tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11860584.post-36700906516280567452007-01-05T11:41:00.000-08:002007-01-05T12:03:33.349-08:00Last year to now is like 1920 to 1950. Still this book is popular, and as it occurred to me that I meant to send a friend these links, I might as well share them with the world. <br /><br /><br><br>Bart Ehrman's <a href="http://www.harpercollins.com/book/index.aspx?isbn=9780060738174"><i>Misquoting Jesus</i></a> is meant to be an lay introduction to textual criticism, and it was quite popular. It also suffers from bias. This is not at all surprising to me. I took his Introduction to New Testament while at UNC-Chapel Hill. Even to a freshman like myself, it was obvious how opinions were being shaped by the bias of a professor. <br><br>Daniel Wallace is an accomplished scholar in the areas that Ehrman wrote on. As I read it a month or so ago in a journal, I thought,<i> it would be cool if this was on the internet.</i> <a href="http://www.bible.org/page.php?page_id=4000">So it is.</a><br /><br />While we are at it, here is one by another well-renowned scholar and UNC alum and blogger <a href="http://benwitherington.blogspot.com/2006/03/misanalyzing-text-criticism-bart.html">Ben Witherington.</a> Enjoy.Arielhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04563017633313441914noreply@blogger.com