tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29769707.post115447561189579136..comments2007-02-22T00:20:12.951-08:00Robhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01478763837213733775noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29769707.post-1154891454330533742006-08-06T12:10:00.000-07:002006-08-06T12:10:00.000-07:00The Indians say the owner's property rights infringe on their religious rights. The owner says the opposite. A court could rule either way on the matter.Robhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01478763837213733775noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29769707.post-1154758608652604392006-08-04T23:16:00.000-07:002006-08-04T23:16:00.000-07:00No rights are absolute, not even First Amendment rights.Robhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01478763837213733775noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29769707.post-1154618836535594202006-08-03T08:27:00.000-07:002006-08-03T08:27:00.000-07:00I initially thought "Why not? This is on someone's private property and is not actually on the sacred site". But then I thought of the noise. The ROARING HARLEYS, which will definitely impact the neighbors.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29769707.post-1154567672065617452006-08-02T18:14:00.000-07:002006-08-02T18:14:00.000-07:00sounds like a good idea...<BR/><BR/>Nothing is sacred. The government knows it all. I vote yes for the better business and entertainment for society.<BR/><BR/>4/4 Indian votes YES to bike barAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com