tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-262693402007-12-06T00:46:43.563-06:00Winnebago 17Jef Hallhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09937646669350649402noreply@blogger.comBlogger100125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26269340.post-1314622281070548032007-11-29T12:50:00.000-06:002007-11-29T12:52:07.397-06:00Winnebago County Personal Function Review & 71 ThingsFor anyone interested in what your county government does for you, I published the Winnebago County Personal Function Review documents on my County County Board Website: <a href="http://www.winnebago17.org/">www.winnebago17.org</a>.<br /><br />Also, I put together a smaller overview of <a href="http://www.jef4wi.com/files/71Things2.pdf">71 Things Your County Does</a> (why 71? I wanted to keep it to 4 pages). I did not include some obvious ones, such as roads.<br /><br />If you want a larger read, the full 23 page program overview is <a href="http://www.jef4wi.com/files/AllPrograms-briefdescriptions.pdf">here</a>.Jef Hallhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09937646669350649402noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26269340.post-67694211906602944812007-11-10T19:24:00.000-06:002007-11-10T19:26:18.600-06:00Update on Prisoners...<a style="font-style: italic;" href="http://www.madison.com/tct/news/255827"><span style="font-weight: bold;"></span></a><blockquote><a style="font-style: italic;" href="http://www.madison.com/tct/news/255827"><span style="font-weight: bold;">State prisons may use county jails</span></a><br /><br /><span style="font-style: italic;">Steven Elbow — 11/08/2007 11:31 am</span><br /><br /><span style="font-style: italic;">As Dane County pulls its inmates back from Winnebago and Sauk counties, the state Department of Corrections is hoping to use the newly available space to ease its own overcrowding problems.</span><br /><br /><span style="font-style: italic;">The state is currently working with those counties, as well as Bayfield and Juneau counties, to use available beds as part of its ongoing effort to house a growing prison population.</span><br /><br /><span style="font-style: italic;">Dane County currently pays Sauk and Winnebago counties about $1 million a year each to house a total of about 120 inmates a day. But Dane County Sheriff Dave Mahoney plans to bring those inmates home early next year as measures to open up beds at the Dane County Jail go into place.</span><br /><br /><span style="font-style: italic;">The stakes on both sides are high: The state Department of Corrections is operating with 5,000 inmates more than it has space for, and counties say they need the revenue that housing state inmates can provide.</span><br /><br /><span style="font-style: italic;">The state is still dealing with the result of its decision to bring 5,000 prisoners who were being housed in other states back to Wisconsin. The last were brought home in May 2005.</span><br /><br /><span style="font-style: italic;">The Department of Corrections already houses about 600 inmates in 15 county lockups, paying the counties $51.46 per inmate per day. The recently passed state budget allows for 1,242 county jail beds for state prisoners.</span><br /><br /><span style="font-style: italic;">Winnebago County Sheriff Michael Brooks said profits from the deal should bring the county about $30 a day per inmate, but he and the state have yet to reach a solid agreement.</span><br /><br /><span style="font-style: italic;">Brooks added, however, that the growth of his own jail population is likely to cut into the profits by taking away rentable beds.</span></blockquote><span style="font-style: italic;"></span>Jef Hallhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09937646669350649402noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26269340.post-83586000294687122702007-10-22T08:05:00.000-05:002007-10-22T08:19:40.525-05:00Dane County to Remove Inmates From Winnebgo County JailsThe OshNW has this story today:<br /><br /><span style="font-style: italic;font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:+2;" ></span><b></b><a href="http://www.thenorthwestern.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071022/OSH0101/710220389/1987"><b><blockquote>County will no longer house Dane County inmates</blockquote></b></a><blockquote><span style="font-style: italic;font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:100%;" ><b><span style="font-size:85%;">By Jennifer K. Woldt </span></b> <br /><span style="font-size:85%;"> of The Northwestern </span> </span><p style="font-style: italic;"> <span style="font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:100%;"><span style="font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:85%;"> </span></span></p><p style="font-style: italic;"><span style="font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:100%;"><span style="font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:85%;">A canceled contract for housing out of county inmates will result in Winnebago County losing more than $1 million in annual revenue. </span></span></p><p style="font-style: italic;"> <span style="font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:100%;"><span style="font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:85%;"><a name="correction"></a></span></span></p><p style="font-style: italic;"><span style="font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:100%;"><span style="font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:85%;">Winnebago County Sheriff Michael Brooks learned earlier this week that Dane County will not renew its contract with Winnebago County to house approximately 60 of their inmates at the Winnebago County Jail. </span></span></p><p style="font-style: italic;"> <span style="font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:100%;"><span style="font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:85%;"><a name="correction"></a></span></span></p><p><span style="font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:100%;"><span style="font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:85%;"><span style="font-style: italic;">The contract called for Dane County inmates to be held at the Winnebago County facility at a rate of $51 per day, Brooks said, which brings in about $1.3 million in revenue to the county. Brooks said the removal of Dane County inmates will happen in a "phased out" manner.</span></span></span></p></blockquote><p><span style="font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:100%;"><span style="font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:85%;"><span style="font-style: italic;"></span> </span></span></p>At the last meeting, I discussed the possibility of this, in the context of this Dane County Press release:<br /><br /><span style="font-style: italic;"></span><blockquote><a style="font-weight: bold;" href="http://www.co.dane.wi.us/press/default.asp?frmPRID=877"><span style="font-style: italic;"> Falk, Mahoney Agree: More Public Safety, Less Cost in 2008 Dane County Budget</span></a><br /><br /><span style="font-style: italic;">Some of the new deputies will be used to staff the expanded use of the electronic monitoring program from the current 40 to 60 inmates to 200 inmates. “This was one of the recommendations included in the Institute for Law and Policy Planning (ILLP) audit by Alan Kalmanoff,” Falk said of the report which stressed modernizing some of the county’s policies to promote more public safety and cost efficiencies. </span><br /> <br /><span style="font-style: italic;">With the expansion in electronic monitoring and several other key proposals which hold inmates more accountable than does the Huber Center, Falk said the county will reduce its costs of shipping inmates to other counties from more than $2 million to $150,000. </span></blockquote><span style="font-style: italic;"></span><br />This could make a big dent in the budget. And it shows that we need a comprehensive study of the jail needs. <br /><br />I propose that it be conducted as a joint effort between the offices of the Sheriff and the County Executive. <br /><br />We need to make sure there is more than one set of eyes looking at the numbers. It may well be that we need to expand jail space, but I want to know that we are looking at a comprehensive picture of the situation, both from a view of jail needs and the current political reality of WI budgeting.Jef Hallhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09937646669350649402noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26269340.post-71570135950130506162007-08-08T00:00:00.000-05:002007-08-08T00:02:23.894-05:00Voting Machines Back in the Northwestern:<p><a href="http://www.thenorthwestern.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070805/OSH/70805013/1987"><span style=";font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:85%;" ><b></b></span></a></p><blockquote><p><a href="http://www.thenorthwestern.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070805/OSH/70805013/1987"><span style=";font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:85%;" ><b>County may be in market for voting machines</b></span></a><br /><span style=";font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:100%;" ><span style=";font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:85%;" ><br />Winnebago County could be in the market for a second set of new voting machines, depending on what happens to a bill working its way through Congress that could add new requirements for what counties need for disabled voters to cast private ballots. </span></span></p><p> <span style=";font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:100%;" ><span style=";font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:85%;" ><a name="correction"></a></span></span></p><span style=";font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:100%;" ><span style=";font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:85%;" >The bill, currently in the U.S. House of Representatives, would require counties to have equipment that would scan ballots and read back a voter’s choices, or allow paper ballots to be marked through automatic marking equipment.<br /><br />That provision would make all of the county’s voting machines obsolete, including Diebold Election Systems touch screen machines purchased in 2006, said Winnebago County Clerk Sue Ertmer.</span></span></blockquote>Read it all <a href="http://www.thenorthwestern.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070805/OSH/70805013/1987">here</a>.Jef Hallhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09937646669350649402noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26269340.post-88437188509408033512007-06-22T16:35:00.000-05:002007-06-22T17:01:46.815-05:00Some Goings-on In the Judiciary Committee...<a href="http://www.co.winnebago.wi.us/countyclerk/docs/jpm070531.pdf">Here are the full minutes</a>, below are the parts that I am concerned with:<br /><br /><br /><em><blockquote><em><strong>4. Domestic Abuse Position for District Attorney</strong><br />District Attorney Christian <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0">Gossett</span> advised that his office only has one Domestic Abuse Investigator at this time due to budget restraints. Currently, the District Attorney’s Office contracts with local police agencies to have an officer work as their Domestic Abuse Investigator. By doing this, they must follow that officer’s union contract with their respective police agency. The contract for the current Domestic Abuse position will expire at the end of June 2007.</em><br /><em></em><br /><em>They are currently in the process of looking at filling this position with someone from within their office, possibly using retired officers, rather than contracting the position. <strong>By doing so, they would not have to follow a union contract</strong> and they would gain five more hours a week, and a full four more weeks a year of time from the person, along a savings of about $17,000. He believes that they will have a better chance of getting the 2<span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1">nd</span> Domestic Abuse Investigator position filled in 2008.</em><br /></blockquote></em><br /><br />Now, I would hope that DA <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2">Gossett</span> would be more concerned with getting the correct person in this position than subverting Union contracts...<br /><br />I support a second Domestic Violence Investigator. The fact that it was left out of the budget was the reason I voted against the budget. However, if DA <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3">Gossett</span> is going to use this position and the needs of battered and threatened women in Winnebago County as an attack on organized labor, I would encourage you to talk to him about it. I will be.<br /><br /><br /><br /><em><blockquote><em><strong>6. Accept Grant from <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_4">Wal</span>-Mart – Sheriff’s Office<br /></strong>Captain <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_5">Verwiel</span> advised that they have received a grant for $1,000 from <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_6">Wal</span>-Mart. This grant money will be used to cover the cost of purchasing Canon digital photography cameras that will work with their preexisting equipment. These cameras are good forensic-type cameras, as they are the only cameras available that have a viewfinder that can be moved around to change positions, which will help greatly at autopsies and traffic accidents. The digital photos can then also be emailed to the District Attorney’s Office. One camera will be used in the jail and two cameras will be used by the Detective Division. </em><br /><em></em><br /><em>A motion to approve acceptance of the $1,000 grant from <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_7">Wal</span>-Mart was made by Donald <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_8">Griesbach</span>, seconded by Tom Ellis. Motion carried 3-1. Bill <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_9">Wingren</span> opposed due to some of <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_10">Wal</span>-Mart’s practices.</em><br /></blockquote></em><br /><br />Bill <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_11">Wingren</span> did the right thing. <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_12">Wal</span>-Mart owes Winnebago County, the State of WI and taxpayers nationwide much more than this $1000 can even begin to repay. I will have a subsequent post detailing the case for rejecting this grant.<br /><br />After <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_13">Wal</span>-Mart stops using Badger care to insure its <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_14">emplyees</span>, tax loopholes to not pay income tax in WI and all the other shady ways they get out of <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_15">thier</span> responsibilities to society, then maybe we can accept the $1000.<br /><br />I'd rather take it out of the budget than accept their money. The <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_16">Sheriff</span> can have his camera if it is needed in <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_17">the</span> budget.Jef Hallhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09937646669350649402noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26269340.post-80586535900596362132007-06-16T11:35:00.001-05:002007-06-16T11:35:19.322-05:00Meeting on Tax Loopholes Monday...Press release from the Institute for Wisconsin's Future:<br /><br /><span style="font-style: italic;"></span><blockquote><span style="font-style: italic;">FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:</span><br /><span style="font-style: italic;">June 15, 2007</span><br /><span style="font-style: italic;">CONTACT: Joe Fahey 414-731-4789 </span><br /><br /><span style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;">County Forum On Closing Tax Loophole </span><br /><span style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;">To Prevent tax increases for homeowners and businesses<br /></span><br /><span style="font-style: italic;">Leaders from city and county government, community organizations and labor unions leaders from Winnebago County are encouraging voters to meet their state legislators and urge them to close a new corporate tax loophole that causes higher property taxes for homeowners and small businesses. The meeting is scheduled for Monday, June 18 at 7:00pm at the Coughlin Center in Oshkosh. </span><br /><br /><span style="font-style: italic;">This loophole was opened by a recent court ruling. A New Jersey-based paper company argued that a 1953 law that exempted sewage treatment facilities from property tax should exempt them also (because they use re-cycled cardboard in their manufacturing process). A state court allowed this company, Newark Paper, to stop paying taxes on its paper mill property in Milwaukee County. This court decision turned a small and specific tax exemption into a giant tax loophole. Currently, hundreds of manufacturers throughout Wisconsin use recycled materials and dozens of companies have applied for this new tax loophole.</span><br /><br /><span style="font-style: italic;">Any property tax decrease received by a corporation results in a property tax increase for everyone else owning property in the same city or county. This property tax break is a windfall for corporations who will continue operating as before, benefiting from the same fire and police protection, the same road repairs, snow removal and other services vital to their businesses. But these normal costs of doing business will no longer be borne by that business. Instead, the costs for the public services used by the corporation will be paid through increased property taxes by other businesses and all homeowners. </span><br /><br /><span style="font-style: italic;">A group of Democratic and Republican legislators have sponsored a bill to close this new loophole and protect families and businesses from property tax increases. This bill – Senate Bill 122 – was introduced in April. Wisconsin Manufacturers and Commerce opposes the bill and Assembly leaders in the state legislature have delayed it. </span><br /><br /><span style="font-style: italic;">The June 18 meeting is open to the public and is an opportunity for the public to discuss the issue with their elected state legislators and ask them to close this loophole immediately.</span><br /><span style="font-style: italic;">###</span><br /><span style="font-style: italic;">Institute for Wisconsin’s Future Press Release</span><br /></blockquote>Jef Hallhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09937646669350649402noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26269340.post-3712502606529155502007-05-16T07:07:00.000-05:002007-05-16T10:18:14.608-05:00Waukesha County Cuts Board, Increases Budget...From <a href="http://www.jsonline.com/story/index.aspx?id=606364">this story in the MJS</a>:<br /><br /><em><blockquote><em>Citing the uncertainty of Waukesha County Board downsizing, supervisors endorsed a plan Tuesday to freeze board salaries for two years while raising the chairman's pay about $3,000 a year.</em><br /><em></em><br /><em>As the only county supervisor who works full time, the chairman is elected every two years by the board to oversee a staff of eight people.</em><br /><br /><em>Under the committee's plan, the position's salary would increase 3% next year and another 3% the following year, climbing from $55,223 to $58,586 a year. Other supervisor salaries would remain frozen at $9,536.</em><br /></blockquote></em><br />So, let's look at the savings of cutting the board:<br /><br />Board Chair: $58,586<br />24 Supervisors: $228,864<br />8 Staffers: $320,000 (estimate @ $40,000/year)<br /><br />Total for a smaller board: $607,450<br /><br />Winnebago's entire County Board budget: $110,000 (approx - I will update<em> </em>when I look at a budget book)<br /><br />The Chair makes an extra $5,000 over the rest of the supervisors. I might make $2,000 this year total.<br /><br />There are no savings for a smaller board.Jef Hallhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09937646669350649402noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26269340.post-15451154035956623242007-05-04T07:12:00.000-05:002007-05-04T08:40:17.157-05:00Chairman Albrecht Gets It Right...In today's <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0">OshNW</span>:<br /><br /><em><blockquote><em>County Board Chairman David Albrecht said some supervisors complained to him about the plan because it could limit the board's ability to use reserves to fill budget shortfalls.<br /></em><a name="correction"></a><br /><em><strong>"A lot of supervisors are saying we're putting money away so they can't keep doing business as usual," Albrecht said.</strong></em> </blockquote></em><br /><br />That is the problem with this issue. People are fighting to keep it 'business as usual'.<br /><br />That is not right, it is a formula for future budget problems.<br /><br />A cannot say it more plain than this:<br /><br /><strong>If a supervisor votes against designating the sick leave fund, they are voting to lie to the voters, the <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1">financiers</span> and themselves.</strong><br /><br />These Supervisors want to be able to say at budget time, we have $XX million in reserve, we can afford to take from that rather than take responsibility for the budget. The problem is that the number they quote will be wrong. <br /><br />As Exec Harris said in yesterdays meeting, you can't spend the same dollar twice. The sick leave benefit dollars are already committed. If we leave them in the general fund, Supervisors will want to spend them.<br /><br />Spending more than you have leads to <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2">bankruptcy</span>. <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3">Bankruptcy</span> on the County Government level leads to losses of services to people who need them most. <br /><br />I will continue to fight for Winnebago County to report it's finances correctly. I will not allow Supervisors to lie to the public.<br /><br />Or to themselves.Jef Hallhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09937646669350649402noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26269340.post-65775502782829145982007-04-19T12:20:00.000-05:002007-04-19T14:25:28.005-05:00I'm Disappointed...... in the vote to send <a href="http://www.co.winnebago.wi.us/countyclerk/countyboard/Resolution%20No.%20189-42007.pdf">this resolution</a> back to committee.<br /><br />The OshNW covered the story <a href="http://www.thenorthwestern.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070406/OSH0101/704060486/1987">here</a>. I commented <a href="http://winnebago17.blogspot.com/2007/04/i-agree-with-exec-harris-we-need-to-be.html">here</a>.<br /><br />As I stated in the meeting. A supervisor that does not support truthful reporting of budget liabilities is doing it so they can raid the fund 'guilt free' in the future.<br /><br />(And by guilt free, I mean they know what they are doing, but they are trying to pull one on citizens)<br /><br />This is simple truth in reporting to Winnebago County Citizens. I hope the committee sends it back for us to pass.Jef Hallhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09937646669350649402noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26269340.post-28407095033651144172007-04-16T07:43:00.000-05:002007-04-16T09:47:07.670-05:00Take Back Medication Program in Winnebago County<a href="http://www.thenorthwestern.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070416/OSH0101/70415020/1128/OSH01">The Northwestern covers this program today</a>:<br /><br /><em><blockquote><em>Household pharmaceuticals accepted during the drop-off include human and animal prescriptions and over the counter medications such as pills, capsules, ointments, liquids, sprays, drops, creams, inhalers, and vials.</em><br /><em></em><br /><em>Traditional ways of managing unwanted household medications is to flush them down the toilet or throw them in the trash, neither of which is advisable, said Jennifer Semrau, recycling specialist for Winnebago County.</em><br /><em></em><br /><em><strong>“People have a misconception that the wastewater treatment plant will take care of it when they flush medications down the toilet. Flushing is not safe,” Semrau said.</strong></em><br /><em></em><br /><em>Water quality is adversely affected by flushing medications and treatment plants don’t process them. It is better to take old meds to events such as Operation Take Back Medications, she said.</em><br /><em>...</em><br /><em>More information is available by contacting Mary Kohrell in Calumet County at (920) 849-1450; Sue Gau in Outagamie County at (920) 968-5721; Debbie Krogwold in Waupaca County at (715) 258-6240; and <strong>Semrau in Winnebago County at (920) 232-1850</strong>. </em><br /><em>...</em><br /><strong><em>May 29 a.m. to 1 p.m. at the Oshkosh Senior Center Annex, 234 N. Campbell Road, Oshkosh</em><br /></strong></blockquote></em>Jef Hallhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09937646669350649402noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26269340.post-31763911431292615612007-04-06T07:45:00.000-05:002007-04-06T09:49:51.978-05:00I Agree With Exec Harris - We need to be responsible in budgeting.<a href="http://www.thenorthwestern.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070406/OSH0101/704060486/1987">Read the full story in the OshNW here</a>.<br /><br /><em><blockquote><em>Funding sick time payouts, county moves to designate reserve funds<br />By Bethany K. Warner of The Northwestern<br /></em><br /><em>A change in government accounting practices is prompting a move by Winnebago County to bank funds to cover the cost of sick time payouts for retirees.<br /></em><a name="correction"></a><br /><em>County Executive Mark Harris is asking the county board to designate $3.5 million of the county's $10 million reserve fund as an earmarked fund to cover the sick-time payouts. </em><br /><em>...</em><br /><em>Harris said creating a specific fund to cover workers' retirement payouts would make it harder for the board to raid reserves to cover holes in the budget, a practice they have followed in the past several years.<br /></em><a name="correction"></a><br /><em>"It would serve as a reminder to them that if they wanted to dip into them, they are designated for an already incurred expense. It's making it clear to the board that there is a liability. It protects part of our reserves," Harris said.</em><br /></blockquote></em><br /><br />If a Supervisor votes against this, it will be because they want to again use the accounting gimmics and tricks we have seen in the last few budgets.<br /><br />This is money that is has been spent, even though it sits in our accounts. We need to be more responsible and make sure we are collecting the money we plan to spend.Jef Hallhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09937646669350649402noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26269340.post-54218316646543596102007-02-21T17:46:00.000-06:002007-02-21T16:56:54.273-06:00Meeting Feb 27Looks like <a href="http://www.co.winnebago.wi.us/countyclerk/countyboard/Agenda%20-%20February%2027,%202007.pdf">a full agenda </a>for next Tuesday's meeting.<br /><br />Here are some points to highlight:<br /><br /><strong><em>*County Executive's Appointments:<br />EastWisconsin Counties Railroad Consortium - Supervisor Jef Hall</em></strong><br />I'm excited about this appointment.<br /><br /><strong><em>**Report On Countywide Phone System Upgrade - Patty Francour, Information Systems Department Director**</em></strong><br />This project comes through the IS Committee that I am on<br /><br /><strong><em>*Reducing the Size of theWinnebago County Board of Supervisors - Presentation by Chairman David Albrecht</em></strong><br />I do not know what this presentation will be about, as last I heard the committee voted for 28 but did not make and organization reccomendations. Has Chair Albrecht come up with them himself?<br /><br /><strong><em>RESOLUTION NO. 158-22007: Amend Section 24.12 of the Rules of theWinnebago County Board of Supervisors (Information Systems Committee)<br />Submitted by:<br />DAVID ALBRECHT, DIST. #11 COUNTY BOARD SUPERVISOR</em></strong><br />Now, I don't get this. The IS Committee is supposed to be voting on this tonight, yet it is already submitted to the full county board by Chair Albrecht? Why take any action at the committee level? I stand behind my previous statements that now is not the time to lessen citizen involvement.<br /><br /><strong><em>RESOLUTION NO. 166-22007: Name County Building at Sunnyview Complex the Paul W. Stevenson Building<br />Submitted by:<br />UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN EDUCATION,<br />EXTENSION & AGRICULTURE COMMITTEE<br />PARKS & RECREATION COMMITTEE<br />FACILITIES & PROPERTY MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE</em></strong><br />I think that it is great to name buildings after people who worked in goverment and championed causes. It give a sense of history and connection.<br /><br /><br /><strong><em>RESOLUTION NO. 168-22007: Create a position of Confidential Secretary (Paralegal) on the District Attorney’s Office Table of Organization<br />Submitted by:<br />PERSONNEL & FINANCE COMMITTEE</em></strong><br />This will be an employee to help out with domestic violence related issues.<br /><br /><strong><em>ORDINANCE NO. 170-22007: Amend Section 2.01 of the General Code of Winnebago County<br />Submitted by:<br />JUDICIARY & PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE</em></strong><br />This is the new map for 36 board members.Jef Hallhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09937646669350649402noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26269340.post-51897645743468572872007-02-19T18:13:00.000-06:002007-02-19T18:15:37.810-06:00Busses at the JailHere is the text of an email I sent to Sheriff Brooks & County Executive Harris:<br /><br /><span style="font-style: italic;"></span><blockquote><span style="font-style: italic;">Sheriff Brooks,</span><br /><br /><span style="font-style: italic;">This is an email to follow-up the phone message I left earlier. I would like to know why there is not a protected bench or any other markings out in front of the County Jail where buses pick riders. </span><br /><br /><span style="font-style: italic;">I travel past there daily on my way to work. I often see people running through traffic to be picked by northbound buses. Today there was a woman holding a child right next to the road, with cars driving past a few feet away.</span><br /><br /><span style="font-style: italic;">Has there been an incident at this location yet? Has there been an attempt to install a covered, protected bench? Is there a reason that this cannot happen?</span><br /><br /><span style="font-style: italic;">Can there be warning signage installed indicating that pedestrians cross?</span><br /><br /><span style="font-style: italic;">Can the buses be routed through the parking lot instead?</span><br /><br /><span style="font-style: italic;">Thank you,</span><br /><br /><span style="font-style: italic;">-jef-</span><br /><br /><span style="font-style: italic;">Jef Hall</span><br /><span style="font-style: italic;">Winnebago County Supervisor, District 17</span><br /><span style="font-style: italic;">224A Scott Ave</span><br /><span style="font-style: italic;">Oshkosh, WI 54901</span><br /><span style="font-style: italic;">920.203.6883</span><br /><span style="font-style: italic;">jef@winnebago17.org</span><br /><span style="font-style: italic;">www.winnebago17.org</span></blockquote><span style="font-style: italic;"></span>Jef Hallhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09937646669350649402noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26269340.post-55236336643230989472007-02-16T17:12:00.000-06:002007-02-16T16:16:39.900-06:00Removal of Citizen Member will be voted on at next IS Committee MeetingAs I discussed in a previous post, the IS Committee will be voting on removing the citizen member.<br /><br />I am against this, I feel we should be doing what we can to have people more involved with County Governance, not less.<br /><br />Just because our current citizen member does not come to meetings is not a reason to remove them. It is a reason the replace them<br /><br /><a href="http://www.co.winnebago.wi.us/countyclerk/docs/isa070221.pdf">Here is the meeting notice.</a>Jef Hallhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09937646669350649402noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26269340.post-39605151282982356792007-02-06T12:02:00.000-06:002007-02-06T10:13:07.430-06:00Citizen Membership on County CommitteesIn our Informations Systems Committee meeting this month, we discussed the status of the committee's citizen member.<br /><br />The comittee was set up to be 5 board members and one citizen member. However, in the time that I have been on the committee the citizen member has not been there for a single meeting.<br /><br />In both of the last two meetings we had, we discussed what should happen to this position, re-appoint a new mamber, or eliminate the position.<br /><br />There are good arguments on both side of the issue. With the (potentially) upcoming county board restructure, a newly appointed member may only sit for a few months and need to be replaced. Therefore by eliminating the position on the committee we would eliminate any confusion.<br /><br />While I understand this point, I disagree. I believe we should be working to get the community more involved in government, not less.<br /><br />At the reccomendation of the Committee Chair, the County Board Chair and the Corp Council, there will be a resulution upcoming to eliminate the position. I will vote against it. <br /><br />If you are interested in an appointment to the Information Systems Committee as a citizen member, I would reccomend contacting the County Board Chair.<br /><br />Lets keep up citizen involvement in government.Jef Hallhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09937646669350649402noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26269340.post-77688636825844683862007-02-06T07:43:00.000-06:002007-02-06T09:06:41.515-06:00Update on Board SizeI received a question on where things sit now. Here is where it is as I currently understand it...<br /><br />(For the record, I am still of the mind that 38 supervisors is a perfectly workable number. In fact, looking at it, there are many boards with fewer members that cost their counties a lot more.)<br /><br /><strong>1 - CUT Lawsuit:</strong><br />The first hearing is Thursday. This is the email I got from County Clerk Sue <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0" onclick="BLOG_clickHandler(this)">Ertmer</span>:<br /><br /><em><blockquote><em>Just a reminder that the hearing on the CUT petitions will be held this Thursday (February 8) at 2:00 p.m. in Judge Schmidt's courtroom in the Safety Building.</em> </blockquote></em>They are (still) pushing to get the referendum for 19 supervisors. Unless it all gets wrapped up in this hearing, it is unlikely that any action on this will be in time to make the ballot in April. Otherwise, there is not another election until the Feb 08 primaries. <br /><br /><strong>2 - Maps:</strong><br />The 36 member map was passed by the board and vetoed by County Exec Harris. Mr. Harris indicated that he did not believe we should approve a map while there was a court case pending. <br /><br />I voted for the map, because I believe that if the board passed 36 members (which I voted against, see statement above) we need to make a map, so both elected members, prospective candidates and other interested parties can make plans.<br /><br />Also, if, as we had been indicated, the map provided the lowest disparity in population - we should have that as the first and only criteria for approval above any political considerations.<br /><br />Because the map was vetoed and that veto was not over-ridden, the map question went back to the judiciary <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1">committee</span>. This is why they will be reviewing maps again next week. I hope we resolve this part of the issue at this month's board meeting. <br /><br /><strong>3 - Board Re-organization Committee <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2">Recommendation</span>:</strong><br />A <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3">recommendation</span> came from the <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_4">committee</span> to re-organize under a 28-member structure after the 2010 <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_5">census</span>. I have not seen a resolution before the full board for this as of yet. <br /><br />If this is passed by the board, it would be <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_6">independent</span> of any other action. After the <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_7">census</span>, the board has the ability to give itself any size it feels <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_8">necessary</span>. If we end up at 19 or 36 after all these actions, we can re-organize our size every 10 years as we see fit.<br /><br />As I have said all along, without a real plan - including an organizational structure - I will not support any number other than 38. Otherwise we are merely picking numbers out of a hat. That is no way to run a government.<br /><br /><br />If I have anything wrong in this, feel free to post a comment.Jef Hallhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09937646669350649402noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26269340.post-5582952677438749712007-02-05T12:10:00.000-06:002007-02-05T13:31:28.434-06:00Judiciary and Parks MeetingsFor <a href="http://www.co.winnebago.wi.us/countyclerk/docs/pra070205.pdf">Parks</a> And <a href="http://www.co.winnebago.wi.us/countyclerk/docs/jpa070212.pdf">Judiciary</a> click on them for the full agenda.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.co.winnebago.wi.us/countyclerk/docs/pra070205.pdf">Parks</a> will be discussing the soccer fees - <a href="http://www.co.winnebago.wi.us/countyclerk/docs/jpa070212.pdf">Judiciary</a> will look at maps for supervisory districts.Jef Hallhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09937646669350649402noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26269340.post-1168545250110063132007-01-11T12:41:00.000-06:002007-01-11T13:54:10.130-06:00Oshkosh Youth Soccer Club's Statement on FeesClick here for ethe full statement.<br /><br />Something to remember:<br /><br /><em><blockquote><em>This year alone, </em><a href="http://www.oshkoshyouthsoccer.org/"><em>Oshkosh Youth Soccer Club </em></a><em>spent $8,000 for goals and nets for this complex. Also, Oshkosh United Soccer Club and Oshkosh Youth Soccer Club members donated hundreds of hours of volunteer time to repaint the shelter in the soccer complex; remove rocks from fields and fill holes in fields (for safety reasons); and plant grass seed, to name just a few projects - all for the betterment of the soccer complex at Winnebago County Park.</em><br /></blockquote></em>Jef Hallhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09937646669350649402noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26269340.post-1168539798840192782007-01-11T12:11:00.000-06:002007-01-11T12:23:18.876-06:00Do the Russian's Love Their Children, Too?I don't know if anyone remembers this song from the 80's (I believe by Sting...), but the gist is that we will both (USA & USSR) have a future if we both love our children equally. This was the Cold War, after all.<br /><br />I was reminded of this song while going over the agenda for this month's board meeting.<br /><br />Specifically these 2 resolutions:<br /><br /><span style="font-style: italic;"></span><blockquote><span style="font-style: italic;">RESOLUTION NO. 144-12007: Authorize Construction of a Communication Arts Center at the UWFox Valley Campus at a Cost of $12,600,000 with Winnebago County's Share Being $5,300,000 and Fund County Portion Through Bonding </span><br /><span style="font-style: italic;">Submitted by: </span><br /><span style="font-style: italic;">UW FOX VALLEY BOARD OF TRUSTEES </span><br /><span style="font-style: italic;">FACILITIES & PROPERTY MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE </span><br /> <br /><span style="font-style: italic;">ORDINANCE NO. 147-12007: Create Sec. 19.24(12), General Code of Winnebago County; Authorize Institution of Community Park Soccer Field Reservation Fees </span><br /><span style="font-style: italic;">Submitted by: </span><br /><span style="font-style: italic;">PARKS & RECREATION COMMITTEE </span></blockquote><span style="font-style: italic;"></span><br /><br />I believe these resolutions directly affect the (admittedly hyperbolic) question above. <br /><br />Of course, Winnebago loves their children. <br /><br />But, are we willing to invest in them? Are the board's priorities in line with the interests of our children?<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">The budget and how an organization spends it's resources is a higher statement of its morals and priorities than is any mission statement. </span><br /><br />I believe in investing in Winnebago County's youth. I will vote for the theater and against the soccer fees.Jef Hallhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09937646669350649402noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26269340.post-1168383371993484732007-01-09T17:51:00.000-06:002007-01-09T17:01:56.046-06:00Here It Comes, Again...MOBILIZE THE SOCCER MOM'S!!!<br /><br />On the Agenda for next Tuesday's (Jan 16, 2007) meeting:<br /><br /><strong><em><blockquote><p><strong><em><a href="http://www.co.winnebago.wi.us/countyclerk/countyboard/Resolution%20No.%20147-12007.cb.pdf">ORDINANCE NO. 147-12007</a>: </em></strong></p><p><strong><em>Create Sec. 19.24(12), General Code of Winnebago County; Authorize Institution of Community Park Soccer Field Reservation Fees<br />Submitted by: PARKS & RECREATION COMMITTEE</em></strong></p></blockquote></em></strong><br /><br />I am 100% against this. In the last budget, we added in $170,000 to the budget, just because we could, yet we want to once again charge our youth to use soccer fields.<br /><br />Let's get some people out to the meeting.Jef Hallhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09937646669350649402noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26269340.post-1166504848056068762006-12-18T23:05:00.000-06:002006-12-18T23:07:28.070-06:00New Board Map<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://photos1.blogger.com/x/blogger/5115/189/1600/985137/newboardmap.jpg"><img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer;" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/x/blogger/5115/189/320/199164/newboardmap.jpg" alt="" border="0" /></a>Jef Hallhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09937646669350649402noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26269340.post-1166117938445684862006-12-14T11:46:00.000-06:002006-12-14T11:38:58.473-06:0012/19/06 Board Agenda and Thoughts<a href="http://www.co.winnebago.wi.us/countyclerk/countyboard/">Click here for the Agenda & Resolutions</a><br /><br /><a href="http://www.co.winnebago.wi.us/countyclerk/countyboard/Agenda%20-%20December%2019,%202006.pdf">Here is the specific agenda</a><br /><br />My thoughts:<br /><br /><strong>RESOLUTION NO. 137-122006: Instruct County Executive to Prepare a Zero-based Budget for 2008</strong><br />It is not our job to tell the County Executive what to do. The County Executive is an elected official. Our job as a board is to either approve, deny or override his actions. I will not vote for this. If this or any other County Executive wants to budget in any matter of ways they feel is best, I encourage them to. We will then go over it line by line and amend as needed.<br /><br /><strong>ORDINANCE NO. 136-122006: Amend Section 2.01 of the General Code of Winnebago County</strong><br />This will be the one everyone will be talking about in the morning - the new map. I am inclined to vote for it., simply on the basis that it seems to have been drawn fairly. I understand that some supervisors may have a second map that they have worked on. If so, I reserve the right to vote this one down if the other map is more equitable.<br /><br />While I voted against the shrinking of the board, it passed. And, as such, we need a map to reflect this fact.<br /><br />I still am happy with 38.<br /><br /><strong>RESOLUTION NO. 135-122006: Authorize Request for Legal Expense Coverage from the Wisconsin County Mutual Insurance Corporation</strong><br />I want to know what this is for. I have not had a chance to open my packet yet (it arrived in the mail yesterday). Is this to cover costs for the board size lawsuit? I don't know. I have questions to be answered before I make a call on this.<br /><br /><strong>RESOLUTION NO. 134-122006: Transfer $3,300 from Salary Contingency Fund to Corporation Counsel's2006 Wage and Benefit Budgets to Cover Projected Cost Overrun as a Result of Temporary Help Needs</strong><br />We discussed that this was coming in the budget workshop. I will support it.<br /><br /><strong>RESOLUTION NO. 131-122006: Accept $10,000 Donation for Renovation of a Steinway Piano at Park View Health Center</strong><br />I will be abstaining from this vote, as I work for J. J. Keller. I am proud of my company, however.<br /><br /><strong>RESOLUTION NO. 128-122006: Authorize Beverage Pouring Rights Agreement Between Winnebago County and Pepsi Americas Inc.</strong><br />My knee-jerk is to support this. I am OK with recreational areas being sponsored (I would vote against it if it were a school). I want some more info. If there is a soccer or rugby tournament, are they required to sell only loose cans of Pepsi? When we have our Democratic Party Corn Roast, we give away soda free as part of admission - is this to be Pepsi only (will I have to deny myself my grape Jolly Good)?<br /><br /><br /><strong>RESOLUTION NO. 126-122006: Support Revision or Repeal of Section 70.11(21), Stats.</strong><br />Due to a recent court ruling, all paper companies in Winnebago County could declare themselves free of property taxes. This is a resolution recomending the state fill in that loophole. I will be voting for it, and I am a co-sponsor.<br /><br />As I get answers, I will post them.Jef Hallhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09937646669350649402noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26269340.post-1166025491375002072006-12-13T07:53:00.000-06:002006-12-13T09:58:11.390-06:00A view from a former County Board Member and Current County Employee:A letter to the <a href="http://www.thenorthwestern.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20061212/OSH06/612120374/1191/OSHopinion">Oshkosh Northwestern:</a><br /><br /><em><blockquote><em><strong><a href="http://www.thenorthwestern.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20061212/OSH06/612120374/1191/OSHopinion">County employees good value for taxpayers</a></strong><br />As a newly minted homeowner (and landlord), I was stunned when I opened my first property-tax bill. Wow, that's a lot of money!<br /></em><a name="correction"></a><br /><em>Then I considered what I'm paying for. From my nearly two decades with the county government in two branches, I'm convinced I'm getting my money's worth.<br /></em><em>Winnebago County is frugal. Tax dollars are spent carefully and wisely. Your county government does what it should do — and must do — and no more. You are served by more than 1,000 dedicated employees. By the way, we're also your neighbors. And I gladly will pay for this vital work. I have extensive contacts in other local governments, and I'm convinced they also are careful with our money.<br /></em><a name="correction"></a><br /><em>Cynics will say this is a self-serving letter from a guy who makes his living at taxpayers' expense, rather than seeking his fortune in a "real" job. But consider this: Without going into detail, I know precisely what I'm worth in the private sector. Yet I've chosen to remain a public servant and government employee. I am not "stuck" in a government job. I truly enjoy public service, and serve proudly.<br /></em><a name="correction"></a><br /><em>My political record speaks for itself. I wouldn't sit quietly and watch tax dollars<br />get squandered. I know I'm getting my money's worth.<br /></em><a name="correction"></a><br /><em>During the last two budget sessions, there was a lot of foolish talk of letting the government practically shut down just to see what would happen. That was the position of many of my fellow conservatives. But it's not conservative to let crime increase, poverty and other social ills balloon, schools crumble (ala California and Colorado) and streets turn to dust, only to realize the horrible mistake years later. The cost to fix neglect in the future would only multiply manifold. That's neither wise nor conservative.<br /></em><a name="correction"></a><br /><em>Ron J. Montgomery Oshkosh</em><br /></blockquote></em>Jef Hallhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09937646669350649402noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26269340.post-1165435505841136552006-12-06T12:04:00.000-06:002006-12-06T14:05:05.860-06:00It didn't have to be this way....<a href="http://www.thenorthwestern.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20061205/OSH0101/612050340/1128/OSH01">From the Oshkosh Northwestern</a>:<br /><br /><em><blockquote><em>Tax bills sent out from the city ultimately will bring in more than $70 million in tax levy dollars for the city, county, Fox Valley Technical College and Oshkosh school district. The city levy – just under $25.6 million – is the largest dollar amount of the taxing entities. The Winnebago County portion of the tax bill has the biggest percentage increase from last year, up 5 percent from last year.</em> </blockquote></em><br /><br />The County levy is for Oshkosh property owners is $5.47/$1,000 in 2006, it was $5.21/$1,000 in 2005.<br /><br />The original budget proposed with the sales tax had about a $4.80/$1,000 rate (I will update this later when I find the exact number.<br /><br />Just a reminder to those who said the sales tax would not reduce the property tax.Jef Hallhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09937646669350649402noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26269340.post-1164116891528581002006-11-21T07:47:00.000-06:002006-11-21T07:48:11.540-06:00The map is coming...<a href="http://www.co.winnebago.wi.us/countyclerk/docs/jca061128.pdf">Here is the agenda</a> for next weeks Judiciary meeting where it is being presented.Jef Hallhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09937646669350649402noreply@blogger.com