<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><entry xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:georss='http://www.georss.org/georss'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11651140.post-613742063102721053</id><published>2009-06-11T16:36:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2009-06-11T17:08:01.122-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='bing'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='market share'/><title type='text'>Bing !</title><summary type='text'>Some stats are out on how Bing is doing and so far so good.As an SEO I'm always interested in how the major three engines are playing against each other.  In this case (and finally) a Microsoft attempt at a search engine seems to be working in both the direction of marketshare as well as in the actual results and how they're displayed.I'm going start by noting that the advances Microsoft has made</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11651140/613742063102721053/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11651140&amp;postID=613742063102721053' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11651140/posts/default/613742063102721053'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/11651140/posts/default/613742063102721053'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.beanstalk-inc.com/blog/2009/06/bing.html' title='Bing !'/><author><name>Dave Davies, CEO</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10990136068142211775</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='08558870371142300341'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry>