Gravity Control Idealism

Time Lines and Distortions

2008-01-06T12:38:00.002-08:00

In order to understand what time lines are we need to revisit the Apollo missions, which began in 1969.

When the first lunar samples arrived at the Johnson Space Center they were placed in quarantine while tests were conducted to determine if the lunar samples represented a hazard to the Earth's ecology.

Both plant and animal species were subjected to and/or injected with a solution of water containing finely pulverized Moon rock. In one particular test both corn and bean seeds were watered with this Moon rock solution. The seeds germinated and the resulting plants grew at an accelerated rate--but they also developed genetic deformities and cancerous growths.

Initially I speculated that the lunar samples would affect accelerated growth in plants, but I had not considered the possibility of genetic deformities or cancerous growths developing. So this was a shocking revelation to say the least.

Today NASA denies the original test results and claims that none of the various plant and animal species subjected to or injected with the lunar solution suffered any ill effects whatsoever, but it does maintain that the lunar solution affected accelerated growth in plants.

However, these radical effects did occur and should have brought the space program to a grinding halt. We should have gone back to the drawing board in order to develop the science and technology necessary to access the environment of another planetary body safely and efficiently, but this did not happen. It was business as usual and still is.

Einstein once said that time is different for every system in motion and of course it is, but what exactly does this mean? Unfortunately, Einstein viewed the universe in terms of linear proportions, which in turn limited our view and our understanding of the universe as well as much of what he himself was attempting to convey.

Certainly we need linear proportions to build a house, but when it comes to the basic principles of the universe those same linear proportions get us into trouble with respect to our ambition to establish a manned base on the Moon or to colonize another planetary body.

The planets, moons and stars share a non-linear relationship which includes time lines, in that lunar time runs much faster than Earth time. So, the aspect of the Moon which presents itself to us is in fact lunar history or the lunar past existing in our Earth's present.

And in that time is different on the Moon the Moon is dynamically out of sync with our terrestrial environment. The underlying dynamics affecting the form and function of lunar material are significantly out of step with the underlying dynamics affecting the form and function of Earthly material.

It should be noted that there is an energy differential existing between the Earth and the Moon in relation to the underlying energy affecting the form and function of physical structure. In this respect lunar materials have a higher ratio of energy per unit of mass than our Earthly materials.

Consequently the Moon has a distortional effect on the Earth and lunar materials have a distortional effect on the dynamics of terrestrial flora and fauna.

We seem to have the idea that the only thing separating us from the Moon is a certain linear distance, much like the distance between one city and another, measured in miles or kilometers, but this is hardly the case.

So why do we ignore time lines and behave as if they do not exist?

To start with someone would have to explain why government agencies have been hiding critical information not only from the public but from NASA scientists and engineers--information critical to establishing a manned base on the Moon or colonizing another planetary body.

At the present time we are talking about a manned mission to Mars and considering the possibility of utilizing Martian water to sustain the mission crew. But if Mars is out of sync with our Earth so is Martian water out of sync with the biological chemistry of the mission crew. So the apparent or real purity of Martian water is not the problem or the issue: it is the underlying dynamics of the water which would ultimately affect the health and safety of the mission crew.

If it were know that a manned mission to Mars was presently beyond our reach and the establishment of a manned base on the Moon was not feasible or even reasonable at this time, I don't doubt that funding for the space program might be significantly curtailed. And without radical advances in science and technology NASA activities might eventually come to a grinding halt.

We require a whole new approach to the space program, starting with the basic scientific principles governing time and space, which means we must start from square one and move forward as advances allow.

Time-line differentials

Time lines are not just a wild idea but a real and present obstacle to manned missions beyond the boundaries of our own planet.

Time lines correspond to energy differentials, in relation to an underlying force of energy affecting the form and function of all physical structure. This is not an easy concept to grasp, but it is essential to our astronauts if they are to survive the environmental impact of direct contact with and/or exposure to another planetary body.

Many assume that we know what energy is but for the most part we are still unsure as to what it really is. We equate energy with a resistant force in that a factor of resistance limits the efficiency of any fuel-driven motorized system. And without an energetic force of resistance we consider it impossible to maintain the flow of energy required to sustain our human industry.

If we are wrong about this and energy is not a resistant force but a dynamic underlying non-resistant force which is continually increasing we might understand that the consumption of fuels in the form of gases, liquids and solids provides us with no actual energy.

Every element of our physical world is governed by time lines--differentials in the underlying energy sustaining and perpetuating all physical matter. Without these time line differentials nothing would happen and there would be no physical matter.

The form and function of physical structure is determined on the basis of a dynamic differential in the underlying energy of the universe, in terms of Non-linear Time Field Frequency Acceleration (NTFFA). In this respect NTFFA accelerates and decelerates in opposite directions simultaneously, which in effect allows time lines to exist.

We have managed to convince ourselves that the universe is linearly structured, whereby we might actually measure the proportions of the universe with a meter-rule without ever considering the dynamic nature or the simultaneous relationship of time and space.

Are radio response delays between ground control and space due to the linear distance involved or are they due to a difference in time itself? The answer to this question is extremely important if we are going to understand the true nature of time and space, as there is nothing static about the condition or the properties of the universe.

Each and every interaction between two or more systems involves time-line differentials in relation to a differential in the underlying energy of each system acting upon the dynamics of every other system. Such interactions can be viewed in terms of distortions, as the field of each system has a distortional effect on every other system; the greater the underlying energy of any specific system the greater the distortional effect it exerts upon all other systems.

Every system of the universe corresponds to a condition of the universe remaining relative to it, as the system of reference determines the relationship of all systems remaining relative to it, but the relationship is not limited to the condition of the universe remaining relative to a single system of reference.

There is a unique and different condition of the universe associated with each and every system due to differentials in the time lines involved. And all conditions of the universe associated with the different systems exist simultaneously, but these different systems also exist in terms of either past or future conditions remaining relative to the system of reference.

What we have to understand is that the universe is not linearly structured or linearly driven. We cannot apply static terms of reference to a dynamic system, as such terms do not apply to the dynamic nature of the universe. Both time and space are continuously changing due to the dynamic nature of the underlying force sustaining and perpetuating the universe.

Time lines confine us to a specific condition of the universe, in relation to the unified field state of our planet Earth. This unified field state does not correspond to that of any other system, as each and every system corresponds to a non-absolute state and/or condition of the universe.

How this is applicable to our existing situation is quite simple; we must adjust our perception to fit the true nature of the universe rather than hope that the universe will somehow correspond to our preconceived concepts.

Instantaneous communication

If we wish to establish a manned base on the Moon, we must formulate a method by which to access uniformly the time lines involved, whereby we might establish an avenue of access compatible to the existence of the mission crew.

This means that the successful establishment of a manned base on the Moon would not be accessible or even visible to those who remained behind on Earth, as there would be a well-defined time line differential and/or gap existing between the lunar base and ground control on Earth.

Therefore, new methods of communication must be developed--methods which allow for instantaneous communication across time lines. This in itself would allow for instantaneous communication to any point in time and space corresponding to past and/or future conditions of the universe.

Some refer to this as "gravitic communications". Gravity itself is instantaneous. There is no speed to gravity, which is why it is impossible to detect gravitons and/or gravity waves. Gravity is simply a condition of field as determined by the underlying force of energy sustaining and perpetuating the dynamics of any unified field system.

In order to understand the instantaneous nature of the universe and better understand time lines we might reconsider the idea we have about light speed--that the linear motion of light can be measured using a one-meter rule and a clock. In this respect it has been determined that the speed of light corresponds to the time it takes light to travel a distance of one meter, said to be exactly 1/299,792,458ths of a second.

We wrongly assume that each of the 299,792,458 portions of a second are of exactly the same linear duration, which means we are using static terms and assuming each portion of a second to be of an absolute value.

On the basis of this assessment, we wrongly define "c" as a universal constant, which in itself defines our perception of the universe. This allows us to measure the properties of the universe in terms of light-years despite the fact that there are no light-years or even any linear years to count. So, we make reference to millions and billions of years in relation to the age of our planet Earth and to millions and billions of light-years in relation to the size and age of the universe without considering the simultaneous nature of universe.

Time lines do not correspond to linear durations of time, but correspond to simultaneous differentials in non-linear time field frequency acceleration (NTFFA). The past and future do not exist in terms of linear durations but do exist in terms of a simultaneous condition of the universe, whereby time lines take on a purposeful meaning. Therefore the concept of instantaneous transformation is not only a possibility but a fundamental aspect of the universe.

Time perception

It is important that we reconsider our existing perception of time, as our reference to something having occurred 10 or 20 years ago sets up a mental frame of reference whereby we think in terms of linear durations without realizing that there are no actual linear years to count.

This should be evident when we make reference to the age of the universe corresponding to billions of years and consider the possibility that we could take photographs of past conditions through the lens of a telescope. We think we can see into the past by looking away from the Earth, simply by equating distance with time.

Unfortunately time does not correspond to a linear duration or a linear distance. Time itself is the primary cause affecting the condition of universe. In this respect time determines the simultaneous nature of the universe in terms of cause and effect.

If time is different for every system in motion it should appear evident that all systems must exist simultaneously in order that they might exist together within the bounds of a single unified field system. And as each system itself exists as a unified field system all conditions of the universe must exist simultaneously in order that they might exist at all.

Therefore our perception of the universe should correspond to a simultaneous condition of the universe, in that time accelerates symmetrically to the center of the field and simultaneously decelerates isometrically in an inversely proportional manner. This alone allows for the existence of space in relation to the condition of the universe remaining relative to the system of reference.

In this respect each system is separated by a time line differential and not by linear distance. Our attempt to apply linear proportions to the dimensions of space results in a flawed perception and/or concept of time and space. Although it may not appear obvious to everyone this is the one thing stopping us from moving forward. We appear to be stuck in the linear mode.

Mass and energy

We tend to equate energy with mass without considering that the ratio of energy per unit of mass is not the same for all materials. We merely assume that more mass corresponds to more energy. In a very general sense this is true, but it is far from an accurate assessment concerning the ratio of energy per unit of mass.

In relation to the underlying force of energy, referred to as NTFFA, the smaller mass of a similar material has the higher ratio of energy per unit of mass. In terms of a single atom structure hydrogen has the highest ratio of energy per unit of mass of any known element. This suggests that hydrogen should be viewed as the most energetic material of universe.

It is due to the high ratio of energy per unit of mass that hydrogen represents roughly 75% of the universe's physical matter. The hydrogen time line runs much faster than that of any other element, whereby hydrogen is simply a very fast element. And because the universe is simultaneous in nature and hydrogen is highly accelerated there is a higher proportion of hydrogen than of any other element. Hydrogen is simply the least resistant element of the universe.

Sun-Earth distortions

If we consider the time line of the Sun in relation to the time line of our Earth we will find that the Sun, the center of the solar field, has an extremely high ratio of energy per unit of mass focused to its core.

The time line differential between the Earth and the Sun is immense and continuously increasing. This in itself provides the space existing between the Earth and the Sun.

As the time line differential increases so does the Earth's resistance to the solar field. The Sun is becoming less resistant to a further increase in energy much faster than the Earth is becoming less resistant to a further increase in energy.

A relative increase in resistance to the solar field will increase the Earth's mean temperature in relation to the Sun remaining remaining relative to the Earth.

If we consider that there is a simultaneous condition of the universe remaining relative to the Sun we might realize that we are subject to a historical aspect of the solar mass in relation to the simultaneous condition of the universe remaining relative to the Earth.

From this we might get a better sense of a time line differential and what it might mean to our future existence, as at the present time we seem ill-prepared for the consequences of the inevitable solar storm.

We must realize that we have been and are affecting our relationship with the Sun by creating distortional effects, which distort the uniformity of the Earth's field and in turn affect the Earth/Sun time line differential.

There is nothing more radical we can do to distort the Earth's field than to detonate a nuclear device, as a nuclear detonation does not release any actual energy in terms of NTFFA, but reduces the energy of the field through a process of distortion.

So not only are time lines important, but the stability of time lines is equally important, realizing of course that all time line differentials share a non-uniform relationship. And although all time line differentials are dynamic it is important that these dynamic differentials remain stable, which means the changes must be smooth and not involve erratic jumps and jiggles.

We do not seem to understand that these distortional effects not only affect the structural dynamics of the Earth, but also affect the underlying dynamics of the solar mass and the solar field. Why this is so misunderstood is due to the time line differential factor, as time line differentials hide these effects.

If we are affecting a future condition of the Sun we will not know exactly what the reaction is going to be until we get there. Consequently it is very easy to dismiss the idea at the present time, but once we do get there we can still dismiss the idea simply because there is no direct linear link between the cause and the effect.

Non-linear terms of reference

Time lines and time line differentials require that we view the universe and our relationship with the universe by employing non-linear terms of reference such as NTFFA, as NTFFA represents the available underlying energy affecting the form and function of all physical structure.

Therefore each and every system of the universe has a different NTFFA value, which includes everything from the micro components of atomic structure to galactic systems. The NTFFA value corresponds to the underlying energy of a unified field system.

Time lines are a basic component of physical structure in relation to the non-linear relationship existing between all systems with respect to the condition of the universe remaining relative to the system of reference. Change the system of reference and you change the condition of universe, as each system corresponds to a different condition of the universe in terms of its relative relationship with the universe.

Therefore we have what we refer to as a "multiverse" where the various conditions of the universe correspond to a seemingly infinite number of systems existing simultaneously in terms of past, present and future.

The strange thing about this is that it is impossible to distinguish past from future as there is no absolute present moment by which to make such a distinction possible. The universe exists on the basis of a truly dynamic process.

Time itself involves a continuance of field in the form of an accelerating underlying force of energy where both past and future exist simultaneously in relation to the non-absolute nature of the present moment.

This gives us something a great deal less materialistic than our existing perception allows for. The physical structure of the universe is determined on the basis of non-liner time line differentials in the form of unified field systems.

We have made every effort to avoid the inevitable consequences of a dynamic system by wrongly asserting the apparent stability of our solar system remaining unaltered for millions and/or billions of years. We have failed to consider the cyclical nature of the solar field.

Whether it is out of fear or simply due to an indifference to the consequences of denial we have chosen erroneously to reject time line differentials and the basic dynamics of the universe. And without considering our denial to represent a strategic failure we must also deny the possibility of our human survival.

If the quantum relationship of energy and mass is defined on the basis of time line differentials it would seem absurd if not insane to ignore the possibility of there being more than enough to sustain our human needs not only in terms of our energy requirements but in terms of unlimited abundance as well.

The Field

2007-06-21T04:02:00.001-07:00

Lynne McTaggart wrote a great book entitled "The Field", which has since been followed by several more, but there is still something missing. It would seem that the basic science associated with the field has not been considered.

Certainly experiments have been conducted demonstrating the effects of thought on the health of plants and animals, but this in itself is not something new. It has been shown that the intention of thought can influence the structure of ice crystals and affect responses in plants.

Recently, as well as historically, scientists have noted distinct changes in the light emission of various materials resulting from the intention of thought, which is assumed to indicate fluctuations in energy. And in such cases the light itself is considered to represent a source of energy. which although seemingly rational hides the real issues involved and effectively prevents further progress leading to a clear understanding of the field.

If we are to understand the field we must consider the actual dynamics affecting the condition of field, plus the relative nature of field and the underlying force of energy responsible for sustaining and perpetuating the condition of field. We have to do better than simply rationalize the obvious effects in terms of what is commonly accepted by the scientific establishment.

In this respect we must embrace the simultaneous nature of universe without which ESP and or thought transference would not be possible. If the condition of universe did not exist as a simultaneous unified field of frequency such things would not be possible, as they would not occur.

Thought is instantaneously transmitted and received regardless of the distance involved, as distance in terms of the space involved is merely a condition of field, just as gravity and electromagnetism are determined by the condition of field, in terms of dynamic responses. Therefore space is a dynamic response to the condition of field.

In relation to a simultaneous unified field system the supporting and or underlying force of energy is non-linear time field frequency acceleration, whereby space is simply the result of a relative differential in non-linear time field frequency acceleration.

Thought bypasses the linear concept of space, time and motion. Because thought is not linear in nature there are no linear restraints in terms of space, time and motion.

Physical matter on the other hand is restricted by the restraints of space, time and motion, in respect to the speed of light being the upper speed limit of universe.

Yet the field itself is a non-linear system which is simultaneously unified in that all aspects of universe are simultaneously linked to each other in order to form a unified field of frequency remaining relative to the system of reference. And in that physical matter exists in terms of a continuance of field it is possible to influence the structural dynamics of physical matter through the medium of thoughtful intention in either a negative or positive manner.

In effect we create the reality of our world through the medium of our thoughtful intentions. The collective mind of humanity has the power to determine the outcome of any event whether we are consciously or unconsciously aware of our intent. There is no such thing as a random event, as all events are the effect of a cause.

The dynamics of field associated with a unified field system are inversely proportional in relation to an internal/external relationship, in that for every cause there is an equal and opposite reaction whereby the resistant response (reaction) of any mass must remain proportionally (equal) opposite to the underlying energy focused to the center of field in terms of a positive/negative relationship.

And the condition of field, as determined by the underlying force of energy is the condition of universe remaining relative to the system of reference.

The condition of universe involves a dynamic differential in the underlying force of energy, in terms of the non-absolute upper and lower limits of field frequency.

From this we should realize that instantaneous communication exists between all systems of universe, as the underlying force of energy provides a simultaneous connection to all points associated with the space, time and motion of universe.

Furthermore we have direct connection to both past and future, as both past and future exist in a simultaneous state while remaining relative to the present moment. And in this respect we are linked to the continuance of field, whereby we are directly linked to all people, all things and all places existing at all times associated with the condition of field remaining relative to the system of reference.

So it should not surprise us that our intentions of thought influence the condition of physical structure, as it is our intention which produces such an effect.

I suggest reading the first 7 chapters of the book Unity which are located at http://www.gravitycontrol.org

The Vanishing Bees

2007-04-11T01:24:00.000-07:00

Bees are essential to the food chain, as they pollinate most of our food crops.  Without the bees there will be a significant drop in our agricultural harvest, which will result in shortages and rising prices.

This year many honey bee colonies have virtually vanished into thin air, as the hives are all but empty.  And to date no one is sure what has happened or why.

One scientist said this was an emergency, and it is.  In fact it is a clear and present danger to the security of the western world; it is a national security issue which is not being addressed.

Over the last several years many homing pigeons have vanished after release, they did not return home as they had so many times before.

Birds and bees navigate via the magnetic field of the earth and when that field is disturbed the birds and bees have no way to accurately navigate the rout home.

I consider the wireless transmission of very low frequency microwave communications to be a major part of the problem, as the resulting electromagnetic pollution distorts the dynamics of the field upon which the birds and bees are dependent for their navigation.

When we were restricted to ground line communications the electromagnetic effects were isolated to the confines of the telephone lines, but with wireless communications the electromagnetic effects are not isolated at all, they are everywhere.  There is simply no where you can go to avoid them other than tunneling underground.

We already know that VLF transmissions cause field distortions, which affect human memory and cause physical alterations to occur at a cellular level.

We have literally wrapped the planet in a web of microwave transmissions without considering the consequences and in some cases attempting to hide the consequences.

Now we have missing honey bee colonies in Europe, Canada and the USA on a scale that has never been seen before.

I spend a lot of time considering hard issues, such as the nuclear agenda and I’m okay with it, but this thing with the bees scares me.  This is more than serious, this is a full blown crisis, but without the appropriate responses.

Oh, isn’t that interesting.  Interesting, you might think it’s a bit more than interesting when you have nothing but potatoes to eat.

You see there is no way to pollinate all the crops by hand with a small paint brush, as it would take many millions of man hours to do what the bees have been doing every year without fail.

Without the bees to pollinate the crops they will be major food shortages and huge price increases.  So in effect many of us will simply not be able to afford adequate nourishment.  In some cases there will simply be no agricultural products to purchase, regardless of price.

So how important are these bees?  Once they are gone we will be on our way to oblivion too.

To think that the convenience of a wireless telephone or a wireless pc could be viewed as more important than our food supply indicates that we are an extremely dysfunctional bunch.

If it is not too late already we had better start yelling loud enough that our political leadership gets off its backside and starts responding to this crisis in an expedient manner.  Either that or accept the frightening possibility that we are in very serious trouble with no hope of recovery.

Crop Circle Dynamics

2007-02-20T00:35:00.000-08:00

Crop Circles might not sound too exciting, in relation to new energy issues, but there is a hidden surprise in store for anyone who wants to follow my logic.

From the sampling and testing of crops and soils taken from crop circles in a variety of countries, including the United Kingdom, Canada, Holland and the United States of America, it has been suggested that crop circles could be the result of meteorite showers and or meteorite falls.

In the soil inside crop circles small spheres of pure magnetized iron have been discovered, which appear to have been molten during the formation of the circle, due to microwave heating.

Meteorites of varying sizes burn up in our atmosphere on a daily basis and shower our planet with tons of meteorite dust every year.

To understand what happens to a meteorite as it falls to earth requires doing a little reading and I suggest the first 7 chapters of the book Unity available at www.gravitycontrol.org.

There is an underlying force referred to as non-linear time field frequency acceleration, (ntffa), the underlying force of universe which sustains and perpetuates the dynamic form and function of all physical structure.

When a mass is in free fall, it accelerates toward the earth at a rate proportional to the underlying dynamic force focused to the center of the earth’s core.  As a consequence the energy of the field in which the mass is falling is increasing and as the mass falls its underlying energy decreases in proportion to the increase energy of the field in which it is falling.

But when you have a falling mass which is also burning up and disintegrating as it falls, the initial mass of the meteorite is decreasing whereby its underlying energy potential is increasing, in respect to an increase in the ratio of energy per unit of mass.

And this is where it gets interesting as instead of the falling masses underlying energy decreasing as it falls, it is actually increasing.

By the time the meteorite completely burns up each of the microscopic particles has a surplus energy potential relative to the field in which they have been falling.

And because most meteorites consist of iron, a relatively stable element, these microscopic particles of iron are forced to release some of thier excess energy in the form of plasma.  If they were not stable they would simply transform to another state, in the form of a lighter element.  And it may be that some elements contained in meteorites do transform to a lighter state.

It is the underlying resonance of the elements contained in the meteorite fall which is transposed into the various designs of the crop circles, which is a subject unto itself.

The formation of crop circles is a very complex process, but the end result is that the microscopic particles of iron form into larger masses of iron, which are still very tiny masses in the form of perfect spheres.  And as they are magnetic they can be seen sticking to each other.

The energy of the plasma is pure energy, which is described in many cases as being roughly the size of a soft ball.  And as the plasma energy is focused to the center of the plasma sphere there is a factor of radiant resistance, which is capable of affecting the crop in the manner described, which is to bend the stalks of the crop and boil off the moisture from within.

The effects of this plasma are dependent on the origin of the meteorite causing the effects.  Of course they all come from space, but while some originate from relatively high energy sources, some do originate from relatively low energy sources, of which there is an abundance of both.

Meteorites originating from high energy sources have what appear to be beneficial effects, such as an increase in the rate of crop growth and an increase in the size and weight of crop kernels.

Meteorites originating from low energy sources affect a decrease in the rate of crop growth and a decrease in the size and weight of crop kernels.  In fact, in some cases these low energy source meteorites inhibit plant growth completely even after the field has been plowed, fertilized and reseeded and this effect can last for a period of two years.

In either case it must be noted that the underlying energy of the meteorites represents a non-uniform potential, in relation to a non-uniform differential in dynamic potential existing between the meteorite and the earth.

The importance of all this is that we do not need to use either fission or fusion reactors to produce power, as the controlled modulation of the underlying force is capable of providing all the power we could possibly use without depleting this new source of energy in any way whatsoever.

In fact the supply is limitless, as the underlying force is continuously accelerating and focused to the center of field.

It is possible to develop a prototype devise by which to test both the credibility and the efficiency of this radical innovation.  And if successful we would have solved our energy problem once and for all.

© 2007 David Barclay  www.gravitycontrol.org

Beyond the Horizon

2007-01-05T04:02:00.000-08:00

Looking up at the night sky we can observe distant star systems, which are located at great distances from our planet earth.  And these distances are so great that they are calculated in terms of light years and astronomical units.

In relation to the most distant stars we are told that the light we can now see took billions of years to reach us.  This light is said to have traveled through space at the speed of light for billions of years in order that we might see it today.

At the present time the speed of light is based on the time it takes light to travel a distance of one meter in a vacuum, which is said to be exactly 1/299,792,458ths of a second.  This means that the speed of light is 299,792,458 meters per second.

Also, the speed of light is said to have remained constant for billions of years, whereby it might be possible to determine the distance involved.

Consequently astronomers take photographs of distant star systems and identify these photos as representing observations of conditions as they existed billions of years ago.  In other words it is possible to photograph events having occurred billions of years ago.

This would suggest that what we see is not what it appears to be at the present as it would have changed somewhat over the course of billions of years.  But we cannot see those changes, as they correspond to that which has occurred over the course of billions of years.

So if you get far enough away you can see the past in the present.  Sounds a little bit strange doesn’t it, because this suggests that space and time are equally proportional in relation to the constancy of light speed.

So time must be equally proportional regardless of distance and if that is true we are stuck with a linear universe, which must have been structured on the basis of static terms of reference.

In other words the universe is not dynamic, but exists in a static state or have we got a static dynamic universe?

Where is science going with this, as it is a contradiction to even consider the possibility of measuring billions of light years.  It is not even rational, never mind logical.

If the universe is acceleratively expanding the value of time and space must be changing, in terms of a dynamic state.  So how do you fit static terms into this picture?

And how does the speed of light remain constant over billions of years, but what is even more important; exactly what is a billion years?

Both the past and future exist simultaneously relative to the non-absolute present moment and in that time itself is dynamic it is either accelerating or decelerating relative to the system of reference.  So what are these billions of years that can be stretched out like bed sheets if the past and future exist simultaneously?

Someone is going to say this is space/time.  Right and the universe is linearly structured just like a brick school house?  I don’t think so.

So just how far off are we on our assessment of universe?

If the universe is not linearly structured and static terms cannot be applied to the condition of universe it would appear that the speed of light is not a linear consideration either.

It would appear that in a truly dynamic universe time must in fact slow with distance in relation to the isometric propagation of space from any system of reference, where space itself is a condition of field remaining relative to the system of reference.

Therefore we can see that if light traveled linearly through space, the light of these distant star systems would never reach us, nor would the light of our sun reach them.  So how is it that we can see distant star systems?

We observe what there is to be seen in the present moment, as the expansion of universe is a simultaneous response corresponding to the underlying force of energy focused to the center of our planet earth.  The process of sight does not respond to the linear motion of light, but to the dynamics of field in which the observer is situated.  And if those dynamics cause a simultaneous response to occur at a distance, the observation of distant star systems involves a dynamic response to the condition of field.

As both the past and future exist in a simultaneous state relative to the present, neither the past or the future correspond to a linear distance in space, but to a non-linear relationship between the present, past and future.

Therefore the photos of distant star systems do not have a historical reference, as the past is confined to the simultaneous condition of universe which is devoid of space and time corresponding to the present moment.

Time is not a linear consideration in terms of the structure and order of universe, as linear durations of time have a purely sociological base with no corresponding relationship to the actual age or size of universe.

Consequently it is impossible to know the age or size of universe in relation to static terms of reference, just as it is impossible to know whether we exist in the past or future of the earth’s existence, as there is no absolute present moment by which to make such a distinction possible.

But, in relation to all other systems, in terms of planets, moons and stars etc., remaining relative to our planet earth, the existing condition of each of these systems must represent either a future or past condition remaining relative to the present moment of the earth’s existence.

How much further off the tracks we could possibly get with our modern innovations of thought I do not know, but the existing perception of universe most commonly accepted to represent the situation does not come marginally close to the mark.

Glossary of terms related to Non-linear Time Field Frequency Acceleration

2007-01-03T02:49:00.000-08:00

Glossary of terms related to Non-linear Time Field Frequency Acceleration

The Douglas Files

2006-12-01T00:48:00.000-08:00

To read the Douglas Files available on the web go to http:/www.checktheevidence.com/DouglasDocs/

Under the heading of communication, reference is made to instantaneous communication, such as that associated with ESP and other similar phenomena.

As it has been demonstrated that instantaneous effects do occur regardless of the distance involved, the concept of instantaneous communication is suggestive of mind boggling possibilities.

Some might question the connection between instantaneous communication and gravity control, but the two are closely linked by the existence of an underlying dynamic force which permeates the universe.  In as much as non-linear time field frequency acceleration is the underlying force of energy determining the form and function of physical structure it is this same force which also sustains and perpetuates the existence of physical structure.  Plus this same force extends from one condition of universe to another in relation to the condition of universe remaining relative to the system of reference.

This means that regardless of how many and how variant the different conditions of universe might be they are all inter-connected by one dynamic force due to the non-absolute nature of those relative boundaries existing between the various conditions of universe.

Therefore it is possible for one’s thoughts to be communicated, not only to the extreme limits of universe, but to all other conditions of universe existing beyond that condition of universe which remains relative to our planet earth.

In relation to gravity control this suggests it possible to affect physical transport between the various conditions of universe, in that it should be possible to affect physical access to any condition of universe existing beyond the limitations of our existing field of view.

Historically we have referred to this process as instantaneous transformation, where a mass might be transported instantaneously from one place to another without having traveled linearly from here to there.

Gravity control offers the possibility of instantaneous transformation, as gravity control itself involves the controlled modulation of those field dynamics determining the form and function of field remaining relative to the system of reference.  In respect to gravity control a modular field system would be the system of reference employed as the access vehicle capable of instantaneous transformation.

Many have questioned the speed of gravity and wondered if the speed of gravity is the same as light speed or if it exceeds the speed of light, while some have considered the speed of gravity to be instantaneous, which would mean that gravity does not have a linear speed.

As it turns out this is quite true, as gravity does not have a speed.  Gravity itself does not move in a linear fashion as gravity is simply a dynamic response to the condition of field.  And as the underlying force determining the condition of field is itself non-linearly accelerating at a rate remaining relative to the system of reference gravity corresponds to the dynamic nature of field frequency acceleration.

Some have considered the existence of gravitons, in relation to gravity existing in the form of particles, but no such particles exist other than as an abstract idea.  In fact the term gravity could be dispensed with completely, as there is no actual force of gravity.  Gravity is simply an aspect of field dynamics, in relation to the non-linear acceleration of field frequency.

So how does simultaneous communication help us achieve gravity control?

In order to control gravity we must understand the true nature of gravity and the force responsible for the gravitational effects we observe.

For example; if an increase in energy focused to the center of the earth’s core causes a simultaneous response at the outer boundary of universe, the increase in energy is instantaneously registered at the outer boundary of universe, in terms of an inversely proportional instantaneous response.  In other words the condition of field remaining relative to the earth is simultaneously linked in all directions due to the instantaneous nature of the field dynamics involved.

Gravity decreases isometrically from the surface curve of the earth in inverse proportion to the square of the distance, which corresponds to an isometric decrease in the underlying energy of field being inversely proportional to the square of the distance in respect to our existing concept of space and motion.  But this concept is wholly inadequate for the purpose it is presently applied.

In other words there is no method by which to linearly traverse the vast distances of interstellar space, as both time and space are isometrically stretched to the point where we perceive an actual outer boundary of universe.

The only feasible method by which to traverse interstellar space is by means on instantaneous transformation.  And as difficult as it might sound it is not at all beyond our ability to master instantaneous transformation in a safe and efficient manner.

The first thing we must accept is the idea that all space is a dynamic response to the condition of field and nothing more.  Space is not a physical material per se, but a condition, a dynamic condition.

Yet, we assume we can measure space in a manner similar to measuring cloth, lumber, or a gas filled balloon.  This is a fantasy, as space does not conform to our perception of linear metric measure.

We wonder how a craft can go from 0 to thousands of miles per hour in the blink of an eye without subjecting the pilot to effects far beyond human endurance.  Its simple, gravity is not a force, but our existing aircraft employ a system of resistant propulsion, (resistance), and these other craft employ a non-resistant system which is not an actual system of propulsion, (resistance), at all.

The other craft, the UFO type craft, control the condition of field remaining relative to them as opposed to the condition of field controlling the reactions associated with conventional aerodynamics.

Our pilots are subject to the condition of field and have no control over the condition of field to which they are subject.  Therefore there are well defined limitations to the maneuverability and speed of their aircraft.

And when you consider manned missions in space, beyond the limits of orbiting satellites, rockets offer little advantage over conventional aircraft.

Certainly we have rocketed to the moon and mars and have landed equipment, but to putting people on the moon or mars is quite another matter.

To start with you must consider the non-uniform relationship existing between all field systems, such as that existing between the earth and moon or the earth and mars.  This is where gravity control comes into play, as gravity control allows for a uniform access to any field condition.

Without a system allowing for uniform access you cannot safely utilize any of the existing resources for the purpose of the mission, such as water etc.  In fact you cannot safely use the existing atmosphere or subject the crew to direct physical contact with the environment of the moon or mars.

The simultaneous nature of dynamic field responses also disqualifies the perception of space in terms of light years or astronomical units, as no such linear durations of time exist other than as an abstract invention of the human mind.  In other words, you cannot see for billions of years anymore than you can get too yesterday by walking backwards.  What you see is what there is to see at the moment you see it, not something which happened so many years ago and took that much time to reach you.

The human senses perceive the dynamic condition of field as it exists at the moment, not how it once existed or how it will exist, as we are confined to the field in which we presently exist.

Dynamic responses have nothing to do with linear terms of reference employed for the purpose of convenience by those involved in the various aspects of trade and commerce, as they are purely abstract values invented for a specific purpose.

The modulation of field is not magic, although it might appear that way to some.  The modulation of field is a natural process associated in varying degrees with every system of universe, which includes both the very small and the very big.

Therefore gravity control is a natural process, which simply mirrors the dynamic nature of universe.

Assuming gravity control to be impossible is no different than assuming that the earth is flat or that the earth is situated at the center of the solar system.

Project Unity, which is clearly described at http://www.gravitycontrol.org represents a basic magnetic frame by which it is possible to modulate the focus of field in any direction one might wish to travel.  This same system can also provide for instantaneous transformation to any condition of universe to which we might wish to be transported.

Simple yes, it is very simple, but the basic principles upon which this system is based take a bit of getting used to, as our conventional wisdom tends to obscure the simple nature of universe and Project Unity.

Instantaneous transformation is simply a matter of going beyond the limits of our existing state.  In other words the modulation of the underlying force alters the dynamics of field, whereby it is possible to experience instantaneous transport and simultaneous communication.

Velikovsky & Einstein Were Right

2006-10-01T22:38:00.000-07:00

It is commonly accepted that gravity and inertia are responsible for maintaining the orbits of the planets around the sun, in that gravity is perceived as a primary force of universe capable of allowing for the stability of this or any other solar system lasting for millions and billions of years.

It is only in recent years that the electromagnetic relationship existing between the sun and the planets has been acknowledged to exist, which has led to much speculation and experimentation in the area of electrogravitics.

Even so gravity itself still remains an enigma with many attempts being made to reconcile the relationship of gravity and electromagnetism.  So it seems somewhat strange that we should consider gravity to be a primary force of universe without yet knowing exactly what gravity is or understanding its relationship with electromagnetism.

To date no one can tell you why or how gravity holds the planets in orbit other than by describing a mathematical relationship associated with mass.

An argument is made for gravity and inertia maintaining orbital stability on the basis of astronomers calculating the motion of the planets against the background of the fixed stars with precise accuracy extending both backwards and forwards over periods of time.  But the accuracy of such extended precision cannot be confirmed or denied on the basis of calculations associated with gravity and inertia.

It must be understood that the extension of such calculations backwards and forwards in time is speculative at best, as there is no physical evidence to support such past and future events having occurred beyond the present era.

Only the confidence of astronomers in their existing standards of understanding allows for the acceptance of such speculation, even though such understanding is incomplete.

It is historically recorded that the planets and moons have not always followed their existing orbits and have on occasion altered their path of orbit and or crossed orbits involving near collisions resulting in cataclysmic events.

Velikovsky presented evidence to this effect in his book Worlds in Collision and those that followed, but for the most part his work was rejected by the scientific community.  Yet it would appear that Einstein took a sincere interest in Velikovsky’s work and agreed with much of the material presented.  http://www.varchive.org/itb/index.htm

It would appear that arguments demeaning the competency of historical recorders who claim to have witnessed the earth moved from its orbit during close encounters with both Venus and Mars are nothing more than an excuse for our inadequate understanding. It’s easier to simply dismiss the historical record on the basis of our own ignorance.

Realizing we live in a relatively primitive and barbaric world with little understanding of universe and little objectivity regarding the self imposed limitations we so guardedly adhere to, it should come as no great shock to discover that gravity is not itself a force of any kind, but simply a dynamic response.

If gravity is not itself a force of any kind it would be impossible for gravity to influence the orbit of the earth or the orbit of any other planetary body around the sun or the orbit of a satellite around a planet.

Therefore it would be equally impossible for gravity and inertia to determine the stability of planetary orbits, as orbital stability is simply the physical manifestation of a dynamic response corresponding to the condition of field remaining relative to the system of reference.

If we consider the condition of field to be determined on the basis of a dynamic underlying force of energy we will realize that a differential in this energy exists between all systems in motion.

And in that this underlying force is its self dynamic in nature, the differential in underlying energy existing between all systems in motion must be continuously changing.  This would suggest that the stability of planetary orbits is limited to a certain degree of dynamic variance existing between the systems involved.

Taking this one step further we might also consider that the stability of the earth in orbit around the sun, in the company of so many neighboring planets, could not be expected to be maintained for more than a limited duration due to the complexity and variance of the dynamics involved.

At the present time we are concerned with the problem of global warming, which we prefer to attribute to human industry.  Yet we are aware of neighboring planets experiencing increased warming without the aid of human industry.

Consequently many scientists deny the possibility of the sun being responsible for global warming, while attempting to convince the population they are collectively responsible for the problem and its remedy.  This allows political opportunities to be created on the basis of personal resolve to control the situation in a timely manner.

If it were not for a differential in the underlying energy of the sun and the earth there would be no earth/sun system.  Furthermore, it is the degree of differential which determines the warming effect of the sun upon the earth and the greater the differential the greater the warming effect.

To suggest that the sun is not responsible for global warming is akin to saying an unattended campfire or a bolt of lightening could not be responsible for a forest fire, as the resulting forest fire was due solely to the tinder dry conditions of the forest, in which case we might prevent forest fires by cutting down more trees.

If all human industry were to cease immediately we would still be subjected to the effects of global warming, as global warming is the natural result of an increasing differential in the underlying energy of the sun and the earth.  Global warming is a base level response to a disproportionate increase in the sun’s dynamic energy potential relative to that of the earth.

Therefore we can anticipate global warming to increase until the earth’s orbit shifts.

Gravity does not hold the earth in orbit around the sun and the earth cannot maintain a stable relationship with the sun forever, as the cyclical nature of the solar dynamics are solely dependent on the relative relationship of those underlying forces of energy involved.

The earth is held in orbit around the sun by means of a differential in non-linear dynamics associated with an underlying force of energy which is inherently responsible for the continuous existence of physical structure and the condition of universe remaining relative to the system of reference.

Therefore an accelerative increase in the existing energy differential between the earth and the sun will cause an ever increasing accelerative variance to grow.  This means we cannot avoid the future, as it is determined on the basis of a dynamic force of energy and not personal bias.

The Nature of Energy

2006-09-25T20:49:00.000-07:00

There seems to be some confusion in respect to our perception of energy and its relationship to mass.

I was recently informed that the ratio of energy per unit of mass was the same for all materials.  But what makes this interesting is the fact that the informant was a well known scientist involved with the new accelerator under construction in Europe.

I know that this man is not stupid, in fact he is extremely bright, but he does insist that the ratio of energy per unit of mass is the same for all materials, as only the mass of a material determines its energy potential.  In other words E=MC2 is valid for all materials, regardless of whether it is hydrogen or uranium, in relation to an equal mass of each element having an equal energy potential.  Both masses would have an equal ratio of energy per unit of mass, which leaves a single hydrogen atom with a very low ratio of energy per unit of mass.

So why would anyone think that the ratio of energy per unit of mass would be different for each and every element appearing on the periodic table?

It depends on what you define as energy, in relation to the question; exactly what is energy?

Is energy the product of a fuel which is consumed or altered in order to do work and or perform some function?  Do we derive energy from coal, wood, gas, sugar, starch etc?

Of course all materials have energy, but is it possible to extract that energy as an actual force of energy?

In order for this to be possible requires that energy radiate or be made to radiate, whereby energy would be considered to a resistant force.  An increase in energy would affect an increase in resistance to a further increase in energy.  The key words are; an increase in resistance.

How could an increase in resistance be associated with an increase in energy, as this would suggest that there should not be any available energy to do work or perform functions?

It is commonly accepted that a force of energy is required and or applied in order to move an otherwise stationary object, such as a bowling ball or a train.  This means that the application of energy is very definitely limited and or determined by the mass of the object to be moved.

This would mean that energy was limited to linear applications, in that a certain quantity of energy must be applied to move a train a certain distance at a certain speed.  And if coal or diesel fuel is used to operate the train, the operation of the train is limited to the supply of fuel.

It is also commonly accepted that the mass of the train increases as it accelerates, which means that the energy of the train itself is increasing in proportion to an increase in mass.  But is this true?

How can there be an increase in resistance to a further increase in energy associated with an actual increase in energy proportional to an increase in mass?

Is mass proportional to energy and is energy proportional to mass?

In a general sense you could say that the larger mass of a specific material has the greater energy, but that is where it ends.

Take a simple hydrogen atom and ask yourself what it is which sustains and perpetuates the existence of the hydrogen atom?  The answer of course is energy, but what exactly is this energy that allows the hydrogen atom to exist and continue existing?

Most would jump in with, atomic energy, or something similar, but what exactly is atomic energy and has anyone ever clearly defined its existence?

The answer is no.  No one has clearly defined the existence of atomic energy, with the key word being energy.

They have clearly shown that there is a factor of resistance associated with the structure of atoms, which allows for nuclear power plants and nuclear weapons etc.  But at no time has anyone accessed the energy of an atom for any purpose.

How could the energy of an atom be accessed by fission or by fusion?  It isn’t and it can’t be done.

We have made an error, as we have mistakenly accepted a false assumption of fact in respect to the idea that energy remains proportional to mass regardless of the material involved.

We assume that more mass always equals more energy without further qualification, when in fact the smaller mass always has the higher ratio of energy per unit of mass, which allows the hydrogen atom to have the highest ratio of energy per unit of mass for any known element.

Why?  Because if energy was in fact resistant atomic elements would not last more than a fraction of a second before folding on themselves and vanishing from sight.

In order to sustain the structural dynamics of any atomic structure requires a continuous supply of energy which is steadily increasing.  And the reason why the energy supply must be steadily increasing is because the dynamics of any physical structure are determined on the basis of a dynamic differential in energy and resistance with the energy focused symmetrically to the center of field and resistance isometrically radiating from the center of field.

From this we can see that mass remains proportional to resistance and not energy, always.

If energy is focused to the center of field it would appear impossible for it to radiate, as energy, the underlying force of universe, is a non-resistant force, where an increase in energy affects a decrease in resistance to a further increase in energy.

Oh but, what about fission, doesn’t this process access this underlying energy?  No, all it does is extend the external dynamics and increase the factor of resistance.  You cannot access the internal portion of field from the external portion of field; all you can do is extend the external portion.

You could strip an atom into its subatomic components and still not access the underlying energy of field, as the energy is focused inward and not outward, it refuses to radiate.

The only way energy can be made to radiate requires the underlying dynamics be reversed, which would result in some very unpleasant effects.

In that the greater mass is more resistant to the underlying dynamics of universe, the greater mass of a particular material has a lower dynamic ratio of energy per unit of mass than a smaller mass of the same material.

So is it any wonder that our perception of energy is based on the consumption of mass.  And the faster we consume mass the more energy we generate.

Generally speaking our perception of energy is associated with a destructive process, where we assume that by destroying this we can create that.  Such as burning coal or gas to provide heat etc.

If energy was a destructive force it would not be capable of creating or allowing for the processes of life or for the construction of physical materials.

Energy in the truest sense provides for a differential in energy associated with the dynamics of physical structure, in relation to the various forms and functions involved.

Energy is directly associated with an underlying force which can only be quantified in terms of a relative non-linear relationship.

If energy was in fact proportional to mass, how would we describe the process determining the inherent characteristics of each atomic element other than as a mechanical arrangement involving interchangeable parts constituting units of energy remaining proportional to their mass.

The high energy requirements of mass less particles said to be traveling close to the speed of light is due to their mass less character, yet a mass less particle should have no energy and of course no resistance either.  But nonetheless mass less particles are considered to be a part of our universe, despite the fact that it would be impossible to impart resistant energy into and or to a mass less particle.

The inherent characteristics of each atomic element are determined by a unique ratio of energy per unit of mass, in relation to a specific ratio of energy to mass determining the specific form and function of each element.

If the underlying force of energy can be modulated in a controlled manner, whereby affecting the dynamics of physical structure, it should be possible to not only alter the space and motion remaining relative to each system of reference, but change the inherent characteristics of any known element in order to compensate for a shortage of another element.

We can increase and or decrease the energy of any system, but we cannot achieve direct access to the internal energy involved.   But what we can do is employ the underlying differential in energy and resistance to fuel our human industry.

Engineering UFO Craft of Extraterrestrial Origin

2006-09-03T18:26:00.000-07:00

In past posts and articles I have written on the subject of Back Engineering UFO Type Craft, with one such article posted on Peswiki.

Despite decades of denial and debunking it is fair to say that the military/industrial complex has done a fair job of keeping the existence of UFO and ET within the realm of science fiction.

If the military do have extraterrestrial artifacts it would appear they are, at the very least, having a tough time trying to back engineer the technology involved and an even tougher time attempting to understand the required science.

It would appear that the military might have maneuvered themselves into a catch 22 situation, as in order to keep their secret things secret they cannot openly seek out solutions to very difficult problems associated with extraterrestrial science and technology.

The biggest snag is the fact that secrets themselves are problematic and the greater the complexity of the secrets the more problematic they become, especially after decades of deception associated with secret research and development.

If the science is the real problem, which I think it is, it could be many more decades before the applicable solutions are finally realized, unless of course someone comes up with the answers in the meantime.

Here at Gravity Control we are attempting to present an alternative view concerning the dynamics of non-linear drive in the form of a field frequency modulator.  It’s a simple idea, but not one that is easily grasped without a certain degree of openness or a willingness to consider alternative explanations for the existing conditions of universe.

No one with any degree of comprehension and or understanding is going to attempt interstellar transport with anything less than a non-linear drive system capable of instantaneous transformation, which puts the military establishment at a bit of a disadvantage in attempting to achieve such a goal or duplicate extraterrestrial science and technology.

The first problem with the science is coming to terms with the concept of a universe which not only exists as a non-simultaneous condition remaining relative to the system of reference but also exists in a dynamic state, whereby an underlying force of energy sustains and perpetuates the existence of this condition.

To appreciate the situation we only have to consider the fact that a nuclear reactor is presently considered efficiently suitable for the purpose of heating water.  And in this respect the heavy elements constituting the nuclear fuel are thought to provide a source of energy proportional to their mass.

The science involved appears logical enough until you attempt to understand what it is which prevents the universe from collapsing on itself.

For a long time it was thought that the universe was running down, which allowed for the idea that the expansion of universe was slowing, whereby it would eventually stop expanding and start contracting.  But as we have discovered this is not the case, as the rate of expansion is accelerating.

This has led to the idea of dark matter and dark energy, without anyone being quite sure what either is.

On top of this we have found background radiation, which is believed to be left over from the big bang.

If the universe is acceleratively expanding, the relative rate of expansion must be proportional to an increasing source of energy capable of sustaining the accelerative expansion.  Therefore the supply of energy must also be accelerating.

This would indicate that the universe is dynamically structured, whereby the basic elements of universe must also be dynamically structured.

We presently consider atomic elements to be running down or decaying in that they are thought to lose energy in proportion to a decrease in mass, but if they are not running down but are in fact being sustained and perpetuated by a steady increase in energy our existing perception of the situation must be in error.

If there is an underlying source of energy sustaining and perpetuating physical structure we can be quite sure we do not yet know exactly what energy is, because if we did we would have already developed a non-linear drive system capable of providing for instantaneous transformation.

Yet our human logic prevents us from moving forward, as we appear trapped in our own thoughts concerning the nature of energy.  We evaluate energy as corresponding to a proportional quantity of mass, where more mass provides more energy.  Of course this is in part true, but in a very general sense.  If an underlying source of energy provides the smaller mass with a higher ratio of energy per unit of mass we might consider our existing perception to be self defeating.

If such an underlying force does exist we might realize that our ideas about strong and weak forces could also be in error, as such forces might be better described as dynamic responses to an underlying force.

Therefore the control of these strong and weak forces should be possible through the controlled modulation of the underlying force, an idea which is readily apparent in nature.  Yet we insist that this is not possible and that no such underlying controlling force exists.

It would appear that the existence of UFO type craft and ET’s prevents us from admitting to such a possibility, as to do so would be viewed as letting the cat out of the bag.  Without such secrets in the form of secret knowledge no one nation or any one person could hope to have control over the rest of the world.

The controlled manipulation of the world’s economy for the purpose of the few would no longer be possible if a source of unlimited energy were available to everyone in an equal manner.  The world’s economy would no longer be based on a restricted supply of energy and raw resources, but on the various purposes to which this new source of energy would be applied.

In light of UFO type craft and ET’s the human race could no longer be considered the only intelligent species in the universe, which would mean that our human activities would be subject to a higher authority than that existing on this earth at the present time.

When you take such ideas into consideration it is not that difficult to understand why and how the existence of UFO type craft and ET’s have remained hidden from public view for so long.

How could the leader of any nation openly admit to the criminal atrocities having been committed for the purpose of hiding the truth from their people?  Such criminal activities cannot be justified in a free and democratic society where each and every citizen is equally subject to the laws and regulations to which they have agreed to abide.

Is it possible for any national administration to come clean and let us in on the truth of this matter or will the truth remain hidden and continue to be protected by whatever means deemed necessary?

If it is the latter, it is not for the purpose of maintaining national security, but for the purpose of hiding the fact that the security of our nation cannot be protected against the influence of extraterrestrial intelligence.

The Expanding Planet

2006-08-16T01:13:00.000-07:00

It is considered by many that our planet is slowly expanding with the rate of expansion accelerating over time, an idea with which I agree.  But many of these same people also make the assumption that an increase in the size of the earth will increase the planet’s gravity, an idea with which I disagree.

Gravity is proportional to the ratio of energy per unit of mass and not proportional to mass alone.

It is also thought that it is the compression of gravity acting upon the earth’s core which is responsible for the expansion, but this is not the case as there is virtually no gravity acting upon the earth’s core.

The dynamic structure of our planet is governed by the underlying force, non-linear time field frequency acceleration, which affects both the internal and external dynamics of our planet in an inverse manner.  Therefore gravity does not increase to the core, but increases isometrically from the center of the earth to the surface curve, while gravity increases symmetrically from the depths of space to the surface curve.  So there is insufficient gravity at the core to affect any degree of compression.

The earth’s greatest gravity is across the surface curve, but because the surface of the earth is not perfectly flat there are fluctuations in gravity with altitude above and below sea level.

Gravity is higher at the tops of mountains situated above sea level and higher over deep ocean basins and trenches.  The inside of a mountain is a vertical extension of the earth’s internal dynamics, while a deep depression or trench is a vertical extension of the earth’s external dynamics.

This provides a differential in gravity at various locations where unequal but proportional pressure is applied from above and below the earth’s surface, which in turn stresses the structure of the earth’s crust.

And as the planet is acceleratively expanding in proportion to an accelerating increase in energy affecting the ratio of energy per unit of mass, it can be expected that all matter constituting the structure of the earth should be affected proportionally.  This means that even at the micro level expansion will be experienced.

Therefore a decrease in gravity will not provide for a stable and unchanging condition, as the rate of expansion is constantly increasing simply because it is driven by a dynamic force.

It is a differential in gravity associated with vertical extremes of high and low points across the surface curve which provides the stress associated with sudden tectonic movements and upheavals, in combination with a gradual decline in gravity associated with the process of expansion.

This picture is further compounded by non-uniform distortions originating from the sun, moon and our neighboring planets, in respect to every system of universe sharing a non-uniform relationship.

A very complex picture indeed, which indicates that an increase in non-uniform distortions can be anticipated to dramatically affect the stability of our planet, especially the surface crust.

The surface crust of the earth is the location where the greatest factor of resistance is applied, which not only causes tectonic movement but also affects an increase in the temperature of the crust, with the greatest resistance located at the equator.

It should also be noted that the basic dynamics of the earth’s structure also affect atmospheric conditions.  Therefore extremes in the weather can be expected to increase over time, keeping in mind that the process is accelerative.

Field Acceleration

2006-07-30T18:42:00.000-07:00

Field acceleration, non-linear time field frequency acceleration, is essential to the function of any process, as without some degree of non-linear acceleration the field structure would collapse.

Simply put, nothing happens unless there is an element of acceleration present, as it is the rate of acceleration which drives field dynamics, in relation to those dynamic responses allowing for the form and function of universe remaining relative to the system of reference.

In this light a low rate of non-linear time field frequency affects a relative increase in both gravity and electromagnetism, as both gravity and electromagnetism are simply dynamic responses to the condition of field remaining relative to the system of reference.

A high rate of non-linear time field frequency affects a relative decrease in both gravity and electromagnetism for the same reason.

As non-linear time field frequency acceleration can be modulated in a controlled manner it is possible to regulate the rate of acceleration affecting the form and function of physical structure, whereby a decrease in non-linear time field frequency acceleration can be considered to have a negative effect.  In contrast to this an increase in non-linear time field frequency acceleration can be considered to have a positive effect, as long as the modulation produces a uniform field effect.

Without the factor of uniformity being considered a non-uniform fluctuation in non-linear time field frequency acceleration, whether high or low, will cause distortions to affect the uniform continuance of field, which has been shown to produce genetic deformities and cancerous anomalies in both plants and animals.

Therefore the application of indiscriminate electromagnetic radiation must be considered to represent a serious threat to health and safety, as extremely high and low levels of EM pollution can be consider to represent non-uniform potentials.

EM pollution is a product of resistance, in relation to relative differentials in non-linear time field frequency acceleration affecting a factor of resistance.  And the greater the differential the greater is the degree of resistance affecting the uniform continuance of non-linear time field frequency acceleration.

Of course there is much debate over this issue, but if public health and safety were the prime considerations involved in the regulation of EM pollution the debate would be over and many corporations would be looking for more environmentally friendly means by which to generate income.

For example; high voltage transmission lines and cell towers would not be permitted to be located anywhere close to human habitation or agricultural land reserves.

I have previously covered the factor of non-uniformity existing between all relative unified field systems of universe and the ill effects resulting from direct exposure to non-uniform potentials, such as the environment of an extraterrestrial planetary body, but to date such considerations are firmly denied.

In order to counter this irresponsible stance there must be some effort made to study and document the basic dynamics of field, in relation to the further consideration being given to the non-linear parameters governing the form and function of physical structure.  And to this end it would be beneficial to construct a modular field system similar to that of Project Unity described on www.gravitycontrol.org

Only through further research and development can Project Unity provide the understanding and insight so necessary, not only for our survival, but for the exploration and colonization of space.

Atoms In Motion

2006-07-24T00:22:00.000-07:00

The underlying energy of every system is focused to the center of field, as the dynamics of each and every system are determined on the basis of a unified field of frequency, which is continuously accelerating to the center of field in a relatively uniform manner.

In this context every system maintains a non-uniform relationship with every other system, whereby the dynamics of every system are affected by factors of field distortion associated with the non-uniformity existing between each and every system. The factor of non-uniformity is determined on the basis of relative differentials in the underlying energy existing between each and every system.

The rate of field frequency acceleration is different for every system, in that the rate of field frequency acceleration is accelerating at different rates focused to the center of each field.

Every atom constituting the structure of the earth maintains a non-uniform relationship with every other atom constituting the structure of the earth, while being restricted to the uniform field of planet earth.

It is this arrangement which allows for the cyclical relationship of all systems, both big and small, as there is a limitation to the extremities of dynamic differentials in terms of balanced stability.

Therefore the underlying dynamics of those atoms constituting one system are not in sync with the underlying dynamics of those atoms constituting another system, such as the moon, sun or mars etc, as there is a differential in field dynamics existing between each and every system of universe.

Life forms on planet earth are subject to the field dynamics of planet earth, as all life forms on planet earth are subject to the relatively uniform acceleration of the earth’s field, in relation to a unified field of frequency.

This situation isolates all of those life forms existing on and or in planet earth from the field dynamics of every other system, as the affects of field distortion from other systems is limited to those non-uniform distortions associated with differentials in the underlying energy potentials involved, such as those differentials between the earth and the sun, the earth and the moon or the earth and mars etc.

As the dynamic differentials existing between systems increase so do the degrees of non-uniformity also increase, whereby the distortional effects of non-uniformity increase proportionately?

For life forms existing on one system to be transferred directly to another system, without protective isolation preventing ill effects, requires inter field access where a uniform balance in dynamic potential can be achieved.

This in itself requires the ability to modulate the underlying dynamics of one system to match those of another system in a controlled manner, which is no small achievement, whether the modulated system is of an artificial nature or not.

In relation to atomic structures constituting any system, it is the factor of non-uniformity existing between all atomic structures which allows for changes and alterations in the context of dynamic interactions.

Without this factor of non-uniformity nothing would change or alter over time, whereby the existence and or development of any and or all life forms would simply not be possible.

In relation to the transmutation of atomic elements existing within life forms, such transmutation is due to the various non-uniform relationships existing between those atomic structures involved, as each atomic structure is attempting to maintain a relative balance, in terms of those differentials in dynamic potential associated with atomic structures constituting organic molecules.

If the transmutation of atomic elements occurring naturally within life forms was not possible, the survival of many life forms would not be successful, as a continuous supply of the required elements in quantities delivered at the exact time required is essential for survival, but not always readily available by any means other than transmutation.

It is the factor of non-uniformity which allows transmutation to occur, as transmutation within the various life forms is due to distortional effects associated with non-uniformity existing between different atomic structures.

A similar situation exists between planets, moons and stars etc. as the differentials in dynamic potential, which refers to the underlying energy differentials existing between each system, are continuously increasing due to the fact that the acceleration of the underlying energy of each system, focused to the center of field, is accelerating at different rates.

Therefore it should be possible to understand why plants and animals subjected to the effects of lunar materials returned to earth would cause accelerated growth, genetic deformities and cancerous growths.

The lunar material is simply out of sync with the field of the earth, whereby the distortional effects of the lunar material become extremely extenuated to the point of causing dysfunctional abnormalities.

The same would be true for seeds transported from earth to the moon or mars and planted in lunar or Martian soil, as the development of the seeds would be extremely distorted by the factors of non-uniformity present.

Therefore non-uniformity has a very real purpose, which cannot be dispensed with. Non-uniformity is essential to the various processes contributing to life in all its varied forms.

Missing Evidence

2006-07-14T16:32:00.000-07:00

When the first lunar samples were returned to Earth a battery of tests were performed to determine if the material represented a threat to our terrestrial ecology.

As it turned out, the lunar material did not carry any extraterrestrial baggage in the form of bacteria and or virus, but some of the tests indicated that the lunar material produced some very peculiar effects.

In 71 I received a brochure from NASA in response to my interest in the moon rocks, as I had speculated that the lunar environment would produce accelerated growth in plants.

This brochure included text and photos of the tested plants, but is no longer listed in NASA's catalog.

The lunar material was pulverized to a fine powder and placed in solution with water.
This solution was then poured directly onto soil in which both corn and beans had been planted.

This resulted in accelerated growth, genetic deformities and cancerous growths.

At the time no one knew what to make of the situation as there was no explanation for these radical results.

It is important to note that the brochure specifically stated that the lunar material was not radioactive beyond normal background levels.

This same experiment was shown on public television during a special presentation authorized and or approved by NASA.

Now, years later there is no reference to this original testing or the radical effects that were so well documented. In fact NASA now clearly denies that any such radical effects occurred.

NASA Archives claim the lunar material affected accelerated growth in plants, but that no structural alterations or ill effects of any kind occurred.

Also, it has been noted that the Apollo astronauts inhaled lunar dust during their return trip to Earth, but suffered no ill effects other than a slight case of hay fever.

Something is wrong here, as the original test results indicated a lack of understanding concerning differences in the basic dynamics of those materials constituting the structure of individual planetary bodies.

Obviously this would indicate an element of danger, in relation to the health and safety of crew members, in attempting to establish a base on the moon or colonize another planetary body.

The mere fact that the Apollo astronauts suffered no ill effects from the ingestion of the lunar material, by means of inhalation, while a variety of plant and animal species did, demands some explanation, as it makes no sense whatsoever.

It was only decades after the fact that I discovered that the original test results have been deleted and are now denied to have occurred.

As I am not the only person to have viewed these original test results, but one of the few people to have maintained a continuing and lasting interest in this issue, it would appear that we have a serious problem.

Certainly NASA represents the authority figure in this situation and many other tests have been conducted since, where no adverse effects have been reported.

The question is why would NASA not only deny the original test results having occurred, but remove all material relating to these original tests from public view? But this restriction is not limited to the general public, but includes present day scientists working within the space program.

Such structural alterations and ill effects indicated that some new science and technology was required, yet the space program continued without even feeling a bump in the road and without further consideration to the structural alterations and ill effects demonstrated under strict laboratory controls.

Obviously this should have slowed or curtailed the general thrust of the space program, but no such slowing or curtailment occurred, as it was and has been business as usual.

Today there is talk of utilizing water which might or might not exist on the moon and or mars for the purpose of human consumption during future manned missions.

If the original test results are valid the use of lunar or martian water would put the mission crew members at risk, in relation to their health and safety.

The occurrence and deletion of these early tests creates many questions, which for the time being must remain unanswered. But it would not be possible for the astronauts of the Apollo missions to have inhaled the same material to which a variety of plants and animals were subjected without themselves suffering ill effects, if the lunar material caused accelerated growth, genetic deformities and cancerous growths in species of plants and animals.

Anyone with information pertaining to this matter is urged to send us an email or post a comment, thanks.

One Single Force

2006-06-13T23:09:00.000-07:00

Non-linear Time Field Frequency Acceleration, (ntffa), opens doors that have remained closed for far too long.

Every aspect of universe is governed by (ntffa), in that (ntffa) represents the single underlying force of energy determining the form and function of all physical structure.  There are no strong or weak forces, just one single force affecting the dynamic responses of universe.

Regardless of the situation, each and every situation or circumstance is governed by the dynamics of field as determined by (ntffa).

Variations in the underlying force of energy determines the properties of atomic structure, as the basic difference between the various elements is their underlying energy potential, in terms of a ratio of energy per unit of mass.

The orbits of the planets are determined on the basis of dynamic differentials in (ntffa) and not gravity, as gravity is simply a dynamic response to the condition of field remaining relative to the system of reference.

Similarly electromagnetism is also a dynamic response to the condition of field.

Both gravity and electromagnetism are dynamic responses to a differential in (ntffa) and the greater the differential the greater the dynamic response.

In terms of uniform and non-uniform relations, every system of universe maintains a non-uniform relationship with every other system of universe, while each system of universe exists as a uniform field of frequency unto itself.

Therefore the total energy potential of any system corresponds to a unified field of frequency, in that the total energy of any system is the total energy of universe remaining relative to that system of reference.

If we were to build an aerospace system, in the form of a modular field system, capable of modulating the underlying dynamic force of energy in a controlled manner, the power drive of the craft would be capable of utilizing the total underlying dynamic energy of universe remaining relative to the modular field system.

As any unified field system is based on the focus of (ntffa) to the center of field, the controlled modulation of a modular field system would be achieved by the manipulation of field focus.

It is commonly thought that any propellantless or field propulsion system will be constrained by the law; conservation of momentum, the center of mass-energy (CM) of any initially stationary isolated system cannot change its position unless acted upon by outside forces, but this is not so.

The controlled modulation of the underlying force of energy focuses the unified field of frequency acceleratively to the center of field, whereby the underlying energy of field does not radiate.  Therefore the force acting upon the craft or system remains internally isolated from the external portion of field.  No outside forces are required or necessary for the craft or system to change its position relative to other systems of universe.

What is important here is the non-linear underlying element of description as we are not talking about push or pull or even a resistant force, as (ntffa) is a non-resistant force in relation to an increase in (ntffa) affecting a decrease in resistance to a further increase in (ntffa).

Here at www.gravitycontrol.org we are dedicated to the challenge of applying (ntffa) for the benefit of all people, in respect to the needs of their human industry.

Unity (the book)

2006-05-21T21:55:00.000-07:00

There are now 4 (four) sample chapters of the book Unity posted on www.gravitycontrol.org

To read these sample chapters or down load them to your computer go to;Project Unity book

Research & Development

2006-04-30T18:45:00.000-07:00

If the plan is to colonize distant planetary bodies and or exploit the natural resources of space, we have a problem.

Back in the 60s our collective ambition was to land a man on the moon, with a promise of bigger and better things to come.  And although we landed several men on the moon and recovered lunar geological samples we have long since failed to duplicate this achievement or make any real effort to do so.

What happened and why do we remain hesitant to return to the moon intent on establishing a permanent base?

The Apollo Missions provided an exciting time for all involved and public interest in space was at its peak.

I remember the first lunar samples returned to earth and the stir of excitement they created.  Everyone was watching as initial experiments were conducted to ensure that the lunar material did not represent a threat to our terrestrial ecology.

A number of plant and animal species were subjected to and or injected with lunar material and the results carefully noted.  One particular test, which was widely publicized, including television coverage, involved two species of plants.

Two horticultural plots were planted with bean and corn and watered with a solution containing pulverized lunar material.  The result was a radical increase in the rate of growth, genetic deformities and cancerous anomalies, despite the fact that no radioactivity was detected beyond normal background levels.

Everyone involved was completely baffled by these test results and no explanation was forthcoming or even available at the time.  It was a complete mystery, but nonetheless an important part of the adventure.

I had speculated that the lunar material would effect accelerated growth in plants, but I was ill prepared for the radical effects of the lunar material.

At the time it was generally accepted that the moon maintained a uniform relationship with the earth, in the sense that going to the moon involved nothing more than traveling a long distance in space.  In other words the only thing separating the earth and the moon was thought to be space.

Although I did not have the answers at the time I made up my mind to find an explanation for these adverse affects.

Consequently, years later I was confident that I had found a solution, but to my shock and horror I discovered that these initial test results had been altered and in some respects deleted from history.  At first it seemed incomprehensible that NASA would or could simply delete the record concerning unfavorable test results, but that is exactly what they did do.

These test results although somewhat limited in scope were critical in advancing our understanding of space science and technology, as they indicated very pointedly that we lacked the ability to access the uniform condition of any other planetary body.

Rockets were and are inadequate and could and cannot under any circumstances allow us to access the uniform condition of the moon or safely utilize the natural resources of space.

This brings us to the point of contention, as it was political will which got us to the moon, an achievement generally regarded as a huge success.  Therefore it would not have been viewed politically prudent to announce that the effort had been nothing more than an initial experiment allowing us to move forward to even more advanced research and development.

On top of this we had military intelligence to consider, as we were in the middle of a very hot cold war where failure was not an option.

Today the cold war is long over, but still no one is willing to correct or even admit to having erred in the decision to hide critical scientific data.  Consequently we continue to pour billions of dollars into a space program which cannot succeed if our goal is to colonize another planetary body.

If the agenda is to simply gain scientific knowledge of other planets and moons robotics can do the job, but if our ambition is to one day colonize another planetary body we are simply spinning our wheels.

NASA has even suggested that lunar materials might represent a benefit to terrestrial farmers, as they do admit that the lunar material did in fact affect accelerated growth in plants, while claiming that no adverse effects or structural alterations occurred in respect to the various plant and animal species subjected to and or injected with the lunar material.

If we were to take NASA at their word and did bring lunar materials back to earth for the purpose of commercial horticulture we would be faced with a disaster.  The lunar material would pollute the soil in a manner whereby crops intended for human and or animal consumption could no longer be safely grown.

There is currently a plan to utilize Martian water for the purpose of a manned mission to mars, should such a mission actually occur.  The ingestion of this water would represent a serious health hazard to the mission crew, as despite its apparent or real purity it would represent a non-uniform potential just as the lunar material represents a non-uniform potential.  Martian water would seriously jeopardize the health and safety of the crew, whereby they could be incapacitated or even die from such adverse and damaging effects.

Even in the area of interplanetary and interstellar communications we are lacking in our ability and or willingness to address issues concerning the non-uniform relationship existing between our planet and all other bodies in space.

New and innovative science and technology must be developed if we are to achieve our goals in space, which is what we at gravitycontrol.org continue to emphasize.

Much of the material we offer on gravitycontrol.org and gravitycontrolidealism is new and perhaps somewhat foreign to many readers, but given half a chance these revolutionary concepts will allow for a clear and comprehensive understanding of our relative relationship with universe, in relation to redefining existing evidence and clues.

The future is waiting to be discovered and the future is now.

© 2006 David Barclay

Internal & External Dynamics

2006-04-28T22:35:00.000-07:00

To date we do not consider the dynamics of physical structure in terms of internal and external dynamics.  We simply consider the dynamics of physical structure in terms of a three dimensional format.

In relation to the dynamics of our planet earth, it is quite amazing that we do not or have not considered the internal dynamics being inversely proportional to the external dynamics, in the context of a balanced field structure.

The consequence of this would seem to be obvious, in that we assume the internal dynamics to be an extension of the external dynamics.  Therefore it is possible to consider gravity increasing to the center of the earth’s core simply because gravity increases toward or in the direction of the earth’s interior on the outside.

No one has ventured into or found a method by which to access the earth’s interior structure, as the inside is always on the inside and never exposed to the outside.

And regardless of how we poke and prod the earth it is impossible to access the internal portion of the earth’s structure, as any such attempt in the form of a hole merely extends the external dynamics inward without accessing the internal dynamics.

The underlying energy of the earth’s field does in fact accelerate to the center of the earth’s core, but the internal and external dynamic responses to the underlying energy potential remain inversely proportional.  Otherwise the earth would tend to fold on itself, which it does not do.

In fact the earth appears to be expanding, which would be attributed to the continuous increase in the acceleration of the underlying force of energy affecting the structural dynamics of the earth.

And in as much as the universe, the non-simultaneous condition of universe remaining relative to the earth, is acceleratively expanding, it would seem reasonable to consider the expansion of the earth remaining proportional to the expansion of universe in relation to the relative space, time and motion involved.

Without considering the internal and external dynamics remaining inversely proportional we are looking at the world with one blind eye.

If the internal and external dynamics of the sun are inversely proportional this would give us a completely different view of the sun’s structural dynamics.

We would be forced to reconsider the idea of the sun being driven by a process of nuclear fusion, as this requires the interior of the sun to be extremely hot.  On the basis of inverse dynamics, the core of the sun should be extremely cold.

The problem as I see it is that we do not appear to understand the basics of a relative condition, which may be why we are still searching for a simple unified field theory.

The earth itself exists as a unified field system, whereby the universe existing relative to the earth is a condition corresponding to the field of the earth.  Therefore the universe existing relative to the earth is a relative condition of field remaining relative to the earth as the system of reference.

In a similar manner there is a condition of universe remaining relative to the sun, where there is a condition of field remaining relative to the sun as the system of reference.

If this is true for planets, stars and moons it must also be true for atoms, as there must be a condition of field remaining relative to each atom, in relation to an atom being a system of reference.

Therefore each atom has both internal and external dynamics which remain inversely proportional,

This gives us a completely revised view of atomic structure, as well as a revised view of bodies in space.

The control of gravity will only come after we view physical structure as being the result of inversely proportional internal and external dynamic responses, whereby physical structure is a dynamic response to an underlying force of energy.

The whole idea of gravity control is to affect the inversely proportional dynamics of a field system by modulating the underlying force of energy focused to the center of the systems field.

If you can modulate the underlying energy of a system you must also affect the dynamic responses associated with that system, which includes gravity.

Energy Defined

2006-04-19T00:29:00.000-07:00

E=MC2 is a one size fits all type of statement, but energy does not comply with the demands of the statement.

It is assumed that an increase in mass affects an increase in energy, which is true in a very general sense, but untrue in a specific sense.

In order for this famous equation to stand the test of time, energy must be equally proportional for all substances.  In other words, a certain mass of hydrogen must possess the same quantity of energy as an equal mass of uranium.

No allowance is made for an underlying force of energy, as E=MC2 associates energy with mass in terms of a resistant force.

When we talk about an underlying force of energy, such as Non-linear Time Field Frequency Acceleration, as described in the June 05 post entitled “The Energy”, we are talking about a dynamic force capable of sustaining the form and function of all physical structure.

In respect to atomic elements it is apparent that their form and function is characteristic of their physical identity.

Each element on the periodic table has a different mass, whereby we assume the more massive elements to possess greater energy, which is true in a very general sense.

In this respect we assumed that energy radiates isometrically from within each element.

In the case of the hydrogen atom and the uranium atom, the uranium atom has the greater mass/energy, but the hydrogen atom has the higher ratio of energy per unit of mass in terms of an underlying force of energy.

Each atomic element has a certain ratio of energy per unit of mass, with hydrogen having the highest ratio of energy per unit of mass of any known element.

Also, if we have two unequal masses of the same element, the smaller or lesser of the two masses will have the higher ratio of energy per unit of mass.  This means that the smaller portion of any given substance has the higher ratio of energy per unit of mass.

As the mass of any similar substance increases, the ratio of energy per unit of mass decreases proportionally.

If we have two equal portions of a similar substance, the two equal portions will have a higher ratio of energy per unit of mass than if they were combined as one single mass.

In relation to atomic structure the underlying energy is always focused to the center of field and does not radiate under any circumstances, in that the underlying energy is non-resistant.  Therefore, an increase in the underlying energy affects a decrease in resistance to a further increase in energy, while a decrease in the underlying energy affects an increase in resistance to a further increase in energy.

If we break a given substance into many pieces we have not accessed its internal energy.  Even if we break an atoms nucleus we have not accessed its internal energy, but have in fact increased the ratio of energy per unit of mass associated with the broken pieces.  No energy is released, as the energy remains focused to the center of field.

Energy in terms of a non-resistant force of energy allows for a greater understanding of energy in providing for the form and function of physical structure.

© 2006 David Barclay

Blinded by the Light

2006-04-09T17:43:00.000-07:00

Light speed and the constancy of light speed is a touchy subject with many, but it is the one factor which holds us in limbo and denies future progress.

Our existing perception is that light travels in a linear manner much like a car, train or bus........traveling at a constant 299,792,458 meters per second on the basis of light traveling one meter in 1/299,792,458ths of a second.

The speed of light is artificially fixed to avoid confusion created by its fluctuating rate. So, the idea that light speed is exactly 299,792,458 meters per second and remains constant for millions and billions of years is only valid if the universe remains in a static state.

Our perception of light and light speed is the key to understanding the dynamics of universe. Without a clear understanding of light we are locked into a static mode of thought.

The idea that light from distant galaxies has taken billions of years to reach us is a fabrication intended to extend the age of universe, as it is impossible to view ancient history simply because we are located at a perceived distance from a distant location.

The universe is dynamic.........it is dynamically structured and functions in a dynamic manner, which means the only thing remaining constant is change.

If you grasp relativity you will realize that the value of c remains relative to the system of reference, as the value of c is different for every such system. This means that the value of c is different for every atomic element, in that the value of c is a dynamic response to the condition of field remaining relative to the system of reference.

The measuring of light speed does not measure the linear motion of light, but measures a linear duration of time associated with the dynamic acceleration of the underlying field of frequency determining the condition of field.

To date we have confused linear and non-linear responses, as the light from distant stars does not travel toward us like a train or bus, which is why stars remain as tiny dots of light in the night sky. We see what there is to see at the moment we view the sky.

An optical lens modulates the condition of field, which can either increase or decrease the field of view.

Light is associated with an electromagnetic response and if we understand energy we know that the intensity of light increases with a decrease in energy and an increase in resistance to a further increase in energy. Therefore the underlying force of field which is non-linearly accelerating toward us, here on earth, is isometrically decelerating to the far reaches of space in a proportional manner, which explains the Doppler effect.

But, the light is not in linear motion..........the field itself is in non-linear motion focused to the center of field.

Therefore most of the light from distant stars is radiated isometrically away from us, which causes the viewed light to diminish in our direction.

There are no millions and billions of years, as this concept of time is an abstract human invention, intended for the purpose of convenience.

You cannot photograph ancient history through a telescope focused on remote galaxies, unless you know the underlying rate of field frequency associated with each star system viewed.

You can view history simply by viewing the moon or the sun, as the underlying rate of field frequency associated with those bodies is higher than that of our earth, but an increase in distance alone does not allow us to view ancient history.

The universe is not a mechanically driven static apparatus, but a dynamic system involving an infinite variety of field conditions.

Our existence is presently confined to the unified field of the earth, regardless of how far we might travel in space by means of linear propulsion.

We use the analogy of a train whistle to explain the Doppler effect, but a train is in linear motion. The analogy is not very helpful, as it makes not distinction between linear and non-linear motion.

The universe is acceleratively expanding at an ever increasing rate which remains relative to the system of reference, which is planet earth. The rate of expansion is proportional to the underlying field of energy acceleratively focused to the center of the earth's core.

From this we might realize that the light of distant galaxies is not in linear motion and moving toward us at the speed of light where it takes billions of years to reach us.

Light does not itself move toward us, as what we view is a non-simultaneous condition of field which is expanding isometrically away from us. Therefore we view the existing condition of field remaining relative to our earth, which has no relationship to our existing concept of time denoted in millions and billions of years. The existing view is contemporary to our present condition and not to the condition of remote and distant galaxies.

Space is not linearly structured, as it does not correspond to linear dimensions associated with our geometry. To understand this we can envision a conventional space craft attempting to reach the furthest stars. Our space ship would never reach its destination as it would be turned back due to the isometric decrease in field potential, (field energy), extending from the center of the earth's core.

Our space craft would gradually slow until it could not proceed any further and would be turned back. If it held together it would accelerate back toward the earth and at some point it would undoubtedly be torn apart by the process.

The acceleration of field is a condition of field in relation to a dynamic unified field of frequency, whereby this allows for changes to the relative condition of field extending from the center of field to the outer boundary of universe, but does not provide for the linear motion of any dynamic response.

Our perception of light in linear motion and or the linear bending of light does not help us to understand the dynamics of universe, as the linear motion of light would require the light itself to be in motion independent of the field in which it exists, which is quite impossible.

Light should be viewed as a relative dynamic response, in that the value of c is a relative variable, where an accelerating field of frequency determines an increasing value of c.

Both the past and future remaining relative to our earth exist beyond the relative boundaries of our existing condition of field and cannot be viewed through a telescope or any other apparatus located within the existing condition of field.

To access past and or future conditions of our field system requires us to access a simultaneous condition of field existing beyond the relative boundaries of our existing condition of field. There is no linear direction to past and or future, as non-linear modulation of field is required for this purpose, which should be left for another post.

(c)2006 David Barclay

Water

2006-04-02T17:33:00.000-07:00

I did not realize what a mystery water represented until I read a story on the subject at www.livescience.com
Evidently we do not understand why ice floats or why water expands when it freezes etc. So an understanding concerning the basic principles determining the behavior of water are still a work in progress. But maybe, just maybe, we can shed a little light on the subject.

To start, a water molecule consists of two hydrogen atoms and one atom of oxygen and as hydrogen has the highest underlying energy potential of any known element water is indeed very special.

Water evaporates into the sky and descends as rain, snow and or hail etc. so water goes up and down, in that it has the ability to defy gravity.

If you are in the mountains at an altitude of 10,000 feet above sea level you will find that water boils at 90 degrees C instead of 100 degrees C at sea level, which is usually attributed to a change in atmospheric pressure. Also, in the mountains water will remain frozen at a higher temperature than at sea level, which is also attributed to a drop in atmospheric pressure.

Of course there is a relationship between atmospheric pressure and the boiling and freezing of water, but this is not the whole story.

The inherent underlying energy of the water relative to the condition of field in which the water exists determines the condition of the water.

In this respect the underlying energy I refer to as Non-linear Time Field Frequency Acceleration, (ntffa), which is explained in detail on earlier posts.

Water at a high elevation above sea level has more underlying energy relative to the condition of field, existing at this high elevation, than at sea level.

It is the underlying energy potential of water which is the key factor in determining the behavior of water and not atmospheric pressure.

We also ascribe atmospheric pressure as being responsible for steam rising from a boiling kettle, where we say the steam or gas is lighter than air, but in making this reference we miss what occurs at the underlying level. Consequently we are puzzled by the behavior of water.

Why does ice float? Ice floats due to the increased ratio of energy per unit of mass associated with frozen water and the colder the ice the higher is the underlying energy potential in relation to the ratio of energy per unit of mass.

Ice has a higher ratio of energy per unit of mass than liquid water, which is determined by the relationship existing between the water and the field in which the water is situated. Therefore we can determine that ice floating in liquid water at an elevation some distance above sea level is going to be more buoyant than ice floating in liquid water at sea level.

The changes in water from liquid to solid or from liquid to gas depends on the energy of the water relative to the condition of field in which the water is situated. In this respect a decrease in the energy of field will affect a proportional increase in the ratio of energy per unit of mass associated with the water.

Why does ice expand? Ice expands due to the increased energy of the water molecules relative to the condition of field in which the ice is situated. The spacing of the hydrogen and oxygen atoms is increased due to an increase in their underlying energy relative to the condition of field in which they are situated.

At very low temperatures ice actually shrinks, but it does not actually contract, as this has to do with the dispersion of atomic components as opposed to the idea of the ice actually contracting. This process requires a study in itself, which would be best left for another post.

In relation to Covalent bonds and Hydrogen bonds the hydrogen bonds are 10 times weaker than the covalent bonds. Why?

Covalent bonds correspond to the two bonds between two hydrogen atoms and the one oxygen atom in one water molecule, whereas the hydrogen bonds correspond to the bonds between one hydrogen atom of one molecule and one oxygen atom of another molecule.

The relationship existing between the two hydrogen atoms and the one oxygen atom are many times stronger than the hydrogen bonds existing between molecules, which is due to an inverse relationship.

To understand this we must realize that each atom exists as a unified field system unto itself, much like the earth or moon existing relative to the sun etc.

In relation to a single water molecule, there are 6 relative relationships existing between the three atoms. There are two oxygen/hydrogen systems, two hydrogen/oxygen systems and two hydrogen/hydrogen systems. The relative relationships existing between the oxygen atom and each of the two hydrogen atoms are not the same as the relationships existing between each of the hydrogen atoms and the oxygen atom, while the relationship between the first hydrogen atom and the second hydrogen atom is not the same as the relationship between the second and first hydrogen atom.

On top of this there is an underlying force of energy which is continuously accelerating relative to the system of reference, which determines the form and function of each atom and their relationship in a molecular format.

Only single atoms of hydrogen have a higher ratio of energy per unit of mass than a single molecule of water, which sets water apart from all other known matter. A water molecule is the basic molecule, nothing simpler is possible in relation to a molecular structure capable of remaining stable. Also it is not possible for a molecule to possess more energy than that associated with pure water.

As water vapor disperses into the upper atmosphere the hydrogen bonds break down and at an even higher altitude the covalent bonds finally break down as well, which allows free hydrogen atoms to escape into space, while allowing some of the oxygen atoms to fall back into the atmosphere.

The underlying energy of the earth's field is focused to the center of the earth's core whereby there is a proportional decrease in energy extending isometrically from the center of the earth's core to the furthest reaches of space. Therefore it is natural for hydrogen to rise skyward, as up is the path of least resistance for hydrogen due to its high underlying energy potential relative to the field of the earth in which it exists.

On the inside of the earth the reverse is true, as the internal dynamics effect inverse responses. Therefore, hydrogen within the earth tends to migrate to the center of the earth, while the heavier elements migrate toward the surface.

Water is a good coolant, because it takes a great deal of heat to lower the underlying energy of water molecules. In other words it takes a higher proportion of heat, (resistance), to heat water than it does most other liquids.

Hot water radiates heat, which is a factor of resistance, but the water does not radiate its underlying energy, as the energy is always focused to the center of field.

In relation to a single molecule of water, the oxygen atom represents the bulk of the molecules mass, and in relation to the increased mass of a water molecule consisting of one oxygen atom and two hydrogen atoms, the increase in mass causes a reduction in the ratio of energy per unit of mass.

One single hydrogen atom has a higher ratio of energy per unit of mass than two or more atoms of hydrogen forming a molecule of hydrogen, while a single atom of oxygen has a higher ratio of energy per unit of mass than when it is in combination with two atoms of hydrogen forming a water molecule.

On top of this it is important to note that the internal dynamics of each atom effect inverse responses inversely proportional to the external dynamics.

Of course this all sounds very complicated and to a point it is, but on the other hand it certainly simplifies our understanding in relation to the properties of water.

To demonstrate this clearly we could imagine water in an environment of low energy, which would effect a huge energy differential between the water and the field in which the water is situated. This situation would cause the water to disperse in to single molecules and if the energy of the field were low enough the molecules would break up into hydrogen and oxygen.

On the other hand where the energy of the field is increasing the opposite would be true.

In relation to the work of Nilsson and Saykally attempting to determine what happens when ice melts, it would seem strange indeed if liquid water retained the same structural dynamics as ice.

Of course water is water regardless of its state, but when ice melts it must lose a certain percentage of its underlying energy otherwise it would not melt.

The bonds, covalent and hydrogen, are the effect of field dynamics as determined by an underlying force of dynamic energy.

Only a fluctuation in the underlying dynamic force can affect change, therefore a change in the condition of field must affect a change in the structural dynamics of physical matter situated in that field.

If liquid water retained the tetrahedral arrangement of water molecules in ice, it would not be liquid water, but ice. In other words, the liquid water would not flow, but would be move more like a dragging chain.

Water flowing down hill loses energy as it flows, which keeps it flowing. It is only a decrease in the underlying energy of the water which allows it to flow from high ground to low. To flow from low ground to high would require the water to be gaining energy as it flowed relative to the field in which it was flowing.

Ice is an energy state of water, change the energy state and you change the condition of the water. Such a change in energy must also change the dynamic structure of the water molecules.

Therefore I am inclined to agree with Nilsson and his group of researchers.

It must also be noted that X-rays represent a non-uniform potential which distorts the uniform field continuance of water molecules, which is going to give one a distorted view of the situation. Making the assumption that at higher temperatures the bonds will bend and stretch where this should be seen through a microscope is a stretch in itself. In relation to the continuance of field frequency acceleration this might not be the case at all.

So, the X-ray argument is not very helpful in understanding the nature of water.

(c) 2006 David Barclay

Gravitomagnetic Induction of Gravitational Fields

2006-03-25T22:31:00.001-08:00

This post is in response to a story originating from the European Space Agency, so check out; http://www.esa.int/SPECIALS/GSP/SEM0LVGJE_0.html
This story is entitled; Towards a new test for general relativity, dated March 23, 2006 and has now been archived at the above site under Education.

It would appear that Tajmar & Matos, the scientists responsible, have demonstrated the underlying force we at Gravity Control refer to as Non-linear Time Field Frequency Acceleration, (ntffa).

When you look at the drawing on the above site, you will notice the accelerative spin of the super conductive ring is opposite to the direction of the Gravitoelectric Field, which is to be expected.

The gravity of the sc ring is increasing as the ring accelerates, so this is not antigravity, but is in fact anti-antigravity. This is the exact opposite of antigravity where the gravity of a system would be decreasing relative to the field in which it is situated.

They make reference to gravitons which are theoretical gravitational particles, but no such particles exist as gravity is merely a condition of field and does not itself move independent of the accelerating underlying field, (ntffa).

The fact that the effect is one hundred million trillion times larger than Einstein’s General Relativity predicts is huge, as this indicates there is something wrong with Einstein’s perception of the situation.

It is my contention that there is a ratio of energy per unit of mass, in that the ratio of energy per unit of mass is different for every system of reference. This means that the ratio of energy per unit of mass is a relative consideration associated with the dynamic structure of all physical matter.

In that the sc ring is linearly accelerating, the underlying dynamic energy of the ring is decreasing in inverse proportion to the rate of linear acceleration, this accounts for this huge difference in Einstein’s theoretical prediction and the experimental results.

The experimental results reported to the ESA correspond directly to the condition of field associated with the underlying dynamics of the super conductive ring.

The linearly accelerating sc ring acts against the underlying field in which the test is run, which is the field of the Earth.

The linear acceleration of the ring is resistant to a further increase in acceleration while the nonlinear acceleration of (ntffa) is non-resistant to a further increase in nonlinear acceleration. Therefore the ratio of energy per unit of mass associated with the ring decreases in inverse proportion to the increase in its linear acceleration. This affects an increase in both the gravitoelectric field and the gravitomagnetic field, which may seem a bit confusing to some.

It is important to note that the underlying force of field, (ntffa) does not radiate, but is focused to the center of field, as what radiates is a factor of resistance corresponding to a differential in the underlying force. In this respect the factor of resistance increases isometrically from the center of field.

What has occurred here is that the linear acceleration of the ring has decreased the underlying dynamics of the ring, which in turn causes a decrease in energy and an increase in resistance relative to the field in which the ring exists.

An increase in resistance affects a decrease in energy and an increase in gravity, whereas a decrease in resistance affects an increase in energy and a decrease in gravity relative to the system of reference.

This experimental evidence supports the contentions of gravity control and the theoretical principles upon which Unity is designed.

When the super conductive ring is stationary, it cannot be slowed any further in terms of linear motion, which makes it appear that a controlled decrease in the gravity of the ring should not be possible other than by the process of freezing and the induction of an electrical charge, which is perfectly correct.

To effect a decrease in gravity the underlying force itself must be modulated in a controlled manner, whereby affecting the underlying dynamics in the desired manner. An increase in (ntffa) can be achieved by the simple focusing of field relative to the system of reference, which in turn affects an increase in the underlying energy, a decrease in resistance and a decrease in gravity relative to the system of reference.

This would suggest that Einstein’s equation, E=MC2, can only be applied in a very general sense, as there is a discrepancy in energy from one system to another, such as the various atomic elements.

Each element has its own energy potential corresponding to a specific ratio of energy per unit of mass, which means that Einstein’s equation is less than accurate.

Furthermore, when a molecular structure is reduced in size, even to the state of single atoms, each of the constituent portions is affected by an increase in energy, in relation to an underlying ratio of energy per unit of mass. This means the larger mass has less energy per unit of mass than if the same mass is reduced to a number of smaller portions.

The underlying energy of any system cannot be physically accessed in a manner which would cause energy to radiate, as energy does not radiate but is always focused to the center of field.

This spinning super conductor forms a field within the field of the Earth

The linear acceleration of the super conductive ring is acting against the underlying nonlinear acceleration of field, (aether), which supplies direct experimental evidence of (ntffa)’s (aether) existence.

We at Gravity Control give two thumbs up to Tajmar & Matos and thank them for their important contribution to field dynamics.

© 2006 David Barclay

Tree Power

2006-02-23T01:05:00.000-08:00

A tree is an amazing piece of work, as a tree is designed to modulate its internal dynamics relative to the field in which it is situated.

In this respect the modulation of the internal dynamics affects both a gravitational response and an electromagnetic response in relation to the underlying force of energy associated with the tree’s physical structure.

It is commonly thought that the electrical charge which can be extracted from a tree results from an electrochemical reaction, despite the fact that during the winter months when the tree is relatively dormant and or inactive and the leaves are gone from its branches, the extractible voltage increases by 50%.

At the present time the underlying force is not considered or even acknowledged in this respect, nor is the inverse relationship of internal and external dynamics.  In fact it is not presently accepted or acknowledged that a distinct difference between internal and external dynamics even exists, as the internal dynamics are considered to be nothing more than an extension of the external dynamics.

If we could grasp the idea of an underlying force of energy affecting the inverse relationship of internal and external dynamics we might begin to realize just how much we have been missing.

If we took the basic design of a tree and applied the underlying force we could easily build a modular apparatus capable of providing us with electrical power without the consumption of a fuel.

A tree provides a differential in dynamic potential between the internal dynamics of the tree and the field in which the tree exists.  And as the field in which the tree exists is itself electrically charged there is a differential in charge between the internal structure of the tree and the external field. This provides a net differential in charge, which can be adapted to provide for useable electrical power.

This is aside from the fact that the tree also affects a differential in gravity allowing for the raising and lowering of fluids up and down the xylem.

Of course this defies accepted physics, but so do a lot of things which remain without a reasonable explanation.
Much is inferred and much more is assumed, but a tree does provide a proof of principle in relation to an underlying force determining the form and function of all physical structure.

Many people around the world have stuck a piece of copper pipe in the ground, driven a nail into a tree and applied a common electrical meter to detect a flow of electrical current.  But most of those people insist this must be an electrochemical effect, yet there is no evidence to demonstrate or support this idea anymore than there is to demonstrate the mechanics thought to allow for the lifting and lowering of fluid through the xylem.

The tree is an inverted version of Unity, but regardless of which way up the apparatus is positioned you still get a dynamic response in the form of both a gravitational and an electromagnetic response.

The simplicity of this system is overwhelming, no question about that, but such simplicity can also be considered to represent a lack of understanding in relation to the complexities of our modern science.

A tree focuses the underlying force of energy inherent to its form and function, in terms of a continuance of field structure associated with the form and function of a tree.

The idea of a continuance of field structure comes from asking why the physical structure of universe does not simply fold on itself, despite the fact that it does not.

Without an underlying force allowing for the continuance of field structure the physical structure of universe would fold on itself, but this problem can be easily ignored or simply dismissed due to the fact that physical structure does not fold on itself.  Yet there is no meaningful answer to the question without the inclusion of the underlying force.

So here we have a system capable of providing us with all the energy we could possibly use and desperately need, yet for the most part we refuse to acknowledge the possibility.

Such an attitude seems less than rational if we are not willing to even consider the possibility.  Especially in light of the fact that we still remain unsure what gravity or electricity actually are.  On top of this we do not know exactly what energy is either, which further compounds the problem.

It is time to put the biased views aside and consider the possibility of a new approach to long standing problems and misunderstandings, as the benefits far outweigh the option of continuing as we have.

We are destroying our environment without benefit or merit to anyone simply for the sake of maintaining the status quo.  Yet there are options which we have yet to address or even consider in an open minded and even handed manner.

What we can learn from a tree should allow us to develop a self sustaining system of energy production far beyond the limitations of our existing and or future needs.

© David Barclay 2006

Field Control

2006-02-17T01:14:00.000-08:00

Most of us believe gravity holds the planets in orbit around the sun, but in that gravity is not itself a force of any kind and what we refer to as gravity is merely a dynamic response to the condition of field, it would seem impossible for gravity to hold the planets in orbit around the sun or the moon in orbit around the earth.

Gravity is in fact a no show or a non-event, as gravity itself doesn’t do anything.

The relatively stable orbit of the earth around the sun and the orbit of the moon around the earth are due to a differential in the underlying force of energy determining the form and function of all three systems, in respect to an underlying force of energy referred to as Non-linear Time Field Frequency Acceleration, (ntffa).

As the acceleration of (ntffa) is non-resistant an increase in the underlying energy affects a decrease in resistance to a further increase in energy, whereas a decrease in the underlying energy affects an increase in resistance to a further increase in energy.

In respect to the energy potential of each system, the sun has the greater energy potential, with the earth second and the moon third.  But because the moon is the smallest of the three, the moon has the highest ratio of energy per unit of mass, the earth second and the sun third.

The dynamic relationship existing between the earth and the sun is inversely proportional to the dynamic relationship existing between the earth and the moon.

Also, the internal and external dynamics of all three systems are inversely proportional to each other in relation to the inside and the outside or each system effecting inversely proportional dynamic responses.

It is a differential in energy and resistance which holds the earth in orbit around the sun, in that the sun and the earth exist as separate fields.  The sun exists as a unified field of frequency where a non-simultaneous condition of universe remains relative to the condition of the sun, while the earth also exists as a unified field of frequency where a non-simultaneous condition of universe remains relative to the condition of the earth.  The moon too exists as a unified field of frequency where a non-simultaneous condition of universe remains relative to the condition of the moon.

The earth exists as a unified field existing within the unified field of the sun and as a unified field existing within the unified field of the moon, while the moon exists as a unified field existing within the unified field of the earth and as a unified field existing within the unified field of the sun.  The sun exists as a unified field existing within the field of the earth and as a unified field existing within the field of the moon.

The moon having the highest ratio of energy per unit of mass is able to maintain a stable orbit around the earth, while the underlying energy of both the earth and moon continues to accelerate with the moon having the higher rate of field frequency acceleration.

This situation provides both a differential in energy and a differential in resistance affecting the orbit of the moon around the earth.

The moon having the higher rate of (ntffa) is resistant to the acceleration of the earth’s field which is symmetrically focused to the center of the earth.
And because the field of the moon is accelerating faster than that of the earth, the moon is slowly receding away from the earth.  This is due to the differential in energy and resistance continuously increasing.

In relation to the earth in orbit around the sun, the earth is resistant to the acceleration of the sun’s field which is symmetrically focused to the center of the sun.  And because the field of the earth is accelerating slower than that of the sun, the sun is receding slowly away from the earth, despite the fact that the sun is at the center of the solar field.

It is important to note, that as much as the universe is acceleratively expanding so is the dynamic structure of the sun, earth and moon also expanding in proportion to their rates of field frequency acceleration.

Without a differential in the underlying energy of each system, where the smaller body of mass has the higher ratio of energy to mass it would be impossible for separate bodies of mass to exist, as all the mass of universe would otherwise remain as a single body of mass.

In relation to the ratio of energy to mass, the larger mass always has the greater net energy, while the smaller mass has less net energy but a higher ratio of energy per unit of mass.

A single block of a single element weighing 100 grams would have more energy than a 50 gram block of the same element, but 100 one gram pieces of the same element would have a higher ratio of energy per unit of mass than either the 100 gram block or the 50 gram block.

In relation to the attraction between two bodies of mass, such as the earth and the moon, an increasing differential in the underlying energy of both bodies decreases the attraction and causes an increase in the space between them.

Although the rate at which the differential in the underlying energy of both bodies increases is very slow it is nonetheless a process of dynamic modulation affecting field control.  In other words the process we are searching for which would allow for gravity control is in fact the very process which allows for the moon to remain in orbit around the earth.

As long as the underlying energy of the moon continues to increase the moon will continue to move away from the earth.

In relation to the earth/sun system there is an inverse relationship to that of the earth/moon system, but as the underlying energy of the sun continues to increase, at a much higher rate than either the earth or the moon, the relative dynamic balance existing between the earth and the sun will eventually become unstable and the earth will be forced away from the sun and into a new orbit.

The reason for this is that the earth has the higher ratio of energy per unit of mass, in relation to the earth/sun system.

If we consider the element hydrogen having the highest ratio of energy per unit of mass, of any known element, we can understand why hydrogen is so difficult to transform to a metallic state.

Hydrogen lacks sufficient relative resistance to accommodate a metallic state, in relation to the relative relationship of hydrogen existing within the field of the earth.  If hydrogen were situated in a much more highly accelerated field of (ntffa) it would be easier for hydrogen to be transformed and remain in a metallic state.

Hydrogen is so high in energy that it is resistant to the field of the earth, which is why a hydrogen balloon rises skyward, which is also true of a helium balloon.

If we consider gravity to have served as a stand-in while we attempted to understand the dynamics involved, we should by now realize that it is time to let gravity go and consider the application of field dynamics in its place.

The Expanding Universe

2006-02-11T17:42:00.000-08:00

Up until 1999 it was believed that the universe was expanding, but at a decelerating rate of expansion, meaning that the expansion was slowing due to the mutual gravitational attraction of all the matter in the universe.

Then in 1999 it was discovered that the expansion of universe was in fact accelerating, but what exactly causes this acceleration is not known, but whatever it is, is not presently considered to be within the realm of Standard Model Physics.

That the universe could expand at a decelerating rate of expansion seems to defy logic, but this was the case up until 1999.

To understand this more clearly we must realize that gravitational attraction decreases in proportion to the square of the distance.  Therefore, the mere fact that the universe is expanding would or should indicate that the gravitational attraction must be decreasing in proportion to the rate of expansion.  And this being the case, the rate of expansion would continue to accelerate.

It would be impossible for the expansion of universe to be deceleratively expanding; as the universe is either acceleratively expanding or it is not expanding at all.

Now, we are told that the universe has only been acceleratively expanding for the last 5 billion years, as prior to this it was deceleratively expanding.

This period of decelerative expansion occurred between the period of inflation associated with the big bang and 5 billion years ago, which could involve as much as 9 billion years of decelerative expansion.

However, in order for this to be considered possible or even rational requires a complete revision of the existing laws governing gravity, as the rules governing gravity must have been much different 5 billion years ago.  But I have yet to see any new rules for gravity dating back 5 billion years.

It is presently considered that dark energy is responsible for the accelerative expansion of universe, but no one knows exactly what dark energy is, what it would look like or if it even exists.

It would appear that the basic tenets of relativity are not very well understood by the majority of those individuals possessing a PhD in physics.

The idea of the universe expanding at a decelerative rate of expansion is either pure speculation or a creative idea intended to hold the rest of the puzzle together, but in order for decelerative expansion to be possible requires us to scrap our existing laws of gravity.

Gravity increases and decreases in proportion to the square of the distance and to date no one has found this statement to be in error.

Yet, it would seem that some of the rules can be ignored when it is convenient to do so, simply to maintain the appearance of a knowledgeable understanding.  But unfortunately such an attitude is less than logical.

Science is based on facts and not fantasy, yet it would seem that the idea of an expanding universe capable of maintaining a decelerative rate of expansion should be considered factual despite being routed in fantasy or drunken stupidity.

An expanding universe must be acceleratively expanding or it is not expanding.  You have two flavors to choose from, accelerative expansion or accelerative contraction, in relation to the condition of universe remaining relative to the system of reference.  There is simply no such thing as decelerative expansion or decelerative contraction.

© 2006 David Barclay