<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><entry xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:georss='http://www.georss.org/georss'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22501279.post-6217549596653245660</id><published>2008-02-06T17:55:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2008-02-06T18:40:29.524-05:00</updated><title type='text'>About that Wabash line...</title><summary type='text'>From the snail mail bag, a missive from Peter Mitchell of Sidney, BC requests that St. Thomas, Ont. be featured in an upcoming publication. Indeed, St. Thomas is technically on a CNR line (keep in mind when I say "is", my mind is in 1954). Operationally, however, it is Wabash territory. There is a CNR element in the form of the local trains (Fort Erie-St. Thomas mixed train and way freight, St. </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22501279/6217549596653245660/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=22501279&amp;postID=6217549596653245660&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22501279/posts/default/6217549596653245660'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22501279/posts/default/6217549596653245660'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.canadianbranchline.com/2008/02/about-that-wabash-line.html' title='About that Wabash line...'/><author><name>Ian Wilson</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15414896384793232690</uri><email>ian@canadianbranchline.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='07555701338547234708'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry>