tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15279569.post112659996775609409..comments2007-05-29T21:19:08.540-06:00Comments on WebORB Blog: Problems with Flash / JavaScript Integration kitMark Pillerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18371158765462322166noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15279569.post-15787427281706383882007-05-29T13:33:00.000-06:002007-05-29T13:33:00.000-06:00Hey Mike - the link you posted says:This topic doe...Hey Mike - the link you posted says:<BR/><BR/>This topic does not exist yet<BR/>You’ve followed a link to a topic that doesn’t exist yet. If permissions allow, you may create it by using the Create this page button. <BR/><BR/>I have seen alot of broken links out there oin this topic lately however... are you guys getting ready to release maybe?<BR/><BR/>The kit works great for me, but have a problem with the clicking sound being generated in IE only (when you call out to js).Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15279569.post-1126628284761761502005-09-13T10:18:00.000-06:002005-09-13T10:18:00.000-06:00To expand on what Mike wrote, the problem here is ...To expand on what Mike wrote, the problem here is that you are using a very old version of the code. In fact, it looks like you are probably using the very first release. We've made several changes since then (added a great deal of functionality, fixed a ton of bugs, and even changed the API slightly), but we haven't packaged it up into another official release just yet. We will likely do that next week, after the most recent code has been better tested.<BR/><BR/>You should definitely use the code at the URL Mike provided. It's much more robust, and it address all these issues and many more.<BR/><BR/>Christian CantrellChristian Cantrellhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13707380635971005251noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15279569.post-1126619031645530752005-09-13T07:43:00.000-06:002005-09-13T07:43:00.000-06:00>tag.addFlashVar('lcId', uid);Hi, the docs are kin...>tag.addFlashVar('lcId', uid);<BR/><BR/>Hi, the docs are kind of wrong here. The latest version of the code in the source uses this new syntax. The next full release will also use that syntax.<BR/><BR/>>The problem with that approach, of course, is if JavaScript makes subsequent ActionScript calls back-to-back, only the last one is executed.<BR/><BR/>This has also been addressed in the latest version of the source, and will be in the next release.<BR/><BR/>You can find out how to get the latest version of the source here:<BR/><BR/>http://www.osflash.org/doku.php?id=flashjs:docs:getsource<BR/><BR/>Thanks for checking out the kit...<BR/><BR/>mike chambers<BR/><BR/>mesh@macromedia.commike chambershttp://weblogs.macromedia.com/mesh/noreply@blogger.com