tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17811039505954925592009-07-19T08:52:08.475-07:00Dipole (Anti)Gravity, Magnetic Gravity, true GravitomagnetismTheory of Gravitation, Cosmology and a part of general relativityEue Jin Jeongnoreply@blogger.comBlogger108125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1781103950595492559.post-90548178461970061802009-07-19T08:03:00.000-07:002009-07-19T08:43:10.501-07:00Tachyonic Electrical Capacitance<p> In the conventional circuit theory of electronics, if the two capacitors have the same capacitance, regardless of the geometrical differences or the type of the dielectric material used in between the conductors, they are the same in real application or in simulation. However, once the repulsive electrostatic potential energy is incorporated, the situation changes drastically. No two capacitors are exactly the same if they have any kind of slightly different size or geometry even if they have the same capacitance in the conventional sense as can be seen from the following example. <br /><br /><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_OL2Uwyg2VWU/SmM4amyYesI/AAAAAAAAAUo/2nCfA5dltUE/s1600-h/capacitor.jpg"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 381px; height: 285px;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_OL2Uwyg2VWU/SmM4amyYesI/AAAAAAAAAUo/2nCfA5dltUE/s400/capacitor.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5360190011240643266" /></a> <br />In the conventional theory, the above example of the two capacitors are, in all of the practically known purposes, the same. However, once the repulsive electrostatic potential energy is incorporated, these two capacitors are not the same anymore. <br /><br />Clearly, by intuition, the smaller sized capacitor would have more repulsive potential energy stored because the same amount of charges are clumped inside the smaller volume of the conducting material.<br /><br />So, in the future electronics, what I have in mind is that I would call it "tachyonics", these two capacitors would have to be treated differently. When a circuit prescribes a capacitance as a component, "tachyonics" will demand all of the detailed geometrical specifications to determine the exact electrical property of the capacitor. <br /><br /></p><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1781103950595492559-9054817846197006180?l=dipoleantigravity.blogspot.com'/></div>Eue Jin Jeongnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1781103950595492559.post-62032910518667972832009-07-19T01:53:00.001-07:002009-07-19T08:49:29.230-07:00The Principle of Energy Conversion<p> I tend to digress whenever I have a chance to talk about the philosophical situation of the world affairs. I guess I have to focus in depth on the physical nature of the energy conversion process. In fact, this subject of energy conversion is as important as finding the excess energy itself. Because without knowing how to convert this energy into a useful form, the excess electrostatic potential energy in the capacitor would be useless. <a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_OL2Uwyg2VWU/SmMezwPsJGI/AAAAAAAAAUg/ljRWvu3nQlM/s1600-h/potential+energy+4.jpg"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 400px; height: 261px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_OL2Uwyg2VWU/SmMezwPsJGI/AAAAAAAAAUg/ljRWvu3nQlM/s400/potential+energy+4.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5360161855973893218" /></a><br />The mechanics of the electrons can be imagined as the motion of a ball bearing placed at the high point of both of the potential curves in the picture rolling down by the force of gravity. In the case of the attractive electrostatic potential, which is represented by the right hand side picture, the electrons gain kinetic energy as the ball bearing rolls down toward the center where the positive charges are located. This is a typical case when a battery or a capacitor is discharged through a resistor. <br /><br />On the other hand, in the repulsive electrostatic potential curve that is represented by the left hand side of the picture, the electrons gain kinetic energy as the ball bearing rolls down away from the center where the clumps of the electrons are located. The electrons gain kinetic energy simply by moving away from each other. Of course, this situation can not occur inside the conductor where the space is confined by the predetermined volume of the conductor itself, which is the reason the excess repulsive potential energy can not materialize in reality in most of the conventional electronics because the real usable energy is the kinetic energy of the electrons. <br /><br />So, in effect, the conversion of the repulsive electrostatic potential energy occurs in two steps. First the electrons have to be clumped inside the conductor by the process of charging the capacitor with a high voltage (to increase the charge density) and next, once a certain point of density is reached, the charges are allowed to escape from the capacitor in an explosive manner, either by the external trigger mechanism or by a spontaneous charge break down. The electrons will have a higher kinetic energy when they are collected at the conductor of the opposite polarity of the discharge tube or simply a spark gap. <br /><br />Here, the compelling question would be what will be the best and the most efficient geometrical configuration of the conductors inside the discharge tube for this purpose.<br /><br />Possible candidates are, concentric double sphere, concentric double cylinder, parallel plates, point to a point, point to a plate, point to a concentric sphere or half(partial) sphere and wire to a concentric cylinder or half(partial)cylinder. <br /><br />My best choice is either the concentric double cylinder or wire to a concentric cylinder. But all of the above list are possible geometrical configurations for the conductors inside the tube. And as many of you by now may have already guessed, the electrons(negative polarity) have to be placed in the smaller side of the conductors of the discharge tubes, regardless of whether it is a point, a wire or the smaller one of the two conductors in such a way that the natural geometry allows the electrons to be dispersed. But even in a point to a point geometry, the electrical current gain has been observed which, of course, corresponds to the simple spark gap with many different configurations(mostly in series) as Tesla used in his experiment.<br /><br /><br /></p><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1781103950595492559-6203291051866797283?l=dipoleantigravity.blogspot.com'/></div>Eue Jin Jeongnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1781103950595492559.post-3725157097258885272009-07-18T11:48:00.001-07:002009-07-19T01:52:45.579-07:00World of Corporate's Interest<p>It is a well known fact that the pharmaceutical as well as the major medical industry is not really interested in curing people's disease. Instead they are interested in managing and controlling people's diseases. This is the same with the energy industry. They are not really interested in solving the energy problem. If they were, the energy problem should have been solved long time ago. The story of J.P. Morgan's pulling the plug off of Tesla's global energy distribution project is a typical example. In banker's point of view, the idea of letting people to have the energy that can not be metered was insane. <br /><br />They want to control the energy problem jut enough to cause the shortage in such a way that the people do not come out to the street for riot. This is because there is no reason to kill the hen when it keeps laying eggs. Here the analogy is that the egg is the money and the hen is the innocent people who are constantly being fed to lay eggs. Furthermore, why the hen house owner would be interested in raising a hen that doesn't have to lay eggs. <br /><br />But, what if the owner, one day, realize that he/she can survive him/her self only if he let the hen to live without having to lay eggs. This is the case if and when the Sun dies for example. Wouldn't they want their children to survive such an extreme calamity? We need this technology, to go to the other star system. What can motivate the owner to be interested in this technology?<br /><br />Don't they need a cell phone or a laptop computer battery that doesn't need to be constantly recharged? Someone has to be able to make money by using this technology. But the nature of the technology is that it is against the principle of making profit off of the people. I'm not against the capitalistic society only if it can be run with the full free competition. But at certain point, the capital itself will attempt to exert the power of its own in such a way that it can perpetuate its monopoly. Here is the game of the catch 22.<br /><br />It seems that when the scientific truth is fighting against the capital, the capital seems to win, unfortunately, all the time. But I believe in the eternal victory of the truth whatever forms of the truth it may be.<br /><br /></p><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1781103950595492559-372515709725888527?l=dipoleantigravity.blogspot.com'/></div>Eue Jin Jeongnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1781103950595492559.post-27234099045709252292009-07-18T07:40:00.000-07:002009-07-19T08:52:08.485-07:00Magnetic Counter Part<p>The peculiarity of the phenomenon of the electricity and magnetism is in its duality between the electricity and the magnetism. Every noble property of the electricity can be traced back to the similar property in magnetism, so it is not hard to understand that a certain magnetic arrangement will show the same property of the excess energy in the form of the repulsive magnetic potential energy in the system. In fact, the devices known as Sweet's, Lester Hendershot and Hans Coler's device do not seem to use the spark gap nor the cold cathode style discharge tubes. <br /><br />However, if you examine those devices carefully, the magnetic field configuration within the device is designed in such a way that the magnetic fields are in the repulsive mode in every moment of the electrical oscillation. <br /><br />To quantitatively calculate the excess potential energy in a specific magnetic system configuration will not be as simple as in the case of the electrostatic device because the individual magnetic charge can not be precisely defined. But the duality of the two phenomena undoubtedly demonstrates that this effect is universal. Physicists have already studied this problem and speculated that there must be magnetic monopoles in the universe because the two phenomena show such a precise duality. While the pursuit for the detection of the magnetic monopoles continues, I think the tachyonic neutrinos are the magnetic monopoles themselves. This idea is not even new. It was speculated by Prof. Recami of Italy long time ago.<br /><br />So, in effect, the known devices can be categorized into two groups. One is electrostatic and the other is magnetic. It is interesting to observe, though, that Hubbard's device seems to utilize both of the properties, but he used the radioactive material (presumably radium) coated spark gap for his oscillation generator according to the record. The fact that he was deeply involved with the radium company in an attempt to commercialize his device indicates that he was convinced the radium coating in his spark gap was the key secret of his device. The eventual break up of their collaboration was partly due to the revelation that the radium was not the real cause of the energy gain, I presume, as the radium company demanded more and more of the ownership of the technology. And also the Testatika machine is certainly an electrostatic type where the spark gap is located behind the rotating wheel like a brush that doesn't make the actual contact with the conductors in the wheel. In general, if the device has a spark gap or a discharge tube, it is based on the repulsive electrostatic energy amplification scheme even if the electricity may be fed into a motor to utilize the mechanical power. For example, Edwin Gray device is one of this cases.</p><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1781103950595492559-2723409904570925229?l=dipoleantigravity.blogspot.com'/></div>Eue Jin Jeongnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1781103950595492559.post-58126212193517877772009-07-14T10:47:00.000-07:002009-07-18T17:23:25.811-07:00Review of Moray's Device<p>Before going into the detailed method of the conversion of the repulsive electrostatic potential energy stored in the capacitor, it would be informative to examine the configuration of the Moray device as much as it was publicized, because it still can provide a lot of information regarding the general structure of the device and also it can be a starting point of departure toward the successful embodiment.<br /></p><p>According to the record, he used a long antenna and a firm solid ground as a starting point of his device. The radio signal that can be received from this antenna can not exceed a few watts maximum in case the strong transmission tower is located nearby. So, this can not the source of the output he obtained which ranged over kilowatts. The critical point of the information was the way he started the machine. He spent ten to twenty minutes before he started his device. This only means that his capacitor bank was charged very slowly, possibly not from the radio signal but from the atmospheric static charge, because to charge the capacitor using the radio signal he would have to use some form of a rectifier to convert the high frequency ac radio signal into a dc form. He allegedly used a device so called "Swedish stone" which had to be frequently replaced because it burned out as the device generates power. This could be a device that has rectifying capability. But for the purpose of rectifying the weak radio signal, there is no way it will burn out the rectifier because the power of the radio signal received from the antenna is extremely small typically in the range of a few tens of miliwatts. So, one can speculate that the Swedish stone was not used for the purpose of charging the capacitor bank. If the antenna and the ground were used only for the purpose of charging the capacitors, this can easily be replaced by a high voltage DC power supply.</p><br /><p>The capacitors in Moray device serve two purposes. First, it is a storage device for the atmospheric electrostatic charges. Second, it serves as a capacitor component for the LC resonance circuit. In physics text book term, the description of the physical device is a typical forced harmonic oscillator. The fundamental physical property of the forced harmonic oscillator is that if the frequency of the external power impulse becomes the same as the inherent internal resonance frequency of the oscillator, the amplitude of the oscillator becomes infinite assuming that there is no resistive loss or energy leakage in the oscillator itself. In actual applications, it is necessary to incorporate a mechanism to regulate the output voltage in such a way that regardless of the energy usage in the output stage, the out put voltage can remain constant. </p><br /><p>As soon as enough charges are accumulated in the capacitor, the voltage across the capacitor becomes high enough to discharge through the spark gap or the cold cathode tube. This spiked current when it follows a well defined periodic channel, it can be fed into the LC resonance circuit to steadily increase the amplitude of the sinusoidal current. In a way, the LC resonance circuit is a sine wave transformer as well as the pulsed electrical energy storage unit. This conceptual process is already well known in the conventional electronics industry. The noble key physical concept is that the periodic self discharge of the capacitor is fed into the LC resonance circuit as if it is an external power source. Thereby, the maximum of 10^10 times fold of energy amplification may be possible. </p><p></p><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_OL2Uwyg2VWU/SmHUHDRxUAI/AAAAAAAAAT4/R1Jiv9dPvvQ/s1600-h/energy+gain2.jpg"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 400px; height: 285px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_OL2Uwyg2VWU/SmHUHDRxUAI/AAAAAAAAAT4/R1Jiv9dPvvQ/s400/energy+gain2.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5359798249151614978" /></a><p> <a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_OL2Uwyg2VWU/SmHXVY1cgFI/AAAAAAAAAUA/SI9uxOn1BUM/s1600-h/definition.jpg"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 201px; height: 189px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_OL2Uwyg2VWU/SmHXVY1cgFI/AAAAAAAAAUA/SI9uxOn1BUM/s400/definition.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5359801793991442514" /></a> where Co is the conventionally known capacitance of the concentric spherical air gap capacitor. <br /><br />It is noted that the excess energy does not depend on the dielectric constant of the material between the inner and outer conductors. It is purely the property of the geometrical configuration of the conductors used in the capacitor. It also shows that the excess energy depends on the inverse of the gap distance between the inner and outer shells. This means, theoretically, that the excess electrostatic energy can be made to be infinite if one can make the gap distance to zero, apart from the fact that the cycle of the extracting process can be repeated as many times as the delay time of charging and discharging allows. But the close to the zero gap distance will make the charges to recombine due to the leakage of the practical capacitors, which also depends on the work function potential of the conductors used.<br /><br />In the future, the material that can be made as thin as possible without making the capacitor to break down even with the highest applied voltage, without necessarily increasing the value of the dielectric constant, will become very important.</p><br /><p></p><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1781103950595492559-5812621219351787777?l=dipoleantigravity.blogspot.com'/></div>Eue Jin Jeongnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1781103950595492559.post-77189883243695236282009-07-14T00:10:00.000-07:002009-07-18T10:14:41.369-07:00Digression on the Source of the Energy<p>I have no problem in believing that this excess energy is coming from somewhere in the infinite universe because the correctly interpreted theory of electricity and magnetism dictates its presence. But we are accustomed to worry so much about exhausting some resources that we regard so valuable. So, where is this energy coming from? Remember that the <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0"><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0"><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0">electromagnetic</span></span></span> interaction is coupled with the weak <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1"><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1"><span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1">interactions</span></span></span>. And the main particles in the weak <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2"><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2"><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2">interactions</span></span></span> are neutrinos. And the major experiments in the world have proven that the mass squared value of the neutrinos are negative. The only way this can happen in special relativity manifested by the Lorentz invariance is that the neutrinos must be tachyons which means that the neutrinos must be the particles traveling faster than speed of light. This is all dictated by Lorentz invariance and special relativity. This observation has such a great importance in <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3"><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3"><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3">understanding</span></span></span> this "anomaly" of electricity and magnetism.<br /><br />The fact that the range of the <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_4"><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_4"><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_4">electromagnetic</span></span></span> interaction is infinite means that this <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_5"><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_5"><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_5">tachyonic</span></span></span> neutrinos are mediating the <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_6"><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_6"><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_6">electromagnetic</span></span></span> <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_7"><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_7"><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_7">interactions</span></span></span>. The ripple effect of this pervading <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_8"><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_8"><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_8">tachyonic</span></span></span> neutrinos manifests into the lights(<span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_9"><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_9"><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_9">electromagnetic</span></span></span> wave in general). We can not see or detect the low energy <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_10"><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_10"><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_10">tachyonic</span></span></span> neutrinos themselves but we can see their ripple effect in the form of the light(<span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_11"><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_11"><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_11">electromagnetic</span></span></span> wave). This is exactly the same as the physical fact that we can not see the individual air molecules but we can hear the sound, the ripple effect of the air molecules vibrating and propagating through the space. Even the fact that we can not hear the too low <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_12">frequency</span> or too high frequency sound is the same as with the <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_13"><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_12">electromagnetic</span></span> wave by the fact that we cannot see those(too low or too high frequency) <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_13">electromagnetic</span> waves. </p><p>If we can freeze this kinetic energy of the <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_12"><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_14"><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_14">tachyonic</span></span></span> neutrinos by <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_13"><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_15"><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_15">manipulating</span></span></span> the electron density in the local environment, we will be able to extract energy from the space and this is exactly what is happening when the compressed <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_14"><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_16"><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_16">electrostatic</span></span></span> charges are suddenly expanded into the space. The kinetic energy of the neutrinos is frozen in the form of the kinetic energy of the electrons by which it becomes available for the local use.<br /><br />The <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_15"><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_17"><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_17">electromagnetic</span></span></span> interaction is inherently non local. It can not be contained nor blocked . Thus, any measurement of the local <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_16"><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_18"><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_18">electromagnetic</span></span></span> energy in the hope that it will remain constant within the container will fail. </p><p>Will the excess use of this energy make the earth hotter? No.</p><p>The reflection of the energy in the form of the light toward the space will cool down the earth, if it really becomes a serious problem. The nice and comforting fact to remind, though, is that even if the Sun dies, the people who have this technology will survive.<br /></p><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1781103950595492559-7718988324369523628?l=dipoleantigravity.blogspot.com'/></div>Eue Jin Jeongnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1781103950595492559.post-62441138392745110002009-07-13T06:21:00.001-07:002009-07-18T17:26:30.779-07:00Simplest Embodiment<p>The simplest way to use this principle has already been used by some of the inventors in the US and other parts of the world without them realizing actually they are using this principle. It is the hydrogen generator which is used in a car which is running on water by using the device in a form of a modified carburetor. The idea is to use the excess energy in the process of discharging the capacitor to dissociate hydrogen atom from the water molecule. If a proper method is used, the excess energy will eventually manifest in the amount of the hydrogen gas created in the process using a peculiar form of the water electrolysis.<br /><br />The difference is that you do not add salt in the water like in a typical water electrolysis instead use highly purified water in such a way that the electrical resistance between the electrode becomes almost infinite. And also use a very narrowly spaced concentric cylindrical conductor chamber which is supplied with pulsed high voltage dc (or ac over all ) that comes out of the capacitor (preferably from a high efficiency excess energy configuration) continuously switched to give the pulsed electrical energy to the water. Some of the energy will eventually be wasted in the form of the heat but depending on the parameters used, it is possible that the maximum efficiency can be obtained in terms of generating a pure form of the hydrogen oxygen gas mixture.<br /><br />So, after all, the idea of running a car on water was not too far fetched. How sad <a href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http://www.waterfuelcell.org/&amp;ei=jzxbStD-KIe-MOy9wUI&amp;sa=X&amp;oi=spellmeleon_result&amp;resnum=1&amp;ct=result&amp;usg=AFQjCNGabVldTGJ3OnbRWv-Fz0SLooSlqg">Stanley Meyer</a> died in the process of pursuing this technology a while ago in a very suspicious circumstance who was the initial highly publicized inventor of this technology.<br /><br />Although this may not be the best way to utilize the new principle of the electromagnetic anomaly, certainly it is one.<br /><br />However, if the excess energy can be converted directly into a pure form of electricity, why would anyone want to go through all of this wasteful conversion process and use the old technology of the combustion chamber engine. I believe the combustion engine will become obsolete sooner or later. But in the mean time, probably and hopefuly a very short one, people can still use the old style combustion engine using the hydrogen gas generated by this method, if the gasoline price goes so high that it becomes unaffordable.<br /><br /><br /></p><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1781103950595492559-6244113839274511000?l=dipoleantigravity.blogspot.com'/></div>Eue Jin Jeongnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1781103950595492559.post-37644057336569664982009-07-12T09:18:00.000-07:002009-07-18T16:36:08.706-07:00Embodiment<p>The rabbit is out of the cage. But for a lot of people, the information presented here would still not be enough for them to start building the device. But if you invest a couple of hundreds of millions of dollars on this, the world will not have to worry about energy anymore. But I'm not even sure President <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_0" class="blsp-spelling-error"><span id="SPELLING_ERROR_0" class="blsp-spelling-error">Barak</span></span> Obama would be interested in this technology. Looking back, it was not the lack of the innovation nor the knowledge that prevented us from getting there. It was the greed that prevented us from having this technology at the moment.<br /><br />For an example, Moray carried the ultimate secret of his device to his grave. Why? I think it is the general human mentality, "If I can't have it, I don't want anyone to have it nor to let them enjoy it". Isn't this the same mentality as the suicide bombers only in a slightly different and twisted way? "I'll be fine as far as I die with the hundreds of other people that I will bring with me to the hell. On the other hand, I may be in the heaven with those virgins". I can't think of any more evil religion than this that allows such a <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_1" class="blsp-spelling-corrected">heinous</span> atrocity. Or there could be something else. There are so many unfortunate stories that people died with the secret they have found or got killed in the process of the pursuit of the greed him/her self.<br /><br />The system of patent filing and all other forms of the <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_1" class="blsp-spelling-corrected"><span id="SPELLING_ERROR_2" class="blsp-spelling-corrected">intellectual</span></span> property is based on this principle of greed. The world has been operating by this very principle, which could be perhaps the right way when there are only so much resources available. To break out of this repeated cycle of poverty and the hellish individual attempts to break out of it, someone has to give without any condition. The fundamental <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_2" class="blsp-spelling-corrected"><span id="SPELLING_ERROR_3" class="blsp-spelling-error">philosophical</span></span> issue in all of these problem is that the evil can not defeat the prevailing pattern of the evil itself.<br /><br />So much for the <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_3" class="blsp-spelling-error"><span id="SPELLING_ERROR_4" class="blsp-spelling-error">philosophical</span></span> digress...<br /><br />Now let's go back to the discussion of the embodiment.<br /><br />The fundamental nature of this repulsive potential energy is that it can not be controlled in a continuous time frame. For an opposite example, the attractive potential energy can be discharged slowly through a resistor in a very well controlled manner. However, the conversion process of the repulsive potential energy can not be delayed nor controlled once the parameter of the circuit is fixed, because the charges are flying in the space while in the conversion process. In other words, the converted energy will have to be in a form of a spiky pulsed electrical energy.<br /><br />Harnessing this form of energy is not actually very difficult. It is <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_4" class="blsp-spelling-corrected"><span id="SPELLING_ERROR_5" class="blsp-spelling-error">fundamentally</span></span> the same principle as pushing a pendulum. Each moment of pushing activity on the pendulum can be considered a spiky energy because it is not a continuous form of energy transfer. I believe someone in the field of electronics should have caught the fundamental idea here.<br /><br />Will be continued.. I need some break here.<br /><br /></p><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1781103950595492559-3764405733656966498?l=dipoleantigravity.blogspot.com'/></div>Eue Jin Jeongnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1781103950595492559.post-43683749002957679782009-07-12T01:18:00.000-07:002009-07-18T17:35:39.922-07:00Miracle of the Work Function Potential of the Conductors<p>If any one asks why all this is possible, I can answer to it in a simple term, it is because of the miracle of the specific properties of the conductors. <br /><br />How?<br /><br />The conductors are capable of holding charges because of the work function potential. It takes a certain amount of energy to knock off an electron from the surface of the metal as demonstrated by the photo electric effect. If this holding property were not available, how the charges are going to be clumped together inside the metal overcoming the enormous repulsive forces among themselves? They won't. The work function potential is the answer. <br /><br />This property of the metal makes it possible to harness the cosmic energy. <br /><br />We can also see this effect from the following different perspective. Suppose there is a spherical conductor charged with +Q and then there is an outer shell of a conductor which is not charged. We are going to bring one electron at a time onto this outer shell. How much energy does it take to bring one electron to the outer shell? The answer is, it doesn't take any energy to do it. <br /><br />Because of the strong attraction of the positively charged spherical shell, each electron will voluntarily transit to the outer shell. This means there is no work needed in this process instead the nature does all the work and deposit the potential energy into the outer shell, where the overall gain of the energy is originated. <br /><br />Here, it must be noted that the spherical capacitor is used only as a model to show the precise mathematical discrepancy of the energy before and after the capacitor is charged. But the ramifications of this model is that this property holds for all kinds of different geometrical shapes of the capacitors in general. <br /><br />In retrospect, if you carefully read the article regarding the Ark of Covenant, you will see that it is a gigantic capacitor which can hold the atmospheric charge for extended period of time. Basically it is a metal coated box of a capacitor which can kill people when it is mishandled. What is the message? Well, it may be designed to teach the secret of the capacitors to the future generation whoever can decode it. <br /><br /></p><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1781103950595492559-4368374900295767978?l=dipoleantigravity.blogspot.com'/></div>Eue Jin Jeongnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1781103950595492559.post-56916282875933323772009-07-11T14:15:00.000-07:002009-07-13T12:07:07.540-07:00The Nature of the Electromagnetic Anomaly<p>If you look at this electrostatic "anomaly" carefully, you can immediately realize that it is really not an anomaly, it is rather a norm but instead the widely generalized local energy conservation principle is the flawed "awkwardly imposed" anomaly. On the other hand, we can agree that it served well the purpose of satisfying the general nonscientific sentimental consensus that you can not get something from nothing.<br /><br />I think I mentioned in my previous posts that the long rangedness of the gravity and the electromagnetic force makes the local conservation law in those interactions to be inapplicable. In fact, the local energy conservation law was derived from the kinetic theory of the gases and this law has been widely generalized in all other forms of the forces which is an inaccurate generalization of the specific case into the universal physical theoretical arena.<br /><br />Naturally, though, you will ask, if you discharge the capacitor, you will still get the same energy you put in. Well, this is not exactly true.<br /><br /><strong>It depends on how you discharge it.</strong><br /><br />I delved into this problem in the last 10 years to solve the dilemma on how to harness this energy and to find out how Moray achieved it in his device. First it is important to realize that this repulsive potential energy is very different from the normal attractive electrostatic potential energy we are used to.<br /><br />In the usual case of the attractive electrostatic potential energy, the conversion to the heat or to the light energy is achieved by letting these two groups of charges to combine and annihilate. In other words, the kinetic energy of the electrostatic charge (mostly the electrons) increases as the two opposite charges get close together in terms of the spatial distances. Now, this is not the case with the repulsive electrostatic energy. The kinetic energy of the electrons increases when the clumped charges are widely separated from each other.<br /><br />The secret of the surplus energy conversion is in the order of the discharging process. When the electrons are allowed to recombine through the conducting wire, the charges do not have a chance to separate from each other to gain kinetic energy from the repulsive portion of the potential energy. They recombine before it gets the advantage of the gaining the kinetic energy from the repulsive potential energy so the excess energy simply disappears into the thin air.<br /><br />However, this is not the case when you discharge it by letting them to have a chance to spread into the space first before they recombine. Now we can understand why Tesla consistently used the spark gap discharge in his wide range of the experiments when he observed anomalous effect and also why Moray had to use the discharge tubes for his over unity device.<br /><br />Now the compelling question is why this effect did not cause harm to the conventional electronic devices. The reason is because this effect is only noticeable when the voltage in the circuit is high as the energy depends on the square of the voltage present. The strongest effect from this anomaly can be noticed when the frequency is high in addition to the high voltage, which is exactly the electrical environment Tesla created in his experiments.<br /><br />Another important observation is that the high voltage capacitor is notoriously lethal when mishandled by a novice technician. This is all because of the excess energy stored in the capacitor rushes out explosively when a slight chance of discharge is provided.<br /><br />It is also noted that the term "cold electricity" was frequently used in the field of the fringe science to understand this phenomenon without specifying what exactly they mean by the term "cold electricity" because there is nothing cold about the electricity itself. If they meant to say it is the repulsive electrostatic potential energy, it would have been quite correct.<br /><br /></p><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1781103950595492559-5691628287593332377?l=dipoleantigravity.blogspot.com'/></div>Eue Jin Jeongnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1781103950595492559.post-24533855021576413392009-07-10T07:35:00.000-07:002009-07-14T02:57:04.247-07:00Presentation of the Theory of Electromagnetic Anomaly in Memory of Nikola Tesla<p>I have been looking for a proper time to publicly release the theory(here I go again) of the <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_0" class="blsp-spelling-error">electromagnetic</span> anomaly and I think today is the right time in honorable memory of Nikola Tesla whose work has <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_1" class="blsp-spelling-error">tremendously</span> inspired many physicists and the amateur (and of course the serious) inventors in the past and the present. We owe him all of our industrial revolution from his invention of the AC induction motors and the convenience of the portable AC electricity as a whole.<br /><br />I mentioned the discovered anomaly is a theory but I really do not like the connotation that the word "theory" carries with it. This anomaly I'm about to disclose is a several century old scientific mystery that has been challenged in physics in the past without success. Who am I to claim this? As I said, I was destined to do this job to create the new "wonderful" world.<br /><br />Contrary to the theory proposed by many <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_2" class="blsp-spelling-error">unconventional</span> physicists who challenged on the validity of Maxwell's equation by <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_3" class="blsp-spelling-error">incorporating</span> Heaviside's and other's <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_4" class="blsp-spelling-error">presentation</span>, Maxwell's equation has been proven to be correct for many centuries. Then, where is the point of the crack that may possibly open up the new <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_5" class="blsp-spelling-error">possibilities</span>?<br /><br />Who first said "The devil is in the details"? I <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_6" class="blsp-spelling-error">tremendously</span> admire this person whoever said it first.<br /><br />In 1999, I was working at <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_7" class="blsp-spelling-error">AFIT</span>(Air Force Institute of Technology) as a research scientist. At this time, my paper titled "Non Newtonian Force Experienced by <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_8" class="blsp-spelling-error">Gravitational</span> Dipole Moment at the Center of the Two Mass Pole Model Universe" was published at the journal <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_9" class="blsp-spelling-error">Physica</span> <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_10" class="blsp-spelling-error">Scripta</span>. It was revised so many times that I can not even remember how many times it was, to suit the format and the <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_11" class="blsp-spelling-error">satisfaction</span> of the specific journal. At that time, people start sending me emails regarding the information on Moray device and others after seeing my paper published in the <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_12" class="blsp-spelling-error">LLNL</span> archive on the subject of "Extracting <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_13" class="blsp-spelling-error">Gravitational</span> Energy From the Homogeneous Isotropic Universe". This paper was only a simple theoretical extension of dipole gravity. It essentially shows that if dipole gravity can exist in reality, it is inevitable that we can extract the <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_14" class="blsp-spelling-error">inexhaustiable</span> amount of <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_15" class="blsp-spelling-error">gravitational</span> energy from the space.<br /><br />So, it is natural that the people already in the field of amateur inventor's society would want to let me know that my theory is not very surprising. Because they have seen and heard of Thomas Henry Moray's and other's device for a long time and I was a newbie in the field from somewhat main stream side of physics community from their point of view. And seriously I have no idea there was such a thing as Moray device until they (the readers of my paper from the <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_16" class="blsp-spelling-error">internet</span>)sent me details of the information. So, effectively and <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_17" class="blsp-spelling-error">inadvertently</span> I joined their club, at least in the mind set of the search for the truth.<br /><br />What do we not know in the theory of electricity and magnetism? Haven't we used it for over a century and don't we all know what it is? What physical mystery is terribly hidden from us?<br /><br />I was so madly in love with the unsolvable scientific mystery that the scientific world has already given up looking for it or already decided not to look for the solution at all that I could not take this Moray device information off of my mind.<br /><br />I could not remember exactly when it was, after several months of <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_18" class="blsp-spelling-error">experimentation</span> and theoretical calculation, I noticed that whenever the <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_19" class="blsp-spelling-error">electrostatic</span> field <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_20" class="blsp-spelling-error">configuration</span> is in the repulsive mode, there appears the anomalous phenomenon from carefully observing the various devices they claimed.<br /><br />In this process of struggle to understand, I calculated the total <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_21" class="blsp-spelling-error">electrostatic</span> energy in a concentric spherical capacitor using Jackson's book(<span id="SPELLING_ERROR_22" class="blsp-spelling-error">Electrodynamics</span>)'s model on the self energy of the electron that appears in the last part of the text book. This theoretical treatment is used to show that the repulsive energy which is associated with the electron's <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_23" class="blsp-spelling-error">electrostatic</span> charge must be the same as the mass of the electron and this model is used to calculate the classical radius of the electron. This is actually the same as the standard calculation of the potential energy on the isolated charged sphere.<br /><br />Now let's focus on what happens in the concentric spherical capacitor when the capacitor is charged.<br /><br />In the long known <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_24" class="blsp-spelling-error">conventional</span> theory of <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_25" class="blsp-spelling-error">electromagnetism</span>, the energy in the charged capacitor is given by 1/2 C V^2, where C depends on the geometrical <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_26" class="blsp-spelling-error">configuration</span> of the two spheres, <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_27" class="blsp-spelling-error">ie</span>, the radius of the inner and the outer sphere and the gap between them. But I noticed that the self energy part is missing in this calculation.<br /><br /><strong>The repulsive <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_28" class="blsp-spelling-error">electrostatic</span> potential energy of the individual (inner and outer conducting sphere) is missing !!!!</strong> in this model.<br /><br />Well, people may scoff at it, "So what?".<br /><br />The seriousness of the problem is that it takes only the amount of 1/2 C V^2 to charge the capacitor using the battery, yet you end up having the total energy far exceeding the energy you put in. The hidden energy is in the form of the repulsive elecrtostatic energy for each individual spherical shells. To understand this carefully, if you take a look at all the lines of the forces present in the charged concentric spherical capacitor, there are lines of the forces going from the inner to the outer shells of the sphere from the negative to the positive side of the shell. Now, how about the lines of the force going against each other among the same charges on each shells?</p><p>The tensions among the same charges possess quite a lot of electrostatic potential energy inside of it. And the most important physical fact to notice is the the lines of the force between the positive to the negative shell is orthogonal to the lines of the repulsive forces among the same charges. Therefore, the two different kinds of energy can not be mixed together. </p><p>Is this real?<br /><br />It is as real as you and I can see each other by our eyes. That's why I hate to say "theory" which can <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_29" class="blsp-spelling-error">notorioulsy</span> be false.<br /><br />I discussed this anomaly with Professor <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_30" class="blsp-spelling-error">Jeong</span>, <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_31" class="blsp-spelling-error">Kwang</span> Ho of Yon <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_32" class="blsp-spelling-error">Sei</span> University, a long time friend of mine (but not <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_33" class="blsp-spelling-error">genealogically</span> related) since early 1990s. He replied initially that "that energy is already included in the formula 1/2 C V^2". I replied "No it can't be, because suppose the inner sphere is charged by Q1 and the outer sphere is charged by -Q2 (they are of different magnitude but only very slightly). The total energy in the <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_34" class="blsp-spelling-error">conventional</span> theory would be 1/2 Q1 Q2/C. But the self energy term 1/2 (Q1)^2/C1 and 1/2 (Q2)^2/C2 for each sphere is totally missing where C1 and C2 are the self capacitance of the two inner and outer spheres <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_35" class="blsp-spelling-error">respectively</span>. And then he said "I taught this subject in my class for the last 20 years" without being able to disprove my argument. His next response was "<span id="SPELLING_ERROR_36" class="blsp-spelling-error">Ok</span>, what's next?". I think it was too <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_37" class="blsp-spelling-error">embarrassing</span> for him even to acknowledge that this anomaly ever existed.<br /><br />If the Moray device was real, this can be the fundamental cause of it. Not only that, how about the whole experiments Nikola Tesla invested in his whole life time?<br />You will see the fundamental mystery of his amazing <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_38" class="blsp-spelling-error">electrostatic</span> discharge experiment was from this anomaly.<br /><br />I would spend the next 10 something years to solve this mystery forgetting everything about dipole gravity that I published earlier to find a way how to manifest this effect in real physical devices. I apologize to the people in the field of <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_39" class="blsp-spelling-error">gravitational</span> physics for the delay of not coming out early with dipole gravity but you would do the same if you were in my shoes. But, anyway, you are not suppose to promote your own "theory" or achievement too strongly, they said. I just tried to help easing the whole, wide spread confusion about the dark matter problems and the jet phenomenon before it goes too far astray.<br /><br />The main problem of this <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_40" class="blsp-spelling-error">electrostatic</span> anomaly next, of course, is how to manifest this surplus energy into a useful form. And this should not be too difficult. The main difficulty was in finding where the "beef" was. As I said, the new (wonderful) world is not very far from us.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/22345404@N02/page2/">Here is the focused <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_41" class="blsp-spelling-error">presentation</span> of the anomaly in honorable memory of Nikola Tesla.</a><br /></p><p>In retrospect, <a href="http://www.cheniere.org/">Tom <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_42" class="blsp-spelling-error">Bearden's</span></a> problem was that he did not exactly quantify the amount and the location of the energy when he proclaimed his "Ultimate Secret of the Free Energy Device". His hunch was <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_43" class="blsp-spelling-error">right</span>, though, there was something <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_44" class="blsp-spelling-corrected">fundamentally</span> wrong about the physical <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_45" class="blsp-spelling-corrected">interpretation</span> that we had on the theory of <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_46" class="blsp-spelling-corrected">electromagnetism for so long</span>. While I admire all of his life long efforts to solve this problem, he didn't quite get the essence of it. </p><p>I will discuss many other <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_47" class="blsp-spelling-corrected">ramifications</span> related to this issue in the following blog articles. After all, this is not too far from the concept of dipole gravity in the base of physics if you look into it deeply.<br /><br /><br /></p><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1781103950595492559-2453385502157641339?l=dipoleantigravity.blogspot.com'/></div>Eue Jin Jeongnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1781103950595492559.post-58667193612507020352009-07-03T11:10:00.000-07:002009-07-12T07:28:28.435-07:00Future of Our Science<p>When people start talking about the truth, you will see that there are many levels of truth in our lives. One side of the story of the event never covers the whole truth. Sometimes, the publicized "story" is so cunningly concocted with the lies that it is hard to see where is the line between the truth and the lie. This is partly because there are too many angles to view an object in human society. But the major problem is because the strongly publicized view is normally the one that comes from the major media which is owned by the major corporate moguls or the establishments. The public, unless they try hard, will never know the real truth of the whole event. Never a single angle point of view reflects the whole truth in any personal, social or political equations. <br /><br />On the other hand, this is not the case with the mathematical truth. No matter from what angle you view the object, the mathematical truth is crystal clear and can not be challenged. I noticed recently that the term "theory" immediately raise the suspicion in people's mind on the validity of the presentation. Especially in legal matters, "theory" often means a view of the event that has many logical holes with dubious validity. Most of the theory in court is considered a conjecture regarding the view on how the event has happened. For example, the private researchers view of the JFK assassination has been called conspiracy "theory". On the other hand, the government's explanation has never been satisfactory to most of the serious investigators. So where is the real truth?<br /><br />In this regard, I often used the term "theory of dipole gravity" for the lack of a proper term for it. I noticed that the term doesn't serve very well for the purpose of conveying the meaning and the implication of it. There are so many theories in physics that doesn't manifest in physical reality that people react immediately "ok, it is a theory so what?". To put it more precisely, dipole gravity is not a theory, it is a mathematical solution of general relativity that has been sought for so long without result that people have given up looking for it long time ago.<br /><br />If dipole gravity ever turn out to be wrong, that can only happen if and only if general relativity is wrong. In a way, dipole gravity tremendously strengthened the power of general relativity. In the past, the lack of the answers to the large scale cosmological phenomenon from the known general relativity has been considered a possible serious flaw of general relativity. Not any more !!!!<br /><br />So what happened is that when I showed them the dipole gravity solution, it immediately gave them the suspicion of it. They didn't even dreamed that there was even an open question for the solution. It was given up and they even made sure in the text book in writing that no one will ever seek for the solution unless you are a mad truth seeker like me. An addition of a subtle and humorous phrase like "at least we do not think there is a way you can make the center of mass of an object to be shifted in real physical manner other than the linear translation of the coordinate system". But then this phrase would have been so ridiculous because the shift of the coordinate system has nothing to do with the real physical movement of the object at all. <br /><br />So, dipole gravity is the mathematical truth demonstrating the real power of general relativity. That's why there is no one who challenges against it from the main stream physics community. I feel sorry for the Einstein detractors but life has to go on.<br /><br />We have a long way to go in science. <br /><br /></p><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1781103950595492559-5866719361250702035?l=dipoleantigravity.blogspot.com'/></div>Eue Jin Jeongnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1781103950595492559.post-49017222023726863072009-05-16T09:44:00.000-07:002009-05-18T05:24:37.406-07:00The New Economic Principle<p> In the old economic principle, there are limited resources and the currency is like the flow of current in the equivalent model of the electrical circuit. When the circuit breaks by the disconnection of the wire or the severe limitation of the current flow, there happens the halting of the electrical current flow or the electrical spark which corresponds to the economic depression and the starvation of the people and ultimately the war(spark) in the human society. It must be noted that this economic model fundamentally assumes the resource is finite. <br /><br />However, what if the resource is not finite, instead, infinite? This means that the electrical circuit can always be fully charged and there is no limitation of the flow of current. The amount of currency can increase indefinitely. The economy can go on the infinite cycle of booming for ever. The gold loses its fundamental meaning as a solid reserve currency because the gold or the equivalent of the gold can be created out of the thin air. <br /><br />This may turn out to be as dangerous as the boom and bust cycle. But then it would be easier to control the excess than the shortage. The society needs to be involved itself into a massive spending project like going to the nearby solar like planetary system. In a way, a society with this kind of advanced technology should involve itself to this type of project that seemingly does not produce immediate economic benefit, but just to moderate the exponentially booming economy. When the old economic model changes into this new model, the world will not be controlled by the evil forces whose sole purpose is to subjugate other humans and limit their freedom. The reason for this is because it is not possible for a small group of people can manipulate the flow of currency that was possible in the old economic system. Simply, people do not need to be forced into work if they do not desire to do so because the resource is infinite. <br /><br />In this new world, the motivation for life will neither be for the survival nor for the desire to control other people anymore, instead, it would be for the simple enjoyment of the tranquil life. In the down side of this, to overcome the boredom of life, which may become prevalent as well, what motivates people to live in this new world will be more on the side of finding the new technology and developing the new gadgets for the ultimate convenience of life and toward the adventure of the outer universe for the search of the new life forms. <br /><br />The government will be at the smallest of the size as possible in this new economic world model. People may indulge into the activities of creating new life forms, like, for example, fish, birds or flowers so exotic and beautiful that will be enjoyable to the utmost pleasure of human life.<br /><br />One can imagine a TV show of contest who created the most beautiful and exotic form of fish or bird or any life form that can imagine. Of course, almost human like cyborg will be prevalent in the society that, sometimes, it would be hard to tell who is a cyborg and who isn't. This kind of society is not very far from us in the new paradigm of the world. <br /><br />Only the most twisted evil soul will indulge into the activities of creating a new virus to kill people. Besides, there will be cures available for all forms of bacterial and viral infections that this kind of evil activities will turn out to be fruitless. <br /><br /></p><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1781103950595492559-4901722202372686307?l=dipoleantigravity.blogspot.com'/></div>Eue Jin Jeongnoreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1781103950595492559.post-28780379105011985552009-05-16T09:37:00.001-07:002009-05-16T09:41:27.474-07:00Disclosure Project<p> There are vast number of groups of people (for an example Dr. Steven Greer) who have been trying hard to push for the disclosure of the hidden information that has been kept away from the public by the government retrieved from the alleged crashed alien crafts and also from some of the past scientists who left incredible legacy that is not available to the general public. I really do not know what is the force behind this suppression and what is the purpose of it all. I do not wish to pretend I do not aware of this movement and all the related tragedies and mishaps. In fact, I have been informed of the activities of this groups and the movement more than I wish to know by the readers of my web pages. <br /><br />The world would be much better place to live than it is now if we can have access to all of these information. But what is frightening is how vastly the society is fragmented from one group to the other. There are no rational communications among the various groups of the people. There are also false information spread by this movements. But then it is the same with the established scientific community. There are vast number of trashes that have been published in the name of the establishment in the scientific journal. The pseudo science has replaced the science that has been built upon the fundamental experiment based on the solid theoretical foundation.<br /><br />In fact, the advanced technology for the future of mankind is with us here. This scientific knowledge will bring us to the new world. Every one wants it, yet there is no simple means to get there. When this new age comes, science and religion will merge and bring us to the peace, where the rationality instead of the blinded bigotry will prevail the society. <br /><br />The paradigm shift has happened. It is coming and it will free us from all the injustices and evils of the world. However if the world is controlled by the media that fundamentally oppose this from happening and we decide to let them, it may not happen. I believe the year 2012 is not the end of the world, instead, it is the beginning of the new world. Mr. Black may put it in his own words, "It will be the end of the world as we know what it is". <br /><p><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1781103950595492559-2878037910501198555?l=dipoleantigravity.blogspot.com'/></div>Eue Jin Jeongnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1781103950595492559.post-11622517548004338672009-05-10T13:47:00.000-07:002009-06-30T00:59:26.757-07:00The Korean Prophecy<p>The prophecies of the future world are intriguing when it is vague, mysterious and unintelligible, or when people realized that the prediction was verified after the event already has happened. However, there are no records of incidents that the ultimate fate of the human calamity was prevented because of any prophecy. So, most of the prophecies of the world are useless because it doesn't help prevent the disasters or certain unfortunate events from happening. <br /><br />In this respect, the usefulness of the prophecies are more or less for the purpose of the satisfaction of human curiosity than for the preparation of the future. People simply would like to know at least they are not at the center of the bad prophecies and to find out if there is anything they can do to avoid it if they learned that they are in fact at the center of it.<br /><br />Regardless, it seems that we are at the verge of the vast changes to come. The end of the world prophecies by the Mayan calender, Nostradamus, Hopi Indians, the bible prophecy and the Chinese I-Ching have all been well publicized, however, interestingly, the Korean prophecy has not been publicized at all, probably because, I presume, it has not been fully translated in English. However, there could be more reasons to it than that in these days when people are hungry for any prophetic knowledge of the future. <br /><br />As any Koreans would have read or at least heard of it, there is a very well known Korean prophecy that started about 1000 years ago (Chung Gam Rok)and then reiterated and confirmed by many other scholars(for example: Kyuk Am Yu Rok) of the Confucian philosophy. Those Korean prophecies are very specific and elaborate in detail. It is a well known fact in Korea that those books of prophecy accurately predicted, the number of years(36 years) Japanese would occupy Korea and then their eventual retreat, which was a painful humiliation for Koreans who are very proud of themselves and have despised Japaneses as being midgets for thousand of years before their invasion. And also the division of the Korean peninsula into North and South and the eventual unification of the two Koreas. It is obvious that this kind of prophecies could not be very popular to the ancient Koreans until those events actually happened because of its stressful content.<br /><br />In Koreans psyche, the idea that, especially in recent years, the difference in ideology is not such a big a deal compared to the blood, has been strengthened. They say in the old Korean folklore, "Blood is thicker than Water". <br /><br />For example, in a recent incidence, the north Korean commerce ship was about to be hijacked by the Somali pirates and the South Korean Navy helicopter fired onto the pirates and saved the north Korean ship from being hijacked. I think this story is wonderful and beautiful. South Koreans certainly do not care if the North have nuclear weapons and the long range missile capability. It is the blood that matters for them. Basically the minds of the people of Korean peninsula are moving toward the unification. We don't know when it will happen, but if the books could predict the Japanese invasion and the division of the Korean peninsula, there is no reason to doubt the ultimate unification of the two Koreas. <br /><br />There are much more materials in the book of the Korean prophecy that also tells about what will happen in the world in the "end" days. They also talk about the pandemics and the famine that will kill many people in the world. But the most glaring subject of all in the books of Korean prophecy is this specific mention about the King who will come to Korea and judge all the evils of the world. He will enlighten the world and bring the peace. The world after those pandemics and the famine will be bright according to the Korean prophecy.<br /><br />I think what scares the people who are looking into the future of the world is this specificity of the Korean prophecy, because a prophecy is, in general, more entertaining when it is vague. The Korean prophecy tells specifically the "chosen" one will come to Korea. The Chinese prophecy also says he (the one) will come in the East. China is also located in the East, so, there is no reason that the Chinese prophet would not specifically mention it will be China if it is going to be so. <br /><br />The more details you study into this books of Korean prophecy, the more you will be surprised by learning how specific those prophecies are about the technologically wonderful world of the future and the family origin and whose descendants he/she(the one) will be. There are many branches of groups of families in Korea with the same family name, so, normally Korean people would tend to specify who is the originator of their specific family branch called "bon juk" to find out if they are blood related. <br /><br />Speaking of "Bon Juk", if a young couple wants to get married and they found out that they have the same family name and also the same "bon juk" (the first originator of the family) then they can not marry. This common law has been in use in Korea for centuries and it caused many miseries because a young loving couple could not get married just because they happened to have the same family name and the same "Bon Juk". I believe this law has been repealed but it is still in use in the circles of the so called "Yang Ban" class(high ruling class) families. This law is far more stricter than the Jewish or the common world (bible) standard that extends only up to among the immediate siblings. It is out of question in Korea for cousins to get married to each other, no matter how the common law may have been repealed. It is simply not possible. A person can not even get married to his/her grand father's sister's grand daughter/son no matter how much they may be in love with each other. If they do, it would be considered a sin almost as close to a incest in Korean morality. <br /><br />Back to the specificity of the Korean prophecies, only some Koreans may have noticed from my blog, the family name of this one man is Chung(Jeong). The reason this person should be a man and not a woman is because the prophecy says he would be called "Chung Do Ryung". "Do Ryung" in Korean word means an "adorable young man of noble descent". And the originator of this family branch(Bon Juk) of Chung Do Ryung is Po Eun, Jeong(Chung) Mong Joo, as repeatedly mentioned in the book of Kyuk Am Yu Rok. <br /><br />Despite this specificity, it must be noted that the religious group(Unification Church) of Sun Myung Moon has been using this Korean prophecy to promote the "legitimacy" of his religious leadership because "Chung Do Ryung" is supposed to be the messiah of the second coming. I don't know how he could prove his "legitimacy" with his family name "Moon" when the book repeatedly said it is Jeong(Chung). It is supposedly said that he(Sun Myung Moon) used the phrase in some part of the book saying that the birth place of the one would be in the north of the 38Th line, the region of which belongs to the area of the present day North Korea where he was supposedly born. However, it should be noted that there are many other conflicting places he was supposed to be born written in the book which are not repeated nor emphasized.<br /><br />But then, a false religion would start with the misinterpretation of the ancient text of prophecy. It is amazing that he totally ignores the repeated mention of the origin of the family in the book that he(the one) will be a descendant of the Chung(Jeong) family especially from the line of Jeong Mong Joo, the most famous scholar in ancient Koryo dynasty.<br /><br />There is no point here trying to prove my legitimacy of some kind to start a new religion by distorting the content of the ancient Korean prophecy book. A scientific discovery is not something that happens only in the minds of the people through a faith or some kind of hypnotic trance. It is the real powerful technical and scientific process that we are going to encounter in the near future in the tangible material world.<br /><br /><br />Here, the compelling question to any one who learns the theory of dipole gravity would be why and how a Korean man should come up with this mathematical solution that is the ultimate secret of the universe that can and will revolutionize the world. For the last 90 years, thousands of the brightest geniuses of the world entered, graduated and practiced in this field of science and tried to find the solution of this mysterious magnetic gravity that would liberate humans from the perpetual grabbing force of the nature. For this kind of remarkable event to happen, some one or some books should have foretold in the past that this event will happen in the future in a form of a prophecy. Only then it will qualify you as being legitimate. People may think somewhat of this line in their minds..<br /><br /><br />My legitimacy, if there is any such thing, would be that I was supposed to find this solution and that was prophesied to be that way 1000 years ago according to the Korean prophecy. I would like to recommend the full translated version of Kyuk Am Yu Rok for anyone who wants to study this Korean prophecy, the English translation of which may not exist at the moment. It would require hundreds of pages of blog space to record the entire content of the book. On the other hand, I would avoid the translation performed by the Moonies since they have the vested interest to bias the content for their misguided religious purposes. <br /><br />And also see what Nostradamus wrote in his quatrain 75.<br /><br />So long expected shall never come<br />Into Europe, In Asia shall appear,<br />One Issued of the line of great Hermes<br />And shall be over all the Kings of the Orient.<br /><br />In Greek mythology, Hermes is known to be the God of science. <br /><br />If Nostradamus was biased by the necessity of boosting the pride of his own people, he would not have written such a quatrain, nor Kyuk Am would have written the shameful defeat of the Korean people and the occupation by the Japanese for 36 years if he was biased to promote the Korean agenda. Both records were written in their truthful visions of the future. <br /><br />By the way, who would like to be a King who reminds me of a living statue surrounded by the people constantly telling you that you can not go to certain places or do certain things due to the various reasons which you didn't have to worry about before. Your 99 percent of the personal freedom will be gone by being a King. The fundamental meaning of being a King is that you are a divine server to the people. In ancient China, according to the legend, the first emperor known as the Yellow Emperor, Huangdi was the teacher of the crop cultivation. He served people by saving them from hunger when the people were entirely relying on the berries and fruits picked off from the shrubs and trees. The knowledge of the farming was the ultimate technology that saved the people from starvation in the remote ancient Chinese society. Therefore, the true King should not be a dictator nor a destroyer, he/she should be the teacher and the savior(server) of the mankind. <br /><br /></p><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1781103950595492559-1162251754800433867?l=dipoleantigravity.blogspot.com'/></div>Eue Jin Jeongnoreply@blogger.com3tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1781103950595492559.post-18996780077309366692009-05-05T06:41:00.000-07:002009-05-11T02:28:37.189-07:00Review of Thomas Kuhn's Theory of Scientific Revolution<p>Thomas Kuhn, in his book 'The Structure of Scientific Revolutions' he describes the reactions of scientists to new discoveries and hard it is for them to make changes in their basic beliefs.<br /><br />Kuhn noticed that scientists would go to any lengths to deny the validity of new theories or the need to change their minds. He describes the symptoms associated with fundamental change:<br /><br /> 1. Persistent denial<br /> 2. Refusal to consider evidence<br /> 3. Reluctance to criticize old ideas<br /> 4. Slander of new-thinking colleagues<br /> 5. Anger at having to give up cherished dogmas<br /><br />Kuhn begins by formulating some assumptions that lay the foundation for subsequent discussion and by briefly outlining the key contentions of the book. <br /><br />A. A scientific community cannot practice its trade without some set of received beliefs (p. 4). <br /> <br /> 1. These beliefs form the foundation of the "educational initiation that prepares and licenses the student for professional practice". <br /> 2. The nature of the "rigorous and rigid" preparation helps ensure that the received beliefs exert a "deep hold" on the student's mind. <br /><br />B. Normal science "is predicated on the assumption that the scientific community knows what the world is like" —scientists take great pains to defend that assumption. <br /><br />C. To this end, "normal science often suppresses fundamental novelties because they are necessarily subversive of its basic commitments". <br /><br />D. Research is "a strenuous and devoted attempt to force nature into the conceptual boxes supplied by professional education". <br /><br />E. A shift in professional commitments to shared assumptions takes place when an anomaly "subverts the existing tradition of scientific practice". These shifts are what Kuhn describes as scientific revolutions—"the tradition-shattering complements to the tradition-bound activity of normal science". <br /><br /> 1. New assumptions (paradigms/theories) require the reconstruction of prior assumptions and the reevaluation of prior facts. This is difficult and time consuming. It is also strongly resisted by the established community. <br /> <br /> 2. When a shift takes place, "a scientist's world is qualitatively transformed [and] quantitatively enriched by fundamental novelties of either fact or theory".<br /><br /><strong>Looking back, Kuhn's insight is astoundingly accurate and penetrating.</strong> Some people should feel like they are looking into the mirror of themselves. They can disprove neither the theory nor the physical evidence yet trying to hold onto the old paradigm that no longer helps enhance our understanding of the universe.<br /><br /></p><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1781103950595492559-1899678007730936669?l=dipoleantigravity.blogspot.com'/></div>Eue Jin Jeongnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1781103950595492559.post-22547980668405716612009-05-03T11:10:00.000-07:002009-05-05T07:20:20.650-07:00Simplicity of the Mechanics of the Universe<p> I believe the general mechanics of the universe is wonderfully simple. God created the universe in a most efficient way possible. While the symmetry of the nature can be traced to the ultimate level, the way the symmetry is broken in the details of the mechanics of the universe is profoundly mysterious and fruitful when it is found. <br /><br />In fact, it must be noted that the most of the secret of the universe is hidden in the manner the various symmetries of the universe are broken. What we have believed to be an ultimate truth turns out to be a partial picture of the entire universe because of the way the specific symmetry is broken. For an example, while the speed of light is the ultimate speed that can be reached by the material body in Newtonian physics as was faithfully adopted by Einstein, there was no mention of the possible existence of the tachyonic particles. <br /><br />Within the conventional paradigm, all the physics described by Newtonian mechanics is correct. However, as soon as we cross over to relativity, which originally conformed to the notion of Newtonian mechanics as an approximation for the case of the slow motion of the particles compared to the speed of light, it must be noted that the quadratic nature of the mass and momentum relation enters into the equation. While not many people in the field have suspected in the early days, there were researchers like E.C.G. Sudarshan and others who proposed the notion that there may be particles traveling faster than the speed of light. This notion, while plausible, did not attract much attention. <br /><br />The fascinating aspect of this conjecture is that the quadratic nature of the Einstein's mass momentum relations did not absolutely excluded the possibility of the existence of the faster than the speed of light particles. Now the question is which known particle can be a candidate for this particle. In this respect, the field of experimental particle physics has been struggling to measure the mass of the neutrinos for decades and in most of the well known experiments, the results were leaning toward the negative mass squared value of the neutrinos which means that the neutrinos can be tachyons. Even the visual(light) detection of the 1987 Supernova was preceded by the detection of the burst of the high energy neutrinos at least by a day.<br /><br />In the manner of the book keeping of the particles known in the universe, the neutron decays always with an emission of a neutrino, as a form of a mysteriously missing momentum, and into an electron and a proton as a by product of the beta decay. If the neutrinos have real mass, they can not travel faster than the speed of light and they should gravitate toward heavy massive sources of gravity. But we do not have evidences for this. As a matter of fact, we have no book keeping for these massive number of neutrinos in the universe. If they can be counted, the number of the neutrinos in the universes will be the same as the number of the electrons in the universe. <br /><br />Conventional wisdom tells us that we do not know where they are and what they do and we simply do not care. <br /><br />I mentioned above about the book keeping of the particles in the universe. If a financial accountant has done the auditing of the present day particle physics for the inventory, he/she would be frowning upon the apparent deficiency of the knowledge of the whereabouts of the neutrinos. The energy and the momentum they carry away from the beta decay simply have disappeared from the scene and no one seems to be bothered by the very fact. If our three dimensional space is a closed surface of the four dimensional space, the neutrinos, if they are tachyons, can not escape the spatial universe and they should be with us every moment of our lives. <br /><br />In fact, they are the masters of the universe and we(all the material objects) are just transients, as the matters come and go and form many different shapes and colors. Neutrinos dictate matters to gravitate and carry all the electromagnetic waves for our daily communications, including the visible lights for us to see and observe. We can not imagine the universe without the neutrinos. They are like air molecules we breath everyday but we rarely contemplate their benefit in our daily lives. <br /><br />We now travel in our air space using the aerodynamical principles. In the future, we will be traveling the unviverse using the tachyonic principles of the neutrinos. <br /><br />The space is filled with tachyonic neutrinos and the future of our civilization, if there is any such thing as the future of our civilization, depends on how we develop this technology and use it for the benefit of our future generation. </p><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1781103950595492559-2254798066840571661?l=dipoleantigravity.blogspot.com'/></div>Eue Jin Jeongnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1781103950595492559.post-76705741454533496902009-04-25T09:47:00.000-07:002009-04-27T02:09:50.767-07:00Black Holes, Worm Holes and Dipole Gravity<p>In general, a rotating massive stellar object does not remain a spherical form. So the solution derived from the Schwarzschild metric can not work for the rapidly rotating black holes at the core of the galaxies. In this sense, the general discussions about the event horizon in various shapes of the black holes is questionable and at most philosophical. <br /><br />In general, the shapes of the rotating stellar object would be gradually changing its profile into a double conic structure as the rotational speed develops faster and faster. This also raises the question of the efficacy of the conventional approach of finding a suitable metric for general relativity is at all meaningful, because for a given metric, the form of the source is supposed to remain fixed. <br /><br />While there will be lingering questions about the covariance of dipole gravity, once the point of view is changed into the fact that Newtonian gravity is not covariant by itself, yet it provided answers to the dominant questions regarding the planetary structure formation, the application of dipole gravity in the real universe will become the most exciting field of physics in the future. <br /><br />In retrospect, the known general relativity didn't provide answers to the mechanics of the rotating massive stars which is directly related to the jets and the dark matter problems and their related structures. Instead, they have spent enormous amount of time on the subject of the time machine and wormhole which will turn out to be fairly impractical from the view point of dipole gravity, and the black holes. The readers should be able to see the large pictures of the areas of the subject that the known general relativity has been covering and didn't cover. <br /><br />Only when people realize what they have been missing, there emerges a large picture. If you are in the woods, very often than not, the forest looks like it is all made of pines. <br /><br />The subject of the black holes and others that have been popularized to the general public in the past, has been presented in the context of the serious flawed assumption that there is no dipole gravity. In fact, all of those theories will have to be reviewed within the new light of dipole gravity. Some will remain valid, while a lot of others will have to be trashed. <br /><br />So, the readers should learn the seriousness of the situation what it means to incorporate dipole gravity in the present day physics and why it is such a formidable threat to the establishment in such way that they have to resist the public recognition of it by all means. <br /><br />It may have worked in the ancient times, when the field was narrowly focused and few people were engaged in the practice of the specific field of science. I seriously do not think that it will work in the present time. The fields are much more diverse and they are all related. Some people in the field will resent the fact that they were not informed of the serious new development early enough so that they didn't have to waste their time on the unnecessary adventures. <br /><br />As Plato elaborated in his book "Republic", the mode of the defeat of an evil is that the evil can not stand by itself because it sparks discomfort within. The collapse of an Empire starts from the lies, the injustices and the corruption within itself, not from the outside.<div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1781103950595492559-7670574145453349690?l=dipoleantigravity.blogspot.com'/></div>Eue Jin Jeongnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1781103950595492559.post-86475836366549115562009-04-24T15:08:00.000-07:002009-04-24T15:51:34.724-07:00Water Vapors Found in Black Hole Jet Emissions<p> "A US-European astronomy team has recently announced at the European Week of Astronomy and Space Science meeting that it has discovered water spewing out of a black hole, at the center of a galaxy located billions of light-years away. The radio wavelength emissions that were observed in 2007 with the 100-meter German Effelsberg radio telescope and the Expanded Very Large Array showed a galaxy that emitted water from its core about 2.5 billion years after the Universe exploded into existence.<br /><br />This means that the formation, which took all these billions of years to get its light from its location to us, was among the first generations of galaxies to be formed. Its water signature was detected as a wavelength marker. Each type of substance has a unique fingerprint on that scale, and water makes no difference. Scientists say that this discovery is very peculiar, and that extensive studies and new theories are needed to explain this phenomenon." quoted from <a href="http://news.softpedia.com/news/Water-Vapors-Found-in-Black-Hole-Jet-Emissions-109986.shtml">softpedia</a>.<br /><br />It would be awfully redundant to mention at this point that the Blanford-Znajek process is disappointingly inadequate to explain this water vapor jet phenomenon. The ejected material would be pretty much the combination of lava and steam as in the typical volcanoes on earth. This experimental report is an another supporting evidence in favor of dipole gravity. This is also the second blow to the Blanford-Znajek theory since the astronomers have announced that neutron stars also emit jets. <br /><br /></p><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1781103950595492559-8647583636654911556?l=dipoleantigravity.blogspot.com'/></div>Eue Jin Jeongnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1781103950595492559.post-72016903063031727012009-04-22T03:42:00.000-07:002009-04-22T05:03:15.127-07:00Scientific Activity Halted<p> If you are a keen observer to the science news, you will notice that the scientific community especially in the field of astrophysics is in a total suspension mode at the moment. No more talks or discussions about MOND or dark matter problems or the black hole jets for that matter.<br /><br />Anyone in the field of cosmology or astrophysics can tell easily what is the meaning of dipole gravity when it is explained to such a pedagogical degree in the dipole gravity blog. Even if they may not tell you what they think in detail, the sudden halt of the news in the field tells you more than what they may want to tell you in public. They want to have a silent exit from their failed research activity. <br /><br />Although the CDM proponents have little to correct in their model, the fine tuning problems may be solved by incorporating dipole gravity. In fact, they should be able to predict the mass, the shape and the rotating speed of the galactic cores using the dipole gravity model to a great precision. I would not suggest the professionals in the field to start with dipole gravity if they are a couple of years away from their retirement. It would be meaningless for them to start a totally new field of research in such a short period of time, but if he/she is many years away from the retirement, it would be wise to jump onto the bandwagon of dipole gravity as quickly as possible. <br /><br />First of all, you don't want your students to learn the subjects that no one will be interested in the future. Your students need to teach their future students the subjects that will last long(at least for hundreds of years if not for millennia) once they become professors in the field. It needs to be emphasized that this is the beginning of a whole new chain of the teaching activity that will affect our future civilization.<br /><br />Wise decisions need to be made for the benefit of the future of mankind. In my suggestion, let one of the students to go through the details of the calculations in the paper and make sure everything is correct. Then, there is nothing for you to look back. <br /><br />Basically, it is the general form of the second order gravity next to Newtonian predicted by general relativity. It is completely general for a rotating object large or small to the size of a molecular level. The geometrical shape of the object is critical to the inherent physics. The known general relativity didn't provide answers to the rotating stellar objects, but we now have the solution with dipole gravity. <br /><br />If you don't have a confidence about it, you can build one by verifying all the details of the calculations in the paper by yourself. I'm sure the member of the editors in the journal Physica Scripta has done more than enough of the proof.<br /><br />I can't wait until someone publish a paper describing how the Saturn like form of the planet can be developed using dipole gravity. The Saturn's polar holes and the rings are the perfect examples that dipole gravity can handle easily.<br /></p><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1781103950595492559-7201690306303172701?l=dipoleantigravity.blogspot.com'/></div>Eue Jin Jeongnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1781103950595492559.post-74548262009275631242009-04-18T09:08:00.000-07:002009-04-27T01:57:15.548-07:00Did Einstein Miss Dipole Gravity in His Own Theory?<p>The brutally honest answer to this question is yes. But it was in the early 1920s and the observational astronomy hasn't yet discovered the jets nor the dark matter problem at the time. Like in many cases when a new theory is proposed, the author of the new theory will be very anxious to establish the strong footing of the new theory based on the existing principles or dogma that has been popularly known. <br /><br />Violation of the well known principles will easily be considered a sign of the failure of a new theory. The only way to achieve this goal is to anchor the theory to those well known results within the established scientific field. Of course, one of this anchors in Einstein's case had to be Newtonian gravity which is very obvious and justifiably a necessary anchor to claim the validity of the new theory of gravity. <br /><br />And the next one in Einstein's mind was Mach's principle. The existence of the centrifugal force like term in the second order of the weak field limit in the linearized theory of general relativity proved without a shadow of doubt that general relativity was the correct theory in Einstein's view. The claim of these two anchors could not be challenged without challenging Einstein's own authority. If anyone decided to challenge his interpretation, he/she has to have the extraordinary physical as well as the theoretical evidence to prove it.<br /><br />So, I don't think it is entirely fair to blame the group that has been so profoundly successful in developing the theory to its present form for missing the solution of dipole gravity. This shows the remarkable example that the ultimate teacher of the secret of the universe is the nature itself not a fallible human. However, the action after the key point of dipole gravity is revealed is a separate issue. They should have done everything that is possible to disseminate the knowledge to the people in the field so that the theory of dipole gravity can be utilized for studying the mystery of the universe. The only reason this knowledge is being suppressed is the jealousy that is the source of all crimes. <br /><br />Even in the early days of general relativity, the mysterious axial term(in the direction of the Z axis) of the Lense-Thirring force, which has nothing to do with the centrifugal force, bothered both Lense and Einstein as we can see in their personal communications, because this axial force term could not be eliminated in the process of deriving the "centrifugal force". In a way, this could and should have raised enough suspicion on the validity of the centrifugal force interpretation of the second order terms. <br /><br />What I believed and wondered in 1981, when I was at the graduate school of the University of Michigan learning theoretical particle physics, was that general relativity should be able to explain the jet phenomenon and if not, why not and why the electromagnetism has to be used for it. It was a legitimate question but I didn't have a clue. I didn't trust the theory saying that the plasma and the magnetic field are the causes of the jets. Black holes by definition should collapse all the electromagnetic fields in the surrounding area. I thought it was too bulky and cumbersome and personally could not eliminate the feeling of the ad hocishness of the theory which is now known as the Blanford-Znajek process, no matter how the people in the field may be excited about it. <br /><br />But it was only in 1995 when I noticed the abnormalities of the rotating hemisphere considered with special relativity and Newtonian mechanics and the rest is history. I can only credit it to God's intervention. <br /><br />Being a human being, I made a mistake of anchoring dipole gravity to the centrifugal force interpretation of the Lense-Thirring force as shown in the <a href="http://www.tachyonics.com/physica.pdf">paper</a> published in 1999. Otherwise, the paper even may not have had a chance to be published anyway. Basically, this interpretation hindered the connection of dipole gravity to the dark matter problem for the next 9 years. <br /><br /><p/><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1781103950595492559-7454826200927563124?l=dipoleantigravity.blogspot.com'/></div>Eue Jin Jeongnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1781103950595492559.post-8946613004944981232009-04-15T05:19:00.000-07:002009-04-16T07:45:08.568-07:00Cosmic Battle Field<p>After all, Fritz Zwicky was right. There IS dark matter in the universe. The Lamda CDM model has been vindicated, while the MOND suffered a blow in this cosmic saga of the dark matter battle field. Except that there is no need for the presence of the exotic particles to explain the dark matter’s identity, most of the results of the CDM model should be valid without a major revision. <br /><br />So, the LHC can relax from the pressure of the expectation of the detection of the exotic particles called WIMPs. At least for now it seems that the detection of the WIMPs is irrelevant to the success of the CDM model. Of course, even if the WIMP may be detected from LHC, there is no reason they should be populated in such a density around the core of the galaxies that the debate will not be over without an additional physics. <br /><br />“Moreover, ΛCDM says nothing about the fundamental physical origin of dark matter, dark energy and the nearly scale-invariant spectrum of primordial curvature perturbations: in that sense, it is merely a useful parameterization of ignorance.” quoted from Wiki.<br /><br />Now, what will be the real identity of the dark matter? Will they look like sands, ice, rocks or rocks of the size of the boulders? If we look at the volcanoes that erupt on earth, it will be pretty much the same as the jets from the rotating galactic cores except that the strong repulsive gravity at the poles will send them very far away (light years) than the usual pressure powered eruption of the volcanoes on earth. <br /><br />Normally, the faster the expansion of the pressure as they come out of the nozzle, the finer the size of the particles and also the faster the rate of the condensation. But then the port of the rotating core of the galaxies may not be small whatever the meaning of the "small" in this case may be. So, one can expect that the rocks ejected from the rotating star could easily be the size of the boulders if not the size of the typical asteroids. <br /></p><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1781103950595492559-894661300494498123?l=dipoleantigravity.blogspot.com'/></div>Eue Jin Jeongnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1781103950595492559.post-57358948029339340152009-04-10T12:02:00.000-07:002009-04-11T09:46:37.979-07:00Futuristic Vision<p>It is not hard to see the connection between the present day rocket technology and the Newton's third law of motion for any one who has a decent amount of education. But it is hard to say if the people in Newton's time had envisioned the travel to the moon using the very principle written in Principia they just witnessed from a scientist. In this respect, in parallel, what we can envision as a scientist from the theory of dipole gravity in the future will be the travel to the far reaching space without the bulky rocket propulsion. <br /><br />Since the base technologies(computers, electromechanics, fiber optics, metallugy etc.) have been developed extremely fast in the recent years, I believe it won't take very long before we can achieve that goal. How fast can we reach that goal depends on when will we start toward that direction and how much resources are we willing to spend for it. Maybe in this difficult economic times, we may have to start this project as a national goal as a means to recovery from the recession as well as for the hope for the future of mankind. <br /><br />The brute force application of the principle of dipole gravity would be practically impossible due to the engineering difficulty if not the sheer effectiveness problem. On the other hand, the theory of dipole gravity suggests the actual existence of the etheric particles that I would like to call the tachyonic neutrinos. The manipulation of the density of the tachyonic particles will be at the central importance in the future propulsion technology. <br /><br />But we can't see it and we can't touch it, then how can we manipulate it?<br /><br />The central importance to this technology can actually be found from the particle physics. According to the Standard Model of the Leptonic particles, neutrinos are not totally independent from the electronic particles. The so called standard model of the Electro-Weak theory suggests that there is a non trivial relation between the weak and the electromagnetic interactions. What it fundamentally suggests is that the neutrinos can be manipulated using the electromagnetic means.<br /><br />We already have had the theory of electromagnetism for a long time but we do not have fully developed the model showing how the behavior of the electromagnetic field influence the motion of the individual tahcyonic neutrinos. Here we need the fundamental change to the concept that the neutrinos are not completely gone when the beta decay occurs. They are with us in every steps of the space we move. All the material particles and matters float in the sea of the neutrinos. <br /><br />Once we get this far, it is a matter of studying the behavior of the neutrinos density in relation to the electromagnetic field we create in space. This might turn out to be extremely simple. <br /><br />Now, let's focus on the topics of the practicality of spending billions of dollars for the gravitational wave detection. We have to be very practical and conservative in this respect because we may be able to satisfy our curiosity if general relativity is actually correct in predicting the existence of the gravitational wave but we may not get anything beneficial to our civilization.<br /><br />So the most important question here is what will we get after the detection of the gravitational wave?<br /><br />If we had the infinite amount of spending capacity, I would not object to the project for the LIGO or LISA. But as they(the advisory committee) recommended for the defunding of the GP-B project citing the plausible reason that there are many other research project in science that needs attention. Using exactly the same logic, I would like to suggest that it is time to be very objective for the funding of the LISA and LIGO. Like in any investment in business, scientific project needs to have a serious review on what we will get with the amount of money we spend on the project. <br /><br />First, we will be able to satisfy our scieintific curiosity on if general relativity was correct on this specific prediction on the existence of the gravitational wave. <br /><br />What next? Tax payers spent billions for the toy that scientist enjoyed. But they have nothing get back from it. <br /><br />Furthermore, I don't see any more futuristic interest as a follow up from LISA and LIGO. I haven't read anything that has been suggested either. We can't use gravitational wave for the purpose of the deep space communication. It may be too early to say there is none. But at least there is no remote theoretical prospect that has been proposed for such an application. Then what else? <br /><br />Compared to this gloomy prospect for LISA and LIGO, the excitement and futuristic benefit for the dipole gravity research is mind boggling. <br /><br />So, I would like to propose the establishment of a govenmental scale institution named "Center for Dipole Gravity Research" and a substantial amount of funding designated for it. Even if we spend ten percent of the fund that is anticipated for the next step project LISA and LIGO, the outcome will greatly benefit the future of human kind.<br /><br />If we can manage to halt the funding for LISA and LIGO altogether, and invest it in totality in the dipole gravity research and its possible propulsion system, as well as for all the following technologies, the future of our civilization will be as bright as the Sun. <br /><br /></p><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1781103950595492559-5735894802933934015?l=dipoleantigravity.blogspot.com'/></div>Eue Jin Jeongnoreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1781103950595492559.post-5287430370083851492009-04-06T19:04:00.000-07:002009-04-09T08:05:17.236-07:00Insider Information<p> When the free exchange of the vital information is willfully blocked or suppressed, there is always a group of people who loses either their time or money or both. This is especially true in the financial stock market situation. That's the reason why there is a law prohibiting the insider trading. Insiders in the physics community, on the other hand, can block the vital information and try to perpetuate their influences over the scientific community. <br /><br />I believe this activity is as criminal as the insider trading in the financial market. When this people in the field of general relativity blocked the idea of dipole gravity from publication, they had no concern or sympathy for the people who are spending enormous amount of time and energy to understand the cosmological problems like the dark matters, jets and anomalous red shift etc. <br /><br />The scientific fields are all interconnected and no one fully understands how one field of science can be applied to all other fields in such way that they can be benefited. The merit of a theory or an idea is always on its own logical and mathematical consistency. The more general the theory is, the wider the related field of science that will be critically influenced. In this respect, the magnitude of the arrogance of the people in the field are staggering. <br /><br />Now, some people may want to ask me why I didn't come forward early. I'm already being accused of using the Internet blog, popularizing the fundamental physics without using the proper channel of the refereed journals by some group of people. However, most of the ideas in this blog can not be originated without the <a href="http://www.tachyonics.com/physica.pdf">paper</a> published in the journal Physica Scripta. In fact, most of the themes in this blog can be deduced from the <a href="http://www.tachyonics.com/physica.pdf">paper</a> without a gigantic leap of faith. If anyone had picked this idea up early, all of these themes and ideas could have been found easily and registered as his/her own credit. The major reason for the answer to the question is that I had other scientific field of interest that had me occupied for the last ten years which I consider was/is as critical as this one, perhaps more. <br /><br />In fact, the idea that the signs of the Lense-Thirring force being reversed was the hardest to catch. It was the most painful discovery as well. The centrifugal force interpretation of a part of the Lense-Thirring force was endoresed by Einstein in the early stages of the development of general relativity. So who am I to challenge this interpretation? But without that finding, the dark matter problem would have been out of touch within the scope of general relativity. In this process, I contacted Dr. McGough of MOND proponent early and proposed that the dark matter problems may be solved if we use dipole gravity. He was skeptical. When I examined the theory that I wrote myself carefully, the extended centrifugal force will become the repulsive force beyond the radius of the star in consideration. However, the spiral galaxy needs additional attractive gravity not the repulsive force to make the flat rotational velocity curve to work. Also the repulsive force at the poles of the rotating black hole would be much more natural for the jet phenomenon. Now, you reverse the switch and see how the theory will work. In fact, the <a href="http://www.tachyonics.com/9604044.pdf">first paper</a> published in the LANL archive had the attractive force on the flat side of the hemisphere and the repulsive force at the dome. But that was written independent of the consideration of the Lense-Thirring force.<br /><br />The well defined jets observed in the universe are actually the ones that has a very well coordinated spin axis without wobble. In general, the spin axis of the core of the galaxies doesn't have to be precession(wobble) free. So, instead of the well defined jets, the majority of the rotating core of the galaxies can have invisible jets that spewing the debris all over the poles without having the well defined incoming trajectories. So, it can be looked like it has no (visible) jets. <br /><br />Of course, this is the perfect candidate for the dark matter. <br /><br /><p/><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1781103950595492559-528743037008385149?l=dipoleantigravity.blogspot.com'/></div>Eue Jin Jeongnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1781103950595492559.post-82472372540650260932009-04-04T13:29:00.000-07:002009-04-09T08:33:54.663-07:00The Great Deception in Physics Today<p>The normal reaction of people, when someone tells them of their mistake, would be to thank the person who found the mistake and correct it with an apology if it may have harmed anyone. However, there can be a possible opposite reaction, i.e., they get angry for being found of their mistake and try to revenge or harm the person who found the mistake or try to hide it as long as possible hoping that no one else may notice it, especially when the mistake is hard to notice by the uneducated public. <br /><br />Of course the second choice of the reaction is from the evil intent. You lose some or large portion of the advantages or prestige you may have had by admitting the mistake and correct it. This effect can perpetuate very long distance especially the mistake has been taught and accepted without contest by many generations. As a result, there is a form of a school of thought that has been formed around this faulty assumption. Now the finding of the mistake is about to have the earth quake effect to the whole scientific community that has been based on this faulty logic and they have to find the reasons why they can not correct the mistake. <br /><br />You can tell lies to a few people and may be from time to time, but you can’t tell lies to all the people all the time. This is going to break up and it has to. The most damaging effect of not correcting the mistake is the loss of the resources, especially the money and the people’s valuable time or lives. For a simple example, if you do not correct the design mistake of a bridge, it will collapse and kill the people. If you do not correct the scientific mistake, it will make the public to lose billions of dollars in the project that is not going to produce the results let alone the innocent students career who have to fight the mistake to understand the workings of the universe. <br /><br />I feel sorry for MOND physicists in this respect, should they have known the <a href="http://www.tachyonics.com/physica.pdf">paper</a>, and the people in the field (of general relativity) have acknowledged their mistake, they would have never ventured into the subject like they did. And Marcus Chown didn't have to write the article titled "Dark Matter is Dead" that looks so silly at this point. Dr. Steven Weinberg, when I pointed out on this subject in 1998, he replied, "publish it". One may say that it was their mistake for not fully performing the literature search. But they will notice there is more to it than that. There was active effort to prevent this paper being published since it was sent to Physical Review Letters, Science and Nature for publication many times to each journal. Who would like to spend four years to publish a paper, the subject of which is so obvious and clear although it may be viewed revolting to the staus quo. <br /><br />It seems to me this is what is happening in the gravitational physics community today. They perpetuate the deception hoping that the public would never be able to find it out. They should remind themselves of the saying that you can tell lies to a few people and may be from time to time, but you can’t tell lies to all the people all the time and also the saying that "people's mind is God's mind". Neither of them seems to notice or act on certain evils of the world immediately but they do eventually. <br /><br />I deeply thank the review board of the journal Physica Scripta from the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences for this paper being published. Otherwise, it would have never seen the light of the day. <p/><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1781103950595492559-8247237254065026093?l=dipoleantigravity.blogspot.com'/></div>Eue Jin Jeongnoreply@blogger.com0