tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15050267.post114038932786887095..comments2009-07-14T10:41:57.807-04:00PetiteMommyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14526874040937712724noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15050267.post-1140664019490521942006-02-22T22:06:00.000-05:002006-02-22T22:06:00.000-05:00We were wondering.. how about if a clone of this tool appears? and we did it. In some days we will be publishing a full working clone of IAGW for sale. Stay tunned, we will not disappoint you. We will deliver and provide a full-feature clone working on 1 more week. Funny? copying the copiers.. who will tell?Javierhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08992272138041953988noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15050267.post-1140633500402771152006-02-22T13:38:00.000-05:002006-02-22T13:38:00.000-05:00Thank you for commenting Jonathan. I recently found out about this program and after some research I must say that I agree with you. I think we all need to be a little more creative and do our part to make the World Wide Web a better place.<BR/><BR/>thanks for sharing your opinionPetite Mom Bloggerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14526874040937712724noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15050267.post-1140622481515835952006-02-22T10:34:00.000-05:002006-02-22T10:34:00.000-05:00Personally, I find IAG to be a waste of money. In addition to be very dubious in terms of legality (given the fact that it's technically one giant copyright violation spread out over hundreds of sites) and of poor ethicsl, the software is completely useless in generating actual articles. In the time it would take you to rewrite the random dribble that IAG spits out, you could easily research the topic yourself and write your own article on the subject. Unless you type really slow or don't mind posting nonsense on your site, IAG is completely useless.<BR/><BR/>Just my thoughts though.<BR/><BR/>Jonathan - http://www.plagiarismtoday.comRavenhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03493181010830778848noreply@blogger.com