tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22587889.post-73078755415519702282007-09-29T09:31:00.000+05:302007-09-29T09:31:00.000+05:30<I>"The completely dynamic nature of the language tends to compound the complexity of the application, and turns it into the worse nightmare in any development team of decent size and attrition rate."</I><BR/><BR/>+1. It is very difficult to scale up a development team programming in dynamic language. I have mentioned this earlier also and has been dismissed as the strawman argument by Ruby fanboys.<BR/><BR/>However, in this post, my main argument is NOT Ruby. It is Rails and the main issue which I have is that the Rails community always dismiss enterprise apps as something not worth their consideration in their forte. But they do not admit that the basic design of Rails along with Active Record model and a coupled domain-persistence paradigm never enable them to go beyond a handful of entities. Some of them point to JRuby as the solution, which unfortunately is nothing for than a jar in a Java app server, given the pathetic state of Rails deployment.Debasishhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01613713587074301135noreply@blogger.com