tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23818283.post-81804458607356997612007-09-03T22:14:00.000+01:002007-11-11T13:45:09.855ZOf no ecological worth?<a href="http://bp0.blogger.com/_CiuaRAVNwYs/Rtx93c8l1jI/AAAAAAAAAVI/tNSwkitESSc/s1600-h/20070715+002.jpg"><img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5106094469147907634" style="display: block; margin: 0px auto 10px; cursor: hand; text-align: center" alt="" src="http://bp0.blogger.com/_CiuaRAVNwYs/Rtx93c8l1jI/AAAAAAAAAVI/tNSwkitESSc/s400/20070715+002.jpg" border="0" /></a> <p>A small piece of Sussex that has been deemed by 'ecologists' to be of no wildlife value and therefore a good place on which to build a few houses.</p> <p>Well, people do have to live somewhere and I find it difficult to decide where the balance of virtue lies. I suppose I want the best of all possible worlds: people with the homes they want and need and plenty of space for wildlife. Maybe we should all become smaller - a good project for the genetic engineers. Roll on Lilliputia.</p> Patrick Roperhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05656486045726647263noreply@blogger.com