tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15497256.post7696220002226057218..comments2007-08-24T10:49:31.089-05:00Dr. Claude Mariottinihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08022725291281227401noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15497256.post-16938576512603572802007-08-24T10:49:00.000-05:002007-08-24T10:49:00.000-05:00Kevin,<BR/><BR/>Thank you for your comment. I really enjoyed your post. I agree with you that the writers were not trying to write a Bible, but they believed that they had to help the churches in their struggle against the teachings of false teachers. Their effort to help the church in the first century has helped the church for two thousand years.<BR/><BR/>Thank you for a good post.<BR/><BR/>Claude MariottiniDr. Claude Mariottinihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08022725291281227401noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15497256.post-60917325085840282552007-08-23T16:43:00.000-05:002007-08-23T16:43:00.000-05:00Thank you, Professor Mariottini, that's very kind. It seems rather almost a "duh" kind of thing to realize that this may be the case. The writers were not writing Scripture per se, but were certainly thinking themselves charged with the duty to preserve the faith that had been entrusted to them, and inspired by the same Holy Spirit, which built them up in their lives. To that extent, they will have recognized their writings as "inspired" I would think, but not to a degree that they were considered superior to what they considered Scripture, the Old Testament. It was, I think, an antiquarian interest that singled out the New Testament as a particular canon, the short list of books from the apostles. Notice how in most explicit discussions of the books included in the NT the ancients go back to origin among the apostles rather than inspiration, orthodoxy, applicability, or anything else as the guiding point for their determination as to whether a book is to be considered authentic, and thus included in that list. The canon was thus intended as a List of Apostolic Books, rather than anything else. We cannot force our preferences onto the canon (genuine authorship, inspiration, orthodoxy, etc), but should be guided by the categories and discussions that belonged to those who did the work of establishing that list.Kevin P. Edgecombhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16590490181739464401noreply@blogger.com