tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10248241.post111472968231336533..comments2009-07-13T19:28:39.533-04:00Comments on Imran Anwar's In My Humble Opinion: We’ll Always Have Paris (Hilton)Imran Anwarhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03919552891874811342noreply@blogger.comBlogger9125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10248241.post-1155435084849316522006-08-12T22:11:00.000-04:002006-08-12T22:11:00.000-04:00I wonder if his daughter Nicki Hilton is named aft...I wonder if his daughter Nicki Hilton is named after the Nicosia, Cyprus Hilton. <BR/><BR/>Their web page says: "Hilton Cyprus is the only five-star hotel in Nicosia. All 298 rooms offer private balcony. Our Executive Rooms are larger than our Guest Rooms, ...."<BR/><BR/>I wonder if each room comes with a video camera with night vision capability.<BR/><BR/>ImranImran Anwarhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03919552891874811342noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10248241.post-1155434532405423252006-08-12T22:02:00.000-04:002006-08-12T22:02:00.000-04:00Flashback to the a scene from the past:"Paris," Mr...Flashback to the a scene from the past:<BR/><BR/>"Paris," Mr. Hilton said, proudly repeating his newborn daughter's name for the rest of the board members to hear. "I'm naming her Paris Hilton. The name speaks of originality and class."<BR/><BR/>"But sir," they interjected, "You still haven't told us what to call our new hotel in France--"<BR/><BR/>"Paris!" Mr. Hilton answered. "Paris Hilton. The name speaks of originality and class."Frances Billanonoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10248241.post-1155407842855269252006-08-12T14:37:00.000-04:002006-08-12T14:37:00.000-04:00Hey, actually, Hilton is HIS last name, and he nam...Hey, actually, Hilton is HIS last name, and he named her after a CITY. Ironically, FranceS.... you could be a distant cousin... think, Paris, France'S capital. :-)Imran Anwarhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03919552891874811342noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10248241.post-1155379231328272072006-08-12T06:40:00.000-04:002006-08-12T06:40:00.000-04:00Paris Hilton is a fine example of what you get whe...Paris Hilton is a fine example of what you get when a rich business mogul thinks it's mighty classy to name his daughter after a product.Frances Billanonoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10248241.post-1155134408039983442006-08-09T10:40:00.000-04:002006-08-09T10:40:00.000-04:00Thanks. Come again!Thanks. Come again!Imran Anwarhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03919552891874811342noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10248241.post-1155082281796044422006-08-08T20:11:00.000-04:002006-08-08T20:11:00.000-04:00So glad you milked that pun dry. Saved me the trou...So glad you milked that pun dry. Saved me the trouble.--spared--http://www.blogger.com/profile/03892133107207913815noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10248241.post-1155072324407708142006-08-08T17:25:00.000-04:002006-08-08T17:25:00.000-04:00Great comment, spared. Loved the puns. I agree, Ma...Great comment, spared. Loved the puns. I agree, Madonna has real media substance, Paris is media abuse. OK, just trying a stretch of a pun there. It is pretty ironic to see Playboy doing a nude pictorial of a Paris Hilton LOOKALIKE, when in fact there's far more explicit Paris Hilton video and imagery available online. BUT, you do have to give Paris Hilton credit for putting her money where her mouth is, cashing in every chip, milking it to the last drop.... ok, enough with the bad puns....<BR/><BR/>ImranImran Anwarhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03919552891874811342noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10248241.post-1155070715499371712006-08-08T16:58:00.000-04:002006-08-08T16:58:00.000-04:00With so many bimbo icons, how can you pick her as ...With so many bimbo icons, how can you pick her as the top-seeded player, pardon the pun. Madonna can re-brand because for whatever her flaws, there is substance to her - she is made of many ingredients. She can bake herself into many types of cakes for mass consumption. Paris is more of a single ingredient kinda girl. I won't mention which ingredient I'm thinking of.--spared--http://www.blogger.com/profile/03892133107207913815noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10248241.post-1142616013962825982006-03-17T12:20:00.000-05:002006-03-17T12:20:00.000-05:00Imran, it also appears that I wrote at too great a...Imran, it also appears that I wrote at too great a length and my post/comment was cut off....<BR/><BR/>Can you add the scintillatingly exciting climax to my earlier attempted post? Thanks -<BR/><BR/>Tell me then, what is Islam's claim on Jerusalem? I know in Lebanon there<BR/>is a Green Line - which as I understand it is the line that divides the<BR/>cultivated and profitable lands from those that have been laid waste or <BR/>unworked by people who did not invest of themselves in it, for whatever<BR/>their reasons or rationalizations. Did the Arab peoples occupying the<BR/>Levant make it bloom like a rose? Perhaps I am reading "Westernized"<BR/>historical texts? To defend my background, I am well familiar with the<BR/>architectural marvels of the amazing underground culverts that carried<BR/>water many miles across the lands....and all the things that made the <BR/>Islamic culture the leading in the world....for awhile. For whatever<BR/>reason - clan in-fighting, politics, I don't know, but like many<BR/>civilizations, it waned and was overtaken by others who built upon <BR/>many of Islam's innovations. But where the "holiness" and "right" to<BR/>lands in Jerusalem? Lands have either gone to those they were given,<BR/>to those that were stronger, or in Biblical language, "to the profitable<BR/>servant."<BR/><BR/>I am not going into the treatment of Palestinians - while there have been<BR/>bad things on both sides, it seems in granting the Palestinians willing to<BR/>live in Israel with the right to vote and such, they are/were living and <BR/>being given more respect in Israel than by the rest of their Arab brother<BR/>who refuse them anything but indentured servant status in their lands.<BR/><BR/>Not meaning to sling arrows - I just want to know what the Islamic claim <BR/>is on temple mount. As you can tell, if it is based solely on a dream, or<BR/>the blood spilt there in the years between the tearing down of the Hebrew's<BR/>temple and the scattering of the last two tribes, and the return of the<BR/>Israeli state in 1948, then I am not likely to buy the justification. I<BR/>have no trouble with the peoples sharing the area, but like Mecca and Qom,<BR/>Muslims have trouble with that. <BR/><BR/>JFK once said, "We cannot negotiate with people who say, 'What's mine is mine.<BR/>And what's yours is negotiable." That is where Yassir Arafat led his people<BR/>wrong. He was given innumberable chances to share and find peace. He wanted<BR/>it all. While I have sympathy for the Arab peoples who have suffered under<BR/>tyrants and despots, I am trying to develop that same sympathy for them collectively<BR/>in not rejecting them much earlier in their histories.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com