<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' xmlns:georss='http://www.georss.org/georss'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2135788133426971614</id><updated>2009-12-28T08:39:03.926-08:00</updated><title type='text'>21st Century Taxation</title><subtitle type='html'>This blog by a tax professor is about tax reform and moving tax systems into the 21st century. It focuses on tax system weaknesses, critiques selected reform proposals, and offers new ideas, with an emphasis on federal, California and multistate matters. Additional information - articles, reports and links, can be found at the 21st Century Taxation website (see link below right). I welcome your comments.</subtitle><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://21stcenturytaxation.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2135788133426971614/posts/default'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://21stcenturytaxation.blogspot.com/'/><link rel='hub' href='http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/'/><link rel='next' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2135788133426971614/posts/default?start-index=26&amp;max-results=25'/><author><name>Professor Nellen</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03288632402197167948</uri><email>anellen@sjsu.edu</email></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>156</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2135788133426971614.post-8008353726144306448</id><published>2009-12-28T07:30:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2009-12-28T08:37:50.673-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='health care reform'/><title type='text'>Taxes and Health Care Bills - Considering Tax Policy</title><summary type='text'>With the Senate passing health care legislation on December 24 and the House having done so on November 7, we now have 2 different health care bills that Congress will have to meld into a single bill.  Each version has a variety of tax provisions.  I'll note a few of them here with some analysis on how they stack up against principles of good tax policy.First, the list of tax provisions and their</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://21stcenturytaxation.blogspot.com/feeds/8008353726144306448/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2135788133426971614&amp;postID=8008353726144306448' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2135788133426971614/posts/default/8008353726144306448'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2135788133426971614/posts/default/8008353726144306448'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://21stcenturytaxation.blogspot.com/2009/12/taxes-and-health-care-bills-considering.html' title='Taxes and Health Care Bills - Considering Tax Policy'/><author><name>Professor Nellen</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03288632402197167948</uri><email>anellen@sjsu.edu</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='02616600393690955346'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2135788133426971614.post-8955851201915299901</id><published>2009-12-27T17:06:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2009-12-28T07:30:06.203-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='state tax reform'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='local governments'/><title type='text'>California State-Local Fiscal Relationship</title><summary type='text'>This month, the Legislative Analyst's Office issued a report - Ten Events That Shaped California State-Local Fiscal Relations (12/15/09) for a hearing of the Senate and Assembly Select Committees on Improving State Government (Assembly page + Senate page). The 10 events:1910 Separation of Sources Act1930s New Deal1952 Proposition 181972 SB 901978 Proposition 131979 AB 81991 Realignment1992 and </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://21stcenturytaxation.blogspot.com/feeds/8955851201915299901/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2135788133426971614&amp;postID=8955851201915299901' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2135788133426971614/posts/default/8955851201915299901'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2135788133426971614/posts/default/8955851201915299901'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://21stcenturytaxation.blogspot.com/2009/12/california-state-local-fiscal.html' title='California State-Local Fiscal Relationship'/><author><name>Professor Nellen</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03288632402197167948</uri><email>anellen@sjsu.edu</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='02616600393690955346'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2135788133426971614.post-5770700045375263598</id><published>2009-12-26T10:05:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2009-12-26T11:04:54.108-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='tax gap; 6707A; TIGTA'/><title type='text'>Tax Policy - Minimizing the Tax Gap</title><summary type='text'>The "tax gap" is the difference between taxes owed and taxes collected.  The amount not collected is due to both intentional and unintentional errors.  Unintentional errors can be due to inadequate recordkeeping, posting errors and confusion over the law.  Intentional errors include purposefully omitting income from one's return, and claiming deductions and credits one is not entitled </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://21stcenturytaxation.blogspot.com/feeds/5770700045375263598/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2135788133426971614&amp;postID=5770700045375263598' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2135788133426971614/posts/default/5770700045375263598'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2135788133426971614/posts/default/5770700045375263598'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://21stcenturytaxation.blogspot.com/2009/12/tax-policy-minimizing-tax-gap.html' title='Tax Policy - Minimizing the Tax Gap'/><author><name>Professor Nellen</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03288632402197167948</uri><email>anellen@sjsu.edu</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='02616600393690955346'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2135788133426971614.post-2221367917996920350</id><published>2009-12-24T11:51:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2009-12-24T13:08:14.699-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='use tax; BOE;'/><title type='text'>Use Tax - New Attention, Old Ideas and How to Track</title><summary type='text'>The use tax - despite news reports and a line on most state income tax returns for it, remains a mystery to most people. Ask anyone if they have paid their use tax and most will likely ask what a use tax is, a few will laugh as if it is not an important tax and a few will say that they have paid it. [More info on the use tax - here.]I was quoted in a recent LA Times article on the new California </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://21stcenturytaxation.blogspot.com/feeds/2221367917996920350/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2135788133426971614&amp;postID=2221367917996920350' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2135788133426971614/posts/default/2221367917996920350'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2135788133426971614/posts/default/2221367917996920350'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://21stcenturytaxation.blogspot.com/2009/12/use-tax-new-attention-old-ideas-and-how.html' title='Use Tax - New Attention, Old Ideas and How to Track'/><author><name>Professor Nellen</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03288632402197167948</uri><email>anellen@sjsu.edu</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='02616600393690955346'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2135788133426971614.post-483915180080154872</id><published>2009-12-23T04:54:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2009-12-23T05:34:32.384-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Australia; tax reform'/><title type='text'>Australian Tax Reform</title><summary type='text'>Australia’s Future Tax System Review Panel formed in May 2008 released its final report to the Federal Treasurer on 12/23/09 (ABC News). The report won't be made public until 2010.Per documents on the Panel's website, the review of the tax system was extensive and over 1,000 public comments were received. The Panel's website notes that its objective was to create"a tax-transfer structure that </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://21stcenturytaxation.blogspot.com/feeds/483915180080154872/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2135788133426971614&amp;postID=483915180080154872' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2135788133426971614/posts/default/483915180080154872'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2135788133426971614/posts/default/483915180080154872'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://21stcenturytaxation.blogspot.com/2009/12/australian-tax-reform.html' title='Australian Tax Reform'/><author><name>Professor Nellen</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03288632402197167948</uri><email>anellen@sjsu.edu</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='02616600393690955346'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2135788133426971614.post-5874117968082424048</id><published>2009-12-18T12:37:00.001-08:00</published><updated>2009-12-18T12:56:48.463-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='state tax reform'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Michigan'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='bottled water tax'/><title type='text'>Bottled water tax proposed in Michigan</title><summary type='text'>The Lt. Governor of Michigan has proposed a 10 cent per bottle tax on water to help fund education (Lt. Governor John Cherry press release of 12/14/09).  Per Lt. Governor Cherry, it makes sense to tax one resource to fund another (Mlive.com 12/14/09). Is this a good idea?  Based on principles of good tax policy and budgeting - no.Equity - why a tax on bottled water and not other bottles or other </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://21stcenturytaxation.blogspot.com/feeds/5874117968082424048/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2135788133426971614&amp;postID=5874117968082424048' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2135788133426971614/posts/default/5874117968082424048'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2135788133426971614/posts/default/5874117968082424048'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://21stcenturytaxation.blogspot.com/2009/12/bottled-water-tax-proposed-in-michigan.html' title='Bottled water tax proposed in Michigan'/><author><name>Professor Nellen</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03288632402197167948</uri><email>anellen@sjsu.edu</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='02616600393690955346'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2135788133426971614.post-1993111601406139149</id><published>2009-12-15T09:45:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2009-12-15T10:18:12.923-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='corporate tax reform; tax reform; BNRT'/><title type='text'>Corporate Tax Reform - options, prospects and issues</title><summary type='text'>I've written frequently about the status of, need for and possibilities for reforming the corporate income tax.  The 12/7/09 edition of Tax Notes has a wonderful, short article on this topic by Marty Sullivan - "A Hitchhiker's Guide to Corporate Tax Reform" (p. 1043) (also on Lexis-Nexis and excerpt here).  The author notes four types of possible reforms:Broaden base and lower rate of existing </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://21stcenturytaxation.blogspot.com/feeds/1993111601406139149/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2135788133426971614&amp;postID=1993111601406139149' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2135788133426971614/posts/default/1993111601406139149'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2135788133426971614/posts/default/1993111601406139149'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://21stcenturytaxation.blogspot.com/2009/12/corporate-tax-reform-options-prospects.html' title='Corporate Tax Reform - options, prospects and issues'/><author><name>Professor Nellen</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03288632402197167948</uri><email>anellen@sjsu.edu</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='02616600393690955346'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2135788133426971614.post-8459964469470323949</id><published>2009-12-14T22:49:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2009-12-14T23:04:52.200-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='tax expenditures; Iowa'/><title type='text'>Iowa to review tax credits</title><summary type='text'>On November 19. 2009, Iowa Governor Culver called for state tax agencies overseeing tax credit programs to review them - all 30 of them (click here for press release). The directors of these agencies "will then serve on a panel to review the programs and submit a report to the Governor addressing oversight, accountability, transparency, public reporting, cost-benefit, and which programs should be</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://21stcenturytaxation.blogspot.com/feeds/8459964469470323949/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2135788133426971614&amp;postID=8459964469470323949' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2135788133426971614/posts/default/8459964469470323949'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2135788133426971614/posts/default/8459964469470323949'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://21stcenturytaxation.blogspot.com/2009/12/iowa-to-review-tax-credits.html' title='Iowa to review tax credits'/><author><name>Professor Nellen</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03288632402197167948</uri><email>anellen@sjsu.edu</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='02616600393690955346'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2135788133426971614.post-8285085813469911691</id><published>2009-12-12T12:45:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2009-12-12T12:48:40.600-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='corporate tax reform'/><title type='text'>Lowering Corporate Tax Rates</title><summary type='text'>Despite a few years of various elected officials and business groups noting that the US corporate income tax rate is surpassed only by the rate in Japan, the rate remains unchanged.I've got a short article from the AICPA Corporate Taxation Insider on the background and prospects for lowering the rate. It includes a brief summary of a few proposals offered to lower the rate.What do you think </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://21stcenturytaxation.blogspot.com/feeds/8285085813469911691/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2135788133426971614&amp;postID=8285085813469911691' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2135788133426971614/posts/default/8285085813469911691'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2135788133426971614/posts/default/8285085813469911691'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://21stcenturytaxation.blogspot.com/2009/12/lowering-corporate-tax-rates.html' title='Lowering Corporate Tax Rates'/><author><name>Professor Nellen</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03288632402197167948</uri><email>anellen@sjsu.edu</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='02616600393690955346'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2135788133426971614.post-7854515420957946800</id><published>2009-12-10T18:57:00.001-08:00</published><updated>2009-12-10T19:03:22.861-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='tax gap; GAO; TIGTA'/><title type='text'>Interesting Tax Reports of 2009</title><summary type='text'>Every year, the federal governments issues lots of interesting reports. They are from the GAO, CBO, Joint Committee on Taxation, Treasury Inspector General For Tax Administration (TIGTA), National Taxpayer Advocate, and Congressional Research Service. It is far to much to read - but hopefully, Congress is reading them because many point out problems in the law and often have suggestions on how to</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://21stcenturytaxation.blogspot.com/feeds/7854515420957946800/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2135788133426971614&amp;postID=7854515420957946800' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2135788133426971614/posts/default/7854515420957946800'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2135788133426971614/posts/default/7854515420957946800'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://21stcenturytaxation.blogspot.com/2009/12/interesting-tax-reports-of-2009.html' title='Interesting Tax Reports of 2009'/><author><name>Professor Nellen</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03288632402197167948</uri><email>anellen@sjsu.edu</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='02616600393690955346'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2135788133426971614.post-973057389091566248</id><published>2009-12-08T08:46:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2009-12-14T23:11:08.710-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='extenders'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='AMT'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='accountability'/><title type='text'>Temporary or Permanent - Which Is Better?</title><summary type='text'>The Joint Committee on Taxation notes that 73 provisions in the federal tax law expire at 12/31/09 (JCX-20-09). These include: Personal tax credits allowable against AMT Increased personal exemption amount for AMT Additional standard deduction for state and local real property taxes Above-the-line deduction for qualified tuition and related expenses (§222) Exclusion of unemployment compensation </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://21stcenturytaxation.blogspot.com/feeds/973057389091566248/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2135788133426971614&amp;postID=973057389091566248' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2135788133426971614/posts/default/973057389091566248'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2135788133426971614/posts/default/973057389091566248'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://21stcenturytaxation.blogspot.com/2009/12/temporary-or-permanent-which-is-better.html' title='Temporary or Permanent - Which Is Better?'/><author><name>Professor Nellen</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03288632402197167948</uri><email>anellen@sjsu.edu</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='02616600393690955346'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2135788133426971614.post-8155951417687045195</id><published>2009-12-05T23:10:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2009-12-07T15:46:12.649-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='SSUTA; sales tax'/><title type='text'>Sales and Use Tax Collection and the SSUTA</title><summary type='text'>Perhaps we'll see Congress reintroduce the streamlined sales tax bill that would allow states that have simplified their sales tax to require remote (out-of-state) vendors to collect sales tax from customers in the state. The bill in the 110th Congress was H.R. 3396. The Multistate Tax Commission (MTC) has a draft of legislation on its website - here. This would be a significant benefit to states</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://21stcenturytaxation.blogspot.com/feeds/8155951417687045195/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2135788133426971614&amp;postID=8155951417687045195' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2135788133426971614/posts/default/8155951417687045195'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2135788133426971614/posts/default/8155951417687045195'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://21stcenturytaxation.blogspot.com/2009/12/sales-and-use-tax-collection-and-ssuta.html' title='Sales and Use Tax Collection and the SSUTA'/><author><name>Professor Nellen</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03288632402197167948</uri><email>anellen@sjsu.edu</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='02616600393690955346'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2135788133426971614.post-8911877967483496219</id><published>2009-12-01T10:20:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2009-12-01T11:37:55.063-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='tax reform'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='President Obama'/><title type='text'>Obama Tax Task Force to Miss December 4 Deadline</title><summary type='text'>President Obama's Tax Task Force was supposed to issue its report on Friday 12/4/09.  Paul Volker, Chair of the task force has announced that the report will be delayed.  He notes that they received over 500 comments and had to cut off submissions due to the 12/4 deadline.  The comment page has been re-opened (see above link).This is not surprising.  They did not have much time and had a lot to </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://21stcenturytaxation.blogspot.com/feeds/8911877967483496219/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2135788133426971614&amp;postID=8911877967483496219' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2135788133426971614/posts/default/8911877967483496219'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2135788133426971614/posts/default/8911877967483496219'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://21stcenturytaxation.blogspot.com/2009/12/obama-tax-task-force-to-miss-december-4.html' title='Obama Tax Task Force to Miss December 4 Deadline'/><author><name>Professor Nellen</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03288632402197167948</uri><email>anellen@sjsu.edu</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='02616600393690955346'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2135788133426971614.post-8713609721361446227</id><published>2009-11-27T03:39:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2009-11-27T03:59:02.061-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='tax expenditures; missouri'/><title type='text'>Missouri to Examine Tax Credits</title><summary type='text'>A recent post noted a proposal in Oregon to add sunset dates to many tax breaks in order to bring some scrutiny to them which otherwise does not exist as it would if they were instead budget line items.  Another post noted a proposal in Florida to review all of the sales tax exemptions and the exclusion for services.And a new one - there is a proposal in Missouri to examine all tax credits. In a </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://21stcenturytaxation.blogspot.com/feeds/8713609721361446227/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2135788133426971614&amp;postID=8713609721361446227' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2135788133426971614/posts/default/8713609721361446227'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2135788133426971614/posts/default/8713609721361446227'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://21stcenturytaxation.blogspot.com/2009/11/missouri-to-examine-tax-credits.html' title='Missouri to Examine Tax Credits'/><author><name>Professor Nellen</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03288632402197167948</uri><email>anellen@sjsu.edu</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='02616600393690955346'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2135788133426971614.post-4541339322917026497</id><published>2009-11-25T14:13:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2009-11-25T14:56:17.291-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='health care reform'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='IRS'/><title type='text'>21st Century Expectation for the IRS - Health Care Enforcer?</title><summary type='text'>Some aspects of the complicated health care legislative proposals have been in the news in the past few months, but it seems that little attention has been paid to some of the tax provisions. Certainly, we should all be used to tax provisions designed to modify behavior. But what about the health care proposals that impose new duties on the IRS? Is this what we expect tax agencies to be doing now</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://21stcenturytaxation.blogspot.com/feeds/4541339322917026497/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2135788133426971614&amp;postID=4541339322917026497' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2135788133426971614/posts/default/4541339322917026497'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2135788133426971614/posts/default/4541339322917026497'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://21stcenturytaxation.blogspot.com/2009/11/21st-century-expectation-for-irs-health.html' title='21st Century Expectation for the IRS - Health Care Enforcer?'/><author><name>Professor Nellen</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03288632402197167948</uri><email>anellen@sjsu.edu</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='02616600393690955346'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2135788133426971614.post-2329937356332572831</id><published>2009-11-24T06:13:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2009-11-24T06:33:14.061-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='climate change; carbon tax; greenhouse gas emissions'/><title type='text'>Costs of Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions</title><summary type='text'>The CBO released an issue brief on 11/23 - The Costs of Reducing Greenhouse-Gas Emissions (also see the CBO Director's blog entry on this which has links to several other CBO reports on this topic). The report provides some guidance on the costs and the challenges of estimating them.The report states that market-based approaches, such as cap-and-trade allowances and taxes, are likely to be less </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://21stcenturytaxation.blogspot.com/feeds/2329937356332572831/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2135788133426971614&amp;postID=2329937356332572831' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2135788133426971614/posts/default/2329937356332572831'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2135788133426971614/posts/default/2329937356332572831'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://21stcenturytaxation.blogspot.com/2009/11/costs-of-reducing-greenhouse-gas.html' title='Costs of Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions'/><author><name>Professor Nellen</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03288632402197167948</uri><email>anellen@sjsu.edu</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='02616600393690955346'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2135788133426971614.post-103404916021013201</id><published>2009-11-21T10:17:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2009-11-21T10:50:45.075-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Florida; tax reform; tax expenditures; services'/><title type='text'>Florida Idea for Modernizing its Sales Tax</title><summary type='text'>All tax systems have exemptions, exclusions or special rules of some type. Often they are enacted because they seem important at the time. However, if enacted without an expiration date, they can easily remain forever even if no longer needed. For example, many systems have some type of tax break for seniors. Decades ago, many seniors were poor. However, that is not the case today so any system </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://21stcenturytaxation.blogspot.com/feeds/103404916021013201/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2135788133426971614&amp;postID=103404916021013201' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2135788133426971614/posts/default/103404916021013201'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2135788133426971614/posts/default/103404916021013201'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://21stcenturytaxation.blogspot.com/2009/11/florida-idea-for-modernizing-its-sales.html' title='Florida Idea for Modernizing its Sales Tax'/><author><name>Professor Nellen</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03288632402197167948</uri><email>anellen@sjsu.edu</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='02616600393690955346'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2135788133426971614.post-2152030930100233904</id><published>2009-11-19T07:21:00.001-08:00</published><updated>2009-11-19T07:49:38.495-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='California; tax reform; sales tax'/><title type='text'>California's continuing budget shortfalls and appropriate tax changes</title><summary type='text'>On November 18, 2009, the California Legislative Analyst's Office released a report - California's Fiscal Outlook: The 2010-11 Budget. The LAO projects an upcoming budget shortfall of about $21 billion.In addition to more spending cuts, it makes sense to also consider this the time to address unnecessary spending that is buried in the tax law. For example, why should California continue to allow </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://21stcenturytaxation.blogspot.com/feeds/2152030930100233904/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2135788133426971614&amp;postID=2152030930100233904' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2135788133426971614/posts/default/2152030930100233904'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2135788133426971614/posts/default/2152030930100233904'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://21stcenturytaxation.blogspot.com/2009/11/californias-continuing-budget.html' title='California&apos;s continuing budget shortfalls and appropriate tax changes'/><author><name>Professor Nellen</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03288632402197167948</uri><email>anellen@sjsu.edu</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='02616600393690955346'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2135788133426971614.post-3371564612744376514</id><published>2009-11-16T15:45:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2009-11-16T16:10:11.956-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='software'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='nexus'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='PL 86-272'/><title type='text'>Software and Income Tax Nexus</title><summary type='text'>Companies that transfer software to customers that are not in the same state and the software company face issues as to whether income tax is owed in the state where customers are located. Nexus guidance of PL 86-272 only applies if the transaction involved the "sale" of "tangible personal property." Software transactions generally challenge both of these terms. That is,Software is typically "</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://21stcenturytaxation.blogspot.com/feeds/3371564612744376514/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2135788133426971614&amp;postID=3371564612744376514' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2135788133426971614/posts/default/3371564612744376514'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2135788133426971614/posts/default/3371564612744376514'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://21stcenturytaxation.blogspot.com/2009/11/software-and-income-tax-nexus.html' title='Software and Income Tax Nexus'/><author><name>Professor Nellen</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03288632402197167948</uri><email>anellen@sjsu.edu</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='02616600393690955346'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2135788133426971614.post-5780927149360410230</id><published>2009-11-14T21:39:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2009-11-24T06:13:03.408-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='tax reform; penalties'/><title type='text'>Need for Penalty Reform at Federal Level</title><summary type='text'>There are about 130 civil penalties in the Internal Revenue Code. That seems like far too many to me. Too many penalties can cause them to not be as effective - people can't possibly know of them all - including Revenue Agents. This is an area that has been studied extensively over the past 12 years, but no actions have been taken.I've got a short article that notes the numerous studies on </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://21stcenturytaxation.blogspot.com/feeds/5780927149360410230/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2135788133426971614&amp;postID=5780927149360410230' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2135788133426971614/posts/default/5780927149360410230'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2135788133426971614/posts/default/5780927149360410230'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://21stcenturytaxation.blogspot.com/2009/11/need-for-penalty-reform-at-federal.html' title='Need for Penalty Reform at Federal Level'/><author><name>Professor Nellen</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03288632402197167948</uri><email>anellen@sjsu.edu</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='02616600393690955346'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2135788133426971614.post-3833801076213504055</id><published>2009-11-11T13:24:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2009-11-15T11:00:40.367-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='federal tax reform; Obama; simplification'/><title type='text'>Tax Reform Reruns - What Will Change This Time?</title><summary type='text'>On December 4, 2009, President Obama's tax reform group is to issue its report. It is not intended to include recommendations for major reform, but to address simplification, the tax gap and corporate "loopholes." Yet, it could easily be a starting point for larger scale reforms. Last year the Senate Finance Committee held hearings in anticipation of reform and Congressman Rangel introduced H.R. </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://21stcenturytaxation.blogspot.com/feeds/3833801076213504055/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2135788133426971614&amp;postID=3833801076213504055' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2135788133426971614/posts/default/3833801076213504055'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2135788133426971614/posts/default/3833801076213504055'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://21stcenturytaxation.blogspot.com/2009/11/tax-reform-reruns-what-will-change-this.html' title='Tax Reform Reruns - What Will Change This Time?'/><author><name>Professor Nellen</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03288632402197167948</uri><email>anellen@sjsu.edu</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='02616600393690955346'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2135788133426971614.post-697325717843011883</id><published>2009-11-07T13:03:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2009-11-07T13:04:47.044-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='health care reform'/><title type='text'>Health care reform and our tax law</title><summary type='text'>Health Care Reform Needs to Reach the Buried TreasureMuch of the current health care debate is about how to provide coverage to everyone. Current reform proposals would cost about $100 billion annually and will drive up deficits for years. Meanwhile, buried in our tax system are billions of dollars of health care benefits that go to a select group. Why is there no reform plan with a smaller price</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://21stcenturytaxation.blogspot.com/feeds/697325717843011883/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2135788133426971614&amp;postID=697325717843011883' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2135788133426971614/posts/default/697325717843011883'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2135788133426971614/posts/default/697325717843011883'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://21stcenturytaxation.blogspot.com/2009/11/health-care-reform-and-our-tax-law.html' title='Health care reform and our tax law'/><author><name>Professor Nellen</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03288632402197167948</uri><email>anellen@sjsu.edu</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='02616600393690955346'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2135788133426971614.post-4853405215835147471</id><published>2009-11-04T20:45:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2009-11-04T21:02:21.321-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='tax reform; trends'/><title type='text'>Changing nature of work and technology</title><summary type='text'>I've written about this a few times before* and hope to someday (soon) complete a more thorough analysis of economic, social, technological and environmental trends and how they illustrate where our tax laws are out of date and how we might change them to make the most of current technologies and ways of doing business.I saw a short video today released by the AICPA to recruit young people to </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://21stcenturytaxation.blogspot.com/feeds/4853405215835147471/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2135788133426971614&amp;postID=4853405215835147471' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2135788133426971614/posts/default/4853405215835147471'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2135788133426971614/posts/default/4853405215835147471'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://21stcenturytaxation.blogspot.com/2009/11/changing-nature-of-work-and-technology.html' title='Changing nature of work and technology'/><author><name>Professor Nellen</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03288632402197167948</uri><email>anellen@sjsu.edu</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='02616600393690955346'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2135788133426971614.post-5873821564634825190</id><published>2009-10-29T19:15:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-10-29T19:21:20.610-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='CA tax reform; COTCE; BNRT; VAT'/><title type='text'>More on the BNRT and its place in tax reform discussions</title><summary type='text'>I haven't heard much discussion lately about the business net receipts tax (BNRT) proposal offered by the California Commission on the 21st Century Economy.  I don't think that means it is over - perhaps there are some legislators and their staff taking a closer look.  I think it is possible that other states might be taking a closer look.  While I am doubtful that any state will enact such a tax</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://21stcenturytaxation.blogspot.com/feeds/5873821564634825190/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2135788133426971614&amp;postID=5873821564634825190' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2135788133426971614/posts/default/5873821564634825190'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2135788133426971614/posts/default/5873821564634825190'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://21stcenturytaxation.blogspot.com/2009/10/more-on-bnrt-and-its-place-in-tax.html' title='More on the BNRT and its place in tax reform discussions'/><author><name>Professor Nellen</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03288632402197167948</uri><email>anellen@sjsu.edu</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='02616600393690955346'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2135788133426971614.post-3594280098463952278</id><published>2009-10-26T23:28:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-10-26T23:40:32.296-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='sales tax services; michigan'/><title type='text'>Michigan Again Considering Sales Tax on Services</title><summary type='text'>In 2007, Michigan enacted law to apply its sales tax to selected services. However, the law was repealed on the day it went into effect. Legislators created an business tax to replace the expected revenues.  For more information on that, see my 12/8/07 post.In October 2009, legislation was introduced to repeal the MBT surcharge and apply the sales tax to services. [HB 5527, HB 5528 and HB 5529]</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://21stcenturytaxation.blogspot.com/feeds/3594280098463952278/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2135788133426971614&amp;postID=3594280098463952278' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2135788133426971614/posts/default/3594280098463952278'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2135788133426971614/posts/default/3594280098463952278'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://21stcenturytaxation.blogspot.com/2009/10/michigan-again-considering-sales-tax-on.html' title='Michigan Again Considering Sales Tax on Services'/><author><name>Professor Nellen</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03288632402197167948</uri><email>anellen@sjsu.edu</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='02616600393690955346'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry></feed>