tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14840542.post-38134860353211348162008-01-10T09:35:00.000-08:002008-01-10T09:35:00.000-08:00fronesis, i'd dump everyone else and vote for <I>you</I> in a heartbeat (and i know you to be crazy). mita and i indeed spent many carpooling hours this semester considering whether making up gore/whedon 08 bumper stickers was a crazy idea or a brilliant one.<BR/><BR/>and i don't know lilita, but i didn't think the edwards thing as offensive as everyone else seems to have. he was talking out his ass for the cameras as one must when one is running for president. if someone had asked me after 65,345, 677 hours of campaigning what i thought about HRC's "emotional moment," i would myself have burst into tears from sheer frustration at the question. so while, sure, obama's answer was better, i felt like, for instance, Broadsheet's response was, um, insane. Yes we love his voting record, his politics, his ideas, his supporters, his staff, and his positions, but he said this semi-critical thing about HRC based on something that seems gender-y (Broadsheet's -- and everyone else's -- fit here surely, but not Edwards's), and we are actually going to put a photo of an ork next to him. (okay, i paraphrased.) are they four? and is that not absurdly reductive and petty and point-missing and pandering and little girl-y? (btw, what the hell is an ork anyway? is this some kind of star wars ref i am missing?)mtgnoreply@blogger.com