tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19068532.post-1144211376694890542006-04-05T00:01:00.000-04:002006-04-11T15:06:55.606-04:00Voters Sought - Boston Globe Tuesday March 28, 2006<br /><br /> On page A3 there was a picture placed in the Globe showing two Black women who were evacuees of Katrina. the words under the pictured read - "'While clothes were given to Katrina evacuees last month in Houston, Linda Jeffers, asked a displaced New Orleans resident, Illmada Shedrick, to register to vote as an absentee. A judge yesterday kept the date for the stricken city's mayoral election April 22.'<br /><br /> Upon seeing this picture I was looking forward to reading more about it. Well, there wasn't any more since it stated, (after looking at the picture four times), to turn to page A4 for more details. The article on page four made no ties to what the picture was portraying. This was an editorial decision to play down the story behind this picture. It was not as important as the Lame Duck article about President Bush on the same page. Aren't the voting rights of the New Orleans victims much more important? That picture should have been followed up with an article on the same page. I definitely think so. Don't you?<div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/19068532-114421137669489054?l=antiracismwatch.blogspot.com'/></div>anessahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16169505037110389461noreply@blogger.com1