tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10248241.post113532945183615018..comments2008-04-20T22:25:27.789-04:00Comments on Imran Anwar's In My Humble Opinion: Did You Give GOOGLE (or Microsoft) The Right To Se...Imran Anwarhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03919552891874811342noreply@blogger.comBlogger20125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10248241.post-51733782459239787372008-04-20T11:46:00.000-04:002008-04-20T11:46:00.000-04:00Good article , Every Google user should know exact...Good article , Every Google user should know exactly what is happening beneath and how they can get affected.Naushadnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10248241.post-1141339955758609792006-03-02T17:52:00.000-05:002006-03-02T17:52:00.000-05:00TJ, hi. My posting is telling people what they are...TJ, hi. My posting is telling people what they are giving away to Google et. al. Obviously, I know what I am doing as I put my content there. Most people do NOT know what they are signing away and I am hoping to make people aware. And to start conversations, your comment being a good example. <BR/><BR/>Thanks for the kind words. As far as your comments' ownership, too late, I already sold them to China for a plate of Chicken With Pineapple. :-) <BR/><BR/>ImranImran Anwarhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03919552891874811342noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10248241.post-1141338934598924722006-03-02T17:35:00.000-05:002006-03-02T17:35:00.000-05:00If you don't want Google to control the way your s...If you don't want Google to control the way your stuff gets posted, don't post on Google. <BR/><BR/>I mean no offense, but I honestly fail to see the point of this (well written) piece. EULAs are always full of clauses and disclaimers that give the software provider impractically extensive rights over the way you use the software, and nearly any bulletin board or forum I've ever posted to has claimed ownership rights to anything I've posted.<BR/><BR/>So, who own these comments of mine, now that I've posted them to your blog? If I shouldn't trust Google not to abuse content I supply, how do I know for sure that I can trust you...?<BR/><BR/>Good wishes,<BR/>- T.J. in A2 MIAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10248241.post-1139297873113425652006-02-07T02:37:00.000-05:002006-02-07T02:37:00.000-05:00FYI you may be interested in the following story:h...FYI you may be interested in the following story:<BR/><BR/>http://www.amnestyusa.org/countries/china/actions.do<BR/><BR/>RegardsAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10248241.post-1139212292522040362006-02-06T02:51:00.000-05:002006-02-06T02:51:00.000-05:00Hi prying1. Thanks for the comment. But, by that t...Hi prying1. Thanks for the comment. But, by that token, we should not use telephones because the phone company can pry into our conversations, we should not mail letters in postal service because they can pry into it. <BR/><BR/>Pretty soon we would be living in a cave --- and would probably find Bin Laden prying into it. Rolling over and accepting usurping of our rights is not the way to keep our rights.<BR/><BR/>ImranImran Anwarhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03919552891874811342noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10248241.post-1139211871903419632006-02-06T02:44:00.000-05:002006-02-06T02:44:00.000-05:00I figure anything I put on the Internet be it an e...I figure anything I put on the Internet be it an email, post or picture inevitably or in essence becomes fair game for anyone. If I want it to be private I will not use the Internet.prying1http://www.blogger.com/profile/04709268799890083117noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10248241.post-1136869193600760312006-01-09T23:59:00.000-05:002006-01-09T23:59:00.000-05:00Even though I am constantly complaining about the ...Even though I am constantly complaining about the way Bush administration people are trying to turn the US into the USSR, I did not think of this really good angle you linked to the Google/MS story above. Thanks!<BR/><BR/>ImranImran Anwarhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03919552891874811342noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10248241.post-1136868810581968902006-01-09T23:53:00.000-05:002006-01-09T23:53:00.000-05:00I thought this was a very interesting post. I real...I thought this was a very interesting post. I really liked this comment that I read in an article about the censorship Microsoft did in China:<BR/><BR/>Rebecca MacKinnon, a fellow at the Berkman Center for Internet and Society at Harvard Law School, wrote on her blog, referring to Microsoft and other technology companies: "Can we be sure they won't do the same thing in response to potentially illegal demands by an overzealous government agency in our own country?"<BR/><BR/>The fact is that there are no boundaries if companies are making these decisions based on bottom lines. I'm sure Microsoft is thinking that China is too valuable of a market to pass up but that shows that they are willing to compromise principles. I would not be surprised at all if China is not the only country that is doing this with corporations or that it won't happen in the U.S.Imran Farooqhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10423126999572044334noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10248241.post-1136775484199541622006-01-08T21:58:00.000-05:002006-01-08T21:58:00.000-05:00Thanks, Anthony. That is exactly my concern. There...Thanks, Anthony. That is exactly my concern. There is no limit to what control they CAN exert over what people will still think YOU said/expressed. Thanks for the comments. Hope to see you visit regularly.<BR/><BR/>ImranImran Anwarhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03919552891874811342noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10248241.post-1136770581403675672006-01-08T20:36:00.000-05:002006-01-08T20:36:00.000-05:00Giving Google the right to change your content is ...Giving Google the right to change your content is going against you own right of free speech.<BR/>Microsoft and Google are pleasing the Chinese government and playing by what the Chinese government wants as they probably want to create a friendly alliance for there own benefits but not us the customers.<BR/><BR/>You can claim that China will benefit from advances and technologies given by Google and Microsoft but these companies are lowering themselves to a censorship government to gain more money.<BR/><BR/>Its not about the publics right to freedom, it's about how much more capital can be gained over last years report.<BR/><BR/>It is a scary fact that Google does have the right at their disposal to modify your own content that you publish and most likely still claim you as the owner of the content.<BR/><BR/>Better still it doesn't say to what extent they can modify the content, so we can assume they can modify all of it anyway they please.Anthony Shttp://spaces.msn.com/members/sledz/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10248241.post-1136765713325121152006-01-08T19:15:00.000-05:002006-01-08T19:15:00.000-05:00I did not say they did, do, or will. As I said, by...I did not say they did, do, or will. As I said, by accepting their new terms and conditions, you are giving them the right to do so. People should know that. Thanks.<BR/><BR/>ImranImran Anwarhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03919552891874811342noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10248241.post-1136761049013787562006-01-08T17:57:00.000-05:002006-01-08T17:57:00.000-05:00I really don't think that Google would actually go...I really don't think that Google would actually go in and modify your content. I would love to see a situation where they would actually do it.EmailHosting.comhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17307832407867835370noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10248241.post-1135990218428314582005-12-30T19:50:00.000-05:002005-12-30T19:50:00.000-05:00Thanks for the comment, but I don't think you get ...Thanks for the comment, but I don't think you get the point. It is the issue of taking the RIGHT to modify your content and message that is at issue. Will George Bush personally listen in on yoru phone calls? I wouldn't think so. But, would we want there to be no checks and balances on who can listen to what we do (especially without court orders)? I didn't think so. Thanks.<BR/><BR/>ImranImran Anwarhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03919552891874811342noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10248241.post-1135989609273414172005-12-30T19:40:00.000-05:002005-12-30T19:40:00.000-05:00Does Google really change your videos? I wouldn't...Does Google really change your videos? I wouldn't think so.EmailHosting.comhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17307832407867835370noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10248241.post-1135618347862722412005-12-26T12:32:00.000-05:002005-12-26T12:32:00.000-05:00I was already thinking something is going to start...I was already thinking something is going to start happening by reading Google's mission statement: "To organize the world's information and make it universally accessible and useful." If the government or corporate entities started having access to "modify" the "world's information" then one can only imagine what kind of society we would live in. I'm not saying that this is taking place right now necessarily but the possibility can always exist with the lofty nature of Google's objectives.Imran Farooqhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10423126999572044334noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10248241.post-1135452261413695582005-12-24T14:24:00.000-05:002005-12-24T14:24:00.000-05:00An eye opener....sounds like a sting operation, hm...An eye opener....sounds like a sting operation, hmm....I used to accept the conditions,blindly....thanks for raising a common man's issue...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10248241.post-1135441630380548832005-12-24T11:27:00.000-05:002005-12-24T11:27:00.000-05:00Thanks, Michael. And, Thank You, Jason for the gre...Thanks, Michael. And, Thank You, Jason for the great plug to my item on your blog. In relation to what you said, and to the comment by Anonymous above, I say:<BR/><BR/>The issue is NOT that you "don't see Google picking random videos". The issue is the RIGHT they may be usurping. No one knows for sure that an American President would become a dictator, but you do not give him the right to be, by having a Constitution, and Congress and the Supreme Court. <BR/><BR/>WHATEVER the reasons for Google WANTING to MODIFY content that I create, their taking the right to MODIFY it as they seem fit does NOT keep them from having the right to change the content, and thereby changing the message. This issue has been covered even in issues related to Hollywood, where censorship can change the meaning of a movie.<BR/><BR/>Their TOS of went out at 0415 AM, so what do you expect, someone to go through 4 million videos, contact 4 million creators, get 4 million originals, compare the two (8 million) and report here so you can then wake up and say, "Uh, OK, there is an issue" ? No, thanks. I have pointed out a serious issue, that at least has started a discussion. You can join in when Google changes your content and meaning of your copyrighted works. :-)<BR/><BR/>Thanks for the comments, all.<BR/><BR/>ImranImran Anwarhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03919552891874811342noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10248241.post-1135432202372761282005-12-24T08:50:00.000-05:002005-12-24T08:50:00.000-05:00it's one thing to be able to modify video, but it'...it's one thing to be able to modify video, but it's another to actually do it.<BR/><BR/>I cannot see Google picking random videos.. or picking on individuals.. just because they think it would be fun to change the message in a video.<BR/><BR/>They write things in their TOS to protect themselves, not to fuck people over. If you can show me a video that has been modified to say something other than what was intended... I will jump on your bandwagon, but until then... I say you better invent a more superior tin foil hat!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10248241.post-1135407037342562932005-12-24T01:50:00.000-05:002005-12-24T01:50:00.000-05:00Good comments...I wrote more about this on my blog...Good comments...I wrote more about this <A HREF="http://www.jasonsalas.com/2005/12/can-google-video-modify-submissions.html" REL="nofollow">on my blog</A>.Jason Salashttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05528741938889827742noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10248241.post-1135402593738580462005-12-24T00:36:00.000-05:002005-12-24T00:36:00.000-05:00Ummm... those are very good points, and a user is ...Ummm... those are very good points, and a user is ultimately granting Google free reign on their material. I like Google, but I think I'll pass on availin gof their video hosting.<BR/><BR/><A HREF="http://prete.ntio.us" REL="nofollow">michael</A>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com