<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' xmlns:georss='http://www.georss.org/georss'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-258127857088261427</id><updated>2009-12-29T18:47:17.955-05:00</updated><title type='text'>The Rockefeller Republican</title><subtitle type='html'></subtitle><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rockefellerconservative.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/258127857088261427/posts/default'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rockefellerconservative.blogspot.com/'/><link rel='hub' href='http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/'/><link rel='next' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/258127857088261427/posts/default?start-index=26&amp;max-results=25'/><author><name>Steve B</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16911705408884923123</uri><email>steve_brady@ymail.com</email></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>255</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-258127857088261427.post-7097206963352720133</id><published>2009-12-28T15:45:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2009-12-28T15:47:42.129-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Grading Obama</title><summary type='text'>With the anniversary of Obama's inauguration and his upcoming State of the Union speech we all have to get ready to listen to pundits from all persuasions give the obligatory grade for the president's first year. Obama himself famously stated on Oprah that he thought he deserved " a good solid B+."  But before we start arguing whether he deserves a B, C, or D, we should really decide on what </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rockefellerconservative.blogspot.com/feeds/7097206963352720133/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=258127857088261427&amp;postID=7097206963352720133&amp;isPopup=true' title='3 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/258127857088261427/posts/default/7097206963352720133'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/258127857088261427/posts/default/7097206963352720133'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rockefellerconservative.blogspot.com/2009/12/grading-obama.html' title='Grading Obama'/><author><name>Steve B</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16911705408884923123</uri><email>steve_brady@ymail.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='00796360299455154448'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>3</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-258127857088261427.post-7984748712153424762</id><published>2009-12-26T08:51:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2009-12-26T08:51:52.906-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Earmarks Return...Did They Ever Leave</title><summary type='text'>A constant refrain from campaign '08 was that earmarks were bad and needed to go. Both Obama and McCain agreed on that and tried to out-due each other in how they would work to get rid of them. From The Hill:
Fiscal hawks in Congress say President Barack Obama hasn't followed through on a pledge to lower federal spending on local projects.

Earmarks are expected to total nearly $12 billion in </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rockefellerconservative.blogspot.com/feeds/7984748712153424762/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=258127857088261427&amp;postID=7984748712153424762&amp;isPopup=true' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/258127857088261427/posts/default/7984748712153424762'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/258127857088261427/posts/default/7984748712153424762'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rockefellerconservative.blogspot.com/2009/12/earmarks-returndid-they-ever-leave.html' title='Earmarks Return...Did They Ever Leave'/><author><name>Steve B</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16911705408884923123</uri><email>steve_brady@ymail.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='00796360299455154448'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-258127857088261427.post-2095761311170219344</id><published>2009-12-24T07:42:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2009-12-24T07:45:06.806-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Merry Christmas!</title><summary type='text'>
One of my regular reads is Thinking Faith, the online journal of the British Jesuits and for this Christmas holiday I anted to share a recent article on the first Christmas and what it means.

Can we ever really know what happened in Bethlehem at the first Christmas?  Nicholas King SJ suggests that while they may not provide a historical account of the birth of Christ, the gospel narratives </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rockefellerconservative.blogspot.com/feeds/2095761311170219344/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=258127857088261427&amp;postID=2095761311170219344&amp;isPopup=true' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/258127857088261427/posts/default/2095761311170219344'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/258127857088261427/posts/default/2095761311170219344'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rockefellerconservative.blogspot.com/2009/12/merry-christmas.html' title='Merry Christmas!'/><author><name>Steve B</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16911705408884923123</uri><email>steve_brady@ymail.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='00796360299455154448'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_aHF_66sCFIk/SzNgIZxG8FI/AAAAAAAAAI0/Mx6-Qy01HkQ/s72-c/modern_stained_glass.jpg' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-258127857088261427.post-5973814369649669042</id><published>2009-12-23T06:35:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2009-12-23T06:35:10.401-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Sobering Reality of the Tea Party Movement</title><summary type='text'>Many of us on the right are operating under the assumption that the Tea Party Movement will help ushering in a new Republican majority in 2 or 4 years. However, Thomas Del Baccaro has a sobering review of this meme.
At its core, the Tea Party movement is a pro-liberty – limited government movement.  Its activists continue to believe in Reagan’s cogent message about government.  Beneath that </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rockefellerconservative.blogspot.com/feeds/5973814369649669042/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=258127857088261427&amp;postID=5973814369649669042&amp;isPopup=true' title='6 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/258127857088261427/posts/default/5973814369649669042'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/258127857088261427/posts/default/5973814369649669042'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rockefellerconservative.blogspot.com/2009/12/sobering-reality-of-tea-party-movement.html' title='Sobering Reality of the Tea Party Movement'/><author><name>Steve B</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16911705408884923123</uri><email>steve_brady@ymail.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='00796360299455154448'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_aHF_66sCFIk/SzH_UA6kbeI/AAAAAAAAAIs/GouQzRmRoqM/s72-c/cup_of_tea_with_lemon.jpg' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>6</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-258127857088261427.post-4159843147612564564</id><published>2009-12-22T09:18:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2009-12-22T09:18:47.836-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Does Congress Speak For You?</title><summary type='text'>With the Senate voting on health care reform this week it is more than interesting to view the latest poll numbers.  American voters "mostly disapprove" of the plan 53% to 36% and disapprove 56% to 38% of President Obama's handling of the health care issue, according to a new Quinnipiac poll.

Will there be reprecussions come next November, or will the electorate forget about the issue by then?
</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rockefellerconservative.blogspot.com/feeds/4159843147612564564/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=258127857088261427&amp;postID=4159843147612564564&amp;isPopup=true' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/258127857088261427/posts/default/4159843147612564564'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/258127857088261427/posts/default/4159843147612564564'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rockefellerconservative.blogspot.com/2009/12/does-congress-speak-for-you.html' title='Does Congress Speak For You?'/><author><name>Steve B</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16911705408884923123</uri><email>steve_brady@ymail.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='00796360299455154448'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-258127857088261427.post-5811187295556987245</id><published>2009-12-21T20:33:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2009-12-21T20:33:31.336-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Letter From John McCain</title><summary type='text'>My Friend, 

Early this morning at 1am, the Senate voted 60 to 40 in favor of moving the Democrats' health care bill forward. The final vote to pass the bill is scheduled for Christmas Eve, and I pledge to you that I will not only continue to cast my vote against this bill, but will actively fight it every step along the way. 

Democrats have used Bernie Madoff-style accounting to assess the cost</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rockefellerconservative.blogspot.com/feeds/5811187295556987245/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=258127857088261427&amp;postID=5811187295556987245&amp;isPopup=true' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/258127857088261427/posts/default/5811187295556987245'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/258127857088261427/posts/default/5811187295556987245'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rockefellerconservative.blogspot.com/2009/12/letter-from-john-mccain.html' title='Letter From John McCain'/><author><name>Steve B</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16911705408884923123</uri><email>steve_brady@ymail.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='00796360299455154448'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-258127857088261427.post-7031233010526067724</id><published>2009-12-21T20:28:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2009-12-21T20:28:59.233-05:00</updated><title type='text'>New Format For The Rockefeller Republican</title><summary type='text'>I created a new and updated look and feel to the blog for the new year. There are some new sections, new graphics and some new sponsor links as well. I would love to hear feedback from regular readers.</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rockefellerconservative.blogspot.com/feeds/7031233010526067724/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=258127857088261427&amp;postID=7031233010526067724&amp;isPopup=true' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/258127857088261427/posts/default/7031233010526067724'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/258127857088261427/posts/default/7031233010526067724'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rockefellerconservative.blogspot.com/2009/12/new-format-for-rockefeller-republican.html' title='New Format For The Rockefeller Republican'/><author><name>Steve B</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16911705408884923123</uri><email>steve_brady@ymail.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='00796360299455154448'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-258127857088261427.post-6321257337161980056</id><published>2009-12-21T05:36:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2009-12-21T05:38:24.041-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Health Care Reform or Not?</title><summary type='text'>More math on health care bill from the Congressional Budget Office:CBO expects that Medicare spending under the legislation would increase at an average annual rate of roughly 6 percent during the next two decades—well below the roughly 8 percent annual growth rate of the past two decades (excluding the effect of establishing the Medicare prescription drug benefit). Adjusting for inflation, </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rockefellerconservative.blogspot.com/feeds/6321257337161980056/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=258127857088261427&amp;postID=6321257337161980056&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/258127857088261427/posts/default/6321257337161980056'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/258127857088261427/posts/default/6321257337161980056'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rockefellerconservative.blogspot.com/2009/12/health-care-reform-or-not.html' title='Health Care Reform or Not?'/><author><name>Steve B</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16911705408884923123</uri><email>steve_brady@ymail.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='00796360299455154448'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-258127857088261427.post-2212435701830662085</id><published>2009-12-20T14:17:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2009-12-20T14:20:52.082-05:00</updated><title type='text'>A Profound Disappointment</title><summary type='text'>Michale Goodwin, writing in The New York Post, tells a story I have heard from quite a few aquaintences. The short article is worth a read. Here is an excerpt.  President Obama, for whom I voted because I believed he was the best choice available, is a profound disappointment. I now regard his campaign as a sly bait-and-switch operation, promising one thing and delivering another. Shame on me.  </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rockefellerconservative.blogspot.com/feeds/2212435701830662085/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=258127857088261427&amp;postID=2212435701830662085&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/258127857088261427/posts/default/2212435701830662085'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/258127857088261427/posts/default/2212435701830662085'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rockefellerconservative.blogspot.com/2009/12/profound-disappointment.html' title='A Profound Disappointment'/><author><name>Steve B</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16911705408884923123</uri><email>steve_brady@ymail.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='00796360299455154448'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-258127857088261427.post-7830577233761459631</id><published>2009-12-16T05:48:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2009-12-16T05:55:18.553-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Rockefeller Republican = Whole Foods Republican</title><summary type='text'>OK, I am a couple of days late in finding this article as it appeared in Monday's WSJ, but it so aptly described what I consider to be the modern reinvention of the Rockefeller Republican that I had to share it. Michael Petrilli makes the case that for the GOP to succeed it needs to cultivate what he calls Whole Foods Republicans.What's needed is a full-fledged effort to cultivate "Whole Foods </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rockefellerconservative.blogspot.com/feeds/7830577233761459631/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=258127857088261427&amp;postID=7830577233761459631&amp;isPopup=true' title='3 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/258127857088261427/posts/default/7830577233761459631'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/258127857088261427/posts/default/7830577233761459631'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rockefellerconservative.blogspot.com/2009/12/rockefeller-republican-whole-foods.html' title='Rockefeller Republican = Whole Foods Republican'/><author><name>Steve B</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16911705408884923123</uri><email>steve_brady@ymail.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='00796360299455154448'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>3</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-258127857088261427.post-4457187036505852901</id><published>2009-12-15T09:01:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2009-12-15T09:04:13.230-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Is Insurance Bad For You?</title><summary type='text'>Excellent article today over at Big Government by Dr. Jane Orient. She makes the case that insurance can actually get in the way of treatment. Fascinating case study and something to keep in mind when we talk about health care reform. I'd be curious to hear if anyone has any similar stories, or contradicting ones...</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rockefellerconservative.blogspot.com/feeds/4457187036505852901/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=258127857088261427&amp;postID=4457187036505852901&amp;isPopup=true' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/258127857088261427/posts/default/4457187036505852901'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/258127857088261427/posts/default/4457187036505852901'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rockefellerconservative.blogspot.com/2009/12/is-insurance-bad-for-you.html' title='Is Insurance Bad For You?'/><author><name>Steve B</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16911705408884923123</uri><email>steve_brady@ymail.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='00796360299455154448'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-258127857088261427.post-5138169385323904713</id><published>2009-12-14T08:55:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2009-12-14T08:55:27.972-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Health Reform Support on Life Support</title><summary type='text'></summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rockefellerconservative.blogspot.com/feeds/5138169385323904713/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=258127857088261427&amp;postID=5138169385323904713&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/258127857088261427/posts/default/5138169385323904713'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/258127857088261427/posts/default/5138169385323904713'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rockefellerconservative.blogspot.com/2009/12/health-reform-support-on-life-support.html' title='Health Reform Support on Life Support'/><author><name>Steve B</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16911705408884923123</uri><email>steve_brady@ymail.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='00796360299455154448'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-258127857088261427.post-7118986629773365499</id><published>2009-12-14T08:30:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2009-12-14T08:31:53.188-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Tax Cuts Instead of Stimulus</title><summary type='text'>My favorite economist writes a new editorial in the New York Times. Mankiw is always recommended reading.</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rockefellerconservative.blogspot.com/feeds/7118986629773365499/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=258127857088261427&amp;postID=7118986629773365499&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/258127857088261427/posts/default/7118986629773365499'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/258127857088261427/posts/default/7118986629773365499'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rockefellerconservative.blogspot.com/2009/12/tax-cuts-instead-of-stimulus.html' title='Tax Cuts Instead of Stimulus'/><author><name>Steve B</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16911705408884923123</uri><email>steve_brady@ymail.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='00796360299455154448'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-258127857088261427.post-5990531398327329039</id><published>2009-12-11T08:06:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2009-12-11T08:07:20.747-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Obama and The Nobel Prize</title><summary type='text'>There are plenty of things I could criticize about yesterday's speech: it was too long at over 4,000 words, his use of first person (34 times) just exacerbates the messianic image, the repetition of the hope/change message. However, by and large I felt good about what was said. My personal favorite:    Whatever mistakes we have made, the plain fact is this: the United States of America has helped</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rockefellerconservative.blogspot.com/feeds/5990531398327329039/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=258127857088261427&amp;postID=5990531398327329039&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/258127857088261427/posts/default/5990531398327329039'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/258127857088261427/posts/default/5990531398327329039'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rockefellerconservative.blogspot.com/2009/12/obama-and-nobel-prize.html' title='Obama and The Nobel Prize'/><author><name>Steve B</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16911705408884923123</uri><email>steve_brady@ymail.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='00796360299455154448'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-258127857088261427.post-1985593710219781449</id><published>2009-12-10T16:55:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2009-12-10T16:57:56.208-05:00</updated><title type='text'>How Will the Reid Bill Affect Me?</title><summary type='text'>According to Keith Hennessey I am going to be paying considerably more per year for my family's health insurance. Want to see how you'd do? Check out this link.</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rockefellerconservative.blogspot.com/feeds/1985593710219781449/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=258127857088261427&amp;postID=1985593710219781449&amp;isPopup=true' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/258127857088261427/posts/default/1985593710219781449'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/258127857088261427/posts/default/1985593710219781449'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rockefellerconservative.blogspot.com/2009/12/how-will-reid-bill-affect-me.html' title='How Will the Reid Bill Affect Me?'/><author><name>Steve B</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16911705408884923123</uri><email>steve_brady@ymail.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='00796360299455154448'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-258127857088261427.post-371969790366229066</id><published>2009-12-10T07:49:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2009-12-10T07:52:00.955-05:00</updated><title type='text'>The Logic of the Center</title><summary type='text'>One of my favorite economic bloggers is Greg Mankiw. The other day he posted an entry on the conclusion of his freshman seminar at Harvard. I want to make note specifically of his freshman's view once the class had ended.I also asked the students how their views had changed over the course of the semester. Those who started out liberal said they came to appreciate market mechanisms more. Those </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rockefellerconservative.blogspot.com/feeds/371969790366229066/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=258127857088261427&amp;postID=371969790366229066&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/258127857088261427/posts/default/371969790366229066'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/258127857088261427/posts/default/371969790366229066'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rockefellerconservative.blogspot.com/2009/12/logic-of-center.html' title='The Logic of the Center'/><author><name>Steve B</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16911705408884923123</uri><email>steve_brady@ymail.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='00796360299455154448'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-258127857088261427.post-1091849440676318178</id><published>2009-12-09T15:39:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2009-12-09T15:42:31.588-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Mor Stimulus Money Hard at Work</title><summary type='text'>From The Hill:Nearly $6 million in stimulus money was paid to two firms run by Mark Penn, Hillary Clinton’s pollster in 2008.Federal records show that $5.97 million from the $787 billion stimulus helped preserve three jobs at Burson-Marsteller, the global public-relations and communications firm headed by Penn.I don't think I need to add anything to this clip. Let the indignation begin....</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rockefellerconservative.blogspot.com/feeds/1091849440676318178/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=258127857088261427&amp;postID=1091849440676318178&amp;isPopup=true' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/258127857088261427/posts/default/1091849440676318178'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/258127857088261427/posts/default/1091849440676318178'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rockefellerconservative.blogspot.com/2009/12/mor-stimulus-money-hard-at-work.html' title='Mor Stimulus Money Hard at Work'/><author><name>Steve B</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16911705408884923123</uri><email>steve_brady@ymail.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='00796360299455154448'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-258127857088261427.post-5920803417909416081</id><published>2009-12-08T05:30:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2009-12-08T05:37:04.035-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Santorum in 2012?</title><summary type='text'>From The Hill:Former Sen. Rick Santorum (R-Pa.) gave his clearest words to date that he is seriously mulling a 2012 presidential bid.     "Absolutely — absolutely taking a look," he told ABC's "Top Line" webcast Monday afternoon. The former Pennsylvania senator has previously exhibited an interest in running in 2012. However, he has, to this point, hedged his language quite a bit, allowing his </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rockefellerconservative.blogspot.com/feeds/5920803417909416081/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=258127857088261427&amp;postID=5920803417909416081&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/258127857088261427/posts/default/5920803417909416081'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/258127857088261427/posts/default/5920803417909416081'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rockefellerconservative.blogspot.com/2009/12/santorum-in-2012.html' title='Santorum in 2012?'/><author><name>Steve B</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16911705408884923123</uri><email>steve_brady@ymail.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='00796360299455154448'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-258127857088261427.post-1237981302460983780</id><published>2009-12-06T10:33:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2009-12-06T10:41:55.296-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Liberal Fascism</title><summary type='text'>I recently finished Jonah Goldberg's Liberal Fascism, The Secret History of The Left, and while the title suggests another boiler-plate special from the likes of Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity or Ann Coulter, what is presented is a chillingly sane explanation of the history of the early 20th century and how its influence can still be felt today. Goldberg is at pains to make clear that this is not just </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rockefellerconservative.blogspot.com/feeds/1237981302460983780/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=258127857088261427&amp;postID=1237981302460983780&amp;isPopup=true' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/258127857088261427/posts/default/1237981302460983780'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/258127857088261427/posts/default/1237981302460983780'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rockefellerconservative.blogspot.com/2009/12/liberal-fascism.html' title='Liberal Fascism'/><author><name>Steve B</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16911705408884923123</uri><email>steve_brady@ymail.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='00796360299455154448'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-258127857088261427.post-2146845117905304826</id><published>2009-12-05T14:04:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2009-12-05T14:04:19.820-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Scientism</title><summary type='text'></summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rockefellerconservative.blogspot.com/feeds/2146845117905304826/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=258127857088261427&amp;postID=2146845117905304826&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/258127857088261427/posts/default/2146845117905304826'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/258127857088261427/posts/default/2146845117905304826'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rockefellerconservative.blogspot.com/2009/12/scientism.html' title='Scientism'/><author><name>Steve B</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16911705408884923123</uri><email>steve_brady@ymail.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='00796360299455154448'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-258127857088261427.post-4162543015777437610</id><published>2009-12-04T05:55:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2009-12-04T06:00:29.242-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Quote of the Day</title><summary type='text'> Poor Al Gore. Global warming completely debunked via the very Internet you invented. OH. OH the irony.-Jon StewartIn related Al Gore news- He was committed to a lecture at the upcoming climate summit. The event cost $1200 per person and 3000 people signed up. Over $3 mil!  Gore canceled and did not give a reason, leaving the organizers "greatly annoyed and disappointed". Any guesses why he </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rockefellerconservative.blogspot.com/feeds/4162543015777437610/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=258127857088261427&amp;postID=4162543015777437610&amp;isPopup=true' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/258127857088261427/posts/default/4162543015777437610'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/258127857088261427/posts/default/4162543015777437610'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rockefellerconservative.blogspot.com/2009/12/quote-of-day.html' title='Quote of the Day'/><author><name>Steve B</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16911705408884923123</uri><email>steve_brady@ymail.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='00796360299455154448'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-258127857088261427.post-1092794749218345927</id><published>2009-12-01T17:05:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2009-12-01T17:08:44.265-05:00</updated><title type='text'>State of the GOP</title><summary type='text'>The new Washington Post poll on the state of the Republican party is something all political junkies should check out. The most disturbing part for me? That Sarah Palin gets 17% [the highest mark] support for 2012 GOP primary.</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rockefellerconservative.blogspot.com/feeds/1092794749218345927/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=258127857088261427&amp;postID=1092794749218345927&amp;isPopup=true' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/258127857088261427/posts/default/1092794749218345927'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/258127857088261427/posts/default/1092794749218345927'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rockefellerconservative.blogspot.com/2009/12/state-of-gop.html' title='State of the GOP'/><author><name>Steve B</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16911705408884923123</uri><email>steve_brady@ymail.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='00796360299455154448'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-258127857088261427.post-6843550516170898600</id><published>2009-12-01T09:47:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2009-12-01T09:50:36.623-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Who Gets Huckabee's Vote Now?</title><summary type='text'>With Mike Huckabee's presidential aspirations coming to a halt this past weekend it raises the question of who gets his support. While it is obviously still very early he had been polling in the lead for 2012. There doesn't seem to be an obvious successor (Palin?) so would they go to Romney by default?</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rockefellerconservative.blogspot.com/feeds/6843550516170898600/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=258127857088261427&amp;postID=6843550516170898600&amp;isPopup=true' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/258127857088261427/posts/default/6843550516170898600'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/258127857088261427/posts/default/6843550516170898600'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rockefellerconservative.blogspot.com/2009/12/who-gets-huckabees-vote-now.html' title='Who Gets Huckabee&apos;s Vote Now?'/><author><name>Steve B</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16911705408884923123</uri><email>steve_brady@ymail.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='00796360299455154448'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-258127857088261427.post-811997313816861073</id><published>2009-11-24T09:31:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2009-11-24T09:33:10.262-05:00</updated><title type='text'>"Conventional Wisdom"</title><summary type='text'>          &lt;!--[if gte mso 9]&gt;        &lt;![endif]--&gt;&lt;!--[if gte mso 9]&gt;     0   false         18 pt   18 pt   0   0      false   false   false                         &lt;![endif]--&gt;&lt;!--[if gte mso 9]&gt;     &lt;![endif]--&gt;  &lt;!--  /* Font Definitions */ @font-face 	{font-family:Cambria; 	panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4; 	mso-font-charset:0; 	mso-generic-font-family:auto; 	mso-font-pitch:variable; 	</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rockefellerconservative.blogspot.com/feeds/811997313816861073/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=258127857088261427&amp;postID=811997313816861073&amp;isPopup=true' title='4 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/258127857088261427/posts/default/811997313816861073'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/258127857088261427/posts/default/811997313816861073'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rockefellerconservative.blogspot.com/2009/11/conventional-wisdom.html' title='&quot;Conventional Wisdom&quot;'/><author><name>Steve B</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16911705408884923123</uri><email>steve_brady@ymail.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='00796360299455154448'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>4</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-258127857088261427.post-5213779059317595378</id><published>2009-11-22T07:37:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2009-11-22T07:47:03.475-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Climate Change a Fraud?</title><summary type='text'>From The Wall Street Journal:The picture that emerges of prominent climate-change scientists from the more than 3,000 documents and emails accessed by hackers and put on the Internet this week is one of professional backbiting and questionable scientific practices. It could undermine the idea that the science of man-made global warming is entirely settled just weeks before a crucial </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rockefellerconservative.blogspot.com/feeds/5213779059317595378/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=258127857088261427&amp;postID=5213779059317595378&amp;isPopup=true' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/258127857088261427/posts/default/5213779059317595378'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/258127857088261427/posts/default/5213779059317595378'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rockefellerconservative.blogspot.com/2009/11/climate-change-fraud.html' title='Climate Change a Fraud?'/><author><name>Steve B</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16911705408884923123</uri><email>steve_brady@ymail.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='00796360299455154448'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>1</thr:total></entry></feed>