tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11635991.post-1117650370049884602005-06-01T15:01:00.000-03:002005-06-01T15:35:52.093-03:00I think that if <a href="http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/CDMTCS/chaitin/">Leibniz</a> was alive today he would be certainly reading this paper:<br /><br /><a href="http://arxiv.org/abs/math.DG/0412316">http://arxiv.org/abs/math.DG/0412316</a><br /><br />Look to this beautiful simple idea: S^6 is contained on the imaginary octonions and then he somehow evades the old non-integrability stuff.<br /><br />Questions:<br /><br />1) Exotic diphemorphism in S^6 are expressed with the use of quaternionic exponential, a function is defintely ruled by the Class II. What is the relationship between this complex estructrure and the exotic diphemorphisms? I guess there is something here having to do with the riemann manifold that result as the analytical continuation of the Class II. The dimension is also 6.<br /><br />2) Why Ed Witten wouldn't answer my emails about his paper?:<br /><br /><a href="http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0504078">http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0504078</a><br /><br />named: <strong>Two-Dimensional Models With (0,2) Supersymmetry: Perturbative Aspects</strong><br /><strong></strong><br />In my case the perturbation comes after his silence. What do people have email for? Can't they just have courtesy and say: "I am busy, sorry" or "I don't care/ I am not interested" or "<strong><span style="color:#6666cc;">your</span></strong> mirror operator and<strong> <span style="color:#ff0000;">my</span></strong> mirror operator are very alike, <span style="color:#cc0000;">maybe there is some sort of<span style="color:#cc0000;"> bridge</span> here</span>". I am afraid this smoke signal of blogging will supercede private non-communication.Roligtrollhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03560684051408656421noreply@blogger.com