tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11656430.post-1147440489559718882006-05-12T10:28:00.000-03:002006-05-12T10:28:00.000-03:00Like Michael Shermer in the " Science of Good and Evil," I advocate a provisional ethic as the ethic rather than relativistic or absolute .This would be objective in that we can discern what is good or bad for people , other animals or the enviornment. In " I don't have enough Faith to be an Atheist," the authors demonstrate the absurdity of relativism ,but their argument for absolute ethics is really for provisional one- one they wouldn't like,I assume. Of course, as with provisional science, there will be disagreements.griggsyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14182257812054159368noreply@blogger.com