The Gospel Doctrine Class

Thoughts on the Old Testament

2009-05-23T08:00:00.001-07:00

Life is busy and I haven't had the time to share so many of my important thoughts on this blog. Over the past few years, I have been assembling in book form, highlights and thoughts from the teachings found in the Gospel Doctrine Class curriculum. I thought that I would share some of those highlights in this blog, possibly on a weekly basis (unless I have more pressing thoughts). I thought I would start with Teachings from the Old Testament (Sunday School curriculum for 2010). Your comments are always appreciated.

Thoughts on the Old Testament

What thoughts first come to your mind when I mention a study of the Old Testament? Do you think of an ancient and dusty land? Do you think of tedious and boring reading? Do you think of strange and peculiar laws? Do you look forward to a study of the ancient prophets?

While I was serving on my mission, the Council of the Twelve issued a Missionary Study Guide. This guide stated, “Ordinarily the greatest value will accrue if the Standard Works are studied in this order: Book of Mormon, New Testament, Pearl of Great Price, Doctrine & Covenants, the book of Genesis and those portions of the Old Testament which relate to subjects being studied.”(1) This guide became the basis for my study of the scriptures during my mission. As a consequence, my study focused on all of the Standard Works, except the Old Testament.

Shortly after returning from my mission I decided it was time to read the Old Testament and committed myself to reading it from cover to cover. It was not easy, but I struggled through, completing it several months later. I have studied much of the Old Testament since, but have yet to read it cover to cover a second time. In contrast, I have completed twenty-eight readings of the Book of Mormon, along with multiple readings of the New Testament, Doctrine and Covenants, and Pearl of Great. In addition, I have read numerous Church books, particularly those related to Church history.

Why is it that we are reluctant to read and study this ancient work of scripture? After preparing and teaching the Sunday School Old Testament course three times, I have come to believe that our reluctance is primarily an attitude problem. Without question, the Old Testament presents greater challenges than those of the other Standard Works. Indeed, it is a book that requires additional effort and study to comprehend and understand. Nonetheless, it is a great treasure that makes the effort one of great value.

President Gordon B. Hinckley stated,

"I hope that for you [studying the scriptures] will become something far more enjoyable than a duty; rather, it will become a love affair with the word of God. I promise you that as you read, your minds will be enlightened and your spirits will be lifted."(2)

President Hinckley’s statement applies to all of the Standard Works, including the Old Testament.

A study of the Old Testament should strengthen our testimony of the Savior and our commitment to live his gospel. If we are guided by the Spirit in our study of this great volume, we should be able to testify with Job, "I know that my redeemer liveth, and that he shall stand at the latter day upon the earth."(3)

As you study the Old Testament, I suggest the use of a good Bible handbook, an Old Testament commentary, and a history of Bible times to aid you in understanding the culture and background of these ancient peoples. The Old Testament Student Manual, available through Church distribution, is also an excellent resource. Most importantly, the messages of the Old Testament are best understood through the Spirit.
________________________

[1] Search The Scriptures – A Missionary Study Guide For Missionaries (Salt Lake City: The Council of the Twelve, 1971), p. 7.
[2] Ensign, May 1995, p. 99.
[3] Job 19:25.

A New Year’s Resolution

2008-12-28T05:54:00.000-08:00

The Prophet Joseph Smith taught that “A man is saved no faster than he gets knowledge” (History of the Church, 4:588). On another occasion the Prophet stated, “It is impossible for a man to be saved in ignorance” (D&C 131:6). I’m sure I could list numerous other scriptures and quotations from the prophets about the importance of gaining knowledge, particularly those things related to the gospel plan. Growing in our knowledge and understanding of the gospel is essential as we navigate the difficult waters of mortality and as we prepare for life in the eternities.

We have a new opportunity for expanding our gospel knowledge beginning in 2009. The course of study for the Gospel Doctrine class is the Doctrine and Covenants and Church History. Unlike the previous three years of study (Old Testament, New Testament, and Book of Mormon) which discuss the gospel as written by the ancients, this year we have the opportunity to study the restoration of the gospel in our time. We begin with the stories of those who are only a few generations removed and continue into our own day and time. This is our story. The revelations were given to address the challenges and needs of those living in these latter days.

The question is this: What will we do with the 2009 course of study? Will we do as so many of us have done in the past, show up and enjoy the class, but do little with the information and fail to study the readings? Remembering the vital importance of continually expanding our knowledge of the gospel, it behooves us to do something more. The 2009 course of study gives us that opportunity.

I would suggest the following resolutions for 2009:

Prepare for each class by at least studying the suggested scriptures as listed in the Class Member Study Guide, along with the suggested reading from the book Our Heritage. If we are truly serious about expanding our gospel knowledge, then we might study other relevant texts, such as the History of the Church by Joseph Smith or the Comprehensive History of the Church by B.H. Roberts.

Over the past two years, I have suggested the keeping of a Gospel Doctrine notebook. Each Sunday afternoon (or evening) take a few moments to sit down and enter your thoughts regarding the lesson. Focus on that which has inspired you and touched your heart. Write down how you might more fully live that teaching or principle during the following week.

Are we serious about expanding our gospel knowledge? If so, then make a commitment in 2009 to be more actively involved in scripture study, particularly as it relates to the Gospel Doctrine curriculum. The above is just a suggestion. If there are other ways to more fully engage yourself in gospel study during the next year, write down a goal and then do it. Such activities in 2009 can make a positive impact in your life, prepare you for the difficulties which seem to surround us, and bring you closer to the Lord.

Knowledge of Eternal Truth Is Essential

2008-12-14T07:18:00.000-08:00

A couple weeks ago I prepared to teach the Joseph Smith lesson Gaining Knowledge of Eternal Truths. A study of this lesson reminds us of the necessity of learning, particularly those things of eternal significance. The Prophet's attitude towards searching for the truth and seeking knowledge has impacted the Church throughout its history.

In 1843, the Prophet instructed the Saints regarding the importance of gaining education and knowledge, "Whatever principle of intelligence we attain unto in this life, it will rise with us in the resurrection. And if a person gains more knowledge and intelligence in this life through his diligence and obedience than another, he will have so much the advantage in the world to come" (D&C 130:18-19). The Prophet also taught that "It is impossible for a man to be saved in ignorance" (D&C 131:16). Without question, the process of seeking out eternal truth is vital. We know of its importance in this life. It is essential in the next.

The lesson manual shared this interesting quotation from the Prophet, “Knowledge does away with darkness, suspense and doubt; for these cannot exist where knowledge is. … In knowledge there is power. God has more power than all other beings, because He has greater knowledge; and hence He knows how to subject all other beings to Him. He has power over all” (History of the Church, 4:588).

As I read this quotation, I was reminded of a scene from the movie Groundhog Day. The movie stars Bill Murray who played the role of Phil Connors, a weatherman that traveled to Punxsutawney, Pennsylvania, to report on the annual Groundhog Day festivities. As Phil had been there in previous years, he had no enthusiasm for making the trip to this small Pennsylvania town. After completing his reporting assignment, Phil, along with his cameraman and producer, attempted to return home. However, a snowstorm blocked their return and they were stuck in Punxsutawney for second night. When Phil woke up the following morning, it was once again Groundhog Day. In fact, every morning, Phil keeps waking up to the same day with all of the same things happening around him.

After a couple of days, Phil begins to take advantage of the information learned on this repeating day by taking advantage of others and doing things he would not normally do, such as robbing an armored car and eating like there was no tomorrow (which there wasn’t). Eventually, he gets bored and depressed and makes several attempts at taking his life, once again waking up and finding another Groundhog Day. Over time, Phil begins to utilize the information he learns to improve his life.

As the story progresses, Phil is sitting in the local diner one afternoon visiting with Rita, his producer. Phil tries to explain to Rita what is happening to him and states that he is a god, not the God. He then tells intimate details about several people in the cafe and predicts that one of the servers will drop a tray (which he does). He explains to Rita that maybe God became God because he went through all of this so many times. Even after this discussion, Phil continues to utilize the knowledge he learns. On what becomes his last Groundhog Day, Phil utilizes his knowledge to serve others in what becomes a perfect day.

I have found a lot of truth in what happened to Phil. At first, Phil abused the knowledge he gained. Then he realized there was a higher road and utilized that knowledge to improve himself and provide service to others. Knowledge is power. Obtained and used wisely, we can have great power for good. In an eternal sense, it is necessary to continue progress towards our eternal destiny.

Sometimes I feel like Phil. I wake up in the morning, going through the same routine: shower, dress, eat breakfast, drive to work, and spend a day at work. Life is repetitive. Maybe not as repetitive as Groundhog Day, but still our days are similar. Nonetheless, like Phil, we have the opportunity to mine each day for new knowledge. Are we doing so? Are we actively striving to improve ourselves with the knowledge we obtain? Are we using that knowledge to serve others? If so, we are on a course to become like our Heavenly Father.

As we approach the end of this year, it is a good time to sit back and examine our lives. What are we doing with each day? What can we do during the coming year to learn more of our Heavenly Father and his gospel? How can we take that knowledge and use it to improve ourselves and bless the lives of others?

Shaken Faith Syndrome

2008-11-20T06:51:00.001-08:00

I recently finished reading the book, Shaken Faith Syndrome, by Michael R. Ash. The subtitle of the book explains its purpose, Strengthening One’s Testimony In the Face of Criticism and Doubt. Brother Ash begins his book by defining what he refers to as “shaken faith syndrome.” He indicates that members of the Church encountering new information about the Church, its history, or doctrines with which they are not familiar, or come across anti-Mormon literature for the first time, may experience doubt. Such doubt for some “can suddenly mushroom into feelings of distress and anxiety. This turmoil can be set into motion by an argument that seems to present a serious problem.”

The Internet age has brought us a wealth of information, both good and bad. Anyone can create a web site and present their views on anything. Hundreds of web sites have popped up purporting to tell the truth about the Church. Many of these web sites and blogs are hosted by former members of the Church. Some members of the Church have been affected by these web sites and testimonies have been lost.

Brother Ash states that one of the goals of his book is to “expose or inoculate members to potentially troubling issues in a faithful setting, thereby inoculating them against the damage that might be inflicted by critical attacks.” The Internet has exposed many Church members to negative information and propaganda about the Church. Shaken Faith Syndrome recognizes this problem and provides information that can assist Church leaders and members in dealing with this growing problem.

After defining the problem of shaken faith in detail, Brother Ash spends the remainder of the book touching on a number of the issues that arise from anti-Mormon literature or even faithful literature that is not read in its full context. Ash explains that this book is “not intended as a scholarly thesis on all issues relating to an ‘intellectual’ apostasy. Nevertheless it is hoped that the information contained in these pages accurately summarizes the scholarly material that has been produced.”

The first section of the book also covers such topics as unrealistic expectations of prophets, confusing tradition with doctrine, and anti-Mormon disdain for LDS scholarship. The second section provides responses to specific anti-Mormon claims and deals with topics related to the Book of Abraham and the Book of Mormon. The third and fourth sections deal with historical challenges, including the Journal of Discourses, plural marriage, the temple, and Joseph Smith.

Shaken Faith Syndrome is a fascinating read. Though any of the topics could be covered in greater depth by themselves, this book provides a basis for learning more, including resources. As I read this book, it was my thought that every bishop in the Church should have a copy of this book to aid them in dealing with challenges to the faith.

Our Sunday School classes are designed to build faith and inspire the members to live the gospel. They are not intended to be scholarly discussions of Church history or evidences of the Book of Mormon. As many members receive most of their instruction about the Church during Sunday meetings, they are often unequipped to deal with challenges that may arise. My web site, The Gospel Doctrine Class, has been online since 1998. Since I began posting lesson outlines, I have received numerous e-mail inquiries about various aspects of the Church, some of those raised by historical issues or anti-Mormon literature. Shaken Faith Syndrome is a wonderful starting place for members who have encountered such questions.

Shaken Faith Syndrome is published by The Foundation for Apologetic Information and Research and is available at their website, http://www.fairlds.org/, or at Deseret Book. More information about the book is available at http://www.shakenfaithsyndrome.com/.

Faith and Politics

2008-08-20T06:49:00.000-07:00

In just a few days the Democratic Party will assemble here in Colorado to officially nominate their candidate for President of the United States. A few days later the Republican Party will do the same in Minnesota. Following the two conventions the political season will continue to accelerate until Election Day on November 4th. It seems that the political season has already been too long. The networks have been broadcasting debates for months. More than past campaign seasons, there has been a lot of discussion in regards to the faith and religion of several candidates, especially Mitt Romney, Mike Huckabee, and Barack Obama.

Is there a place for faith in politics? A recent editorial stated, “Too much of the conversation is guided by the incivility of politics - charges and countercharges by religious liberals and conservatives that the other side is trying to impose its will on the majority by undemocratic methods” (David Briggs, The Plain Dealer, August 9, 2008). Such discourse causes citizens to wonder if faith has a role in the political process.

The Church has stated, “The Church’s mission is to preach the gospel of Jesus Christ, not to elect politicians. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is neutral in matters of party politics. This applies in all of the many nations in which it is established” (www.newsroom.lds.org).

What then is our role as members of the Church? The Lord has stated, “Wherefore, honest men and wise men should be sought for diligently, and good men and wise men ye should observe to uphold; otherwise whatsoever is less than these cometh of evil” (D&C 98:10). Thus, though the LDS Church, as an organization, maintains political neutrality, we have been given a solemn and sacred responsibility to be involved in electing candidates who have proven their honesty, virtue, and wisdom.

What about the issues? “And that law of the land which is constitutional, supporting that principle of freedom in maintaining rights and privileges, belongs to all mankind, and is justifiable before me. Therefore, I, the Lord, justify you, and your brethren of my church, in befriending that law which is the constitutional law of the land” (D&C 98:5-6). On another occasion, the Lord revealed, “And for this purpose have I established the Constitution of this land, by the hands of wise men whom I raised up unto this very purpose, and redeemed the land by the shedding of blood” (D&C 101:80). Based on these words from the Lord, I believe we have a responsibility to understand the Constitution and the intent of the founding fathers that were “raised up unto this very purpose.” The best source for understanding the intent of the founding fathers can be found in the Federalist Papers. On online version can be found at: http://www.foundingfathers.info/federalistpapers/.

As we come to understand this remarkable document, we then have a responsibility to support worthy candidates that possess a firm understanding of the Constitution and who will uphold positions that are in harmony with this inspired document. It is easy to get caught up in the hype and excitement of a campaign, but we need to back away from the rhetoric and make our decisions based on the foundational principles which the Lord has revealed through his prophets.

Search for the Truth

2008-05-04T06:46:00.000-07:00

I recently received the following e-mail:

Dear Brother Beardall, I have recently watched the series of videos Search for the Truth: Good News for LDS, because a recent convert girlfriend watched them and has decided that she is to no longer be a member. It is a cleaver twist of truths and lies. I also have my son who will soon be going on his mission this summer who will no doubt run into many who have watched these outlandish claims. Have you seen them? And how is the best method for correcting these “confusing" and "false" claims against Joseph, his vision accounts???, his method of translation??, his wives: underage girls etc... DNA etc. This does not effect me as I know the witness of the Holy Ghost is more powerful than any word of man and especially men who offer nothing else. Can you give some direction on approaching this issue? Thanks

In response, I wrote the following:

I have seen most of the videos from the Search for Truth series. They are professionally done. Unfortunately, they have taken bits and pieces of truth and twisted it for their own purposes. Over the years I have studied most of the claims presented within the video, so I was not surprised to see them addressed in the video. Unfortunately, the unsuspecting member, one who has not acquired that powerful witness from the spirit, can be swayed by this video and its claims. Our Sunday School and Relief Society/Priesthood lessons are designed to teach doctrine and inspire us to become better people. They are not places for teaching a scholastic history of the Church, thus we are left to do that study on our own. Most members are not prepared to counter the arguments so often used by those who would tear down the Church.

By far, the best place for answers to counteract anti-Mormon arguments is the website from FAIR, Foundation for Apologetic Information and Research. This group was started about ten years ago by a group of faithful Latter-day Saints to counter the rising tide of disinformation about the Church, its history, and its doctrine. I have attended their annual conference the past two years (and will attend again this year) and normally contribute a nominal sum to assist their efforts. They have done a remarkable job and I do not think that there is a single anti topic that they haven’t addressed. Though not officially endorsed by the Church, the LDS.org Newsroom has linked to FAIR on occasion. One of the FAIR board members is Dan Peterson, a member of The Neal A. Maxwell Institute for Religious Scholarship at BYU.

When the video first came out, someone at FAIR was able to obtain an advanced copy of the video. A day or two before the video was released, FAIR had posted responses on their website. I was amazed. The Search for Truth response is found on this page: http://en.fairmormon.org/Search_for_the_Truth_DVD

FAIR has also created a website organized like Wikipedia, which provides for quick answers on a number of topics: http://en.fairmormon.org/Main_Page

The main fair page is located at: http://www.fairlds.org/. My favorite area is the topical guide, where one can find links to numerous articles on all sorts of topics. For instance, there are 182 articles about Joseph Smith and 951 articles on the Book of Mormon. Under the Book of Mormon topic there are 26 articles on DNA. The topical guide is located at: http://www.fairlds.org/apol/

I guess this is a bit of a commercial for FAIR, but they are performing an amazing service. It is an all volunteer organization of people who believe in defending the Church from defamation and untruth. Two years ago at the FAIR conference, I visited with Scott Gordon (FAIR president). He told me that FAIR has made the most difference when it comes to saving testimonies. He stated that numerous members have been saved from falling away when presented information contained on the FAIR website. It is sad that your friend was lost because of a lack of information. This is why FAIR exists.

An amazing amount of scholarship on the Book of Mormon and other scriptures can be found at the Neal A. Maxwell Institute for Religious Scholarship, formally known as FARMS. I subscribe to their semi-annual Journal of Book of Mormon studies, which contains wonderful articles supporting the authenticity of the Book of Mormon. Their website is located at: http://maxwellinstitute.byu.edu/. In looking up the link, I noticed this quotation from Elder Maxwell on the main page, “We may never become accustomed to untrue and unjust criticism of us but we ought not to be immobilized by it.”

Let me also recommend a couple of books. An excellent book on the life of Joseph Smith is Richard Bushman’s Rough Stone Rolling. Richard Bushman is an active member of the Church and professor emeritus at Columbia University. The book is written as a scholarly history of Joseph Smith for a general audience. He quietly puts to rest many of the anti arguments about Joseph Smith.

Another book which I recently read, and highly recommend, is By the Hand of Mormon: The American Scripture that Launched a New World Religion. It is written by Terryl L. Givens, Professor of Religion and Literature at the University of Richmond. Givens is another faithful Latter-day Saint who has written to a general audience about the impact of the Book of Mormon. Not an easy read, but I found it amazing. He helps us realize what an amazing gift we have been given.

As far as addressing the video, I would start with the first FAIR page listed above. However, I would familiarize yourself with the other resources. I believe that challenges to the Church and our belief system will continue to increase. We need to follow the admonition of Peter, “Be ready always to give an answer to every man that asketh you a reason of the hope that is in you” (1 Peter 3:15).

The FLDS & Apostasy

2008-04-27T08:38:00.000-07:00

In recent weeks, many of us have watched with great interest as events have unfolded at the YFZ Ranch in Eldorado, Texas. While watching the many news stories, it was easy to become deeply concerned about the treatment of women and children at the ranch and within the Fundamentalist LDS Church as a whole. On the other hand, I have also been concerned about the rights of the parents and children. The whole saga is deeply disturbing and it will be interesting to see how all of this plays out.

A few months ago I read a book titled Modern Polygamy and Mormon Fundamentalism: The Generations after the Manifesto by Brian C. Hales. It is a history of those who continued to practice plural marriage after President Woodruff’s manifesto declaring an end to the practice within the Church. It is a fascinating read about those individuals and groups who believed that President Woodruff was wrong and then continued the practice. As I progressed into this history and read about how these groups functioned, I felt impressed that I was reading a study on the fruits of apostasy.

I have been fascinated by some of the video coming out of the FLDS story, particularly those scenes showing the homes on the ranch. In a scene or two, pictures of the FLDS presidents were shown on the wall. The pictures progressed in the following order: Warren Jeffs (apparently they still think of him as their prophet), Rulon Jeffs, Leroy Johnson, John Barlow, Lorin Woolley, and John Woolley. The pictures continued right to left with John Taylor, Brigham Young, and Joseph Smith. In other places, only the picture of Warren Jeffs was visible. Hanging pictures of the prophets in one’s home is not unusual. I have a picture above my desk of all the latter-day prophets. What I found unusual is that there were no pictures of the Savior. I looked carefully through multiple scenes both on television and the Internet. If you walk into a typical LDS home, you almost always find a picture of the Savior in a prominent location. I wondered if they should change the name of their church to the Fundamentalist Church of Warren Jeffs.

This past Friday, in my daily Book of Mormon reading, I read again about Alma’s mission to reclaim the apostate Zoramites (Alma 31). Within that chapter we learn how the Zoramites corrupted the true gospel. They built a tower, which was the only place where they could pray and worship. Alma tells us that after praying, “they returned to their homes, never speaking of their God again until they had assembled themselves together again to the holy stand, to offer up thanks after their manner” (Alma 31:23). Alma tells us that they failed to keep the Law of Moses and did pervert the ways of the Lord. We learn in Alma 32 that the poor among the Zoramites were cast out of their places of worship.

What happened to the Zoramites? They failed to give heed to priesthood authority and to obey the word of the Lord as it was given through his prophet. As a consequence, their faith was corrupted and they worshipped after the manner of their own desires.

What happened to the FLDS? Like the Zoramites, they failed to give heed to the duly constituted priesthood authority and disregarded the word of the Lord as given through his prophet. The FLDS, and other such polygamous groups, believe that Joseph Smith was a prophet. Yet they are will to be obedient to only one portion of that which the Prophet taught. The Lord, through Joseph Smith, revealed the pattern for succession in the presidency. These groups are fine with that process until it reaches Wilford Woodruff. Because President Woodruff stopped the practice of plural marriage, they believe that he no longer spoke for the Lord.

Like the Zoramites, these people fell into apostasy. Like the Zoramites, we see the fruits of their apostasy: unrighteous dominion, child brides, possible child abuse, children taken away from their parents, boys kicked out their homes and church.

In the Section 1 of the Doctrine and Covenants, the Lord issues a warning to all people that must be carried to the world by his disciples. If these people truly believe that Joseph Smith was a prophet, they are unable to carry out this commission from the Lord because of their actions. Their fruits speak louder than any truth they might possess. In excerpts from President Woodruff’s addresses, attached to the end of the Manifesto, he indicates that if the Church had continued the practice of plural marriage, the work of the Church would have been unable to go forward, temples would have been confiscated, and the work for the dead would have ceased.

The work of preaching the gospel to the ends of the earth and doing saving ordinances for the dead has continued because President Woodruff heeded the Lord’s counsel. Since the days of President Woodruff millions have accepted the gospel and been blessed in innumerable ways. Since the days of President Woodruff, the work for tens of millions of the dead has been done in the temples. In the almost 120 years since issuance of the manifesto, only thousands have become part of the FLDS church or the other polygamous offshoot faiths. Little or no preaching to the world has been done. President Woodruff was inspired to cease the practice of plural marriage and time has confirmed the importance of issuing the proclamation.

Whose Church Is It Anyway?

2008-04-06T07:24:00.000-07:00

Over the past year there have been numerous articles and blogs addressing the Church, its doctrine, practices, and people. Much of this is due to the Romney candidacy. I have taken an interest in following this discussion about the Church. As I have tracked threads from articles and blogs, I am sometimes led to the pages of those who are members of the Church, yet unhappy with its doctrines and/or practices, or some of those who have left the Church. I do not dwell on these pages for I find little constructive discussion.

I came across the blog of one individual who recently resigned his membership in the Church. He posted on his blog, “The 96 Theses: Constructive Suggestions for Improving the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.” I suppose he is trying to beat Martin Luther’s 95 Theses. Here are a few of his suggestions or criticisms:

The Church should acknowledge that the “faith-promoting” history it has been teaching through its correlated materials is often misleading or false and the Church should present members with accurate and complete information about Church history. The Church should not teach through word or visual image things that are demonstrably false.
The Church should sell its interest in KSL and other media ventures. The Church should not be in the media business.
The Church shows disrespect toward women by withholding the priesthood from them. The Church should grant women the priesthood and the right to officiate in all the offices pertaining thereto.
The Church shows disrespect toward homosexuals by supporting a constitutional amendment to prevent states from granting all the same legal rights and privileges to homosexual couples that married heterosexual couples enjoy.
The Church shows disrespect for members whose spouses are not members of the Church or are disaffected with the Church by teaching that only couples sealed in the temple who maintain strict obedience to Church teachings and requirements will enjoy family relationships after death.
The Church should clarify for its members that a “full and honest tithe” should be paid on one’s “surplus,” that is, on the amount of money one has left over after paying for taxes and necessary living expenses such as food, housing, clothing, utilities, and transportation.
The Church should shift focus to humanitarian service missions rather than active proselyting missions.

I would love to discuss each of these challenges (and maybe I will at some future time), however all of these challenges and criticisms boil down to one single question: Whose church is it anyway? In his preface to the Doctrine and Covenants, the Lord stated, “Wherefore, I the Lord, knowing the calamity which should come upon the inhabitants of the earth, called upon my servant Joseph Smith, Jun., and spake unto him from heaven, and gave him commandments” (D&C 1:17). Later on in the same revelation that Lord stated, “And also those to whom these commandments were given, might have power to lay the foundation of this church, and to bring it forth out of obscurity and out of darkness, the only true and living church upon the face of the whole earth, with which I, the Lord, am well pleased” (D&C 1:30).

The Lord has claimed this Church as his own. He called Joseph Smith to be his voice upon the earth. Through him, priesthood authority, the authority to act in God’s name, was given to men. An organization was revealed that would perpetuate God’s kingdom upon earth. If this is not the Lord’s church, then whose church is it? If it is not the Lord’s, why belong to it? Apparently, the writer of the 96 Theses does not believe it is the Lord’s church or he would not have resigned his membership. In which case, why the 96 Theses? Why try to reform something that is not what it claims to be?

One of my favorite missionary scriptures is found in Amos 3:7, “Surely the Lord God will do nothing, but he revealeth his secret unto his servants the prophets.” If this is the Lord’s church, he will reveal his will through his prophet. The Church is not a democracy where we gather in a convention to discuss doctrines and practices and then vote to decide what to change or not change. They tried that at the Council of Nicea, which excluded the will of God, and ultimately led to the incredible fragmentation of Christianity.

Is the Church (meaning the membership) perfect? No. Is there room for improvement? Absolutely. This is the reason for the existence of the Church, “For the perfecting of the saints, for the work of the ministry, for the edifying of the body of Christ: Till we all come in the unity of the faith, and of the knowledge of the Son of God, unto a perfect man, unto the measure of the stature of the fulness of Christ: That we henceforth be no more children, tossed to and fro, and carried about with every wind of doctrine, by the sleight of men, and cunning craftiness, whereby they lie in wait to deceive” (Ephesians 4:12-14).

As members, we can make suggestions for improving the effectiveness of this great work. Within the limited authority granted through our callings, and through inspiration, we can do that which helps us to succeed and carry out our responsibilities. In the 1930s, Harold B. Lee, then president of the Pioneer Stake, along with other stake leaders, came up with a welfare plan for their stake that was eventually adopted by the whole church. However, the acceptance of the plan at higher levels was subject to approval by the Brethren under the guidance of the Lord.

This is the Lord’s church. Changes as suggested by the writer of the 96 Theses are not the prerogative of the writer, myself, or even the entire body of the Church. Such changes in doctrine and practice must be approved by the Lord and revealed to “his servants the prophets.” It continues to amaze me that such individuals that have separated themselves from the Church even care whether it changes or not.

A final note. We all loved President Hinckley. I never met him personally, but he was my friend and counselor. I came to know that he was the Lord’s prophet. Upon his death, I felt the loss of my friend and prophet. Though I have admired President Monson over the years and cherished his counsel, I could not see him filling the great shoes of President Hinckley. Last evening I attended General Priesthood Meeting at our stake center. As I watched President Monson speak to the priesthood brethren assembled throughout the world, the spirit manifested to me that the mantle of the prophet has been moved and President Thomas S. Monson is the man bearing that mantle. There is a new prophet in town.

Doctrinal Ping Pong

2008-03-27T05:08:00.000-07:00

I often receive questions about various aspects of the gospel from those who frequent my lesson outlines posted on the Internet. Though I’m not a scholar, I search my resources and attempt to provide an answer based on the teachings and writings of the Brethren (past and present).

I recently received the following question: At what point in time did Joseph Smith become the prophet? The question was raised by a sister during a lesson discussion in Relief Society. The instructor taught that Joseph became a prophet at the time of the First Vision. At the end of the class, the sister who raised the question came up to the instructor and said that Joseph could not have been the prophet until he received the priesthood and the Church was organized. This sister then raised the question with the husband of the instructor. Apparently, the discussion continued among some of the sisters the following week, creating a certain amount of stress and contention.

I recall a High Priest group meeting I attended some years ago. I do not recall the topic of the discussion. What I do recall is the group discussing a variety of answers to a particular question, some of those answers speculative. The discussion continued for several minutes when one of the quorum members indicated that we were participating in doctrinal ping pong and not getting to the heart of the matter. I remembered that discussion when I received the inquiry about the Joseph Smith and at what point in time he became a prophet.

I love nothing more than a good gospel discussion and have probably been involved in more than my share of doctrinal ping pong conversations. I would also be among the last to put the brakes on a healthy interchange of ideas. Such discussions can be both spiritually and intellectually stimulating. However, within our class and quorum discussions, we need to be careful about getting caught up in discussions over questions that cannot be resolved, require speculation, or may negatively affect the feelings of a class member. Doctrinal ping pong discussions should be limited.

The answer to the question posed by the writer, did not have a simple answer. Each party seemed wed to a particular answer without exploring the response by the other. In the end, one simple fact remains, Joseph Smith became the Lord’s mouthpiece for a new generation. Regardless of the day or year his prophetic calling began, this simple truth stands above the rest. Our ultimate goal is to seek truth and we need to be careful about getting sidetracked in that quest by participating in doctrinal ping pong.

Church Growth

2007-10-14T07:15:00.000-07:00

In the Sunday morning session of the October General Conference President Hinckley made the following statement, “The Church has become one large family scattered across the earth. There are now more than 13 million of us in 176 nations and territories. A marvelous and wonderful thing is coming to pass. The Lord is fulfilling His promise that His gospel shall be as the stone cut out of the mountain without hands which would roll forth and fill the whole earth, as Daniel saw in vision (see Daniel 2:31–45; D&C 65:2). A great miracle is taking place right before our eyes.”

When President Hinckley’s talk was reported in the Deseret Morning News, one reader responded, “LDS Church growth extolled? According to Wikipedia, the world's population is believed to have reached over 6.7 billion, as of September, 2007. Mormons represent 13 million out of 6.7 billion humans (according to the LDS Church's statistics), or .0019 percent of the world's population.” The writer continued by comparing the size of the LDS Church to other major religions and concluded, “Give me a break. The 4th column of government (free press) deserves better critical thinking and better representation.” Besides not interpreting his calculator correctly,[1] the author did not attempt to understand that which President Hinckley was teaching.

President Hinckley was not making comparisons to the size of other religions, rather he spoke about the remarkable growth of the Church throughout the world and the incredible story of the restoration. Indeed, the growth of this “large family scattered across the earth” has been nothing less than awesome. In the year of my birth, the membership of the Church was a little over one million members. While serving my mission in the early 1970s, membership passed the three-million mark. Last year Church membership surpassed the 13 million mark. As wonderful as we find this growth, I do not think we need to make membership and growth comparisons to other churches or religions. This is the Lord’s work and it will go forth as he so directs.

I would like to make a couple of comments regarding Church growth. Nephi made the following prophecy, “And it came to pass that I beheld the church of the Lamb of God, and its numbers were few, because of the wickedness and abominations of the whore who sat upon many waters; nevertheless, I beheld that the church of the Lamb, who were the saints of God, were also upon all the face of the earth; and their dominions upon the face of the earth were small, because of the wickedness of the great whore whom I saw” (1 Nephi 14:12). The way I read Nephi’s prophecy, it would appear that as long as there is great wickedness upon the earth, the size of the Church will be small in relation to the total population of the world. However, though the saints are few, they will be upon “all the face of the earth.” President Hinckley stated that there are now members of the Church in 176 nations and territories. Nephi’s prophecy seems to be near fulfillment. Daniel’s prophecy, as cited by President Hinckley, will not be completely fulfilled until the millennial reign. How much larger will the Church grow prior to the millennium? We do not know, but according to Nephi the numbers of those belong to the church will be small in comparison to the rest of the world.

I have been tracking membership growth throughout my life, more particularly in the last two decades. I started noticing an interesting trend. In 1990, convert baptisms reached an all time high of 330,887 new members. That number has not been surpassed in the subsequent sixteen years.[2] In fact, each of the years 2003 through 2005 reflects the lowest number of converts since 1987. It seems to me that the number of convert baptisms should increase exponentially in relationship to the overall size of the Church. However, baptism numbers have been relatively level over the past several years, meaning that annual converts are becoming a smaller percent of the whole.

What does all of this mean? At a time when the Church is receiving unprecedented coverage, I would think that there would be greater interest in the restored gospel. I might suggest one possible reason for this change. In 1995, the Brethren issued the Proclamation on the Family. I believe the Brethren saw disturbing trends in our country and throughout much of the world that were impacting the stability of the family. I think these continuing negative changes may be a significant contributing factor affecting the number of convert baptisms as people are turning away from the basic principles and moral values of the past. A prime example of this may be seen in the lack of religion and liberal lifestyles of so many living in Europe. The growth of the gospel in that part of the world appears to have reached a standstill. We know that at some point the missionaries will be called home. The Lord will not call those missionaries home until every person that should hear the gospel has heard the gospel. Clearly, that time has not come yet. 300,000 converts per year (give or take a few thousand) is still a wonderful increase. But as the numbers show, something has changed.

We need to remember that the Lord has not released us from our responsibility as bearers of the good news of the kingdom. We need to continue our efforts as friends to our neighbors and associates. We need to continue to be positive examples and stand as a beacon to those around us. And we need to stand up for the truth when we hear the Church being maligned. It is time to renew our commitment to the Lord and join hands with him in bringing to pass the “immortality and eternal life of man” (Moses 3:5).

[1] The figure is actually .19 percent, or almost one-fifth of one percent of the world’s population. This is still a small number, but not as infinitesimal as the author might suggest.
[2] I have prepared a graph showing Church growth 1990-2006. It is posted at: http://beardall2000.com/extras/membership_growth.PDF.

No Sunday School This Weekend

2007-09-28T18:48:00.000-07:00

If you are anything like me, there is anticipation in advance of General Conference. I always wonder what great announcements might be made. In the upcoming conference, I am reasonably certain that both a new counselor in the First Presidency and a new apostle will be named. I sometimes wonder if there will be great and momentous announcements such as the building of the temple in Jackson County or that we have six months to get our year’s supply in order. I know that sometimes I am guilty of looking for the “big” announcement. In doing so, I may miss the real substance of the conference, that which is meant to guide and prepare us for whatever may lie ahead.

Consider the last the April 2007 General Conference. At the Priesthood session, President Hinckley began by reciting statistics regarding Church progress since he became prophet. These numbers show remarkable growth in the Church, particularly when compared to the previous 165 years of Church history. He then stated, “Now, while all of this has been tremendously significant, I am convinced that with a little more dedication this wonderful recent past can be but prologue to a greater future. Let us all put our shoulders to the wheel and push along, do our duty with a heart full of song. This cause needs work; let no one shirk.” We are reminded that this is not a time to rest on previous successes, but to continue to move forward with optimism in doing the great work of the Lord.

President Hinckley continued his priesthood address by relating an account from the Hawaiian mission of young Joseph F. Smith. Young Joseph dreamed that he encountered Joseph Smith and other great ones from Church history and was able to declare himself clean before them. We are then reminded, “In modern revelation the Lord has said: ‘Be ye clean that bear the vessels of the Lord’ (D&C 133:5). In a world that wallows in filth, be clean—in language, in thought, in body, in dress.” President Hinckley then discussed cleanliness in each of those areas and concluded by stating, “You are His chosen servant; you have been ordained to something holy and wonderful. You cannot live in the world and partake of the ways of the world. You must be above all of that.” As bearers of the priesthood, we are reminded that its power and authority is dependent on our worthiness.

In his Sunday morning address, President Hinckley bore his testimony and reminded us of several great truths: the true nature of Heavenly Father, the reality of Jesus Christ and his atonement, the restoration of priesthood authority, and the blessings of the temple. His testimony stands as a beacon of truth reminding us that there is only one true path to happiness. As the spirit bears witness, we are reminded that there is much to do to improve our relationship with Heavenly Father, in following the teachings of Jesus Christ, to honor our priesthood, and to serve more faithfully in the temple.

As President Hinckley closed the conference, he stated, “We hope that you will use the May edition of the Church magazines as a text for your family home evenings, to review that which has been spoken in this conference. What has been said by each of the speakers represents his or her prayerful attempt to impart knowledge that will inspire and cause all who have heard it to stand a little taller and be a little better.” We are reminded that the teachings spoken throughout the conference are for our benefit and to be studied and used, not to be forgotten when the closing prayer is concluded.

There might not be any Sunday School this weekend, but we will be taught and instructed by the Lord’s servants in magnificent ways. We may not learn when the call to Jackson County will come, but if we listen, study, and ponder, we will be filled with those things that are most important for us to do at this time in the history of mankind.

Proclamation on the Family & Prophetic Fulfillment

2007-09-10T19:04:00.000-07:00

I recently completed reading America Alone: The End of the World As We Know It by Mark Steyn. Much of the book discusses changing world demographics. Steyn reviews demographic changes in Europe due to two major factors: 1) declining birth rates among the native populations; 2) Immigration, primarily from Muslim nations. According to Steyn, by mid-century many European nations will have a Muslim majority.

Steyn states that by “2050, Italy’s population will have fallen by 22 percent, Bulgaria’s by 36 percent, Estonia’s by 52 percent—or more. Seventeen European nations are now at what demographers call ‘lowest-low’ fertility: 1.3 births per woman. In theory, those countries will find their population halving every thirty-five years or so.”

I was startled by what I read. As a high school student we were taught about the exploding world population. Steyn points to a different scenario, with falling birth rates throughout the world, many nations are below the replacement rate of 2.1 children per woman. I wondered if Steyn was spinning a tale for political purposes. I checked Wikipedia and found an article that supports Steyn’s claim (see Wikipedia: Sub Replacement Fertility). For hard statistics see Field Listing - Total Fertility Rate in the CIA World Factbook.

As I read through Steyn’s American Alone, it hit me that I might be seeing evidence of prophetic fulfillment of the warning found in the Proclamation on the Family. Consider the following statements from the Proclamation:

Marriage between a man and a woman is ordained of God and that the family is Central to the Creator’s plan for the eternal destiny of His children.

We declare that God’s commandment for His children to multiply and replenish the earth remains in force.

We further declare that God has commanded that the sacred powers of procreation are to be employed only between man and woman, lawfully wedded as husband and wife.

We affirm the sanctity of life and of its importance in God’s eternal plan.

Children are entitled to birth within the bonds of matrimony, and to be reared by a father and a mother who honor marital vows with complete fidelity.

It occurred to me that many of the nations or nationalities with birth rates below replacement levels are those with the most liberal lifestyles, moving away from basic principles found within the Proclamation. Many of these countries have minimized the importance of marriage, in that many of their citizens live together out of wedlock and allow for gay marriage or civil unions. Abortion is easy. Consider the projected population loss by 2050 in some of these nations: Spain = 22.7%, Bulgaria = 34.8%, Germany 14.4%, Italy 20.3% (see NationMaster.com). The list goes on. Amazingly, these statistics include immigrant growth. In addition, the population will be aging as there are fewer and fewer young people, thus placing social programs, such as health care and retirement, into a crisis. These are statistics from 2001. It appears to have changed for the worse since that date.

Near the end of the Proclamation we find this warning:

We warn that the disintegration of the family will bring upon individuals, communities, and nations the calamities foretold by ancient and modern prophets.

It would be interesting to take the time to search the prophecies and find that which has indeed been foretold. However, based on the demographic changes which are occurring due to liberal lifestyles, we can guess at some possibilities. If the demographic trends in Europe continue, many of those nations could lose their historical identity. The Italians, the French, and the Spanish peoples may become a minority in their own nations as immigrants from Muslim nations, along with their natural born children, become a majority. With Muslims in the majority, they would be empowered to enact their own, more conservative laws. Might the Muslim majority choose to be ruled by Sharia law (see Sharia - Wikipedia)? Could there be European civil war?

The Old Testament and Book of Mormon provide many examples of what happens to nations when the people turn away from time honored traditions and the teachings of the Lord’s prophets. Other civilizations, such as the Greek and Roman empires, provide further evidence of what happens to those nations that sacrifice basic values. The Lord’s modern prophets have issued a proclamation to the world reminding all people of the importance of morality, marriage, family, and the sanctity of life. Based on the limited evidence noted above, it appears that the world has failed to hear and heed. As a consequence, we are beginning to see the fulfillment of “the calamities foretold by ancient and modern prophets.”

September Dawn

2007-08-26T19:12:00.000-07:00

Occasionally I receive an e-mail from a visitor to my web site asking about the Mountain Meadows Massacre. Here is a sampling of some of the questions I have received:

What was the Mountain Meadows Massacre?
Was it as bad as I have heard?
Were Brigham Young and other Church leaders involved?

One cannot fully chronicle in a blog, or even an article, this event and the circumstances that led up to this tragic page from Church history. For a brief summary, I refer the reader to this excellent article by Richard Turley posted at LDS.org: The Mountain Meadows Massacre.

This past week a major motion picture was released chronicling the events surrounding the Mountain Meadows Massacre. No doubt, this movie will increase the questions surrounding the massacre and even the Church. A few days ago I listened to an interview with the director of the movie, Chris Cain, and actor Jon Voight on the Hugh Hewitt radio program (click here for transcript). Mr. Cain and Mr. Voight would have one believe that this is a great movie that tells the truth about Mountain Meadows. Consider the statements from the following movie critics:

Roger Ebert: “The Mormons are presented in no better light than Nazis and Japanese were in Hollywood’s World War II films. Wasn’t there a more thoughtful and insightful way to consider this historical event?.... I am trying as hard as I can to imagine the audience for this movie. Every time I make any progress, it scares me.” (complete review)
Kyle Smith in the New York Post: “SEPTEMBER Dawn succeeds completely at failure; the unified incompetence of its writing, directing and acting suggest a man who manages to be on fire and drowning at the same time, just as the bus runs him over. I was baffled: Why does this film even exist?” (complete review)
Michael Medved in USA Today: “The film's producers insist it's merely coincidence that their project's release coincides with the surging presidential campaign of the most serious Mormon candidate in American history; after all, planning and pre-production work took place years before Mitt Romney launched his campaign. Nevertheless, even a modest motion picture like this one with little chance of achieving blockbuster status will spark intense new discussion of Mormonism's origins, while powerfully re-enforcing negative stereotypes that already lead millions of Americans to tell pollsters that they wouldn't vote for a Mormon.“ (complete column)

As I scanned several other reviews, I couldn’t find one that praised the picture or its historical accuracy. Yahoo reviewers gave the movie a C- rating.

Mr. Medved raises the question about why this movie was produced and released at this particular time. He believes it has something to do with the candidacy of Mitt Romney. The producers claim it has a message about religious fanaticism. However, it is clear that they were not aiming for historical accuracy. Based on the reviews I have read, a visit to the September Dawn website, and watching the trailer, it seems to me that there is another agenda. The movie trailer itself speaks about a secret that has been cloaked in conspiracy. That statement alone brings the past into the present,creating a link from the massacre to Church leadership from Brigham Young to President Hinckley.

How should members of the Church respond when asked about the massacre? I do not believe that we need to see the movie to make a reasonable response. The article by Brother Turley provides excellent background. We cannot excuse the massacre, but we can put it in its historical setting. The perpetrators were an isolated group living in southern Utah. Many had fled from Missouri and Illinois after the assassination of Joseph Smith, the Hans Mill massacre, and the Missouri extermination order. The U.S. army was marching on Utah under orders from President Buchanan. Their beloved apostle, Parley P. Pratt had been murdered in Arkansas only months before. Their fear cascaded into an unspeakable tragedy. I think we can ask the questioner to consider the full history of the Church and not one isolated negative incident.

September 28, 2007

A follow-note to my previous entry. September Dawn remained in theaters three weeks. The movie cost over $11 million to make. During its three week showing it grossed just over $1 million, which means the investors are stuck with the bill. We can only hope that it will do as poorly once it is released on DVD.

Return to Oklahoma

2007-03-05T19:02:00.000-08:00

Thirty-five years ago I served as a missionary in the Oklahoma Mission. It remains the defining experience of my life. It was during those two years that my testimony blossomed and I gained a passion for gospel study. I had many wonderful experiences among extraordinary Latter-day Saints. It was indeed the best two years. It was also two of the most difficult and challenging years.

Over President’s Day weekend, my wife and I flew from Denver to Tulsa for my first visit since I was released from my mission in 1973. Arriving mid-afternoon, we drove north to Independence, Kansas, my fifth assignment. We drove around town and found the ward. Thirty-five years ago it was a branch with a small building in Coffeyville, Kansas. We continued our drive east to Joplin, Missouri, where we spent the night.

Joplin was my second area. It only had one branch and was part of a mission district. Joplin now has two wards and its own stake. Joplin was a difficult area and I wondered if it would ever grow. We continued our drive south through western Arkansas, stopping to see the gravesite of Parley P. Pratt near the town of Alma. Parley was murdered in Arkansas in 1857.

After visiting Elder Pratt’s grave we turned west on I-40 and returned to Oklahoma. We exited the freeway at the town of Sallisaw, continue west through the town of Vian, and on to Gore (all towns which I had tracted). I was sent to Gore as a senior companion with a new missionary just four and a half months into my mission. At that time, Gore was only a town of about 400 citizens. The only housing we could find was a trailer in the woods about 10 miles north of town, not far from Lake Tenkiller. My companion and I spent our first two weeks without a car. We felt like missionaries of old, some days walking as far a dozen miles. Serving in Gore was a wonderful experience, never to be forgotten.

We continued north from Gore, around Lake Tenkiller, to Tahlequah, capital of the Cherokee nation. I spent ten months of my mission in Tahlequah. It will be forever, a home away from home. The members were wonderful and I was privileged to see a number of people join the Church. My wife and I spent Sunday in Tahlequah and attended meetings at the relatively new ward building. I found a few families that were there 35 years ago, and some even remembered me. That afternoon we traveled into the countryside and enjoyed dinner with one of the couples from my mission years. During my missionary days, when the weather was warm, we performed baptismal services in the creek that ran through their property.

It was fun to drive through these areas and see the changes that have occurred over thirty-five years. We even found the old missionary apartment still standing in Tahlequah (much to my surprise). I came to realize as we drove around that it was not the towns or the countryside that made my mission, it was the people and the experiences. It was a great weekend and I only wish that I had returned sooner.

The Mormon Question

2007-01-07T18:00:00.000-08:00

This past week, Mitt Romney, former governor of Massachusetts and faithful member of the Church, formally launched a presidential exploration committee, the first step in pursuing a candidacy (see Salt Lake Tribune – January 4, 2007). Several months ago, in a column in the Metrowest Daily News (a Massachusetts newspaper), Frank Mazzaglia wrote, "Two questions are certain to come up again and again during the upcoming political season. The first is, can a Mormon be elected president of the United States? The second is, just what is a Mormon?"

In recent weeks, the question about whether a Mormon can be elected to the highest office in the land has come up several times (see America's first Mormon president? – Newsweek or Is America ready for a Mormon president? – Reuters). Just this past week, Susan Estrich wrote a column titled The Mormon Question and asked again, “is American ready for a Mormon president?”

The Romney candidacy has people and the press asking about Mormons. As members of the Church, we need to be prepared to answer the questions that will surely arise and be ready to deal with common misconceptions.

I have been surprised that some of these misconceptions still exist. Two recent conversations left me stunned that some educated American's still believe that plural marriage is still part of the Church and is legal in Utah. I can understand some of the misconceptions that arise from Church history, but to believe that polygamy is practiced by a major American faith in the 21st Century is amazing.

How do we answer the questions that are sure to arise because of Mitt Romney’s candidacy? The most important thing that we can do is continue our daily study of the scriptures. As we do so, prayerfully, we more fully comprehend the doctrines of the kingdom and are touched by the influence of the Holy Ghost.

In addition to our study of the scriptures, I think it is important to understand Church history. There are many wonderful books available on Church history that can help us understand our incredible heritage. I recently completed Joseph Smith - The First Mormon by Donna Hill. As well as a biography about the Prophet, it was a great review of Church history to the time of his martyrdom. I am currently reading Richard R. Bushman’s acclaimed history of Joseph Smith, Rough Stone Rolling. It is a wonderful read.

There might also be questions about our history and doctrine to which we may not have answers. The easy answer today is to "Google it." Be careful of which websites you use. There are a multitude of anti-LDS websites that contain erroneous information. The Church's website at LDS.org contains an amazing amount of great information. FARMS (Foundation for Ancient Research and Mormon Studies) at BYU is a wonderful resource for information about the scriptures. The FAIR (Foundation for Apologetic Information and Research) website contains numerous articles that respond to challenges about LDS doctrine and history.
I think these questions can be a wonderful opportunity to share the message of the Restored Gospel. Will we be prepared? What other suggestions do you have?

Ancient Prophecies

2006-12-22T06:11:00.000-08:00

The final Old Testament lesson of 2006 (Lesson 48) discusses the latter-day prophecies of two ancient prophets, Malachi and Zechariah. Zechariah’s prophecies are the more dramatic. Among other things, he saw the restoration of Israel, the great war that precedes the second coming, and the appearance of the Savior on the Mount of Olives.

Since I was a child, I have been fascinated by prophecies about the Last Days. I recall finding on my parent’s bookshelves a little green book titled The Last Days. Published in 1942, this book was a compilation of latter-day prophecies from many of our early church leaders, including Joseph Smith, Brigham Young, Parley Pratt, Heber J. Grant, and others. As I read through the prophetic utterances, I wondered if I would live to see the Lord’s second coming.

As I grew older, I began to think more and more that; perhaps, I would not live to see that glorious day. World conditions seemed to change. The Cold War ended. We began sending missionaries to Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union. It seemed like the dawn of a great new day when the good news of the gospel would spread throughout the earth.

In the midst of those changes, we were not paying attention to the growing threat in the Middle East. As the 90s progressed, there were a series of attacks from Islamic fundamentalists, the most dramatic being the events of September 11th. My wife and I were in London on July 7th, 2005, when the London Underground and a bus were attacked. We see the growing struggle in Iraq fueled, in part, by Syria and Iran. We hear the threats of the Iranian president about the destruction of Israel. Indeed, we hear of wars and rumors of wars.

Regardless of the timetable, we are indeed living in the last days. The Savior counseled his ancient disciples to, “Watch therefore: for ye know not what hour your Lord doth come“ (Matthew 24:42). I think the counsel to “watch” means more than just observing latter-day events. As I am writing, I am watching a fierce winter storm literally bury the Denver area. I am an avid weather watcher and saw this storm develop over the past few days. When we began to see the potential for this storm grow, we did a number of things in preparation, including making sure we had sufficient groceries and other supplies. Part of our watching included active preparation. We do not know the day or the hour of the Savior’s second coming; however I know that we need to be actively watching and preparing no matter when the great latter-day events lead to the return of the Master.

Old Testament - New Insights

2006-12-02T08:24:00.000-08:00

In my Old Testament – Lesson 1 outline I wrote that much of my study of this ancient volume of scripture had been guided by A Missionary Study Guide which I received while on my mission in 1971. Published by the Quorum of the Twelve, it stated,

“Ordinarily the greatest value will accrue if the Standard Works are studied in this order: Book of Mormon, New Testament, Pearl of Great Price, Doctrine & Covenants, the book of Genesis and those portions of the Old Testament which relate to subjects being studied."

I believe I used that statement as an excuse for failing to seriously study the Old Testament in subsequent years. When I was first called to teach the Gospel Doctrine class, I was relieved that the course of study was the Book of Mormon, to be followed by the Doctrine and Covenants/Church History. However, the day of reckoning finally arrived and I had to begin preparing and teaching lessons about the Old Testament. Though the Old Testament was more challenging to read and understand, to my surprise I was delighted to find that the stories and doctrines were as relevant today as they were thousands of years ago. I placed new value on the Old Testament and have since approached it with new enthusiasm.

We are about to conclude another year of study of this great volume of scripture. It has been for myself a year of new and renewed insights. Here are a few:

The days before the great flood were similar to those of our time. As stated by Elder McConkie, “The coming of the flood of Noah, and with it the ‘end of the world’ for the carnal civilization of that day, is a perfect type of the coming of the Lord, and the end of the world for the wicked of the latter-days.” A clear reminder that we need to heed the words of the living prophet.
After rescuing Lot from his Elamite captors, Abraham was offered the spoils of war by the king of Sodom. Abraham responded by saying that he would take not even a “thread” of the bounty. He wanted nothing of the wicked king’s possessions. In today’s world we are often tempted to accept a “thread” of wickedness. Like the bounty offered to Abraham, these threads look tempting. We need to realize that by accepting a “thread” of unrighteousness we may be taking the first step towards embracing unrighteous behavior.
I have reviewed the story of Joseph many times over the years, but continue to be impressed with his steadfast faithfulness in spite of persistent challenges.
In contrast to the story of Joseph, we find the continued murmuring of Israel after escaping bondage in Egypt. They complain about hunger; the Lord provides food. They Lord provides food; they complain about the lack of variety. In the face of miracles, the Israelites complained. Joseph, faced with challenge after challenge, keeps turning adversity into opportunities. Joseph teaches us the value of great faith. The Israelites teach us that murmuring accomplishes nothing.
The story of Eli’s sons, Hophni and Phinehas, warn us about the evil of seeking to honor ourselves. Are we ever guilty of honoring ourselves by the music we listen to, the movies we watch, indulging in inappropriate Sabbath activities, or going into debt for that which is not necessary? How may such activities affect our spirituality? Who do we honor?

This list could go on for pages. Though the Old Testament is an ancient work, it is rich with stories, insights, and teachings that can guide us today.

As you conclude your study of the Old Testament, what stories or teachings have touched your soul and changed your life for the better? I would like to add your thoughts to future Old Testament lesson outlines.

The Gospel Doctrine Class Blog

2006-11-19T10:59:00.000-08:00

In 1971 I received a call to the Oklahoma Mission. As most returned missionaries will agree, those two years of service are an incredible experience. One of the great blessings of my mission was gaining a love for the study of the gospel, a passion that remains part of me some 35 years later.

In 1989, my journey in gospel study took a new turn when I was called as the teacher for the Gospel Doctrine class in the Federal Way 4th Ward (Federal Way Washington Stake). I found that my personal study changed as I prepared for the weekly class and I was rewarded with new insights. I continued to serve as a Gospel Doctrine teacher until 2005 (with a couple of small breaks). In September 2005 we moved from Auburn, Washington, to Centennial, Colorado. I am currently teaching the Gospel Principles course.

One of the challenges in preparing for a weekly Sunday School class is attempting to compress the available material into a forty minute presentation. I found I could not do it. While teaching in the Federal Way 7th Ward, several class members gathered together for an informal discussion group one Sunday each month. We discussed principles touched upon during the class presentation. We had a wonderful time. After a couple years we decided it was more important to be with our families on Sunday evening.

The next opportunity for expanding on the Sunday School class came when I discovered the Internet. I was fascinated by the idea of building webpages and sharing ideas with a wider audience. In 1998, I began posting my Sunday School outlines on the web for the benefit of those in my weekly class. They thought it was a great idea and it became a catalyst for better preparation for both myself and class members.

Somehow word about the website leaked out and others started visiting. I began receiving e-mail thanking me for my efforts and encouraging me to continue the website. Thus, some eight years later I am still posting my outlines to The Gospel Doctrine Class on a weekly basis. In those eight years, people have written me from 49 of the 50 states, 7 Canadian provinces, and 44 countries. It has been a wonderful experience as I have communicated with brothers and sisters from California to Chile, New York to Singapore, and Utah to Ghana.

This blog is intended to provide a place for discussion of those things covered in the weekly Sunday School lessons, the gospel in general, the Church, and the great blessings that come from membership in the Lord's kingdom. Please feel free to join with me in sharing your thoughts and experiences.

Thanks to LDSfiles for hosting this blog and for providing summaries and links to my Gospel Doctrine outlines.