tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14912650.post114133989248795003..comments2009-11-15T17:50:13.648-08:00Stevenoreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14912650.post-1168980919782598632007-01-16T12:55:00.000-08:002007-01-16T12:55:00.000-08:00Thanks for your post. I'm one of those people who's going to reference you in my post on this subject (should be out Saturday, 20 Jan 07. Right now I'm still doing research on it). My perspective is different, I think, in that I'm interested in developing/discovering tools to predict where blogging will go. Right now I'm going after an ecosystem concept. - JosephJoseph Carrabishttp://bizmediascience.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14912650.post-1141884005742739552006-03-08T22:00:00.000-08:002006-03-08T22:00:00.000-08:00Absolutely makes sense. SOme of the blog networks are launching "hubs", that aggregate content from several bloggers, within a specific niche. So, if you like to read about entertainment, a hub can bring in 20 of the best bloggers in that spectrum, and aggregate their writings into one RSS feed. Erati and Corante are already doing that.Stevehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07254867681706917705noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14912650.post-1141852868815224282006-03-08T13:21:00.000-08:002006-03-08T13:21:00.000-08:00I agree with you, Steve. One thought I had recently was that perhaps blogging will evolve to where it's "horizontal" more so than "vertical" - so instead of you and I visiting each other's websites, we simply have aggregation tools that automatically alert us to relevant posts from each other (and from other blogs according to our preferences).<BR/><BR/>Does that make any sense?Easton Ellsworthhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06085676567299530414noreply@blogger.com