Law for Librarians Blog

2007-06-29T11:42:00.000-07:00

State adopts English as the official language.

HB 2140, as approved by the 2007 Legislature, designates English as the official language of the State of Kansas for all public documents and official public meetings. However, the legislation allows a state agency or local government, and presumably a public library, to publish documents in other languages as needed to communicate with residents.

2007-06-29T06:23:00.000-07:00

Concealed carry amendment 0f 2007 impacts libraries.

The 2007 Kansas Legislature amended the 2006 concealed carry statute to include a requirement that all areas must have appropriate signage in order to apply to individuals who have concealed carry permits. This means that public libraries must post the no-carry sign in order for the state law banning weapons in these areas to apply.

The statute also provides that the no-carry signs be posted in accordance with rules and regulations adopted by the Attorney General.
The Attorney General has an analysis which makes it a bit clearer:http://www.ksag.org/files/shared/HB2528.Modifications.pdf

The Attorney General has also provided specific instructions on the size and look of the sign: http://www.ksag.org/files/shared/conceal.carry.signage.pdf

2006-12-21T13:35:00.000-08:00

Is a Kansas public library required to post one of the official "no guns allowed" signs, per the new regulations released by the Attorney General's office?

No. Public libraries are not required to post a "Personal and Family Protection Act" sign. Public libraries were made exempt from the statute and it was, and is, therefore already illegal to carry a concealed weapon into a library.

While a library is not required to post one of the new signs, a library may chose to do so. If that is the case, the sign to use has just been proscribed in regulation posted on the Attorney General's Web site. The regulations issued pursuant to the new act can be found at www.ksag.org. See the link on the right hand side of the page labeled, "For information on Kansas Concealed Carry." Click on the link for the regulations. Follow a link marked "Right Click Here" to find a downloadable copy of the sign.

2006-10-23T12:20:00.000-07:00

Kansas AG Opines Regarding Library Employee Benefits Contribution Fund.

October 12, 2006
ATTORNEY GENERAL OPINION NO. 2006-25
Michael R. O'Neal, Counsel Girard Public Library20 West 2nd Avenue, 2nd FloorP.O. Box 2977Hutchinson, Kansas 67504
Re:
Cities and Municipalities--Miscellaneous Provisions--Employee Benefits Contribution Fund in Certain Taxing Subdivisions; Tax Levy; Use of Proceeds; Funding for Employee Benefits Contribution Fund for Library Employees
Synopsis:
A taxing subdivision that has created an employee benefits contribution fund for the benefit of a political subdivision pursuant to K.S.A. 12-16,102 must fully fund the political subdivision's share of the employee benefit identified in the ordinance or resolution creating the fund. Such funding may come from any source that can be lawfully utilized, including the tax levy authorized in the statute. Cited herein: K.S.A. 12-16,102; L. 1983, Ch. 65, § 1; L. 1978, Ch. 67, § 1.
* * *
Dear Mr. O'Neal:
In Attorney General Opinion No. 2006-13 we considered K.S.A. 12-16,102, which authorizes a taxing subdivision to create an employee benefits contribution fund for a political subdivision on behalf of which the taxing subdivision levies taxes. K.S.A. 12-16,102 authorizes the taxing subdivision to levy an annual tax in an amount determined "to be necessary for the purposes for which [the] funds were created."(1) The issue addressed in the opinion was whether it was the taxing subdivision (i.e. the city) or the political subdivision (i.e. the city library) that established the amount of the annual tax. We concluded that it is the taxing subdivision that determines the amount of the annual tax.
Our opinion did not address whether K.S.A. 12-16,102 requires a taxing subdivision to fully fund the political subdivision's share of employee benefits. It is this issue that we now consider in the context of the dispute between the City of Girard and the Girard Public Library.
In 1991, the Girard Public Library Board of Directors adopted a resolution whereby the Board agreed to "pay the same type of benefits as the other City of Girard's employees, as to equal amounts as long as the amount is met by the levy [which] levy is separate from and in addition to the general levy and fund for library operations." The levy referred to in the library resolution was K.S.A. 12-16,102 which provides, in part:
"(a) Except as provided in this section, "taxing subdivision" means any city, county, township or other political subdivision of the state of Kansas having authority to levy taxes on taxable tangible property . . . ."
"(b) Any taxing subdivision may create and establish employee benefits contribution funds for (1) the taxing subdivision or (2) any political subdivision for which a tax is levied by such taxing subdivision for the purpose of paying the employer's share of any employee benefits, exclusive of any salaries, wages or other direct payments to such employees, as may be prescribed in the ordinance or resolution of the governing body creating such funds. The taxing subdivision may receive and place in such funds any moneys from any source whatsoever which may be lawfully utilized for the purposes stated in the ordinance or resolution creating such funds, including the proceeds of tax levies authorized by law for such purposes.
"(c) The governing body of any taxing subdivision having established employee benefits funds under subsection (b) is hereby authorized to levy an annual tax upon all taxable tangible property within the taxing subdivision in an amount determined by the governing body to be necessary for the purposes for which such funds were created and to pay a portion of the principal and interest on bonds issued under the authority of K.S.A. 12-1774, and amendments thereto, by cities located in the county."(2)
Soon after the Library's resolution, the City enacted Ordinance No. 1038 which provides, in part:
"Section 1. The City of Girard, Kansas, in accordance with K.S.A. 12-16,102, does hereby create and establish an Employee Benefits Contribution Fund for the purpose of paying the City's share of employee benefits as prescribed in Section 3 of this Ordinance."
"Section 2. The City of Girard, Kansas, in accordance with K.S.A. 12-16,102, does also hereby create and establish a Library Employee Benefits Contribution Fund for the purpose of paying the Girard Public Library Board's share of employee benefits as prescribed in Section 3 of this Ordinance."
"Section 3. The employer's share of the cost of employee benefits authorized for payment from the Funds created and established by Section 1 and 2 of this ordinance shall include the following:
"(a) Social Security (FICA);
"(b) Kansas Public Employees Retirement System (KPERS);
"(c) Worker's Compensation benefits;
"(d) Employment security, unemployment compensation benefits;
"(e) Medical health and hospitalization insurance and other health care costs."(3)
It appears that the City is unhappy with the increasing number of Library employees who are eligible for the benefits identified in Section 3 of the ordinance. You indicate that in the City's 2005 budget, the City neither budgeted sufficient funds nor levied a sufficient tax to cover the cost of the Library's share. This same scenario is expected for the 2006 budget year.
The history of K.S.A. 12-16,102 is recounted in our previous opinion(4) and will not be repeated in its entirety. First enacted in 1978, its purpose was to obviate the need for cities, counties, and other taxing subdivisions to levy separate taxes for a variety of employment benefits.(5) Once created, the fund was to pay "the employer's share of any employee benefits . . . as may be prescribed in the ordinance . . . creating such fund."(6) In addition to the tax levy, the taxing subdivision could use funds from other sources.(7)
In 1983, the Legislature augmented a taxing subdivision's ability to create and fund an employee benefits contribution fund by authorizing an identical fund for certain political subdivisions.(8)
Given the purpose and the plain language of K.S.A. 12-16,102, it is our opinion that a taxing subdivision that has created an employee benefits contribution fund for the benefit of a political subdivision pursuant to K.S.A. 12-16,102 must fully fund the political subdivision's/employer's share of the employee benefit identified in the ordinance or resolution creating the fund. Such funding may come from any source that can be lawfully utilized, including the tax levy authorized in the statute.
While the fund is discretionary, once established, its funding must be at a sufficient level to satisfy the political subdivision's share of the employee benefits identified in the ordinance or resolution creating the employee benefits contribution fund.(9)
You also inquire what legal remedies may be available to require the City to pay the Library's share of employee benefits for 2005 and, possibly, 2006. Whether a particular legal remedy is appropriate will depend upon the facts and circumstances of each situation and therefore is not a topic suitable for resolution in an Attorney General opinion.
Sincerely,
Phill KlineAttorney General
Mary FeighnyAssistant Attorney General
PK:JLM:MF:jm
FOOTNOTESClick footnote number to return to corresponding location in the text.
1. K.S.A. 12-16,102(c).
2. Emphasis added.
3. Emphasis added.
4. Attorney General Opinion No. 2006-13.
5. Id. Attorney General Opinion No. 86-140.
6. L. 1978, Ch. 67, § 1(b).
7. Id.
8. L. 1983, Ch. 65, § 1.
9. See Attorney General Opinion No. 89-50 (once employee benefits contribution fund is established, taxing subdivision may not decline to levy for fund amounts necessary).

2006-10-20T12:27:00.000-07:00

Kansas AG's Office Opines Regarding Library Employee Benefits Contribution Fund, see text below.

October 12, 2006
ATTORNEY GENERAL OPINION NO. 2006-25
Michael R. O'Neal, Counsel Girard Public Library20 West 2nd Avenue, 2nd FloorP.O. Box 2977Hutchinson, Kansas 67504
Re:
Cities and Municipalities--Miscellaneous Provisions--Employee Benefits Contribution Fund in Certain Taxing Subdivisions; Tax Levy; Use of Proceeds; Funding for Employee Benefits Contribution Fund for Library Employees
Synopsis:
A taxing subdivision that has created an employee benefits contribution fund for the benefit of a political subdivision pursuant to K.S.A. 12-16,102 must fully fund the political subdivision's share of the employee benefit identified in the ordinance or resolution creating the fund. Such funding may come from any source that can be lawfully utilized, including the tax levy authorized in the statute. Cited herein: K.S.A. 12-16,102; L. 1983, Ch. 65, § 1; L. 1978, Ch. 67, § 1.
* * *
Dear Mr. O'Neal:
In Attorney General Opinion No. 2006-13 we considered K.S.A. 12-16,102, which authorizes a taxing subdivision to create an employee benefits contribution fund for a political subdivision on behalf of which the taxing subdivision levies taxes. K.S.A. 12-16,102 authorizes the taxing subdivision to levy an annual tax in an amount determined "to be necessary for the purposes for which [the] funds were created."(1) The issue addressed in the opinion was whether it was the taxing subdivision (i.e. the city) or the political subdivision (i.e. the city library) that established the amount of the annual tax. We concluded that it is the taxing subdivision that determines the amount of the annual tax.
Our opinion did not address whether K.S.A. 12-16,102 requires a taxing subdivision to fully fund the political subdivision's share of employee benefits. It is this issue that we now consider in the context of the dispute between the City of Girard and the Girard Public Library.
In 1991, the Girard Public Library Board of Directors adopted a resolution whereby the Board agreed to "pay the same type of benefits as the other City of Girard's employees, as to equal amounts as long as the amount is met by the levy [which] levy is separate from and in addition to the general levy and fund for library operations." The levy referred to in the library resolution was K.S.A. 12-16,102 which provides, in part:
"(a) Except as provided in this section, "taxing subdivision" means any city, county, township or other political subdivision of the state of Kansas having authority to levy taxes on taxable tangible property . . . ."
"(b) Any taxing subdivision may create and establish employee benefits contribution funds for (1) the taxing subdivision or (2) any political subdivision for which a tax is levied by such taxing subdivision for the purpose of paying the employer's share of any employee benefits, exclusive of any salaries, wages or other direct payments to such employees, as may be prescribed in the ordinance or resolution of the governing body creating such funds. The taxing subdivision may receive and place in such funds any moneys from any source whatsoever which may be lawfully utilized for the purposes stated in the ordinance or resolution creating such funds, including the proceeds of tax levies authorized by law for such purposes.
"(c) The governing body of any taxing subdivision having established employee benefits funds under subsection (b) is hereby authorized to levy an annual tax upon all taxable tangible property within the taxing subdivision in an amount determined by the governing body to be necessary for the purposes for which such funds were created and to pay a portion of the principal and interest on bonds issued under the authority of K.S.A. 12-1774, and amendments thereto, by cities located in the county."(2)
Soon after the Library's resolution, the City enacted Ordinance No. 1038 which provides, in part:
"Section 1. The City of Girard, Kansas, in accordance with K.S.A. 12-16,102, does hereby create and establish an Employee Benefits Contribution Fund for the purpose of paying the City's share of employee benefits as prescribed in Section 3 of this Ordinance."
"Section 2. The City of Girard, Kansas, in accordance with K.S.A. 12-16,102, does also hereby create and establish a Library Employee Benefits Contribution Fund for the purpose of paying the Girard Public Library Board's share of employee benefits as prescribed in Section 3 of this Ordinance."
"Section 3. The employer's share of the cost of employee benefits authorized for payment from the Funds created and established by Section 1 and 2 of this ordinance shall include the following:
"(a) Social Security (FICA);
"(b) Kansas Public Employees Retirement System (KPERS);
"(c) Worker's Compensation benefits;
"(d) Employment security, unemployment compensation benefits;
"(e) Medical health and hospitalization insurance and other health care costs."(3)
It appears that the City is unhappy with the increasing number of Library employees who are eligible for the benefits identified in Section 3 of the ordinance. You indicate that in the City's 2005 budget, the City neither budgeted sufficient funds nor levied a sufficient tax to cover the cost of the Library's share. This same scenario is expected for the 2006 budget year.
The history of K.S.A. 12-16,102 is recounted in our previous opinion(4) and will not be repeated in its entirety. First enacted in 1978, its purpose was to obviate the need for cities, counties, and other taxing subdivisions to levy separate taxes for a variety of employment benefits.(5) Once created, the fund was to pay "the employer's share of any employee benefits . . . as may be prescribed in the ordinance . . . creating such fund."(6) In addition to the tax levy, the taxing subdivision could use funds from other sources.(7)
In 1983, the Legislature augmented a taxing subdivision's ability to create and fund an employee benefits contribution fund by authorizing an identical fund for certain political subdivisions.(8)
Given the purpose and the plain language of K.S.A. 12-16,102, it is our opinion that a taxing subdivision that has created an employee benefits contribution fund for the benefit of a political subdivision pursuant to K.S.A. 12-16,102 must fully fund the political subdivision's/employer's share of the employee benefit identified in the ordinance or resolution creating the fund. Such funding may come from any source that can be lawfully utilized, including the tax levy authorized in the statute.
While the fund is discretionary, once established, its funding must be at a sufficient level to satisfy the political subdivision's share of the employee benefits identified in the ordinance or resolution creating the employee benefits contribution fund.(9)
You also inquire what legal remedies may be available to require the City to pay the Library's share of employee benefits for 2005 and, possibly, 2006. Whether a particular legal remedy is appropriate will depend upon the facts and circumstances of each situation and therefore is not a topic suitable for resolution in an Attorney General opinion.
Sincerely,
Phill KlineAttorney General
Mary FeighnyAssistant Attorney General
PK:JLM:MF:jm
FOOTNOTESClick footnote number to return to corresponding location in the text.
1. K.S.A. 12-16,102(c).
2. Emphasis added.
3. Emphasis added.
4. Attorney General Opinion No. 2006-13.
5. Id. Attorney General Opinion No. 86-140.
6. L. 1978, Ch. 67, § 1(b).
7. Id.
8. L. 1983, Ch. 65, § 1.
9. See Attorney General Opinion No. 89-50 (once employee benefits contribution fund is established, taxing subdivision may not decline to levy for fund amounts necessary).

2006-06-29T14:53:00.000-07:00

Library Sales Tax Exemption Clarified

Marc Galbraith
State Library of Kansas
300 SW 10°i Ave, Rm 343N
Topeka, KS 66612-1593

Re: Your Correspondence Dated June 21, 2006 Dear Mr. Galbraith:

You requested clarification concerning the provisions in 2006 Senate Bill 404 providing a new sales tax exemption, effective July 1, 2006, for public libraries on their sales of tangible personal property, which will be codified at new subparagraph (ooo) of K.S.A. 79-3606.

You ask what libraries are covered within the exemption, and in particular whether the exemption would include public academic libraries which also serve the general public and are supported in whole or in part with tax money, and for which there are not-for-profit organizations whose purpose is to raise funds for or provide services or other benefits for those same academic libraries. The libraries described above appear to fit within the new exemption.

You also ask what tangible personal property is included in the exemption. Sales of tangible personal property by public libraries or not-for-profit organizations whose purpose is to raise funds for such libraries are included in the exemption. This would cover not only sales of books and other library reading material but also pencils, paper, coffee cups and book bags.

You further ask about the types of sales and number of sales covered by the new exemption. The new exemption places no limitations on the number of sales. It would include public library book sales, whether sponsored by the public library or a library friends group, regardless of how many sales took place within a year. It would exempt proceeds from the sale of library books and related material from an ongoing sale in a shop/cafe or in "booktiques," as long as the sale is made by a public library or not-for-profit organization whose purpose is to raise funds for or provide services or other benefits to such public library, such as a library friends group.

Finally, you ask whether the library must secure 501(c)(3) status in order to claim the exemption. The statutory language requires that library must serve the general public and must be supported all or in part by tax dollars, in order to qualify for the exemption on its sales of tangible personal property. It does not require that the library obtain 501(c)(3) status. However, in order for sales on behalf of a public library to qualify for the exemption, the organization conducting the sale must be able to verify its not-for-profit status and show that its purpose is to raise funds for the public library or to provide services or other benefits to the public library. Status as a 501(c)(3) organization for those purposes would provide such verification for the not-for-profit organization.

I trust this addresses the questions you raised. Please let me know if you have additional questions.

Very truly yours,

Richard L. Cram

2006-06-26T09:28:00.000-07:00

Libraries Ask about Unconcealed Weapons

While the Kansas Legislature recently passed legislation making it illegal to carry a concealed weapon in a library, some librarians have asked about the status of Kansas law regarding unconcealed weapons and whether or not it is legal to bring unconcealed weapons into a library.

The short answer to this question is that Kansas statutes are silent with regard to unconcealed weapons.

That means there is no state law that makes it illegal to carry an unconcealed weapon in Kansas; therefore, it is presumably legal to carry a firearm or gun on your person, so long as it is visible.

The longer answer to this question is that local governments can regulate such activity by ordinance. Generally speaking then, the question of whether it is legal or illegal to carry an unconcealed weapon or firearm in a library has to be answered at the local level. In fact, a number of cities in Kansas have passed such ordinances. Libraries should inquire with their local city attorney, or prosecutor, as to whether their city has such an ordinance.

2006-06-17T11:40:00.000-07:00

Concealed Carry and Kansas Libraries

In response to questions from the State Library, the Kansas Attorney General’s office recently responded by stating the Personal and Family Protection Act (also known as the Conceal Carry bill) makes it a class A misdemeanor to carry a concealed weapon in “any public library operated by the State or by a political subdivision of the State” even if the person has a license to carry a concealed weapon. 2006 HB 2118, Sect. 7. “Weapon includes a handgun, pistol, or revolver.”

The Attorney General’s office also responded that a library is not required to post a sign. If a library employee becomes aware that a patron is carrying a weapon, he or she should feel comfortable calling the police or following the library’s procedure regarding the commission of crimes on library property.

Licenses will be issued after January 1, 2007. If the library wants to put up a sign reminding licensees that they can’t carry their weapons in the library, the library is free to do so. Part of the 8 hours training that licensees have to undergo before getting a license includes educating them regarding where they cannot carry a concealed weapon so licensees are on notice that libraries are off limits.

There are no regulations that the library has to follow regarding signage. It could be something as simple as a picture of a handgun with a big slash across it similar to the “no smoking” signs, or something like “It is a crime to carry a concealed handgun in this library even if you have a license to carry a concealed handgun.”

Determining the appearance of the signs will be up to each library.

2006-06-08T05:57:00.000-07:00

State Library Seeks Clarification on Sales Tax Exemption

Legislation (Senate Bill 404, section ooo) just passed by the 2006 legislature gives libraries and library Friends groups a sales tax exemption on the sale of tangible personal property. The legislation appears straight forward, but a spate of questions regarding what organizations, what tangible personal property and what type of sales events are covered by the legislation point to the need for clarification.

In response to that need, the State Library will ask the Kansas Department of Revenue (KDOR) for help in understanding the new law. KDOR can respond in several ways including a formal “Revenue Ruling” and “Private Revenue Letter”. How KDOR responds is somewhat dependent on how we submit the question. We will explore the best options with the staff at KDOR and act accordingly.

It is difficult to predict how long the process might take, but several weeks to a month certainly would not be out of the question.

Watch this blog for a post that includes KDOR’s clarifying response.

2006-06-05T12:17:00.000-07:00

Governor Signs Kansas Library Homework Legislation

The State Library is pleased to announce that on May 24, Governor Sebelius signed legislation in the final step to provide funding for HomeworkKansas, an online service to connect kids with tutors for homework help. The service will be available in mid-August for after-school use through Kansas libraries and home computers.

HomeworkKansas has one mission – to connect Kansas students with a live tutor in one-on-one homework sessions. Sessions are conducted online via the internet and a computer located in a public library or in the student’s home. The tutors are all subject experts and student and tutor are matched by grade level and homework topic. Tutoring sessions take place in an online classroom via chat and an online whiteboard. The service will be offered seven days a week, from 4:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m., after schools close for the day and when students are doing their homework. The tutoring sessions will be available in both English and Spanish.

The State Library will begin plans for rolling out HomeworkKansas in the near future with a kick-off planned for mid-August. Before that time, there will be training opportunities for library staff to familiarize themselves with the product, and we plan to provide maximum publicity about the upcoming availability of the service. We will also be asking you for help in spreading the word to your community or school about the program so that every student is ready to use this wonderful service when schools open in the fall.

HomeworkKansas is a product of Tutor.com, and was an enhancement in the State Library’s budget request for FY 2007 and a priority item in KLA legislative agenda. The initiative was supported early on by the Governor and generally received warm support by Kansas legislators. As is true with many new initiatives, the HomeworkKansas request was moved to the omnibus bill and to consideration in the latter days of the session. Legislators remained supportive and it survived the omnibus process and moved to the Governor’s desk. Special thanks goes to KLA and all those who advocated for this important online service.

If you have questions about the project, please feel free to email me at marcg@kslib.info or call 785-296-2146.

2006-05-27T07:23:00.000-07:00

Net Neutrality Fight Heats Up in Congress

Legislation was introduced in the House May 2 that reportedly was designed to prevent telecom operators and broadband service providers from selling favored access to some websites or video stream connections for an additional fee. The Network Neutrality Act of 2006 (H.R. 5273) states that companies may not “block, impair, degrade, or discriminate against the ability of any person to use a broadband connection to access the content, applications, and services available on broadband networks, including the internet.”

Drafts of several telecommunications bills said to be aimed at enabling phone carriers to get into the video business are currently making their way through the House and Senate, Reuters reported May 2. None of them specifically address “net neutrality,” or the idea that telephone or cable companies should provide services to all customers at the same cost, the system basically in effect now. Telecom companies have argued that they deserve the right to charge premium rates for faster, unrestricted service to make their investment in new technologies viable, the Cnet online news service reported May 2.

“Those who cannot afford the premium rates—nonprofits, the public sector, libraries, schools, and colleges—would be relegated to the equivalent of third-class mail,” American Library Association Washington Office Executive Director Emily Sheketoff told American Libraries. “This legislation has an impact not only on libraries and their ability to deliver first-class service to patrons, but to the general public as well.”

http://www.ala.org/ala/washoff/WOissues/techinttele/technologyinternet.htm

2006-05-23T21:08:00.000-07:00

According to a CNET New.com article dated May 10, 2006, MySpace, Facebook and other social networking Web sites may be rendered inaccessible by most schools and libraries following provisions of a recently proposed federal law. The same article indicated that House members had endorsed new legislation that would cordon off access to commercial web sites that let users create public Web pages or profiles and might include sites such as Blogger.com. AOL and Yahoo's instant-messaging.

The bill is known as the "Deleting Online Predators Act" or DOPA.

According to CNET News.com some Web site managers have taken steps in recent weeks to reduce concerns expressed by parents and others. According to the CNET article, MySpace has assigned a large portion of its staff to provide customer care and security concerns.

A full copy of the article may be viewed at http://www.ala.org/ala/news/presscenter/newscoveragelibraries.htm

2006-05-15T20:17:00.000-07:00

AASL develops a position statement on instructional classification

CHICAGO - The American Association of School Librarians (AASL), a division of the American Library Association (ALA), has posted a new position statement on Instructional Classification of School Library Media Specialists.

The position statement was developed by the AASL Task Force on Instructional Classification to voice support for the inclusion of certified school library media specialists as part of the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) definition of "instructional" school staff and services. AASL believes that school library media centers are classrooms in which school library media specialists teach and students and teachers learn.

AASL's Board of Directors appointed the Task Force on Instructional Classification during the ALA Midwinter Meeting in January, in response to the concerns of members over the proposed "65% solution" legislation. The legislation, being considered in many states nationwide, mandates that 65 percent of all funding for schools be spent on "direct classroom instruction." This presents a problem for school library media programs and staff, when the proposed legislation uses the current definition from the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) classifying school library media services as "non-instructional."

"AASL is working to achieve universal recognition of the critical role of school library media specialists in K-12 education and we hope to influence the education community and gain support for our efforts," said AASL President J. Linda Williams.

The new position statement is available at http://www.ala.org/aasl/positions.