Wake up Black America

Sonya Sotmayor's liberal allies target attacks on New Haven Firefighter Frank Ricci.

2009-07-11T23:48:00.003-03:00

The latest victim to experience the Saul Alinsky attacks by the left is New Haven Firefighter Frank Ricci. When liberals can't defend their causes or ideology against those that challenge them, they have to try and take out the messenger in an effort to "discredit the message". On the eve of the Sotomayor's confirmation hearing, the left is gearing up to aid Sonya by trying to get the media to dig up dirt on Frank Ricci. Some of you may be asking, "What does Frank Ricci's personal life has to do with Sotomayor's confirmation: I was hoping someone could tell me.

Obama's approval numbers are tanking among independent voters.

2009-07-10T09:18:00.007-03:00

I predicted this was going to happen way back in February. There really was no way Obama could have avoided this. Obama's popularity among independent voters is collapsing. It has gotten so bad that the crucial battleground states of Ohio and Virginia are starting to trend towards the GOP. Obama's approval rating in Ohio and Virginia is below 50!! Independent voters voted for Obama based on the expectations that he was better suited to fix the economy. The exit polls on election day stated that the economy was the top issue. Apparently their patients have run out. Don't expect the networks to report this news. Funny how the network media had no problem reporting on Bush's approval numbers when they were in free fall. These are the so called Fox News pundits reporting on the obvious. It's stunning how the "experts" almost seem shocked that this is happening to Obama.

Top that off with spending that has made Bush and Republicans look like Ebenezer Scrooge, Obama and Democrats are in a world of trouble going into the midterms. Democrats tried to use Rush Limbaugh as their new GOP bogey man a few months ago. I said back then that it wouldn't work. The whole "Limbaugh wants Obama to fail" spew never caught momentum like I predicted. The fringe within the Democrat Party bought into it hook line and sinker of course, but Independent voters never got caught up in it for a reason. They aren't "emotionally attached to Obama" like his kook base is. These latest poll numbers show that independent voters care whether Obama can fix the problems or not period. Here's omething else of note. Once again I have to pat myself on the back for something I said back in January. I mentioned as time goes on, people will gradually start to forget more and more about George Bush and focus more and more on Barack Obama's handling of the economy. I even said last week that none of Obama's championed legislation has been popular with the American people. People out of work could really care less about "curving green house gases" with cap and trade. Many on the right echoed that Obama is nothing more then Jimmy Carter version 2.0, and it appears that the "right is right". Is Obama historic or just "history repeating itself"?

Here's another dose of liberal hypocrisy, this time brought to you by Michael Moore.

2009-07-09T21:12:00.003-03:00

Time to get your popcorn ready folks. The second rate, self promoting, hypocritical, lard ass is about to come out with another movie. Michael Moore's movies are so bad, they actually make Spike Lee's movies seem legitimate. I've proven too many times to count now about how two faced most liberals are. For those liberals who still don't want to embrace reality, I'm going to inject you with another dose of the bitter truth. Michael Moore is coming out with a new movie in October entitled "Capitalism A Love Story". His so called "documentary" is nothing more then an anti capitalism flick. I don't really have a problem with Moore making this movie. Very few people are going to go and watch it anyways. This is my problem with Moore though. He's a fraud. Liberals will never call out other liberals for being fake, because they're just as fake as the next person. Nobody from MTV, E Entertainment, Rolling Stones, GQ, US Magazine or others in Hollyweird will ever ask Moore what he'll do with the money he makes from the movie. So what will Moore do with the money? If capitalism is bad according to Moore, why didn't he fund his anti capitalism movie himself? I'm more then certain that the people who foolishly financed this destined disaster are actually expecting to make a "profit" on this film. Oh well, fools and their money are soon departed. I know Michael Moore is hoping his movie does well. It's not because he wants to "open the eyes of Americans". He wants to "cash in". File this under the Hollywood liberal hypocrisy file.

Is Malia Obama fair game for attack for making a "political statement"?

2009-07-09T20:13:00.014-03:00

This debate has been going on for a few weeks on the blog since Letterman made his crude joke about Willow Palin. I've gotten a lot of emails from other conservatives that are fed up with always being expected to take the "moral high ground" when it comes to dealing with the double standards of liberals being able to attack conservatives but never the other way around. Liberals made the claim that Sarah Palin's children were "fair game", because Palin "put her children out their in the public eye". Well take a look at this picture. For some reason I mistook the picture originally for Michelle Obama, but this picture is actually of Malia Obama in Rome Italy. Italy is where the G8 summit will take place. The Obama children have been seen more times in public then the Bush Twins or Chelsea Clinton ever were combined. If a candidate's child or children become politically active, should they still remain off limits to criticism and attack? This picture of Malia wearing a peace symbol Tshirt says no. This is is a paragraph from the Guardian UK.
Guardian UK" Given the intense sartorial scrutiny to which her parents have been exposed, it seems unlikely that the T-shirt was packed or pulled on by accident."

Guardian UK" While Barack Obama struggles to reinvigorate the G8 summit in L'Aquila,Italy his elder daughter has apparently launched her own campaign to educate the planet about nuclear. She was snapped leaving a Rome ice-cream parlour today in a T-shirt bearing the CND symbol, one of the world's most recognizable and political logos."

I find it odd that Malia would wear such a shirt knowing what it stands for less then 72 hours after Barack and Russian President Medvedev signed a peliminary agreement to cut back their nuclear arsenals.

Guardian UK "A CND spokesman expressed delight at seeing the logo on a member of the first family."Perhaps Malia has been the driving force behind the administration's push towards a new disarmament deal? We'll get an 'I'd-rather-grow-up-than-blow-up' T-shirt in the post to her straight away."

If Malia Obama was making a political statement, then she should know what the consequences of her actions can be. Prominent liberal Arianna Huffington of the Huffington post said that the Palin children were "fair game" as well. I came across this headline from the Infidels's Paradise, "If The Palin Kids Are “Fair Game” Why Isn’t She?" That is a good question, and I don't have an answer for that. It does show that I'm not the only conservative thinking the same thing.

Why didn't Obama just ask her to be his intern while he was at it?

2009-07-09T17:33:00.008-03:00

GOT STIMULUS?

Looks like Obama likes a little cream in his coffee after all. In his brief moment he forgot that he was married to someone black and extremely bitter. I don't believe the "black racist militant crowd" that voted for him might not be so open minded about this. What would the folks at the Trinity United Cult think? This is a picture for the ages. For once, I'm actually defending Obama on something. If I was married to Michelle, I'll be looking at every woman that crossed my path twice as well! Bill Clinton is probably kicking himself right now. This picture was taken today in Italy at the G8 summit. I can only imagine what Nicolas Sarkozy and Barack Obama were thinking. If George Bush was catch in a picture like this, it would have been non stop coverage of how "unfaithful" Bush was and a so called hypocrite conservative or something along those lines. I'm sure if Obama would have whipped out one of his robotic, monotone speeches, that lady would have passed out from either excitement or from pure boredom. I choose boredom of course.

Americans move more and more to the right.

2009-07-06T21:08:00.004-03:00

Americans, by a 2-to-1 margin, say their political views in recent years have become more conservative rather than more liberal, 39% to 18%, with 42% saying they have not changed. The Gallup poll really isn't shocking news. This has been the trend for the last several years. If anyone finds the poll doubtful, It is indeed accurate. Barack Obama has proven that he is a socialist. There is really no denying that. When Obama was on the campaign trail last year, he became very angry when he was labeled a "socialist".

This goes back to the whole "Joe The Plumber" chapter last year. Obama tried to shake off the socialist brand, because he knew how Americans would react if they knew the truth.

Obama talked boldly about tax cuts and restricting spending. It was all an act to mask what he represented. He tried to pass himself off as a "centrist". A nickel late and a dime short later, people are starting to realize that the warnings given by others about Obama weren't just Republican propaganda. If you all have paid attention to the public reaction to the bills Obama has pedaled so far for public support, all of them have been met with negative reaction. This is no coincidence. Americans didn't embrace Obama's stimulus bill, mortgage modification bill, omnibus spending bill, the take over of GM, Chrysler, AIG and Citibank, and the creation of 23 "czars". Americans are also not in favor of the Cap & Trade bill that is now in the Senate. Americans are even luke warm on the idea of the government getting into the health care business. With all of this liberal garbage been rammed down people's throats, this is why Republicans now find themselves tied withe Democrats in the generic congressional midterm ballot poll. I accidentally deleted a good portion of the archived stories I wrote a few months ago. One of those stories was about why the Republican Party lost power in 2006 and 2008. I commented that the Republicans lost power in congress in 2006, because they lost their conservative way several years prior. Some of the idiotic pundits would claim that it was the Iraq war that caused the GOP's down fall in 2006 and 2008. If that was truly the case, Bush would have lost to Kerry in 2004. When Republicans started to act like liberal Democrats, that was when the wheels started to come off the wagon. Polls show that the Republican Party is shrinking in size mainly due to conservatives leaving the party and registering as independents. I've said before that conservatives don't lose presidential elections against liberal candidates, and I still stand by that claim. No matter how much the neo conservative crowd tries to spin McCain's defeat, it was the fact that McCain didn't have a core conservative message in which to not only rally conservatives but also attract Independents. Obama is personally liked among his liberal base of Democrats, but he is noticeably losing support among Independents. Fiscal restraint is a conservative trait, and more and more people are demanding that congress stop spending money they don't have. If Republicans can get off on being stuck on stupid, they have a very good shot at swinging the momentum back towards the right. They need to "give the people what they want".

The seeds for Palin already being planted in Iowa?

2009-07-05T18:19:00.003-03:00

This gentleman's name is Harlan Muth. He's a resident of Marion Iowa. I guess it's never to late or in this case early to make a first impression. Mr. Muth has displayed his Palin 2012 car window sign on his car since last year's election. I like it, but he better be careful driving around with that sign. Obama fringe loyalists aren't tolerant to anything in opposition to him.

My analysis: Sarah Palin is running for President in 2012

2009-07-04T12:57:00.006-03:00

Palin", "We are not retreating. We are advancing in another direction."

I've rarely been wrong in what I've posted on this blog since it's conception. I don't think I'm wrong now. When Palin announced she was resigning as Governor of Alaska, I was taken back by the sudden decesion of Sarah. I went back and watched the video of her speech. Then I started to think and think and think. Then I displayed a very smirked grin, because a light bulb went off in my head. It was like everything just fell into place like playing Tetris. If Sarah Palin is going to do what I think she is going to do, the woman is as crazy as a fox and a genius on top. I debated my theory for Palin's resignation, and I have yet to find any flaw with it. Here is the reason why Sarah Palin resigned now instead of waiting until her term ended in 2011.

Go back to last year. The political primary session was pushed way back to January 3rd. States wanted to push their primaries back to coincide and compete with the Iowa Caucus and the New Hampshire Primary. Other states wanted their primaries to have some validity and not be taken for granted by the candiates. Last year's Iowa Caucus took place on January 3rd. That is a very important date to keep in mind. If Sarah Palin was to have finished out her first term as Governor, she wouldn't have left office until January 22th of 2011. That would have only given Palin "less then a year" to create a campaign team from scratch, go across country to raise money, and create a support staff in Iowa and New Hampshire along with organizing her supporters nationwide. It would have been logistically impossible to have accomplish a massive undertaking like that in less then 1 year time. If Palin would have stayed to completion, she would have only been severely handicapping herself in the process. Furthermore, this would have given her GOP rivals time to out raise money and have an obvious advantage over her. Here is a text book example of what I mean. Fred Thompson entered the Republican primary race on September 6th of 2007. That was less then three months before Iowa. His campaign was in disarray from the beginning primarily due to rushing to make up time and total miscommunication. Palin's haters can call her a "quitter" all they like. They must not have listened to the same speech I've heard. Palin isn't a quitter, if anything she's an "opportunist". If Palin truly wasn't going to run for President in 2012, why she just didn't say that she wasn't going to run for President either? Think about that. This sums it all up and then some.

Great minds think alike. This is Mark Levin's take on Palin's resignation.

Sarah Palin to resign as Governor of Alaska on July 26!

2009-07-03T18:03:00.007-03:00

What is going on here?!! The death of Michael Jackson was one shock I never saw coming. Sarah Palin just announcing that she will be resigning as Governor is another shock I didn't see coming. I can't figure out the reason why she's doing it. I don't even know how to begin commenting on this news. Palin has been very vague over the last few weeks about whether she was going to run for reelection as Governor. Any news that comes out of the media is going to be pure speculation regarding her reasons. She threw the political establishment for a loop when McCain announced her last summer as his VP pick, and she has done it again today.

With the self destruction of Mark Sanford's political career and potential 2012 ambitions, the window of opportunity for Palin winning the nomination seems that much more viable. That is of course if she is still going to pursue it. As I see it right now, Palin's only true competition for the Republican Nomination is Mitt Romney. I'm definitely going to have to do some investigative digging on this story. If Palin is truly considering running for the 2012 Republican nomination, then it wouldn't make any sense for her to run for reelection as Governor. If that is her motive, why would she resign this early? Why didn't she just announce that she would finish her term and not run for reelection? I have more questions then answers, and that isn't normal for me. The news story is all over the Internet. I'm sure the media's liberal stooges of Couric, Lauer and Gibson will be doing back flips over the news. With Palin not on the political radar, other liberals are going to go nuclear. They won't have Sarah around in which to channel their insane loathing against her. Liberals want to frame Sarah Palin as dumb, but the woman is clearly anything but dumb. She is clever as a fox. The question remains is Sarah Palin "burned out" from the negative media onslaught or is she "laying the groundwork" for her quest for the White House in 2012?

The Baltimore Tea Party Report: Part 2

2009-07-03T15:24:00.004-03:00

I estimated the Tea Party crowd at around 250. My pictures don't do the crowd justice. I had to narrow my shots because of the sun's glare as you all can see. That wasn't a bad turnout at all, because the main Tea Party was held that same day in our state capital of Annapolis. The speakers were just fantastic. They spoke with a lot of passion and determination. It was great to listen to people that were actually informed on the dismal affairs going on in Washington and Annapolis. Right now I'm kicking myself, because I can't member the name of the Marine that served in Iraq. He gave one hell of a speech, and the crowd really responded to it. If I find out his name, I'll post it later. He's definitely a hero. One of the other speakers that caught my eye was a gentleman by the name of Charles Lawyer. I guess Jeane Garofalo would have claimed that Mr. Lawyer suffered from "Stockholm Syndrome. Charles Lawyer is black. So much for the claims by the kooky left that only "whites have a beef with Obama and how government is being run". I really wish I would have taped Charles's speech. His speech flat out rocked!! Another great speaker was former Gubernatorial candidate Ellen Sauerbrey. Ellen had the election stolen from her back in 1994 in favor of Paris Glendening. What happened to Ellen was a near carbon copy of what happened to Norm Coleman in Minnesota. That's a different story for a different day. Ellen also gave an impassioned speech on the Constitution and how it's being ruined. I really wish she would run again for office. Her values and common sense approach to everyday problems are sorely needed in this state. This is Gubernatorial candidate Mike Pappas speaking at the Tea Party. He's running for Governor in 2010. I sure hope he beats O'Malley if he gets the Republican Nomination. I'm not in this video. I was speaking to another person off camera to the right.

All in all, it was a terrific event. I believe one the local Fox affiliate was taping the event. I have to check to see if I can find any video. This won't be my last Tea Party. Liberals don't understand the concept of the Tea Parties. Maybe that is a good thing. They are already confused enough.

The Baltimore Tea Party Report: Part 1

2009-07-03T14:15:00.010-03:00

The Baltimore Tea Party was a great success. It didn't start out that way however. The BTP was scheduled to take place at the Inner Harbor Amphitheater at 5:00pm. Unfortunately, another event was already taking place at the time. The event was some promotion for some cellphone company. I'm not blaming them, because they had nothing to do with the timing and use of the space. Baltimore's finest was a different story. The Baltimore Police wanted the Tea Party crowd to organize all the way on the other side of the Inner Harbor near Rash Field. If that would have happened, late Tea Party attendees wouldn't have known where to find the event. Fortunately we were allowed to gather at the Baltimore Visitor Center. In reality, that location was much better then having to gather at Rash Field. Special thanks goes out to Jessica Ryan for organizing the Baltimore Tea Party. I found out that she is also a resident of the city of Baltimore. Go figure, I thought I was the only odd ball conservative in an overwhelmingly liberal city. Well at least I'm not alone. It was so great to be surrounded by normal thinking, patriotic, common sense people for once. It was a refreshing break from my ordinary routine of having to interact with ignorant, crude bottom feeding liberals that inhabit this city. I was going to bring my camcorder, but I decided to just bring my digital camera instead at the last minute. I guess I got lazy. Living in Baltimore can do that to you. The Tea Party was very well organized, and it went off without a hitch once it got started. For those who are wondering, I didn't speak at the event. The scheduled speakers said everything I've felt and then some. The signs were great. One protester brought a flag that was upside down. Some of the other protesters thought it was in bad taste. I didn't think it was. An upside down flag represents distress, and our country is definitely in a state of distress. Contrary to what left wing kooks tried to paint the event as, it wasn't a "partisan event". It was an American event and nothing more. Some candidates were on hand to speak, but their speeches were based on ideology and the current events in Washington and Annapolis. I have more to say about the speakers in the next post.

Justice is served and a "dream" lives on.

2009-06-30T07:00:00.010-03:00

The ruling yesterday by the Supreme Court in favor of the white New Haven firefighters represents a great day for Civil Rights in America. I can't wrap my mind around how liberals think on the aspects of "equal justice" in America. What they view as "equality" is anything but "equality". In reality, their concept of equality is to discriminate against one group "whites" in favor of another "non whites". It is in essence "robbing from Peter in order to pay Paul". At the end of the day, someone still got robbed. The people that were robbed in the New Haven fire fighter's exam were white firefighters and one Hispanic firefighter. Yesterday in a five to four ruling, The Supreme Court ruled that the City of New Haven Connecticut was wrong in denying the promotion of white firefighters that scored higher then other black firefighters on the promotional exam. Liberals do not see non whites as "equals" in society, especially white liberals. They see blacks and Hispanics as nothing more then "oppressed victims" that some how can't do for themselves without their help. This is the sole purpose why liberal activists "dumb down" tests to begin with. They want to achieve an "equal outcome" by "lowering the bar". I guess in their delusion of good intentions, they can't see that their actions are actually hurting blacks and Hispanics more so then helping them. When the City of New Haven originally threw out the promotion exam because blacks didn't score high enough, that demonstrated what the officials in New Haven thought about the black firefighters in the first place. From a liberal's perspective, they blame the test for being "racist" or "geared towards whites". Normal people would just say that the black firefighters need to "STUDY HARDER SO THEY CAN GET A HIGHER SCORE ON THE NEXT EXAM", Sorry for yelling, but I wanted to make a contrasting point between the two mindsets. If liberals truly believed in the potential of blacks and Hispanics as "individuals" regardless of their race and economic backgrounds, they would be telling them to study harder and apply themselves, but they don't do that. The white firefighters in the New Haven case played by the rules, and they rightfully deserve their promotions. This is a great day for those that still believe that a person should be "judged on the content of their character and not the color of their skin".

Why are the race pimps speaking for the Jackson family?

2009-06-29T22:35:00.004-03:00

I am suffering a brain freeze trying to come up with a rational answer to that question. I know that Al Shartpon and Jesse Jackson are lower then smelly dog crap on a hundred degree day. I also know they they are two self serving, egotistical, race hustling poverty pimps. Normally when a son dies in a family, the mother and father speaks for the family. Joe Jackson should be the person speaking out on the latest news regarding Michael. I wish Jesse and Al would go somewhere and sit the hell down already. Contrary to what they might think, the black community doesn't revolve around them. If Joe Jackson was any type of a man, he would handle the affairs of HIS SON. Here is CNN kissing the behind of Jesse "I have a sceam" Jackon. This whole Michael Jackson situation has officially become a full blown circus.

In my "fair and balanced" reporting of the snake oil salesmen, here's Al Sharpton finding a way to get "face time" to exploit the death of Michael Jackson.

Is Obama a "super hero" or "super zero"?

2009-06-29T21:44:00.001-03:00

Here's a hint. It's not the first choice. This is the latest parody from Jib-Jab. They've seriously outdone themselves with their latest creation. Obama has not come to save the day!!

Jon Voight: Obama is a "false prophet".

2009-06-29T21:22:00.003-03:00

Jon Voight is one of the few actors in Hollywood that is openly "out of the political closet"as a conservative Republican. To be that in Hollywood is "taboo". I have a tremendous amount of respect for Mr. Voight. He's not only extremely brave, but he's also very bright. Jon Voight understands not only how Republicans lost in 2006 and 2008, but he also has a very clear concept on what Republicans need to do in order to regain power in 2010 and 2012. The question of course is, will cowardly Republicans even listen? Jon Voight addressed the National Republican Senatorial Committee and the National Republican Congressional Committee back on June 4th at a Republican dinner function in Washington DC. In his speech, Jon really took Obama and the media to task. His speech should be listened to by every person that calls themself a conservative. Jon referred to Obama as a "false prophet" which can't be disputed. It's nice to know that I'm not the only person that also see Obama for the false idol his sicko worshipers and the media try to prop him up as being. Mr. Voight should consider giving up acting in hollyweird and truly dwell on running for political office. After watching this speech, I believe it will be very hard for anyone to not come to that conclusion. Jon Voight is the real deal!!

Warren Buffet claims the economy is in "Shambles".

2009-06-29T20:28:00.002-03:00

I wonder exactly how long did it take for Buffet to figure that out? Warren Buffet is an investment genius. He rotates between being the second and third richest man in the world according to Forbes Magazine. That's where my praise for Buffet stops cold. Warren Buffet is a Democrat and, he voted for Obama. In a interview last week on CNBC, Warren Buffet said point blank that the economy is currently in "Shambles" with no real signs of recovery. I can only assume that Warren is a fan of capitalism and the free market. I don't understand how anybody that claims to embrace free market capitalism could have voted for and still support Barack Obama to this day. Warren Buffet is rich in wealth, yet he's not that bright in common sense outside of his investment realm. Since Buffet understands that the economy is in "Shambles", why does he still like Barack Obama? Why does he believe so much that a radical fascist gives a dam or cares anything about repairing and promoting a free market economy? If Warren and other wealthy liberals believe the economy is bad now, they really haven't seen nothing yet. Maybe they need to lose a few more billions to help them understand the obvious. Liberalism isn't about wealth creation. It's about wealth redistrubtion.

The reasons why the 4th of July Tea Party protests are needed.

2009-06-28T15:16:00.011-03:00

It is time for all of us so called "right wing extremist" to gather once again. A lot has transpired in our nation since the first round of Tea Parties were held back on April 15th. To say that the Tea Parties are needed now more then ever is a gross understatement. Obama and his foot soldiers in congress are trying to ram down our country's throat so much poison, I don't see how the country can survive it if it's all passed. I was very pleased to hear that the "ABC-OBAMA" production on the promotion of Obama's health care "reform" bombed in the ratings. Even with that said, Obama is still pushing hard to get a government run health care bill passed by the end of this year. I posted the results of the Gallup poll showing that Obama is losing support among independent voters. This goes back to what I've said back in April during the first round of Tea Party protests. Liberals and their media allies tried to paint the people attending the Tea Parties as nothing more then "white, racist, Republicans" mad that a black man is in the White House. They conveniently stuck their fingers in their ears to the truth as usual. The Tea Parties were attended by not only Republicans but Democrats and also the all important "Independent" voters. The recent Gallup poll verified that Americans across the political spectrum are in deed becoming increasingly upset with not only Obama but self serving politicians in congress in general. The cap and tax bill passed in the House of Representatives Friday. If you aren't sitting down while reading this, you just might want to do so now. It appears that the idiots and morons in congress that VOTED IN FAVOR OF THE BILL " DIDN'T EVEN READ IT"!!!! Yes you all read right. The 1500 page cap and tax bill passed without any of the self serving liars that voted for it actually reading it. This is why the Tea Parties are vitally needed. If someone asked me to endorse a book, I would be an absolute fool to do so without at least reading it first. I forget to mention something else about the cap and tax bill. Once it was announced that the bill did pass, THE GARBAGE THAT VOTED FOR AND DIDN'T EVEN READ THE BILL "CHEERED" ONCE IT WAS CONFIRMED THAT IT PASSED!! That really angers me, and this is why it does. 219 members of congress voted in favor of the cap and tax bill, eight Republican rinos were included. I bet if I asked every congress person that voted in favor of that bill that they didn't even want to read, "were they looking out for my best interests" when they voted, everyone of them would look me in the eye one bye one and say "YES". This is why the Tea Parties are needed. It is really that simple. In the real world, people are fired for not doing their job. Call me crazy or even a little bit naive, but I always thought that politicians were suppose to vote yes or no on any legislation BASED ON WHAT IS IN THE LEGISLATION!! I forgot to mention something else. If people aren't ready to march on Washington yet, this will probably be the icing on the cake. I forgot to mention that the original cap and tax bill was 1200 pages. Friday at 3:09 am in morning, 300 more pages were added to the then 1200 page bill. This made the entire bill 1500 pages total, and the entire bill was voted on 16 hours later. Do anyone recall the words of Nancy Pelosi when she was sworn in as the Liar aka Speaker of the House?

She claimed that the Democrats were going to lead the "most honest, most ethical, most open congress in history". Did the way the "stimulus" and "cap and tax" bills were passed represent "honesty" and "transparency" ? Here is one last note on why the Tea Parties are vitally necessary. Did any of you see the "Stimulus Bill" posted online before it was signed by Obama? Did any of you see any of the legislation posted online before Obama signed it into law? If you answered no, don't be feel bad. The bills were never posted in the first place. I posted what Pelosi said about ethics and transparency, let's hear those same hollow words from the person at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. Once again, now do you all understand why the Tea Parties are necessary?

Obama admites Americans will pay more for energy if his cap and tax bill is passed and signed into law.

2009-06-26T16:24:00.005-03:00

The Obama nation doesn't want to see the writing that is currently on the wall. If they want to remain blind and in the dark, I have no problem with that. For some people ignorance is bliss. It is a different story for the rest of us. The people that have never joined the "yes we can" societal cult know more about Barack Hussein Obama then his loyal zombies that worship the ground he walks on. Obama said last year that he wasn't going to raise taxes on people that made over $250k a year. Is it safe to say that increased energy prices act as a "tax" to the American people? I would say it does. If people are spending more money on energy and less in the economy, is the economy going to "grow" or "contract"? I can't make up or manipulate common sense. Liberals don't get it. This is why I've said over and over that Obama "doesn't care about fixing the economy", he never did. It was never apart of his plan. The economy started to slow down last year, when energy prices started to go through the roof. If that being said, I want you all to listen to Barack Obama "IN HIS OWN WORDS". This is Obama talking about the impact of the passing of a "cap and trade" bill will have on the average citizen's energy rates. Obama would look like a deer caught in the headlights of an approaching car at high speed if he was asked this question. How is it in the "best interest" of Americans and the economy to pay a lot more for energy?

The King of Pop has died, and the world has come to a stand still.

2009-06-25T21:18:00.010-03:00

For the first time in a long time, I'm absolutely speechless and am in shock. This story obviously isn't going to have a political motive behind it. The sudden death of Michael Jackson can only be measured as an "historic catastrophic global shock". My favorite decade was the 80's without a doubt. Michael Jackson was one of my favorite performers. Many people claim that Michael Jackson was as big or if not bigger then Elvis Presley and the Beatles. Since the announcement of his death, all of his videos on You tube have spiked into the millions. Also, it has been reported that the entire Internet came to crawl due to so many people logging into Internet news sites to find out what happened. I'm not going to jump on the negatives of Jackson's life like the media wolf pac has done since they've learned of his passing. Michael Jackson was only 50 years old. The news outlets are saying that he died of a heart attack. I'm sure the official cause will surface in the following days. Thanks for the memories Michael, and you will be missed.

ABC decides to become Obama's loyal whore in order to promote his government health care proposal.

2009-06-23T21:52:00.007-03:00

How gullible can people get? I understand that our country is full of lazy, unmotivated, leeches. I also understand that these people are for a lack of a better word, "freeloaders". These people are liberal in nature and feel its the responsibility of the government to "take care of them". I hear them constantly using the words "free health care" or "universal health care". Any service that is promoted as being "free" will be abused. Its human nature, and that will never change. If I ran an ad in the local newspaper here in Baltimore saying that I was "giving away" a car in running condition, my phone wouldn't stop ringing off the hook. This is why the whole essence of the government running health care is so gravely dangerous. If the federal government does indeed take over the health care system, insanely long waiting lines and sub standard care will become the norm. People will go to the hospital merely for something relatively stupid like a splinter or a hang nail. Their reasoning will be that "its no money out of their pocket", and "that's why they pay taxes for". Tomorrow on ABC News, the network has decided to make itself a bigger whore for Barack Obama then they usual are. They will be broadcasting from the White House. The reason for this "special event" is so that Obama can pitch his "Obamacare" government plan. ABC didn't want any opposing views against Obama's plan, they went as far as to turn down "paid" advertising from groups that have a different perspective on the impact of government health care. So ABC's broadcast will be nothing more then a glorified Obama informerical. ABC "claims their coverage will be balanced" in their questioning of Obama. Why would anyone for one mintue expect a network that donated heavily to Obama's campaign will ask Obama even one hard question? They didn't do it during the campaign, so why would they start now? I roll my eyes just knowing what the reaction would be if George Bush invited Fox News to broadcast from the White House to help promote the Iraq war. I wonder how many people in our country remember when Obama claimed up and down that he wasn't a "socialist". I wonder could he explain to the American people now how his government run health care plan isn't the ultimate form of socialism? A sucker is truly born every minute, if he or she believes that the government will give them a "chicken in every pot" and "free first class health care".

Looks like Obama's approval rating is finally starting to come down to earth.

2009-06-21T21:53:00.014-03:00

When you follow politics, you start to notice certain trends. I knew Obama's approval numbers had to come down to normal levels eventually. Some couldn't figure out why his approval numbers remained high month after month. To me it was a clear as water flowing out of a tap. Back in December, I said that Obama had two types of supporters that made it possible for him to win the election. He won among his base of Democrat kooks, and he won the majority of Independents voters. Democrats voted for Obama overwhelmingly because of his skin color, his liberal ideology, and he wasn't George W. Bush. Independents on the other hand voted for Obama based mainly on the current issues. The number one issue that came out of the exit polls was "the economy". Well we are almost seven months into the Obama "era", and it looks like reality is starting to set in for Obama. The latest Gallup Poll was released the other day, and it showed what I knew was going to happen. Obama's approval numbers have slipped to it's lowest rating yet at 58%. Many would say that it is still a high percentage of support. I agree, but Obama's all time high was around 70% percent. Look at the graph very carefully, and you all will see why Obama is sinking slowly but steadily. Obama has maintained his very high support among his Democrat bottom feeding base. That is to be expected. His support among Independents is where things get interesting. Obama biggest drop in approval has come from Independents voters. I gave a detailed explanation why Republicans lost control of congress in 2006 and why McCain lost to Obama in November. Candidates regardless of party affiliation "can't win elections with out attracting support from "Independent voters". Independent voters are looking at the issues and how Obama is addressing them, and they don't like what they see. Obama's numbers dropped 7 points among Independent voters and 4 points among Republican voters. Even with Obama's support among Dems increasing, it isn't enough to keep his overall approval numbers above 60%. If Obama continues to lose support among Independents, his approval numbers could get down to the low 50% range. I don't want this to happen just yet. I want to see his numbers start to tank among Independent voters around 2011 going into 2012. Independents are becoming very upset at Obama's reckless spending and his "out in the open" power grab to expand the federal government. I said it many times that Obama benefited from the nation's negative taste of George W. Bush. The decline in Obama's numbers prove that Obama can no longer milk the "blame bush cow" in order to mask his failures. People are starting to catch on. For whatever it's worth, it's still an interesting trend, and it's a clear signal that the "Honeymoon is coming to an end" for Obama.

The speech Obama should be giving on the current events in Iran, but Obama isn't Reagan.

2009-06-21T09:18:00.002-03:00

Reagan knew all about the power of freedom. He knew it was worth fighting for and worth dying for. This is why Obama my be a "historic" president, but he'll never be a "great" president like Reagan.

Obama and his legions say that America should just sit back and say absolutely nothing about the civil unrest in Iran. Contrast the speech President Reagan gave on freedom to the words of Obama on "staying out of Iran's business".

The world reacts to the turmoil in Iran, yet the leader of the free world remains silent.

2009-06-20T21:07:00.003-03:00

Obama needs to consult with a higher power on how to proceed with addressing the civil unrest in Iran. His all knowing teleprompter is rumored to be in the shop for repairs. Maybe he can consult with former President Jimmy Carter. Oh wait a minute, he was the reason for the Islamic Revolution in Iran in the first place. There are people in our country that believe that Obama shouldn't say anything. In my book it's different. A person either stands for something or he or she will fall for anything. Barack Obama is pathetically weak on foreign policy. I guess since I'm not a community organizer by trade, the obvious makes sense to me. This is what erks me about Hussein. He tries to tippy toe on the issue of the Iranian election and the current protests. He's trying to present a picture of the United States being as neutral as possible on the issue while the world reacts with protests of their own.

Obama has talked relentlessly about "respecting Iran's sovereignty", he doesn't practice what he preaches, when it comes to respecting the sovereignty and rights of the Israelis and Israel as a whole. I find it odd that Obama wants to almost micro manage the creation of a Palestinian state, yet he wants no part in expressing solidarity to the people in Iran that are standing up for the democratic process. Speaking of Israel, just 6 percent of Jewish Israelis believe President Obama's policies are pro-Israel, according to a new Jerusalem Post pol l. Contrast the feelings of Israeli's towards Obama to that of George Bush. 88 percent of Jewish Israelis believed that the Bush administration was pro-Israel. It looks like Jews in the United States truly sold Israel down the river, when they voted overwhelmingly for Obama seven months ago. I guess I'm wonder does Obama truly respect the "sovereignty" of Israel like he claims he does for Iran? Sure Obama is brave to buck bad with a fly, two teenage pirates and Benjamin Netanyahu, but that seems to be where his bravery ends. Obama doesn't' want to comment on the Iranian elections, but he has no problem telling Israel that it can't expand it's settlements in order to take care of the growth of their people. This is from the L.A Times "The public disagreement between President Obama and the Israeli government appears to be headed for a solution. But concessions by the U.S. could undercut Obama's influence among Arabs". The translation is this. If Obama concedes anything to Netanyahu, it will hurt Obama's "street creds" among his Islamic brothers. I believe Obama should follow his own advice, and stop meddling in the affairs of others, that includes Israel.

A show of might by Barack Obama "against a common house fly".

2009-06-19T00:11:00.005-03:00

You won't see Obama acting tough against dictators such as Kim Jong Il or Hugo Chavez. Obama isn't even brave enough to lend support to the students in Iran that are fighting for their democracy. Obama acted like a coward in the presence of Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez. All of that has changed. Barack Obama demonstrated how tough he is yesterday. No he didn't demonstrate forcefulness against tyrants and dictators, he fought and won against a much formidable opponent.

America for once can be proud of Obama. He forcefully took action against the common house fly. It was laughable watching Obama point to the fly that he killed. The CNBC crew thought Obama was the greatest person ever for merely killing a fly. I guess Obama's ego wasn't pumped up before the interview.

How is "Obamacare" going to be funded?

2009-06-17T17:45:00.004-03:00

How is Obama and Democrats going to pay for Obama's government sponsored health care? I've heard the dribble about how it's going to "compete" with private insurers in the free market. It actually sounds odd just saying it. Saying that the government is going to compete with the private sector is like saying oil is going to try and bond with water. Government doesn't work well with nor likes the private sector. The whole notion of government entering the private sector to "compete" is so bogus just on face value alone. Companies are in business to make money. Profit is a dirty word that Obama and liberal politicians don't like to hear. If the government cared about profitability, Amtrak and the Post Office would be both running in the "black" instead of constantly in the "red". I've said this many times before, Government is about "control". Obama can care less how much money it will take to create this disaster in the making. The goal is simple. The more people that are dependent on the government is more people under the government's thumb. Think of government entitlements as nothing more then "political crack". From a financial perspective, it is no way possible that any good can come from a government health care system. Right now our country is in debt up to it's eyeballs, yet the money presses just keep on running and printing. In the exit polls conducted after the election, people claimed that the economy was their number one issue. Americans are getting extremely ticked off at the government's continuous accumulation of debt. The state governments are equally as guilty in all this. California is on the verge of bankruptcy because of fiscally irresponsible, self serving politicians. Obama is no different. Obama and Democrats don't want to use the "Congressional Budget Office" numbers to predict how much Obamacare is going to cost. Thats because it completely exposes how much of a catastrophic disaster this scam really is going to be to the public. Obama nor his loyal stooges can give a straight answer on the actual cost. How much will it cost?! I have another question. Is Obamacare going fix the economy? Never mind what I just said. I forgot that "A CRISIS IS A TERRIBLE THING TO WASTE".