tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14973022.post5577836662085369884..comments2007-09-20T23:14:09.983ZTillerMaNhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09915372792045776533noreply@blogger.comBlogger9125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14973022.post-91557284028871827682007-09-20T23:14:00.000Z2007-09-20T23:14:00.000ZDarsch, that process has some history to it in beating random generators, mainly older slot machines and the video poker machines. <BR/><BR/>Most of the time it does not tell you what number (card) will come next, but it gives you the probabilities of each number coming; the better the hack, the more uneven the probabilities. However, for this to work, the random number algorithm has to be weak in at least one of a few different areas. Modern number generators are very strong since they've learned from their mistakes in the past - most are either not crackable or would take an infeasible amount of computing power and sample sizes to do it. <BR/><BR/>Considering what's on the line with popular poker rooms, they put serious effort into making sure their RNG (random number generator) is top of the line. I believe most are independently verified as well (they usually put this on their site somewhere).<BR/><BR/>It's just much more likely there is something from the inside going on, if anything at all.Gibybonoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14973022.post-32859744061773955152007-09-18T22:02:00.000Z2007-09-18T22:02:00.000ZHey, something is very interesting here but i have another solution i read some weeks ago.<BR/>it's all about Poker's success, bad people are interested by making money :/.<BR/>A special forum was talking about statistics and the way most of programs make combinaisons & the way they run it. it's like roll a dice with a program from a computer. You can analyse the way it generates numbers with the code & the function random(). I ve read on this forum that some really intelligent developpers were loggind in many poker clients, letting them running to records all tables results from dealer 24/24. They combine it all & try to know the famous "random sequence". With something like this, if i can find back this forum, i could mb show you another explanation of this hack.<BR/>Sorry finally for my english, but i'm french.<BR/>Cheers & please Tiller, please the most you can have about this story please.<BR/>Thank you.<BR/>Darsch(¯`¬ Ҹқ.Darsch ⌐´¯) 【ツ】http://www.blogger.com/profile/17765626920743513839noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14973022.post-13000224528187144242007-09-18T10:48:00.000Z2007-09-18T10:48:00.000ZBlizzard is trying to build the game for competitive gamers...<BR/><BR/>All throughout the SC2 demonstration vids they're constantly talking about "in the hands of a skilled player" and such<BR/><BR/>And it looks like there's no limit to the productivity of worker units, which is supremely important, and also looks like it will be a high-supply mass-army kind of game<BR/><BR/>So Blizzard is doing some things right<BR/><BR/>But at the same time, I just don't see what 3 dimensions adds to an RTS game. 3D graphics just always seem to get in the way of the gameplay when it comes to RTS games, I've never played a 3d RTS that controlled smoothly and had smooth gameplay and quick unit reactions<BR/><BR/>WC3 was a massive failure imo, terrible game. The campaigns were alright, but wow, what an awful awful game to play competitively, just in every way.<BR/><BR/>There were huge luck factors, they could never balance the races right... the game punished you for expanding, the game punished you for building a large army<BR/><BR/>And as far as spectating that game, there was just nothing exciting to watch at all. The micromanagement was all slow and required little finesse, the macromanagement was all dumbed down to the point where nobody could outproduce anybody<BR/><BR/>Starcraft has really spoiled me, it'll be hard for me to ever like another RTS again I thinkAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14973022.post-82761117214710793932007-09-18T10:36:00.000Z2007-09-18T10:36:00.000ZI started doing the fake reaver drop when I had noticed that people had adapted to reaver drops and usually had the timing down and were ready to defend it. Since reavers take so long to train, as soon as the shuttle would pop, i'd float it over to my opponents minerals, they would send their workers running and i'd chase them around with an empty shuttle, it was hilarious. I only had it not work once and to this day i'm not sure if the guy was ignorant or good.]..Mad_game..[noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14973022.post-44726069863971054052007-09-18T02:04:00.000Z2007-09-18T02:04:00.000ZI have linked you up to my page, somebody mentioned you had a post about the UB accusations. Via a third party (who does not play poker) I heard several years ago of people who could see others hole cards. I am putting a post on my blog now.Punterzhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09856545033369169111noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14973022.post-67948283749333364552007-09-17T21:16:00.000Z2007-09-17T21:16:00.000ZIt should also be noted that they have near infinite river aggression.<BR/><BR/>Good luck in WCOOP 6!foalnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14973022.post-40918607066039701942007-09-17T20:47:00.000Z2007-09-17T20:47:00.000ZYeh, thx mike, kinda tilting over that. Hehe :)TillerMaNhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09915372792045776533noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14973022.post-48544266274206670832007-09-17T20:23:00.000Z2007-09-17T20:23:00.000ZGood luck in the PLO event today. Saw that you missed the add-on, doh! GG PokerStars!Mike S.http://www.pokersavvy.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14973022.post-36043753925391908712007-09-17T19:41:00.000Z2007-09-17T19:41:00.000ZHey Tillerman thought u may be interested in this:<BR/><BR/>http://jobs.problogger.net/view/770<BR/><BR/><BR/>-Lipton<BR/>www.Starfeeder.comStarfeederhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09535912689856647703noreply@blogger.com