tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12106487.post9107996052231514224..comments2008-12-16T16:21:08.574-05:00katehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00377046348187702190noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12106487.post-24846348892450551132008-12-16T16:21:00.000-05:002008-12-16T16:21:00.000-05:00Most law is based on perceptions of morality, so to make gay marriage "legal" will probably entail making it "moral". I think the article is wonderful. Thanks for posting it.superdave524http://www.blogger.com/profile/03944859425456485321noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12106487.post-61468418706278392112008-12-15T09:18:00.000-05:002008-12-15T09:18:00.000-05:00I'm sure many people approach the issue of faith from the standpoint of 'do I believe'... but a better approach would be 'does God believe in me?' It puts a fresh perspective on everything.<BR/><BR/>As far as fundamentalism , evangelicalism and hatred... I'm convinced there's some level of hell reserved for people who live by dogma and doctrine.dinnyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01586201720644547005noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12106487.post-71924406439056992232008-12-14T15:42:00.000-05:002008-12-14T15:42:00.000-05:00It's a nice article, but the thing is, it's approach is wrong-headed. Regardless if the argument is pro- or con- regarding gay marriage, it shouldn't be based on religious ideals when considering public policy. While she makes some good points for a theological discussion, her fundamental assumption that religion should play any role at all in policy is flawed.<BR/><BR/>You can fight fire with fire, but you'll just end up scorching the earth.QuakerJonohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13429026512255898056noreply@blogger.com