Election Junkie

Atomic Bomb-Worst Event Ever?

2009-05-06T07:40:00.000-07:00

I was looking through some threads on some of my favorite links, and the torture debate continues to be debated with an iron fist. I'm a little mute on the issue because to be quite honest, I see the pros and cons on both sides of the issue. I have a hard time with issues that involve torture methods. Whenever it comes to the issue of morals vs law, I am usually feel morals is the smartest bet. Unfortunately, this subject isn't so easy. When it comes to terrorism, I expect to fight fire with fire. I believe when it comes to terrorists, the softer you go, the greater the edge to the other side. With that battle in my mind, it is hard for me to feel strongly one way or the other.

Now here is something I will argue about. While sketching through some threads, a person said that dropping the atomic bomb was more just than the torture tactics used by the Bush Administration. I strongly disagree. Over 200,000 people died in the bombings of the two Japanese cities. Millions were subject to radiation that cause defects in births that still occur to this day. To my knowledge, no person was murdered while being tortured, and Obama even admits that the torture likely made us safer.

Bush could have dropped atomic bombs on terrorist nations. The 9/11 Attacks certainly was just as big of an event as Pearl Harbor. Yet, instead of blowing them off the face of the Earth, he used a much 'morally' correct way. Not a single solider could have died in Afghanistan and Iraq, but we did in an ethical way (at least in terms of this).

My point is, the Atomic Bomb was wrong. It should have never been built. Yes, the Japanese may never have given up, but 200,000 civilians didn't deserve to die either. THAT is morally and ethically wrong. It is dreadful to grow up in a world where every single person on Earth can die in the blink of eye. That is why in my opinion, it is the worst thing that has ever happened in human history. I do not want to grow up in a world where the world could explode, and I would never want my children and the future generations of the United States to be forced to make that type of decision. That is why I take torture over the Atomic Bomb. Taking the atomic bomb over torture methods is a pretty disgusting point in my opinion. Clearly his argument is based on the pathetic loyality to a political party. I so badly wish people would dissassociate with parties so that they can make logical points. The Father of Our Country, George Washington, saw this coming. Maybe one day we will start taking his advice.

Obama Shakes With Chavez, bows to a Foreign King

2009-04-18T06:39:00.000-07:00

Maybe it's just me, but I'm thinking that this isn't something that benefits the United States of America. The job of the President isn't to make us appear powerless. Tackle that with his socialism ideas (that is convincing liberals that it is the best way to go), and we have a great speaker that has proved that his objective is not the American people, but his Socialistic Liberal Polices.

Where was Hollywood's Unity 8 Years Ago?

2009-02-01T12:56:00.000-08:00

I'm sure most of you have seen the "I Pledge" video of dozens of celebrities saying that they pledge to do all they can for America. They pledge to give more of their time to help charities, smile more, and of course unify to help America and the world.

That is wonderful, but where was all of your time four and eight years ago? Why all the sudden do you want to supply more of your time? Why couldn't you supply more of your limitless amounts of money then? Where was your devotion to the common man?

Ah yes, we all know where it was. It was spent bashing the Bush administration. All of your time was spent bringing down his administration, leaving the country, and punishing the "common" man for electing someone other than who they want.

Just think if they could have cared about all of us then. No. They had to spend all of their money calling Bush a criminal and for years trying to influence others to hate George Bush.

And so here is a question for all of Hollywood and those who "NOW" pledge to help America. If Bush was such an evil guy that was destroying the world, why exactly were you not helping us then? Now that your "God" is in office, why are you stepping up your game, when we so clearly needed you before?

I can't believe these people. "NOW" they pledge to be good parents. Will Smith "NOW" feels proud to be an American. Hollywood can "NOW" care about us. It is the purest form of hypocrisy. This type of attitude is exactly what brings down societies.

Hollywood is full of the people who demand 40 million dollars for movies, yet they say that George Bush is the one that doesn't care about you. The man that based his entire presidency on keeping us safe after 9/11. Meanwhile, celebrities begged for more money.

So what is my point? My point isn't for anyone to boycott any movies or get rid of Hollywood. My point is for you to tell celebrities that you don't need their help being an American. You don't need their help on who to vote for. You don't need their help on being a good person.

Sit back and make your own decisions on where you want for America and what you believe in. Because from what I've seen from Hollywood, their only influence on me is how not to live my life.

Pardon Me!

2009-01-29T15:11:00.000-08:00

Excuse the mess I have thrown on the page. As you may have noticed, I switched back to my old setup yesterday and I paid the consequences to say the least. I have been working today to fix the issues, and I will work to fix all the problems I've created.

President Obama to Shut Down Guantanamo

2009-01-22T11:34:00.000-08:00

President Obama has wasted no time shuting down Guantanamo Bay and other secret camps as he begins his historic presidency. Obama was intent on balancing a tough attitude with a sympathetic one. Although shutting down Gauntanamo, he has made clear that "We intend to win this fight, we will win on our terms."

I think this is a brilliant move on the part of Obama. One could never doubt how well he carries his words, and his inauguaration speech certainly got the point across early that he intends to fight terrorism near as strong as now former President Bush.

He moves on to mention that we win fights, with the respect and dignity that our founding fathers intended from the beginning. Another fine showing of his respect for the ideals and values that were held true by the great leaders of our country. I just hope and pray that it last and that he doesn't start to take shots at conservatives as things move forward. It just isn't nessecary.

Why Bush Should Be Commended on Foreign Policy

2009-01-14T13:16:00.000-08:00

If I have to be the only one to thank George W Bush for his time in office, then I will do so. I have been harder on him than most conservatives, and I think I have more than enough reasons. First, he seems clueless on the economy. Not that he was a complete disaster all eight years, but when something this 'big' is coming, as our current recession, the president and his advisers should know it. Not to mention, the American people should know it. I highly disapprove of his handling of the economy lately, and it hurts the GOP to have a person with such poor creditability as the past election proved. However, I do acknowledge that we did have many times of strong economic strength despite a recession heading into his presidency, 9/11, and two wars, so I do credit him keeping the economy from a complete disaster. I do feel like he has laid some level of ground work to help the economy in the future.

What George Bush should be most proud of is his powerful leadership skills when it comes to foreign policy.

I'll start with the September 11th Attacks. This was the biggest disaster in American history, yet I don't know if there was a stronger leader in the time of American crisis. Instead of allowing the country to fall into chaos, he united not only Americans, but the world abroad in the fight against Islamic terrorist, and sent an early message that this would not happen again. George Bush held true to his word, and we remain safe due to his actions.

Now look at the War on Terrorism (we will leave Iraq out of this equation). Instead of sitting back and letting terrorist succeed in destroying American civilization, he sent a clear message in the Afghan War, where American troops broke the Taliban's control over Afghanistan and set up a constitution and democratic society. This type of action (and certainly it's success) is unheard of when you look back at world history, yet he was able to do it.

The Iraq War was nothing short of a disappointment. After just weeks of fighting, there was a general consensus that it was they had won more handily than in Afghanistan, and Bush made his mistake of believing that it was 'Mission Accomplished', while the years that followed included dreadful rebel uprising, suicide bombers, and a civil war between factions of the Shite and Sunni Muslims. Where Bush should be commended is when many people said we had failed and should abandon Iraq, he held true. He picked up a brilliant General David Peterus, and came up with the plan of a troop surge. This surge saved Iraq and has led us to victory that many thought was impossible. It may be years before we realize just how significant this surge was. We lost 2/3 less troops this year alone.

You can argue on the validity of the Iraq War all day long, however, having two democratic societies and allies, where there were enemies filled with ruthless dictators and Terrorist organizations is something that no man many achieve again. Bush's actions also convinced Libya to give up their nuclear capabilities, and he has continued to keep Iran, North Korea, and others at bay. So when it comes to foreign policy, I give props to our out-going president, and wish him nothing but the best in the future.

Obama's Mistake

2009-01-12T10:23:00.000-08:00

Barack Obama took a lot of heat for his selection of Rev. Rick Warren to say the invocation at his inauguration. Warren is of couse loathed (yes, maybe even Hated) by Gay Rights groups for his strong support of the gay marriage ban in California.

So what is his response? He tags a gay bishop by the name of Gene Robinson to say prayer on this special day. It is no secret that I am opposed to gay marriage and fine with any person that decides that they WANT to be gay (and yes, I mean WANT to be GAY), however this decision is poor and may be a prelude to his actions in the future.

So you want to piss the religious right off huh? Your starting to do a good job. Aside from a strong rise in Democratic voters this turn around, you can attribute a large part of your success to a lack Christian enthusiasm, not to mention Republican voters in general. I realize that in four years people will seldom remember this event, but continue this and you are setting yourself up for a backlash.

Gene Robinson has more problems than just being gay. In fact, he has the pleasure of splitting an entire fact of the Episcopal Church. He also was married, had two kids, and later divorced because of his homosexuality. He would later be accused of impropriety. These allegations would later prove to have little merit if any at all, however in 2006 he entered rehab for alcohol. abuse.

I believe that you should never judge a man's character. I have had my struggles in life, mistakes, and regrets. I will never suggest that a man be judged for the mistakes he has made, as long as he professes them to be wrong the God Almighty. He is the judge. However, a person's actions show actions show the person you are. I will not judge Robinson for his actions to which I am strongly opposed, however I have the right a Christian and American to believe that someone else should be doing it.

Here is my biggest problem with him. He has decided that he will not read from the Bible because "not everyone believes that way." Interesting, because not everyone believe you should be gay, you do it anyway because that is what you believe in. As a bishop, it seems to me that he abandons his "sacred" beliefs in the Bible for the same reason he has fought to be gay. It looks as if he has a double-standard on his own beliefs.

I mean when it comes to the Bible, it is objective of all Christians to spread the belief of Jesus Christ. I will ignore the passages against homosexuality, but as bishop he is not only obligated to spread the message of Christ, it was the reason he was created. The disciples spread the news of Jesus Christ to people who did not believe what did (that is the way people learn of Jesus right?). They along with Paul risked death to spread the word of God, yet a bishop will not because of political reasons?

From my standpoint, that is why I do not like the idea of him being the representation of the Christian faith. Its bad judgement.

For Obama, who took this guy for political reasons, you are setting yourself up to appease people. That should not be your objective. It appears you are trying to save Hollywood status and wonderful articles from People Magazine, but hey, I would much rather you be a good president than popular, world united, celebrity.

Bright Day for Chambliss/GOP

2008-12-03T10:49:00.000-08:00

What a difference from the election night results just last month. Saxby Chambliss retained his seat for senate in what turned out to be a landslide. At last check it appears as though Chambliss will win by a margin or 7 or 8 points, a far cry from the massive upswing of Democratic voters a month ago.

All the reasons I expected Chambliss to win yesterday rang pretty true, as black turnout was not very high, Republicans in a red state seemed pretty worried, and Chambliss pretty much had already won.

So if Coleman holds on in Minnesota, the GOP will likely feel pretty relieved that things did not turn out much worse.

Chambliss and Martin Scramble for Georgia Tonight, Coleman and Franken Still in Battle

2008-12-02T09:08:00.001-08:00

It will be a big night for both parties as the run-off for senate in my home state of Georgia. Polls have shown a consistent 3-5 point advantage for Chambliss, which is welcomed by Republicans as the Minnesota race continues to be recounted. My own projection is pointing to a 54-46% win for the Republican, but one has to wonder who will show up the second time.

I think there is a good chance that Chambliss wins by a comfortable margin. Here are my list of reasons.

1- The Black Vote

With the race only centered on Chambliss and Martin, I do not see the high black turnout this time around. The African-American vote was ridiculously higher than normal due to Obama on the ticket, but I don't expect those kind of numbers again.

2- Previous Vote

Saxby Chambliss won on election night. He was 0.2% from claiming an actual majority. This was with the high democratic numbers and again, the African-American vote. I would have to assume that his three point margin should actually increase.

3- Fear of Filibuster-Proof Majority for Democrats

This is still Georgia. Saxby is not the most popular person in my state, but he is a Republican in a red state. Many GOPers are scared that the Democrats will take that majority, as Minnesota is still unsettled. Even many independents do not want one party with complete domination, and that certainly plays into the hands of Chambliss.

As for Minnesota, I have been looking very often on Coldheartedtruth for the latest information on the senate seat in his home state. Right now, the Coleman camp still maintains a lead of 135 votes with 92% of the state recounted. Many are starting to believe that Coleman will hold on despite the relentless efforts by Democrats to take the seat. For Republicans in Minnesota, you have to be thankful that there is no run-off, because Franken probably wins, especially with the backing of many big name Democrats in a blue state.

What happens if Things Don't Improve?

2008-11-20T06:52:00.000-08:00

Here is a difficult question to ask should this be the case. What if in four years, we are at about the same point as we are right now. A near filibuster proof senate, huge majority in the house, and now a president, seemingly would hit democrats hard wouldn't it?

I'm not so sure. Should the economy continue it's terrible run, they will continue to tout Bush as the reason for the misery. Many question weather that can work in four years. If the GOP nominates someone with little ties to the Bush administration, can they really mention George Bush every other word, as they did the previous election? Maybe not, but then again, it will resort to the "Republicans did this to you, we are just having a hard time cleaning up their mess."

Maybe that will work, maybe it won't. I think if things show much improvement, then Democrats are in great shape in 2008, but a weak economy may actually help Republicans. Hm...sounds impossible, but interesting thing to look at.

I see it being another election cycle or two before the GOP starts to rebound. Then again, you never know.

Congrats to 44th President Barack Obama, Future of Republican Party

2008-11-05T12:12:00.000-08:00

What a big night for president-elect Barack Obama as he easily carries the election and will soon replace George W. Bush as our next president. I am trying my best to believe in Barack Obama, and if he does as much as he talks about, I'll be more than willing to support him in the coming years. I'm always excited with the coming of a new president. Who knows what the future holds, but the majority of Americans (and the world for that matter) got exactly what they wanted. God speed, President Obama.

And even though it must be a gloomy day for John McCain and his supporters, they should be proud of what he has accomplished. Despite everything that went wrong in his campaign, he certainly gave it everything he had against seemingly impossible odds, but he never gave up. He is an inspiration concerning the never give up attitude. Good luck in the future for you John McCain.

As for the future of the Grand Old Party, my first advice for Republicans is to NOT challenge Obama with Romney or Palin. What the GOP needs is some fresh faces and to keep their main focus on regaining senate and house seats. Certainly we don't know what is going to happen, but I expect at this point that Obama will be poised to a second term, start finding new leaders that can match Obama's youth, ability, and intelligence. Things look the same as it did in 1994 before you surged back, so doubt you will be gone forever.

God Bless.

Final Tally

2008-11-04T07:35:00.000-08:00

Nothing changed from from last friday so the final tally is looking great for Democrats. Despite all of the numbers, I do expect things to be much closer than some of the polls have indicated, but we will see what happens!

A btw...PLEASE VOTE!!!

New Projection: Obama on Cruise Control

2008-10-31T08:00:00.000-07:00

Even as many national polls show the race getting closer, Obama still has a very clear advantage in the Electoral College, where it could be even worse. If not for previous elections weighed into my formula, Obama would also have Missouri and North Carolina. Even Indiana is on the verge of moving towards the Democrat.

If national polls continue to get closer in the next couple of days, election night may prove not to be a huge blowout. If the present numbers continue though, the election will be over once Virgina is called for Obama. McCain can't win without this state, along with Colorado, Nevada, Indiana, Ohio, Florida, North Carolina, among others. A McCain victory would be nothing short of a miracle.

Could I Vote for Obama?

2008-10-30T09:48:00.000-07:00

Unless you know me personally, you probably wouldn't know that I'm not affiliated with a party. Although in more instances than not, I side with with Republicans, it doesn't mean I don't put a lot of stock in what each candidate has to say and wait to make my decision.

So for all of you curious as to who I have favored throughout the campaign, you might be surprised that I have changed my mind on a few occasions. Going through primary season, my favorite two candidates were Republican Mike Huckabee, and yes; Democrat John Edwards. Well obviously, Edwards turned out to be a bust for more than a few reasons, but Huckabee seemed poised for a real shot. Ultimately, I have ended up having to choose between John McCain and Barack Obama. When these two candidate settled, I initially favored Obama because where I'm from, we could use a bit of change in Washington. The more I heard what he had to say however, he seemed more about press and talk. I started to feel sure that I would settle with McCain, but then the vice-president picks rolled in. I hated the pick of Sarah Palin. Do I think she is completely clean of the whole troopergate thing. No way. Combine that problem with terrible inexperience, and the pick of Joe Biden who is very skilled, and I favored Obama again. For a long time. However, Once again I grab that impression that he is just another politician. He can literally say anything he wants right now and neither the media or independents who are struggling in life will actually look at what he says.

Is everything he says impossible. No. I love some his ideas, but the world doesn't change because we have a black president of the United States. The economy doesn't look at the president and say, "Oh, now it's a democrat, let's start looking good."

I sat down, looked at the issues over and over again. Looked at the various plans, problems, and solutions to our country and I can't help it. I favor more with John McCain. Barack Obama could make history next week, and should he win, I wish him and our country the best of luck. I don't doubt that he has the capability of leading this country, and for the people of America, I hope he really does bring us hope. But when it comes to me, my values, my ideas; McCain is speaking more of my realistic language.

Just Something to Think About

2008-10-30T09:37:00.000-07:00

7 1/2 YEARS OF GEORGE BUSH

George Bush has been in office for 7 1/2 years. The first six the economy was fine. Remember, it was Iraq that costs Republican's in 2006, not the economy.

At the end of 2005:
1) Consumer confidence stood at a 2 1/2 year high;
2) Regular gasoline sold for $2.19 a gallon;
3) the unemployment rate was 4.5%.
4) the DOW JONES hit a record high--14,000 +
5) American's were buying new cars,taking cruises, vacations overseas, living large!

But American's wanted 'CHANGE'. So, in 2006 they voted in a Democratic Congress and yes--we got 'CHANGE' all right.

In the PAST YEAR:
1) Consumer confidence has plummeted;
2) Gasoline is now over $4 a gallon & climbing!;
3) Unemployment is up to 5.5% (a 10% increase);
4) Americans have seen their home equity drop by $12 TRILLION DOLLARS and prices still dropping;
5) 1% of American homes are in foreclosure.
6) as I write, THE DOW is likely around a new low~~

$2.5 TRILLION DOLLARS HAS EVAPORATED FROM THEIR STOCKS, BONDS & MUTUAL FUNDS INVESTMENT PORTFOLIOS! YES, IN 2006 AMERICA VOTED FOR CHANGE...AND WE SURE GOT IT!

REMEMBER THE PRESIDENT HAS NO CONTROL OVER ANY OF THESE ISSUES, ONLY CONGRESS.

AND WHAT HAS CONGRESS DONE IN THE LAST TWO YEARS?
ABSOLUTELY NOTHING.

NOW THE DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE FOR PRESIDENT CLAIMS HE IS GOING TO REALLY GIVE US CHANGE ALONG WITH A DEMOCRATIC CONGRESS!!!!

JUST HOW MUCH MORE 'CHANGE' DO YOU THINK YOU CAN STAND?

NOTE: This does not mean a full pledged Republican, just saw this on the internet and wanted to see what you thought.

Time for My Personal Calls for Election 2008

2008-10-20T10:00:00.000-07:00

Good news, I will be covering the election everday from here on out and will be updating my projections on the 24th, 31st, and the day of the election, so be sure check back often for updates.

And now for my calls three weeks from the election. Every week I take the oppurtunity to change these calls up until the election, however I don't have to change them.

My presidential call: Barack Obama will win the election on November 4th, 2008.

But it won't be a landslide. Although McCain is trailing right now, I predict that he will regain Ohio, Florida, Missouri, and North Carolina. Nevada will be too close to call, however it will be Colorado that puts Obama over the edge, as he edges McCain by three or four points. He will have little struggle in New Hampshire, Michigan, Wisconsion, and Pennsylvania.

My Senate call: Democrats take 57 seats, and the GOP hold on to filibuster powers.

Alaska remains the toss-up, as it depends on how the trial of Ted Stevens goes, but I expect the Democrats to make gains in New Hampshire, Oregan, and New Mexico. I expect the GOP to hold in North Carolina, Georgia, Minnesota, and Mississippi.

My House call: Democrats make more signifigant gains

I can't give an exact number but expect big gains for them once again.

I Will Be Back

2008-09-25T08:41:00.000-07:00

I am sorry for my absence lately, and also for the lack of updates. It has been one thing after another and things have really piled up on me as of late. Expect an update on ALL the races either today or tomorrow and more frequent posting along with that.

UPDATE: The updated projection is now done. However only the senate and governor page has actually been updated, but the numbers are visable on the side as of now.

John McCain - Acceptance Speech Ending - Republican National Convention 09/04/08

2008-09-06T13:10:00.001-07:00

A bit slow at many points, but his reasons for loving his country and then ending was very well done. And by the way, his speech brought in better ratings than Obama.

Republican National Convention Highlights Day 3

2008-09-04T16:48:00.001-07:00

Besides Mitt Romney, the speeches given last night were very strong. Giuliani was brilliant in his build up for Sarah Palin, and Palin certianly exceeded everyone's expectations.

Rating Some of the Speeches

2008-09-04T16:24:00.000-07:00

Mitt Romney- This is my least favorite speech thus far. After his speech yesterday, I found myself thankful that he was not the vice presidential pick. I was never really big on Romney and I think that his selection for VP would have been the beginning of the end for John McCain.

Mike Huckabee- A strong speech but nothing really suprising. This was who I wanted John McCain to pick for his VP. Palin is good choice, but Huckabee would have had the experience, religious morals, and a great story. I thought he related very well to those middle class and lower class Americans that have worked hard for a living, and that he didn't grow up rich. He also lost a lot of weight which I also thought was a great story.

Rudy Giuliani- I thought this was a very strong speech. He got the crowd going qucikly and he didn't let up on his attacks on Obama. I thought his attacks on Obama were very solid and should be helpful for McCain in the future. A terrific lead in for Palin.

Sarah Palin- Simply amazing. The reaction from the media was that she was brilliant. The first words from Wolf Blitzer was that she "Not just hit it out of the ballpark, but she hit a grand slam." I was worried that it wouldn't be a very good speech, and it started a bit slow, but I became more and more impressed as her speech went along. She hit Obama hard, and did it EXTREMELY well. Her speech left the GOP thinking to themselves: "Wow, maybe this was the right choice afterall."

I can't help it but the line: "You know they say that the only difference between hockey moms and pitbulls...is the lipstick." Classic.

Highlights from the Republican National Convention, Day 2

2008-09-03T17:22:00.001-07:00

A suprisingly strong speech on the part of Fred Thompson. Great job on McCain's life story. Joe Lieberman was a bit of a suprise as he actually went after Obama a bit, something few thought he would do.

Was Palin the Wrong Choice?

2008-09-02T13:27:00.002-07:00

Hmm, I get the feeling that this pick is backfiring on John McCain. Truthfully, she is getting terrible press for all the wrong reasons as of late. A woman that CNN planted on the television today actually had the audacity to say that Sarah Palin was a bad mother. She blames Palin for her 17 year old daughter for getting pregnant, and also claims that she is a terrible parent because she has five children and that she should be putting her family first.

This is absolutely sickening. How does her daughter's pregnancy take away from her moral beliefs? I have had two brothers have children out of marriage, and I would be furious if some one would have the nerve to tell me I don't really hold true to my religious beliefs because of what they did. And Now, having too many kids is a cardinal sin when it comes to being a vice-president. I know that vice-president is a bit different from Governor of Alaska, but how is breaking the tying vote in congress more of a terrible task than taking on the problems of an entire state.

People also are on her for not having any foreign policy experience. Ahem, and Barack Obama has what experience? Amazing, the VICE-PRESIDENT nominee is taking a lot more heat than the PRESIDENTIAL nominee, despite the fact that she has more executive experience than Obama. How pathetic of the news media. How pathetic of people.

While she still isn't who I wanted to be the VP pick, here is someone that will show her a bit of respect.

2008-09-02T13:27:00.001-07:00

"It's Palin!": Sarah Palin Tabbed McCain's VP

2008-08-29T11:11:00.000-07:00

In a suprise move, Sarah Palin (R-Alaska) has been selected as John McCain's running mate. McCain did a brilliant job keeping things under wraps, as the media swirled over the belief that it must have been Tim Pawlenty, and if not him, Mitt Romney, Tom Ridge, and Joe Lieberman were sure to be on top.

The selection of Sarah Palin was met with praise from the GOP, and mixture of shock and critics from the Democrats. Certainly part of the thought process was to get some Hillary voters. She is also a strong 'classic' Republican and pro (life), something many questioned on McCain.

My initial thought was that it would hurt McCain's experience argument, but from a better prospective, McCain's experience didn't go away. As far as executive experience, Palin is in better shape than Obama. So how could Obama even think about trying to raise that argument. He has had one year in the senate, and two years of campaigning.

I believe McCain is taking a chance, but my initial feelings are that it is a winning chance. I don't see it hurting, but it has MORE than potential when it comes to helping him.

We will see...

Breaking News: Pawlenty Not VP Pick, Sarah Palin Rumors Gain Steam

2008-08-29T06:26:00.002-07:00

CNN has just confirmed that Tim Pawlenty of Minnesota, who appeared the frount runner as of late last night, is NOT John McCain's choice for vice-president. Mitt Romney also appears unlikely at this point.

Sarah Palin has gotten a lot of media converage this morning, as a private jet from Alaska that fits bill of Palin landed this morning about 20 miles from where McCain is supposed to release his choice.

There are still a number of dark horses that should not be ruled out at the moment and those are: Tom Ridge (Pennsylvania), Joe Lieberman (Connecticut), and Rob Portman (Ohio).

Mitt Romney is still not out of the question, but he doesn't appear to have any plans to go to Ohio as of last report. Tom Ridge is also very unlikely at this point, as he said he also has no plans of heading to Ohio.