

Why are you so consumed with limiting the speech of others, little fella?

6:46 AM, December 14, 2007

Anonymous said...
At least he actually has an opinion, whether it's good or bad, and expresses it in a clear, coherent, non-confrontational way. You should ask him/her for lessons.

7:11 AM, December 14, 2007

THEN WHY ARE YA TRYING TO STIFLE HIS OPINION, LITTLE FELLA?

Anonymous said...

"I thought he was concerned about equitable application of our laws. And avoiding the appearance that those in positions of authority and trust are above the law.I thought he was concerned about equitable application of our laws. And avoiding the appearance that those in positions of authority and trust are above the law."

It is disappointing. What has happenend in Colchester is equally wrong.

7:16 AM, December 14, 2007

Anonymous said...

"Your response shows how little you've got going for you in every sense of the word."

Actually it show my deep liberal concern for your mental well being. I am willing to see my tax dollars used to fund your journey back towards mental stability.

Get some help.

8:53 AM, December 14, 2007

Anonymous said...
Who is got the balls to run against Jim Douglas?

8:54 PM, December 14, 2007

Anonymous said...
Who cares? We need a new Attorney General - ASAP!

8:54 PM, December 14, 2007

JWCoop10 said...

Anonymous said...

"Who is got the balls to run against Jim Douglas?"

So far, Polina has the stones to run against Les Nessman.

Actually, Matt Dunne has 'em. Jeb Spaulding has 'em, too.

If the Dems can come up with the candidate and the cash, Jiminy Cricket can be beaten.

10:16 PM, December 14, 2007

Anonymous said...

"If the Dems can come up with the candidate and the cash, Jiminy Cricket can be beaten."

Oh, you mean if one party comes up with an attractive candidate and throws in lots of money, they can beat the opposing party's candidate? Really?

Duh. You must be one of those high-priced political consultants.

Care to get a little more specific about WHICH candidate and HOW MUCH money?

10:38 PM, December 14, 2007

You can't find any postings by me that support you...

2007-12-16T17:41:00.000-05:00

You can't find any postings by me that support your claims. You lose.

Anonymous said... "For the month that I've been he...

2007-12-16T16:59:00.000-05:00

Anonymous said...

"For the month that I've been here, you've constantly sang the praises of the likes of Jim Douglas, the Vermont Republican Caucus, The Bush Administration and The Gop slime minority of the US Congress as you've constantly whined about Shumlin and Symington and the State and Federal Dem Caucuses when you're not givin' your boy bubbles an amen every time he belches up some nitwit nonsense claim yet you still expect me to believe you're a loyal, dues-paying member of the Democratic Party in good standing, eh?"

"Let's check your record:"

"1. I've occasionally defended Douglas from mindless partisan attacks, but I've never "sang (sic)his praises." 1 point loss for you."

Ah, so it was another anonymous poster, eh?

Nice try. Ya might wanna look up the word "Occasionally," little fella. Ya see, if it happens a lot, it's not really happening only "occasionally.

"2. I've never sung the praises of the Vt. Republican Congress. Find the posting to the contrary. Thought so. 2 point loss for you."

Ah, so it was another anonymous poster, eh? Nice try, nitwit. No sale.

"3. I've never sung the praises of the Bush Administration. Find the posting to the contrary. Thought so. In fact, I despise the Bush Administration. But you're such a black and white thinker that anyone who questions liberal dogma must be a Bush supporter? Wrong. 3 point loss for you."

Ah, so it was another anonymous poster, eh? Sure thing, schmuck.

"4. I've never sung the praises of the "GOP slime minority of the US Congress." Find the posting to the contrary. Thought so. Wrong again. 4 point loss for you."

Ah, so it was another anonymous poster, eh?

5. Yep, I have whined about S&S. They've been wrong on a number of issues since they took over. I have the right to disagree with the party leadership when I think they're wrong. Gov. Dean did so as well when he was Gov. But I'll give you this one, just for kicks. 1 point for you.

Gee, an honest answer. Perhaps there's hope for you yet, little fella.

"6. I have not whined about the "State and Federal Dem Caucuses." Show me the posting to the contrary. Thought so. Wrong again. Another point loss for you."

Ah, I spoke too soon. No hope. No sale.

"7. I agree with Bubba? Not. I disagree with him on about 99% of his stuff. Show me the posts where I agree with him. Thought so. Wrong again."

Ah, so it was another anonymous poster, eh?

"The only things I agree with him about are: 1) that this Legislature is anti-business, and 2) that you are an ass."

In other words, you agree with bubbles, eh?

Another honest answer. Sort of.

Nice try.

Thanks for playing. We have some lovely parting gifts for ya.

Dismissed.

"For the month that I've been here, you've constan...

2007-12-16T14:07:00.000-05:00

"For the month that I've been here, you've constantly sang the praises of the likes of Jim Douglas, the Vermont Republican Caucus, The Bush Administration and The Gop slime minority of the US Congress as you've constantly whined about Shumlin and Symington and the State and Federal Dem Caucuses when you're not givin' your boy bubbles an amen every time he belches up some nitwit nonsense claim yet you still expect me to believe you're a loyal, dues-paying member of the Democratic Party in good standing, eh?"

Apparently, you can't read, or you're just easily confused. I wouldn't be surprised by either.

Let's check your record:

1. I've occasionally defended Douglas from mindless partisan attacks, but I've never "sang (sic)his praises." 1 point loss for you.

2. I've never sung the praises of the Vt. Republican Congress. Find the posting to the contrary. Thought so. 2 point loss for you.

3. I've never sung the praises of the Bush Administration. Find the posting to the contrary. Thought so. In fact, I despise the Bush Administration. But you're such a black and white thinker that anyone who questions liberal dogma must be a Bush supporter? Wrong. 3 point loss for you.

4. I've never sung the praises of the "GOP slime minority of the US Congress." Find the posting to the contrary. Thought so. Wrong again. 4 point loss for you.

5. Yep, I have whined about S&S. They've been wrong on a number of issues since they took over. I have the right to disagree with the party leadership when I think they're wrong. Gov. Dean did so as well when he was Gov. But I'll give you this one, just for kicks. 1 point for you.

So far, you're losing 1 to 4.

6. I have not whined about the "State and Federal Dem Caucuses." Show me the posting to the contrary. Thought so. Wrong again. Another point loss for you.

Now you're down 1 to 5 with your incorrect statements.

7. I agree with Bubba? Not. I disagree with him on about 99% of his stuff. Show me the posts where I agree with him. Thought so. Wrong again. The only things I agree with him about are: 1) that this Legislature is anti-business, and 2) that you are an ass.

Game over. You lose.

Dismissed.

Anonymous said... "Jw, shut up."Oh, yeah. That's g...

2007-12-16T12:57:00.000-05:00

Anonymous said...

"Jw, shut up."

Oh, yeah. That's gonna do it.

"So, Chairman Stalin, please remind of the date of the Vt. Dem. Pty. meeting when you were elected Dogma Czar and Minister of Membership?

Thought so.

You probably don't even pay dues to the State Party."

I don't. I just contribute to their campaign coffers from time to time, so you're half-right. Congrats on finally making contact and mustering up your first foul tip, little fella.

I'm a Dem because they're the only viable alternative to the gops. My allegiance to the Democratic Party begins and ends there.

"It must really frustrate you that you don't get to decide what the Dem. Party dogma is, and that you don't get to decide who's in and who's out. You're a wannabe."

"I'm a member. Tough for you."

Do me a favor, little fella. Remind me to tell you how much sleep that's costin' me when I wake up from my pre-Jets/Pats nap.

Let's examine the record, shall we?

For the month that I've been here, you've constantly sang the praises of the likes of Jim Douglas, the Vermont Republican Caucus, The Bush Administration and The Gop slime minority of the US Congress as you've constantly whined about Shumlin and Symington and the State and Federal Dem Caucuses when you're not givin' your boy bubbles an amen every time he belches up some nitwit nonsense claim yet you still expect me to believe you're a loyal, dues-paying member of the Democratic Party in good standing, eh?

Nice try, nitwit. No sale.

For the sake of argument, let's assume you're actually telling the truth about being a loyal, dues-paying member of the Democratic Party in good standing while simultaneously supporting Douglas, Bush and their policies, trashing Symington and Shumlin, the Dem Congress in DC and givin' bubbles an amen every 30seconds or so.

While I have no doubts that you're delusional enough to actually believe that to be the case, the reality of the situation demonstrates that you're just plain delusional.

You're not paying dues, little fella. You're payin' fines.

Always a pleasure.

How's that evidence hunt to support your claim that Exxon really has paid its fine for the 3/24/89 Exxon Valdez oil spill clean up coming, little fella?

Jw, shut up.So, Chairman Stalin, please remind of ...

2007-12-16T09:58:00.000-05:00

Jw, shut up.

So, Chairman Stalin, please remind of the date of the Vt. Dem. Pty. meeting when you were elected Dogma Czar and Minister of Membership?

Thought so.

You probably don't even pay dues to the State Party.

It must really frustrate you that you don't get to decide what the Dem. Party dogma is, and that you don't get to decide who's in and who's out. You're a wannabe.

I'm a member. Tough for you.

Ass.

Anonymous said... "I am a Dem. And you're an ass."...

2007-12-15T22:25:00.000-05:00

Anonymous said...

"I am a Dem. And you're an ass."

Yeah, and I'm Marvelous Marvin Hagler.

Sure, ya are, schmuck. Sure, ya are.

Peddle that slop to bubbles, punk. Nobody else is buyin' it.

Ya got bupkis, bozo. Bupkis.

Tough break, little fella.

Always a pleasure.

Anonymous said... To quote from JWCoop10:"...becau...

2007-12-15T22:19:00.000-05:00

Anonymous said...
To quote from JWCoop10:

"...because a couple of Dem Reps couldn't make it."

"Lose the Ms Nice Guy shtick, Gaye and get a Dem Chair and somebody who knows what they're doing like Sue Minter in a key role."

"JWCoop10 - you are a complete idiot."

Again with the sweet talk, little fella. Knock it off. You're gonna make me blush.

There were a couple of other Dems besides Sue Minter that weren't there, shmendrik. And if memory serves, they were in VT but absent for other reasons.

She wasn't the only one absent, little fella.

Moreover, Jiminy Cricket picked Jon Anderson to replace Francis Brooks when he became Sgt At Arms and replaced the Deer Jacker.

Anderson voted with Douglas and against the interests and the wishes of the City of Montpelier.

Again, the point being that Symington should have had a vote count and the necessary people in place to make sure the veto could not be sustained.

Besides, unlike you, Minter knows her stuff about transportation.

Get your facts straight or stuff a sock in it.

As for VY, they're not just another business so spare me the poor, poor persecuted business community song and dance, punk.

You don't want VY to pay for Education, fine. Let 'em pick up the tab for the Corrections Budget.

Perhaps you haven't heard, Corrections is up 10 percent this year. That's a hell of a lot more than Education, little fella.

So, how's that evidence hunt comin' google boy?

You're gonna have to do more than steal my lines to class up your crap, douche bag.

Always a pleasure.

I am a Dem. And you're an ass.Tough break for ya,...

2007-12-15T21:56:00.000-05:00

I am a Dem. And you're an ass.

Tough break for ya, little fella.

I knew you were an ignorant, ill-informed, fundame...

2007-12-15T21:04:00.000-05:00

I knew you were an ignorant, ill-informed, fundamentally-dishonest, UnAmerican sack o'shite without a legitimately patriotic bone in your body before you even knew I existed.

"Of course. You know ALL about me. You know everything about everyone here. Right. That's because you're omniscient."

I know that there's nothin' to know, little fella.

Half an hour of skimmin' the posts of you, yourselves and bubba more than prove that when it comes to smarts, there's simply no there, there.

Your brains rattle around in your heads like a BB in a boxcar.

As for the omniscient bit, that's sweet of ya to say but you said it, not me.

Still, unlike you, I know which end is up and what day it is so I can see how you'd get that impression.

Let me know if I'm goin' too fast for ya, little fella.

"You know everything and don't have to prove anything. Everyone on here who doesn't agree with you is a conservative Republican."

Like I keep tellin' ya, little fella. You keep provin' you don't know your ass from your elbow while I just point it out and give ya the occasional nudge towards the grave you've dug for you and the rest of yourselves.

"Just because they don't goosestep to your exact beliefs and sarcastic, shitty tone?

In other words, you coalition of the clueless cretins don't like it when somebody calls ya on your BS and smacks ya back.

Gee, you can imagine how badly I feel about that.

Well, actually, I'm sure you can't, but you're gonna have to try to do it anyhow.

"I'm sure many of the posters on this blog are Democratic voters like me. But, no, according to you, anyone who doesn't hold your exact view on every issue (whatever that view may be, since we don't know until you spew a post) must be a right-winger."

Nah, but you, your anonymous, invisible little friends and bubbles are.

Gimme a break.

You're a Dem like I'm the Middle Weight Champion of the World, little fella.

All I see you do - when you're not stealin' my lines and googling jwcoop10 to tell me stories about my life - is trash Symington and Shumlin as you agree with bubbles and sing the praises of Jiminy Cricket and the Bush Administration.

You may not be as whacked as bubbles but you're within walking distance.

Then again, at least he makes an effort to distinguish himself and he's not pretending to be a moderate anything let alone a moderate Dem, sport.

The likes o'you on the other hand, not so much.

"If anyone who is to the right of you on any issue is "an ignorant, ill-informed, fundamentally-dishonest, UnAmerican sack o'shite without a legitimately patriotic bone in [his/her] body," does that mean the Progs to your left can say the same thing about you, little fella?"

Sure. I don't support Bush, the War in Iraq, the War he wanted to start with Iran 'til he got busted for lyin' about that, too or the lousy job he's doin' on everything else under the Sun so it'd be almost as silly of them to say it as it is for the likes o'you, little fella, but they can say whatever they want. I don't give a damn.

The facts aren't doin' them any more favors than they're doin' the likes of you, little fella.

As for this other posters slop you keep spewin', just who and where the hell are they? I've been here a month and all I've seen is me, bubbles, Hoffer and maybe one or two others.

Fair enough. That takes care of the fingers on one hand. Apart from that, there's virtually nothin' but anonymous posters and probably half of them are your anonymous, imaginary little friends, sport.

Again, I don't give a damn if somebody posts as Brittany999, sport. At least they're making the effort to differentiate themselves from everyone else.

No matter what their views or their politics, if somebody can't make that much of an effort, why should I give a damn what they think?

That's what I thought.

Always a pleasure.

"I knew you were an ignorant, ill-informed, fundam...

2007-12-15T14:23:00.000-05:00

"I knew you were an ignorant, ill-informed, fundamentally-dishonest, UnAmerican sack o'shite without a legitimately patriotic bone in your body before you even knew I existed."

Of course. You know ALL about me. You know everything about everyone here. Right. That's because you're omniscient. You know everything and don't have to prove anything. Everyone on here who doesn't agree with you is a conservative Republican. Just because they don't goosestep to your exact beliefs and sarcastic, shitty tone? I'm sure many of the posters on this blog are Democratic voters like me. But, no, according to you, anyone who doesn't hold your exact view on every issue (whatever that view may be, since we don't know until you spew a post) must be a right-winger. Guess what, douche? You're wrong. Congratulations!

If anyone who is to the right of you on any issue is "an ignorant, ill-informed, fundamentally-dishonest, UnAmerican sack o'shite without a legitimately patriotic bone in [his/her] body," does that mean the Progs to your left can say the same thing about you, little fella?

Douche.

Way ahead of ya, schmuck. I knew you were an ignor...

2007-12-15T06:59:00.000-05:00

Way ahead of ya, schmuck.

I knew you were an ignorant, ill-informed, fundamentally-dishonest, UnAmerican sack o'shite without a legitimately patriotic bone in your body before you even knew I existed.

Keep at it, little fella. In a year or two you just might graduate to "I'm rubber your glue" yet.

Always a pleasure.

""That is true projection."No, that would be this ...

2007-12-14T23:55:00.000-05:00

""That is true projection."
No, that would be this comment of yours, punk."

No, that would be this comment of yours, punk.

Get it?

Idiot.

Anonymous said... "If you've got nothing to offer ...

2007-12-14T23:02:00.000-05:00

Anonymous said...

"If you've got nothing to offer but this anonymous sanctimonious slop of yours, stuff a sock in it."

Look above ya, little fella. I already did.

Secondly, ya gonna tell me Douglas won't spend a small fortune tryin' to keep his job, pinhead.

I'll take my chances with your boy on a level playing field.

Oy, you're fookin' thick.

"That is true projection."

No, that would be this comment of yours, punk.

Always a pleasure.