tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11449714.post3228052566067664545..comments2008-01-12T00:21:42.013-07:00JavaJayhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05001847019775728154noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11449714.post-78495627130840307582008-01-12T00:21:00.000-07:002008-01-12T00:21:00.000-07:00

I agree with the President's decision to veto the bill. If he approved it, it would be like eating poisoned food. You only need a little bit to kill you. <BR/><BR/>What am I talking about? Well, he veto'd the bill because it would allow lawsuits against the Iraq government for acts of terrorism commited during Sadaam Hussein's time. This could cost over a billion dollars to the Iraq

microwerxhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03840818461667666283noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11449714.post-52635156059017583482008-01-04T23:23:00.000-07:002008-01-04T23:23:00.000-07:00

Even though I agreed with most of 99.9% of the NDAA for 2008, I'm actually in agreement with President Bush's veto but for totally different reasons.<BR/><BR/>I stand with the only two Democrats that had the nuts to vote no on the Defense Bill.<BR/><BR/>Senators Byrd, and Feingold.<BR/><BR/>You know why they voted no on this bill.....because they read it!!!<BR/><BR/>I guess everyone else didn't

Iraq War Veteranhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17560024926835274233noreply@blogger.com