Comments on WebORB Blog: Invoke ActiveRecord Models Directly from Flex

For Rails 1.2.1 i needed to add the following rout...

2007-01-22T00:58:00.000-06:00

For Rails 1.2.1 i needed to add the following route to get the tests to run:

map.weborb '/weborb', :controller => 'weborb', :action => 'index'

In case people get stuck

Isn't that a security risk, what about authenticat...

2007-01-06T18:06:00.000-06:00

Isn't that a security risk, what about authentication? If you link the remote object to a model in the remoting config than surely you have complete control over the model - from the client side! Is this practice only advocated when the security risk isn't an issue?

It's great to be able to do this. I just don't kno...

2006-11-29T14:54:00.000-06:00

It's great to be able to do this. I just don't know what to think of it yet. I'm still a bit attached to service way of doing things.

Great features Harris. The direct access to Model...

2006-11-06T09:43:00.000-06:00

Great features Harris. The direct access to Models is very usefull. An added benefit is that you can now support
the Restfull Web from WebORB.

Harris - Wow! Those are really, really great feat...

2006-11-05T13:33:00.000-06:00

Harris - Wow! Those are really, really great features. The 'minor' feature that you mention will make it much easier to cleanly implement the ValueObject pattern in Cairngorm.

Harris - this is great stuff and I think lots of f...

2006-11-04T08:24:00.000-06:00

Harris - this is great stuff and I think lots of folks will find it helpful!

Wow thats cool. I would think either is definately...

2006-11-04T02:29:00.000-06:00

Wow thats cool. I would think either is definately a viable way. But yes keeping business logic on the server makes sense. But allowing special requests to be processed client side is very cool, especially around user searching and filtering the UIs diplayed results. Nice feature!

Campbell