Students Supporting a Secure Israel

Holding out for a Hero

2007-04-19T05:47:00.000+01:00

Warsaw, April 19th, 1943. Destiny called, and he answered her call. May he rest in peace, and may we always choose his side.

We're not standing with Israel, actually

2006-07-25T13:51:00.000+01:00

A poll for The Guardian suggests 61% of Brits believe Israel has acted "disproportionately" to the threat it faces against Hezbollah in Lebanon. Since this is the Guardian its tempting to assume this is just the usual suspects on the Left, but sadly I don't think it is. The poll goes on to say even 68% of conservatives believe Tony Blair's position on this is too close to that of President Bush (and it is safe to say that "yo Blair" incident didn't help).

The British Conservative Party also seems to be following its leftward lurch in domestic policy with a similar change in direction in foreign policy. Even NRO has noticed this, with a typically accurate post on David Frum's blog:

This week... Cameron’s front bench indulged itself in the most serious attack to date upon its friends: this time, an attack upon US-UK diplomacy in the Middle East, upon George Bush, and upon Israel as it defends itself against terror attack.

This is because Tony Blair was openly mocked on the Conservative benches for being unwilling to "stand up to" Bush, and an admission from Shadow Foreign Secretary William Hague that Israel's response has indeed been disproportionate (that specific word was used).

This was not however as bad as it got. 'Liberal Democrat' leader Ming Campbell had the following bile to spew:

The Government is right to ensure there are no arms transfers, either direct or indirect, from the UK to Syria, Iran or illegal armed groups such as the military wing of Hizbollah ... The Government must now comply with its own arms export rules and institute an immediate suspension of all UK arms exports to Israel

A moral equivalence is drawn between Israel and Iran, Syria and Hezbollah. Tories may be doing their best to cuddle up to elitist opinion in Europe on this, but you still won't see such alarming idiocy from them as seems manditory for a liberal.

Without doubt, the UK isn't standing with Israel as it should be. But their is still a minority who sees Israel's fight as our broader fight, a fight against Islamofascism. This pro-Israel rally in London shows not everyone is suffering from pancake-on-the-brain syndrome

Yoni Netanyahu, Hero

2006-07-04T23:51:00.000+01:00

“I, and the Israeli youth, have the duty to defend this country. It is a great responsibility that has made us come of age prematurely: people from the Moshav, the city and the Kibbutz who are united by something stronger than political affiliation. They are united by a feeling of brotherhood, mutual responsibility, recognition of the value of human life, a strong and sincere yearning for peace but at the same time a willingness to stand up to any challenge”.

Thirty years ago today, on America's Two-hundredth birthday, Israel did what few even dared dream of, and liberated over 100 hostages in Entebbe, Uganda - 3,000 miles from home, in enemy territory. The man behind this most daring and most impressive of raids, Lt. Col. Yoni Netanyahu, was not to come home alive.

He rests on Mt. Herzl, in Israel's eternal capital, and within our hearts, he lives on.

Media Bias: Why is Israel to blame?

2006-07-03T12:10:00.000+01:00

Once again the Arab-Israeli situation flares up in the Middle East. We've all grown used to seeing it in our news, and rarely do people seriously look at the events and the motives before them, instead using the situation to 'support' either side based on the prejudices they already have. Palestinian supporters cry that the Gaza incurison is morally unjustified and an act of "collective punishment"; Israeli supporters don't tend to understand why the IDF have stayed out of Gaza this long.

So what is the truth, assuming their can be an objective one? Most of the media is playing the standard anti-Israeli bias, with their message being if i summarise "Yes Israel was provoked, but its reaction is out of all proportion, unnecessary, aggressive, damaging to the peace process and designed not to get their soldier back but rather to extract revenge on the Palestinians, making their lives a misery".

One of the worst media offenders of ridiculous bias is the barely contained anti-semitism at UK Channel 4 News. Lets just have a look at this report (video link on this page), followed by an interview with presenter Jon Snow and the Israeli ambassador to the UK.

This 'special report' is billed as showing life in Gaza during the incursion. How Israelis view events, or how life is like in Israel during constant rocket attack or fear of suicide bombing, is of course uninteresting and irrelevant. Reporter Jonathan Miller first seeks the objective views of a Hamas guard on the bombing of a power station, with the guard saying of Israel “the only way they can get their way is by force". The staggering, breath-taking hypocrisy of this statement from a member of an armed terrorist organisation is gone unchallenged.

Miller than scours the Strip for more people who agree with his worldview. He finds someone in the form of a Palestinian whose roof has apparently collapsed from a sonic boom of Israeli aircraft, who says “I hope they get more of them" (them being kidnapped Israeli soldiers). Portrayed utterly unchallenged, the report barely stops short of at least sympathising with the kind of Palestinian terrorism that started all this.

It gets worse. We see a press conference by the Hamas prime minister, and it is reported “Ismael haniyeh had urged his people to remain patient and strong". Yes, the peace loving Palestinians must remain calm at this Israeli violence out of left field. Riiiiiiight. The report ends by commenting that "Gaza is running out of patience" , patience of course being something these "resilient people" have "abundance of".

If your stomach continues to have patience at this point, it will let rip its contents upon the floor after 'questioning' from Jon Snow of the Israeli ambassador, which goes something like this:

"...rockets, pretty pathetic things, nobody gets injured, home-made, and you well know they have nothing stronger than an AK-47 - an RPG - they have no weapons, and you're delivering some of the most sophisticated bombardment thats ever been subjected to a defenceless people. Is that an act of terror would you say?"

For viewers of course, the obvious answer is meant to be 'yes'. The Israeli argument that this is a response to constant rocket attack is dismissed effectively by saying that rocket attacks against innocent civilians mean nothing. The lack of casualties (and Snow shamelessly lies when he says no one gets hurt) is hardly a redeemer for the Palestinians. Yet, after two days of "sophisticated bombardment", just a single Palestinian is dead, which is less than the dead in the original kidnapping incident. Israel may indeed be trying to pressurise and intimidate, but with such a massive action causing so few casualties illustrates the extreme caution with which the IDF approaches this. This is no "act of terror".

The media stands blissfully unaware of the facts. The kidnapping of Cpl Gilad Shalit was the last straw of what amounts to almost a year of Palestinian terror originating from Gaza. With the proper background it hardly seems an overreaction.

Indeed, if I may say so, sympathy of the Palestinian cause can only result from a misunderstanding of the real situation. Some people, many of whom really should no better, are actually naive enough to believe, probably because of media spin, that there are really two 'wings' of Hamas - political and militant - and so are outraged when Israel arrests members of the Palestinian parliament. From top to bottom, from the lone guard in Miller's propaganda piece all the way up to the prime minister, Hamas is a terrorist organisation - a group which holds as its objective the destruction of Israel (and another media falsehood, that Hamas was about to sign a document with Fatah recognising Israel, is debunked simply by reading the document), which refuses totally to renounce violence, and whose grassroots members see the extinction of the Jewish people as being the will of Allah.

Many pundits often use the phrase "cycle of violence" to describe the middle east. This is a lie. The reality is Palestinian action and Israeli reaction. It is Palestinian terror followed by Israeli response which does its best to be humane under the most extreme and difficult circumstances and geography in the world (Gaza is of course the most densely populated area on earth - nothing can be done there which wouldn't effect everyone; it is not just punishment which is done collectively, inevitably and unavoidably everything is).

We all hope and pray this incident cools down and some resemblance of peace returns. We all hope Cpl Gilad Shalit is returned safely, no matter how unlikely that now appears. We all hope the Palestinians do not suffer excessively from Israeli efforts to rescue him and deal more widely with the situation. But equally, I sincerely think we should all also hope that this incident reveals the true nature of the conflict: a conflict which at its heart the Palestinians are to blame for, yet also a conflict which our enlightened media will use endlessly in its quest to unfairly smear Israel

Israel strikes back

2006-06-28T15:13:00.000+01:00

It was only last year that the IDF made the unfortunate mistake of withdrawing from the Gaza strip. No one with any real understanding of what was going on there could begin to contemplate why that decision was taken. We all said they'd be back...

...and now, they are.

Our hopes and prayers are with Cpl Gilad Shalit, so that he may return safe and well to his family soon

Not again!

2006-05-29T19:46:00.000+01:00

For some reason that totally, absolutely defies belief, Israel wants to surrender yet again to a bunch of Jew-murdering, gay-stoning and West-hating Arabs. All in the name of "peace", of course.

Will we be able to stop this? There is hope, as this time, as opposed to the battle over Gaza - the loss of which hurts nowhere near as much as the realization that all one's worst assumptions and expectations have materialized - the Wall Street Journal, that beacon of the enlightenment, is on our side.

Consider today's must-read piece by the great R. James Woolsey, a neoconservative's neoconservative and a thinker's thinker:

The approach Israel is preparing to take in the West Bank was tried in Gaza and has failed utterly. The Israeli withdrawal of last year has produced the worst set of results imaginable: a heavy presence by al Qaeda, Hezbollah and even some Iranian Revolutionary Guard units; street fighting between Hamas and Fatah, and now Hamas assassination attempts against Fatah's intelligence chief and Jordan's ambassador; rocket and mortar attacks against nearby towns inside Israel; and a perceived vindication for Hamas, which took credit for the withdrawal. This latter almost certainly contributed substantially to Hamas's victory in the Palestinian elections.

But even if Israel were hell-bent on national suicide, there would still be reasons to be object, for this is about more than "just" Israel - the future of the "least worst Arab state", Jordan, is at play as well:

Israel is not the only pro-Western country that would be threatened. How does moderate Jordan, with its Palestinian majority, survive if bordered by a West Bank terrorist state? Israeli concessions will also make the U.S. look weak, because it will be inferred that we have urged them, and will suggest that we are reverting to earlier behavior patterns--fleeing Lebanon in 1983, acquiescing in Saddam's destruction of the Kurdish and Shiite rebels in 1991, fleeing Somalia in 1993, etc.

And we are, lest we forget, not dealing with rational, tit-for-tat Western minds, but rather with a medieval death cult that interprets every bit of compromise as weakness, not to be rewarded:

Israeli concessions indeed enhance Palestinian hope, but not of a reasonable two-state solution--rather a hope that they will actually be able to destroy Israel.

A hope that, sadly, they can still get away with. As for the true road to true peace:

A two-state solution can become a reality when the Palestinians are held to the same standards as Israelis--to the requirement that Jewish settlers in a West Bank-Gaza Palestinian state would be treated with the same decency that Israel treats its Arab citizens. Until then, three failures in 13 years should permit us to evaluate the wisdom of further concessions.

Indeed. And then, as ever, let us remember the words of the great Golda Meir:

There will be peace with the Arabs when they love their children more than they hate us.

Don't hold your breath...

Yom Ha'Shoah

2006-04-24T23:48:00.000+01:00

While remembrance calls for silence, I would still like to use this special day to point out that there is one country, just one, that will side with Israel and stand by her side regardless of economic and commercial costs, world opinion, oil, and other considerations.

Given the twentieth century's history, the natural candidate for this post should be Germany, or possibly Poland, on whose territory the most despicable and incomprehensible crimes ever planned by man were perpetrated. In fact, just about any European nation that collaborated in the Holocaust might have decided to stand by Israel - and that means all of Continental Europe with the exception of Switzerland, Denmark, Spain, Portugal, and Bulgaria.

But, for that whatever reason, all these countries have chosen not to do so.

And thus that one, irreplaceable country is America, still the shining city upon a hill, and as ever, mankind's last, best hope.

George Washington, James Madison, Alexander Hamilton and Abraham Lincoln would be proud.

And Israel shall live on, an eternal friend of America, and an eternal reminder that Hitler, Himmler, Heydrich and Hoess did not succeed, did not manage to exterminate the Jewish people, and did not break the Jewish people's will for survival, or for a return home to Jerusalem, at long last.

Show me the way to Tehran, II

2006-04-23T20:43:00.000+01:00

Coming Soon to a Mullah Near You

2006-04-23T19:31:00.000+01:00

Show me the way to Tehran

2006-04-21T21:06:00.000+01:00

Disgusting

2006-04-19T03:08:00.000+01:00

The deadliest suicide bombing in 20 months, and the Hamas run Palestinian Authority won't even condemn the attack, calling it a justified response to Israeli "aggression".

I've lost my rag with Hamas already. If Israel were to forcibly remove them from office they'd have my full support. The last Palestinian Authority elections should have been a great exercise in democracy - yet from the election of Hamas and their subsequent actions, I'm more of the conclusion that democracy is all well and good, but it won't work for savages.

You cannot spell "unbearable" without UN

2006-04-11T09:42:00.000+01:00

Anne Bayefsky, one of the most tireless and righteous fighters in the crusade against the corrupt and immoral abyss that shames the entire New York skyline, has a brilliant piece in the Weekly Standard, Another U.N. "Reform".

A nice little fact to get started:

The council was created by the U.N. General Assembly on March 15 in a vote of 170 to 4

Now, why does that sound familiar? Or, more to the point, did Australia, which had joined the coalition of the free not too long ago, and brought the count in the hall of fame at Turtle Bay to 5, forget its mind? Or was it one of the two Pacific nations of blessed memory? Or possibly one of the Original Satans?

(United States, Israel, Marshall Islands, Palau)

Palau, by the grace of Queen Elizabeth the Second. Marvelous. But what about the Federated States of Micronesia, and the Pacific Pillar of the Anglosphere?
Did they have the decency to abstain? Or did someone else?

...with 3 abstentions (Belarus, Iran, Venezuela).

Is anyone else noticing the foul smell? Or, while we're at it - what were Zimbabwe, Cuba and Sudan doing?

Now that we know who was responsible, let's look at what exactly they have wrought.

How about a look at the members of this august, high-flying council?

Which brings us to the candidates that have put themselves forward. First out of the gate for the African group is ...

I'm taking a wild guess here.... Libya? Or maybe the Congo?

Algeria.

Oh. Competing on a high level, are we?

And throwing their hats into the ring for the Asian group are China, Iran, Pakistan, and Saudi Arabia, among others.

That is just priceless. One has to wonder, though: was the North Korean delegate busy at the UN restaurant? Was Syria's representative busy at a biochemistry lecture downtown?

The Latins? Cuba to start.

Any questions? No, thanks.

Oh, wait... the whole thing is actually fool-proof!

In another twist, countries standing for election can choose to make a public pledge that they will eventually protect human rights.

Eventually. As in, whenever hell freezes over.

In the words of the secretary general, "states wishing to be elected to the new Council will put forward their pledges and commitments to protect and promote human rights. It will be up to their fellow member states to evaluate these promises."

A pledge. By a communist or Islamofascist stooge. Makes me feel so much better already...

Why no candidate is good enough

2006-03-27T12:16:00.000+01:00

The Israeli Elections are tomorrow. By the recent polls, Kadims gain between 30 - 37 Mandates, the Likud gains 15 Mandates, Haavoda ( Labor ) gains 20 Mandates, and Yisrael Beteino ( Liberman ) gains around 12 Mandates.
Now, let's see why none of them can be the next PM:

Ehud Olmert - very corrupted Person. His familly is RADICAL leftist, and his sons, all of them reject Israel's right to exist. This is not good.
Amir Peretz - Also, corrupted. But, he is also having some Communist attitudes. Like, expelling the rich of their homes, and raising the Minimum Salary to 1000$, which is NOT going to be good in Israel's economic condition.
Benjamin Netanyahu - has absoloutly no responsibility. The way he just left the Government without telling anyone is not responsible.
Avigdor Liberman - I would say he is the most suited for being a PM, however, he fails to understand the threat Israel is facing [ i.e. Islamonazism ].

When we put the corruption aside, none of those leaders understands the threat of Islam. None of those leaders ever read the Quran, or learnt upon Islam more then what is taught at school. None of them is doing so, and no one will probably.
No one of them can be compared to Ariel Sharon. Even though he was corrupted to his bone, Ariel Sharon knew exactly how to deal with Terror, and how to deal with Iran. Liberman might have some of his spirit, but certainly not enough.
Even though I disagreed with Ariel Sharon, he was the only one capable of being a good Prime Minister. I have to say, as many Israelis, I miss him.

What went wrong? - Review

2006-03-17T13:44:00.000Z

What went wrong?
Bernard Lewis's about Islamic Fundamentalism, known as " what went wrong? "
Is one of the most known researches about Modern Islamicism. As he writes, he tries to claim that Islamic Fundamentalism is happening thanks to lack of moderation.
However, as how much his claim is true or false, he says nothing about WHY there was a lack of it.
From that moment forward the book turns into Politically Correct theme which I found very shallow.
He didn't write the Islamic line of thinking - Non Muslims are inferior and the Muslims should kill them.
He didn't write that Islam alreay ordered specifically his science ( so if you'll think of it, there can't be moderation ).
Let me rewrite it:
When the Muslims conquered many nations, they forced Islam on them. Almost all of the Science came out of Jewish/Christian/Muslims of Christian descent, so the Muslims just exploited it.
After the Islamic Empire became far more religous under the Abbasids, the slow sinking down began, and non Muslims were systematically thrown out of culture, as Islam commands ( Note, this was so also at the Ottoman Empire ).
The Islam, who had been nothing but Military power, was an Empire, but as Science and time went on, the West became stronger and Smarter, and the Muslims, who can't understand that what led to their great poverty was Islam itself, were angry upon the first thing they found out, which was Jews and Christians at first, and then turned onward to the West.
That's the truth. The thing that went wrong was that Muhammad's Mother didn't make an abortion.

Twisting truth

2006-03-14T10:09:00.000Z

MK Avigdor Liberman, has been calling for years to transfer Israeli Arab populated area to Palestine. As he says, he wants Israel to stay Jewish, and if the Israeli Arabs define themselves as Palestinians, they may go and live in Palestine.
By what he says, he wants Israel Jewish, and he knows that Demographics are playing an important role. To summ up his position, he wants to give lands by measures of Demographics, not 67' borders ( while keeping Ancient Jerusalem and large settelments blocks ).
Even though he wants the good of the Jews, all of the Leftists define hin as RACIST.
Why?
Because he wants Israel to remain Jewish?
Because he thinks that in order to keep Israel as a Jewish state we should think of Demographics?
Let me remind the Left what is Israel's goal and why was it founded.
Israel's goal was to establish a place where all the Jews will be able to live in it without dangers of Antisemitism.
So, shall I understand that being a Jewish nationalist or a nationalist at all makes you a racist?
In Liberman's case it makes you so ( I support him by the way ).
There's another case when this hypocrisity had happened. Misolevic and Yugoslavia. There's no doubt Serbia done terrible crimes, however, many Leftists forget something.
The Muslims started the whole thing. The Serbs just retaliated too strongly.
Furthermore, many of the rape stories seem to show some problem.
Women claimed they were raped at January and they were having birth at April. That's....
Shall we forget how many Serbs were butchered by the Albanians?
And if we talk of the Albanians ( Serbia's Palestinians ), 400000 of them were immigrants when the conflict had actually started.
Well, and the Left critircize only the Serbs. Even the Israeli left ( even though the Serbs were the ONLY nation in Eastern Europe who've helped the Jews at the Holocaust, while the Muslims recruited terribly fast without it's being forced on them to Husseiny's Balkan SS ).
When we are coming back to Israel, if so, what's Zionist in you?
The Two state solution in which one state is binational and the other is Islamic theocracy?
There's no Zionism in the Israeli left. And the World Left is the second Chamberlaine when it comes to Islam.

Why did Israel lost the war on Terror

2006-03-05T13:08:00.001Z

At the last few days, the Terror came back, and by what senior Security Officers say, we are on the verge of a new Intifada.
However, this time it will be different. This time, Iran, the growing Evill in the Middle East is capable of taking care for the Palestinians. It is the time to admitt, Israel was defeated.
Many people think, that the Israeli Palestinian War is just a local conflict. Sadly, the World made it not just Israeli Arab War. It has become a Global War that is fought by force only at Israel.
Israel, sure that the US will do her job, didn't attack Iran. And therefore led to a supporter who is irrational, hatefull, racist who has global Ambitions pretty much as Hitler.
What the West ceases to understand, that Israel's death will be his step into his grave. An alliances of Islamic states without anything between them is not something easy to stop.
Moreover, Israel has problems from inside. The Palestinians and the Israeli Arabs are one thing, and the Radical Left is another. Enough was spoken of Islam, but on the Left nothing eas spoken. Anarchists, Gush Shalom, Shalom Achshav, etc are setting hatred between the Jews, lying about the settlers and supporting illegaly the Palestinians, thus promoting Terror.
Israel gave those traitors a wide range to promote anti Israel and even Anti Semite slogans in Europe. And Israel didn't answer. And the World supports them today.
Israel was defeated in the battle of the Intifada, however she didn't lost the full scale war. Sadly, Israel isn't trying to win. Our Politicians care only of money, except Netanyahu and Mertez ( And Merez are extreme leftists ), who won't have a vast support.
We could've won this war. But we were too gentile to the Palestinians. We could've cut them off with Electricity and water, and block international reporters. We could've shut down any Palestinian crossing into Israel, we could have executed Terrorists who were captured.
And we did none of this. If Israel wants to save herself, she will better strike Iran, if we won't help ourselves, no one will help us. Apparently, even after the Holocaust Jews didn't learn why and how to protect themselves.

The Parasitic Mindset

2006-03-03T10:10:00.000Z

One of the world's greatest bloggers, Nelson Ascher, is back in style, with a number of must-read posts. This excerpt, taken from his latest piece, The Parasitic Mindset, is especially good:

Whatever we create they exploit: from cars and planes to democracy and political correctness, from public transportation to explosives and the UN, from open borders to the internet and investment banking.

"Together, facing the new totalitarianism"

2006-03-01T10:35:00.000Z

Please read this extremely important appeal, signed by Ayaan Hirsi Ali, Salman Rushdie, Bernard Henri-Lévy and Taslima Nasreen, among others.

After having overcome fascism, Nazism, and Stalinism, the world now faces a new totalitarian global threat: Islamism.

We, writers, journalists, intellectuals, call for resistance to religious totalitarianism and for the promotion of freedom, equal opportunity and secular values for all.

The recent events, which occurred after the publication of drawings of Muhammed in European newspapers, have revealed the necessity of the struggle for these universal values. This struggle will not be won by arms, but in the ideological field. It is not a clash of civilisations nor an antagonism of West and East that we are witnessing, but a global struggle that confronts democrats and theocrats.

Eine Kalifat, Eine Allah, Eine Caliph - Eine Welt - ( Arabic ) Wahad Khalifa, Wahad Allah, Wahad Khalif, Wahad Alam

2006-02-25T08:47:00.000Z

In response to FDR's post, showing Muslims hailing Hitler, I think this would've been a requested post.
Let's compare Islam to Nazism-
Treatment of others :
Islam - Qur’an 9:71 “O Prophet, strive hard [fighting] against the unbelievers and the Hypocrites, and be harsh with them. Their abode is Hell, an evil refuge indeed.”
Qur’an 4:168 “Those who reject [Islamic] Faith, Allah will not forgive them nor guide them to any path except the way to Hell, to dwell therein forever. And this to Allah is easy.”Qur’an 4:114 “He who disobeys the Apostle after guidance has been revealed will burn in Hell.” Ishaq:344 “We smote them and they scattered. The impious met death. They became fuel for Hell. All who aren’t Muslims must go there. It will consume them while the Stoker [Allah] increases the heat. They had called Allah’s Apostle a liar. They claimed, ‘You are nothing but a sorcerer.’ So Allah destroyed them.”Qur’an 33:60 “Truly, if the Hypocrites stir up sedition, if the agitators in the City do not desist, We shall urge you to go against them and set you over them. They shall have a curse on them. Whenever they are found, they shall be seized and slain without mercy—a fierce slaughter—murdered, a horrible murdering.”
Nazism - Inferior and must be killed unless they are Arians.
Imperialsim:
Islam - Noble Qur’an 2:190 Footnote: “Jihad is holy fighting in Allah’s Cause with full force of numbers and weaponry. It is given the utmost importance in Islam and is one of its pillars. By Jihad Islam is established, Allah’s Word is made superior (which means only Allah has the right to be worshiped), and Islam is propagated. By abandoning Jihad Islam is destroyed and Muslims fall into an inferior position; their honor is lost, their lands are stolen, their rule and authority vanish. Jihad is an obligatory duty in Islam on every Muslim. He who tries to escape from this duty, or does not fulfill this duty, dies as a hypocrite.”
Nazism - Germany must expand, and the Arians better rule the world.
Treatment of Blacks -
Islam- Ishaq:243 “I heard the Apostle say: ‘Whoever wants to see Satan should look at Nabtal!’ He was a black man with long flowing hair, inflamed eyes, and dark ruddy cheeks…. Allah sent down concerning him: ‘To those who annoy the Prophet there is a painful doom.” [9:61] “Gabriel came to Muhammad and said, ‘If a black man comes to you his heart is more gross than a donkey’s.’Tabari II:11 “Shem, the son of Noah was the father of the Arabs, the Persians, and the Greeks; Ham was the father of the Black Africans; and Japheth was the father of the Turks and of Gog and Magog who were cousins of the Turks. Noah prayed that the prophets and apostles would be descended from Shem and kings would be from Japheth. He prayed that the African’s color would change so that their descendants would be slaves to the Arabs and Turks.” Tabari II:21 “Ham [Africans] begat all those who are black and curly-haired, while Japheth [Turks] begat all those who are full-faced with small eyes, and Shem [Arabs] begat everyone who is handsome of face with beautiful hair. Noah prayed that the hair of Ham’s descendants would not grow beyond their ears, and that whenever his descendants met Shem’s, the latter would enslave them.”
Nazism - should be wiped of Earth.
Jews:
Islam - Qur’an 5:59 “Say: ‘People of the Book! Do you disapprove of us for no other reason than that we believe in Allah, and the revelation that has come to us and that which came before?’ Say: ‘Shall I point out to you something much worse than this by the treatment it received from Allah? Those who incurred the curse of Allah and His wrath, those of whom He transformed into apes and swine.”
Ishaq:240 “The Jews are a nation of liars.... The Jews are a treacherous, lying, and evil people.” Qur’an 33:26 “Allah made the Jews leave their homes by terrorizing them so that you killed some and made many captive. And He made you inherit their lands, their homes, and their wealth. He gave you a country you had not traversed before.”
Qur’an 4:55 “Sufficient for the Jew is the Flaming Fire!”
“Some Muslims remained friends with the Jews, so Allah sent down a Qur’an forbidding them to take Jews as friends. From their mouths hatred has shown itself and what they conceal is worse.”
Nazism ( Main Kampf) - “Woe to the people that is shamed of seizing the Jews!” And the rest is known.

From now on, don't say Islamists or Islamofascists. Allah reveals, the true name for Islam and his Fuhrer Muhammad is Islamonazi.
Now, for some pictures from the 20th Century that show it clearly:

http://www.malas-noticias.com.ar/ManoenaltoHiHitler.htm

That's just from " Palestine " and Lebanon, however, after I look at the Quran, it's so bad at the whole Muslim World.

Horban Bayit Shlishi, and how Islamo-Nazism and the Left help it

2006-02-20T15:01:00.000Z

" End of the Third House ".

A house, in the Jewish tradition, refers to the Jewish revival in their land and the rebuilding the Temple. The First House lasted from 1000 B.C. to 586 B.C., the Second from 517 B.C. to -70 A.D. and the Third House lasts from 1948 to the present (and future) .

(*Note - this is not a post that calls for the destruction of the Dome Of Rock, although it means nothing to Islam )

The Jews came back to their land, and the 2,000 years of exile ended. As was written in the Bible "we cried for Zion", and in 1967, this ended. Jerusalem (translation - the city of peace) returned into our hands, and is getting more Jewish by the day (many Muslims leave the ancient city by will for money, and Jews buy the Houses ).

By our sources, there should be no more tears and blood after another destruction, because Israel is not supposed to perish.

Sadly, Jew-hatred is growing. In Europe and the USA not to mention the Islamic World, Radical Leftist groups support Anti-Semitism in the name of Liberalism and "Historical Justice" (which is racist, since it claims that Jews, alone among the people of the world, somehow do not deserve a state) and help the darkest Satanic Sect ever, invented by a mass Murderer and a good Hitler (i.e. Muhammad, for Leftists), Islam.

To Islam, Jews are the sons of Pigs. Jews are also liars, treacherous and evil - in sum, all of the Nazi slurs (Islam does hat other people and religions, but that's not the matter here).

And the "Liberals" support it. Israel's case is a classic and easy one for Liberals to support. A hunted nation for 2,000 years, wanting to reunite in her homeland, over which she cried for thousands of years, and defends herself from Terrorism.

But no.

Those "enlightened" people support the Terrorist cause, and managed to get help and support from self-hating Jews (e.g. Uri Avneri, Ilan Pappé, Noam Chomsky, and others).

This is pure racism against Jews. Calling oneself an "Anti-Zionist" is a nice way to escape from the truth of Anti-Semitism. Israel is the only state to which all the Jews in the world can flee in case of danger (a danger that can be seen in all of Europe, with growing Left-Islamism).

Those people work toward the end of Israel, which they fervently hope for.

Let us not forget that the Shah's Reform movement of the 70s led to the creation of one of the most evil and threatening states - the Islamic Republic of Iran.

Those Leftists are unknowingly supporting Iran's Nuclear Ambitions, in the name of "their right" to have the same technology as the USA, Great Britain or France does. Very nice - a Leftist agreement for another Holocaust on the Jews.

Of course, Ahmedinejad is just a "misunderstood" ruler of an "embarrassed" country, the religion of which is not tolerated in the "Racist" West (which is surely a Jewish Plot - those sons of pigs again).

If the Jews want to keep the Third House built upon the land, we had better stop being tolerant - and stop now. Israel was created in order to prevent another Holocaust, not to idly stand by another.

The Face of the Enemy, II

2006-02-20T09:19:00.000Z

This is not a photoshop. Just a standard display of what passes for a "Religion", and one of "Peace" at that.

Hamas Leader speaks openly and publicly about what to expect in the future

2006-02-19T11:23:00.000Z

With ugly guys like these:
Chaled Mash'al (left) und Hassan Nasrallah, head of Hizbollah.

"The Nation of Islam Will Sit at the Throne of the World and the West Will Be Full of Remorse When It Is Too Late."

This is Hamas' Chaled Mash'al's open and unveiled prediction, uttered at the beginning of February in a Damascus mosque.

Please watch this Windows-Media-Stream... and don't complain about not having been warned ...

Why We Love Yaacov Lozowick

2006-02-17T11:13:00.000Z

"The Palestinians are still actively seeking the reversal of 1948, and Israel is still expected somehow to recompense the Palestinians for the crime of having won a war that was forced upon her - and fairly won."

- Right to Exist

Why We Love P.J. O'Rourke

2006-02-16T16:33:00.000Z

From his remarkable Peace Kills:

"During a question-and-answer period Clinton said he supported the creation of a Palestinian state. It's a good idea. Islamic fundamentalists will need someplace to go.

Having them all in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip would allow the War on Terror to be conducted in a compact area with well-mapped terrain and an excellent road system.

As long as the Israelis don't get involved. We wouldn't want anybody on our side who was guilty of premature antiterrorism."

Like a Hurricane

2006-02-13T09:56:00.000Z

Just in case we needed any more reasons to be thankful for President George W. Bush - here it is: US Prepares Military Blitz Against Iran's Nuclear Sites.

And since the wait might be long and agonizing, why not get to know some of the key actors a bit more closely?

A. The incomparable B2

B. One of many Los Angeles-Class nuclear submarines, the delightfully named USS Annapolis

C. Since any Naval operation calls for great surface ships, how about a nice Arleigh Burke-Class Guided Destroyer? And since we're at it, why not the USS Roosevelt?

D. The ultimate force for good in this world